Effects of Soil Texture, Moisture Condition and Cropping Systems on Soil Friability

آب و خاک

Article 9, Volume 30, Issue 1 - Serial Number 45, March 2016, Pages 186-193   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v30i1.38160

Author

A. Safadoust^*

Bu-Ali Sina University

Abstract

Introduction: Soil friability is defined as the tendency of a mass of unconfined intact soil in bulk to crumble and break up under applied stress into similar fragments, aggregates and individual soil particles with specific size range. Tensile strength is a term which defined as the stress, or force per unit area, required to cause soil to fail in tension. The stated parameters are almost considered as the key physical properties of agricultural soils, because the friable condition is a desirable feature for establishing adequate seedbeds during tillage practice. In spite of the relevance of the subject, information on the effects of intrinsic soil properties on the tensile strength and friability is limited in Iran. The objective of this study was to quantify and to relate tensile strength and friability of two texturally different soils of clay loam and sandy loam under two different cropping systems of wheat and alfalfa.
Materials and methods: The soil samples were collected from the 0–30 cm horizon of two sites of sandy loam (SL) and clay loam (CL) soils which were located inHamadan province in western Iran. Each soil had been under cultivation of either wheat (conventionally tilled) or alfalfa for 11 years. At the laboratory, the soils were gently dry-sieved to separate 8-10, 15-25 and 30-38 mm fractions. The tensile strength was calculated as suggested by Dexter and Kroesbergen, (1985) and the soil friability was calculated through the coefficient of variation method as proposed by Watts and Dexter (1998). The experiment was carried out at the air-dry water content and soil matric suctions of 80 and 50 kPa for three ranges of aggregate size (8-10 mm, 15-25 mm and 30-38 mm). Then the impacts of soil texture (clay loam and sandy loam) and cultivation types (alfalfa and wheat) were assessed in a factorial design at each water content. Regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the relationship between soil intrinsic properties (clay content and organic matter) and tensile strength and friability.
Results and discussion: The considered factors in this study i.e. soil texture and cultivation, in different water content and aggregate size, have a pronounced influence on the tensile strength and friability. The soil of clay loam-alfalfa displayed a higher increase in tensile strength than clay loam-wheat (21%), sandy loam-alfalfa (57%), and sandy loam-wheat (70%) that may be related to differences in organic matter content and clay amount. Both organic matter and clay content have been mentioned as aggregating agents that affected soil strength. The results indicated negatively correlation of tensile strength of soils aggregate with aggregates size and water content. In the other word at low water contents, smaller aggregates of all soil treatments have a small friability value and a large tensile strength, that is, the soils are very difficult to crush and at high water contents the soils have relatively small strengths. Soil texture and cultivations' combination affected friability in the order of CL-A (0.06) < CL-W (0.9) < SL-A (0.15) < SL-W (0.20). The results showed that the calculated amount of friability reaches maximum (0.16) at water content around the plastic limit (matric suction of 80 kPa). This is in good agreement with some earlier workers found that the water content giving the maximum soil crumbling on tillage is around 0.9-1.0 of the plastic limit.
Conclusion: Tensile strength and friability are influenced by several factors such as water content, clay content and soil organic matter. The influence of these factors on soil tensile strength and friability depends on climatic conditions, management practices, and soil composition. Since the formation of cracks in large aggregates occurs more intensively than in small aggregates, the decrease in strength in the large aggregate occurs more rapidly than that in the smaller aggregates; this resulted in greater value of friability of large aggregates compared to small aggregates. Friability on its own does not define the tensile strengths of aggregates, only the way (or except the condition) that the tensile strength changes with aggregate size. Soils may have high friability but also have very high strengths over a wide range of aggregate sizes. Our result showed that these two parameters could be considered as useful indicators of the soil structural condition and the friability of a soil is an important factor in determining soil response to tillage.

Keywords

Friability; Plastic limit; Aggregate; Cultivation; Tensile Strength

References

1- Angers D.A., and Mehuys G.R. 1988. Effects of cropping on macro aggregation of marine clay soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 68: 723-732.

2- Barzegar A.R., Rengasamy P., and Oades J.M. 1995. Effect of clay type rate of wetting on the mellowing of compacted soils. Geoderma, 68: 39-49.

3- Ben-Hur M., Shainberg I., Bakker D., and Keren R. 1985. Effects of soil texture and CaCo3 content on water filtration in crusted as related to water salinity. Irrigation Science, 6: 281-294.

4- Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54: 464-465.

5- British Standard 1377. 1975. Methods for Testing Soil for Civil Engineering Purposes. British Standard Institution, London, 134 pp.

6- Causarano H. 1993. Factors affecting the tensile strength of soil aggregates. Soil and Tillage Research, 28: 15-25.

7- Curtin D., Steppuhn H., and Selles F. 1994. Effects of magnesium on cation selectivity and structural stability of sodic soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 730-737.

8- Dexter A.R., and Kroesbergen B. 1985. Methodology for determination of tensile strength soil aggregates. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 31: 139-147.

9- Dexter A.R., and Watts C.W. 2000. Tensile strength and friability. In: Smith, K.A. and Mullins, C.E. (Eds). Soil and Environmental Analysis: Physical Methods. 2nd Edition. Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 405-433.

10- Farrell D.A., Greacen, E.L., and Larson W.E. 1967. The effects of water content on axial strain in a loam soil under tension and compression. Soil Science Society of America, Proceeding, 31: 445-450.

11- Hajabbasi M.A. 2007. Soil Physical properties. 1st Ed. Isfahan Univ. of Technology press. 288 p. (in Persian)

12- Hallett P.D., Bird N.R.A., Dexter A.R., and Seville J.P.K. 1995. The application of fracture mechanics to crack propagation in dry soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 49: 591-599.

13- Khazaei A., Mosaddeghi M.R., and Mahboubi A. 2008. Test conditions, and soil organic matter, clay and calcium carbonate contents’ impacts on mean weight diameter and tensile strength of aggregates from some Hamadan soils. Journal of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences and Technology of IUT. 44: 123-135 (in Persian with English abstract).

14- Klute A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. PP. 635-662. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Agron. Monog. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

15- Le Bissonnias Y. 1996. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crust ability and erodibility: theory and methodology. European Journal of Soil Science, 425-237.

16- Lyless L., and Woodruff N.P. 1962. How moisture and tillage can affect soil cloudiness for wind erosion. Soil Science, 43: 150- 159.

17- Macks S.P., Murphy B.W., Cresswell H.P., and Koen T.B. 1996. Soil friability in relation to management history and suitability for direct drilling. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 34: 343-360.

18- Munkholm L.J. 2001. Soil Fragmentation and friability effects of soil water and soil management. PhD Dissertation. PhD thesis, Department of crop physiology and soil science, Danish institute of agricultural science. 50p.

19- Munkholm L.J., and Kay B.D. 2002. Effect of water regime on aggregate-tensile strength, rupture energy, and friability. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66: 702-709.

20- Oades J.M., and Waters A.G. 1991. Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 29: 815-828.

21- Shainberg I., Rhoades J.D., and Prather R.J. 1981. Effect of mineral weathering on clay dispersion and hydraulic conductivity of solid soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45: 273-277.

22- Tajik H., Rahimi H., and Pazira E. 2002. The effect of soil organic matter, electrical conductivity, and sodium adsorption ratio on tensile strength of aggregates. Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences and Technology of IUT. 6 (3): 151–161 (in Persian with English abstract).

23- Tiplittgr G.B.D., Vandoren B., and Schimdt B.L. 1968. Effect of corn Stover mulch on no-tillage corn yield and water infiltration. Agronomy Journal, 60: 236-239.

24- Utomo W.H., and Dexter A.R. 1981. Soil friability. Journal of Soil Science, 32: 203- 213.

25- Walkly A., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of digestion method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration. Soil Science, 37: 29-38.

26- Watts C.W., and Dexter A.R. 1998. Soil friability: theory, measurement and the effects of management and organic carbon content. European Journal of Soil Science, 49: 73-84.