Effect of Rice-Duck co-Cultivation on Rice Yield, Water Productivity and Weed Control in Different Cultivation Systems

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 7, Volume 18, Issue 3 - Serial Number 59, October 2020, Pages 341-355   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v18i3.86497

Authors

K Mansour Ghanaei-Pashaki¹; Gh Mohsenabadi^{* 1}; M. H Biglouei²; M. B Farhangi³

¹Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

²Department of water engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

³Department of Soil science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

 
Introduction
Rice-duck cultivation is an integrated farming technology, which could increase rice production, grain quality and ecological sustainability in paddy fields. One of the main strategies in sustainable agriculture is the use of optimal cultivation systems in agricultural systems which could be increased the range of adaptation of rice to flooding depth and degree of moisture control. Rice-duck cultivation could be affective to weed control as well as reducing environmental pollution which caused by herbicides and providing the development of environmentally friendly agriculture. It should be noted that traditional and conventional cultivation systems have been faced with problems such as permanent flooding of paddy fields, soil erosion, resistance to pests and pathogens and weeds to chemical pesticides, and environmental pollution. Moreover, they require a lot of labor and water, and high energy, which has increased the need to pay attention to new approach. Studies have showed that the application of effective methods in water productivity, including SRI due to improved irrigation management in the field in terms decreased drainage water, permeability and the consequences of conventional cultivation and increasing soil fertility (duck) can significantly increase the water productivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of duck application and weed control in different planting systems on yield and abundance of dominant weeds under field conditions.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as a split plot factorial in a randomized complete block design with three replications during two years of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 at Guilan University. Treatments included three different cultivation systems (conventional, improved, and SRI) as the main factor, and factorial combination of two duck density (un-use and 750 No ha^-1) and three weed control (control (un-weed control), once and twice of weed control) as the sub factor. The experiment had three replications and the length of each plot was 4.5 meters and the width was 4 meters. In order to carry out the experiment, first plowing in the land to a depth of 20 to 25 cm with a rotator and paddling with a tiller was done according to the custom of the farmers of the region. In all plots, 80% of the recommended fertilizer was applied in SRI system after deducting the values of cow.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that abundance and dry biomass of weeds (Umbrella sedge, Barnyard grass, Knot weed and Arrow leaf) were significant in terms of planting system. In all planting systems, 750 ducks ha^-1, once and twice weed control, caused complete loss of ovaries, Umbrella sedge, Barnyard grass, Knot weed, and Arrow leaf due to ducks' non-use conditions. 750 ducks ha^-1 compared to un-use duck in conventional, improved and SRI planting systems increased grain yield of 21.61, 20.80 and 30.84%, respectively. Also, the application of 750 ducks ha^-1 in compared to the conditions of un-used of duck in the cultivation systems of conventional, improved and SRI, increased by 34.80, 33.01, and 38.69% of water productivity, respectively, while there was no significant difference between different levels of weed control in the 750 ducks ha^-1 in terms of water productivity.
Conclusions
In general, duck increased plant growth, improved power of rice and finally increased rice yield by proper weed control in the field with muddy water and beak, as well as adding rubbish to the paddy field. According to the results of this study, probably do once the initial hand weeding to control dominant weeds in SRI rice cultivation system with 750 ducks ha^-1 to improve rice production systems and to increase water productivity in fields of Guilan province is appropriate.

Keywords

Hashemi cultivar; Rice-Duck; SRI cultivation system; Weeding

References

1. 1. Abdul-Rahman, S., Saoud, I. P., Owaied, M. K., Holail, H., Farajalla, N., Haidar, M., and Ghanawi, J. 2011. Improving water use efficiency in semi-arid regions through integrated aquaculture/agriculture. Journal of Applied Aquaculture 23: 212-230.
   2. Ahmed, N., Ward, J. D., and Saint, C. P. 2014. Can integrated aquaculture-agriculture (IAA) produce “more crop per drop”?. Food Security 6 (6): 767-779.
   3. Bouman, B. A. M., Lampayan, R. M., and Tuong, T. P. 2007. Water management in irrigated rice: coping with water scarcity. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, 54 pp.
   4. Dass, A., Chandra, S., Choudhary, A. K., Singh, G., and Sudhishri, S. 2016. Influence of field re-ponding pattern and plant spacing on rice rooteshoot characteristics, yield, and water productivity of two modern cultivars under SRI management in Indian Mollisols. Paddy Water Environ 14: 45-59.
   5. Deng, Q. H., and Pan, X. H. 2008. Effects of rice-duck mutualism on diseases insect pests and weeds and economic benefits. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 36: 7752-7755.
   6. Endriany, E. 2018. Effects of duck density and foraging frequency on rice production systems in East Java, Indonesia. MSc Thesis, University of  Wageningen, The Netherlands 35PP.
   7. FAO, 2018. FAO statistical database. Available at: www.fao.org.
   8. Farooq, M., Kobayashi, N. K., Wahid, A., Ito, O., and Basra, S. M. A. 2009. Strategies for producing more rice with less water. Advance Agron 101: 351-388.
   9. Flohre, A., Rudnick, M., Traser, G., Tscharntke, T., and Eggers, T. 2011. Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs. Simple Landscapes Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 141 (1-2): 210-214.
   10. Furuno, T. 1996. Significance and practice of integrated rice cultivation and duck farming-sustainable agriculture. Kyushu International Center, Japan International Cooperation Agency and Kitakyushu Forum on Asian Women. pp. 12.
   11. Hedayatipour, A., and Bahrami, M. 2007. The effect of padding frequency on specific apparent weight and water permeability and rice yield in paddy feilds. Third Student Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Shiraz University.
   12. Hossain, S., Sugimoto, H., Uddin Ahmed, G. J., and Islam, M. R. 2004. Effect of integrated rice-duck farming on rice yield, farm productivity, and rice-provisioning ability of farmers. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development 2 (1): 79-86.
   13. Huang, Z., Tang, X., Wang, Y., Chen, M., Zhao, Z., Duan, M., and Pan, S. 2012. Effects of increasing aroma cultivation on aroma and grain yield of aromatic rice and their mechanism. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 45 (6): 1054-1065
   14. Kumar, A., Nayak, A. K., Das, B. S., Panigrahi, N., Dasgupta, P., Mohanty, S., Kumar, U., Panneerselvam, P., and Pathak, H. 2019. Effects of water deficit stress on agronomic and physiological responses of rice and greenhouse gas emission from rice soil under elevated atmospheric CO₂. Science of the Total Environment 650: 2032-2050.
   15. Lamour, A., and Lotz, L. A. P. 2007. The importance of tillage depth in relation to seedling emergence in stale seedbeds. Ecological Modeling 201 (3-4): 536-546.
   16. Li, M., Li, R., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Luo, H., and Qiu, S. 2019. Rice-duck co-culture benefits grain 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline accumulation and quality and yield enhancement of fragrant rice. The Crop Journal 7: 419-430.
   17. Liang, K., Zhang, J., Song, C., Luo, M., Zhao, B., Quan, G., and An, M. 2014. Integrated management to control golden apple snails (Pomacea canaliculata) in direct seeding rice fields: An approach combining water management and rice-duck farming. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38: 264-282.
   18. Long, P., Huang, H., Liao, X., Fu, Z., Zheng, H., Chen, A., and Chen, C. 2013. Mechanism and capacities of reducing ecological cost through rice–duck cultivation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93: 2881-2891.
   19. Lopes, A. R., Faria, C., Fernandez, A. P., Cepeda, C. T., Manaia, C. M., and Nunes, O. C. 2011. Comparative study of the microbial diversity of bulk paddy soil of two rice fields subjected to organic and conventional farming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43: 115-125.
   20. Lu, J. X., Zhang, J. E., and Huang, Z. X. 2005. Anauxiliary control methodof rice–duck farming system leaf roller: the rope scraping of rice tail. China Rice 3: 39-46.
   21. Ministry of Agriculture. 2018. Programs and Achievements. Achievements of the agricultural sector in the twelfth government. Available at: http://www.pr.maj.ir/portal/Home/. (in Persian).
   22. Mohammadi, M., Pirdashti, H., Aqajani mazandarani, M., and Musavi taghany, S. Y. 2012. Performance evaluation as an agent of biological diversity and density of duck weed in cultivated rice combination- ducks. Journal of Agricultural Ecology 4 (4): 335-346. (in Persian with English abstract).
   23. Molden, D., Oweis, T., Steduto, P., Bindraban, P., Hanjra, M. A., and Kijne, J. 2010. Improving agricultural water productivity: between optimism and caution. Agricultural Water Management 97: 528-535.
   24. Monaco, F., and Sali, G. 2018. How water amounts and management options drive Irrigation Water Productivity of rice. A multivariate analysis based on field experiment data. Agricultural Water Management 195: 47-57.
   25. Nayak, A., and Biswal, S. 2018. Performance of Rice in Modified Conventional System over System of Rice Intensification (SRI). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6: 2163-2168.
   26. Qu, J. L. 2010. Research on rice-duck commensalisms to control weed and Pests. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science 6: 67-69.
   27. Quan, G. M., Zhang, J. E., Teng, L. L., Chen, R., and Xu, R. B. 2008. Effects of integrated Rice-duck farming on rice root growth. Journal South China Agricultural University 29: 1-5.
   28. Randriamibarisoa, R. P. 2002. Research results on biological nitrogen fixation with the system of rice intensification. Proceedings of an International Conference on the system of rice intensification (SRI) held in Sanya, china.
   29. Randriamiharisoa, R., Barison, J., and Uphoff, N. 2007. Soil biological contributions to the system of rice intensification. Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development.
   30. Rao, K. V. R., Gangwar, S. K., Chourasia, L. B. R., and Soni, K. A. 2017. Effects of drip irrigation system for Enhancing Rice. Yield Under System of Rice Intensification Management. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 15: 487-495.
   31. Rehman, H. U., Aziz, T., Farooq, M., Wakeel, A., and Rengel, Z. 2012. Zinc nutrition in rice production systems: a review. Plant and Soil 361 (1-2): 203-226.
   32. Roderick, M., Florencia, G. R., Rodriguez, G. D. P., Lampayan, R. M., and Bouman, B. A. M. 2011. Impact of the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water-saving irrigation technique: Evidence from rice producers in the Philippines. Food Policy 36 (2): 280-288.
   33. Sepaskhah, A. R., Tavakko, A. R., and Mosavi, F. 2006. Preciples and application of deficit irrigation. Iranian National Committee of Irrigation and Drainage Press, 1th Ed. 288 pp. (in Persian).
   34. Sheng, F., Cao, C., and Li, C. 2018. Integrated rice-duck farming decreases global warming potential and increases net ecosystem economic budget in central China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23: 22744-22753.
   35. Singh, Y., Humphreys, E., Kukal, S. S., Singh, B., Kaur, A., Thaman, S., Prashar, A., Yadav, S., Timsina, J., Dhillon, S. S., and Kaur, N. 2009. Crop performance in permanent raised bed rice-wheat cropping system in Punjab, India. Field Crops Research 110 (1): 1-20.
   36. Styger, E., Attaher, M. A., Guindo, H., Ibrahim, H., Diaty, M., Abba, I., and Traore, M. 2011. Application of system of rice intensification practices in the arid environment of the Timbuktu region in Mali. Paddy and Water Enviroment 9: 137-144.
   37. Tabbal, D. F., Bouman, B. A. M., Bhuiyan, S. I., Sibayan, E. B., and Sattar, M. A. 2002. On-farm strategies for reducing water input in irrigated rice; case studies in the Philippines. Agricultural Water Management 56: 93-112.
   38. Teng, Q., Hu, X. F., Cheng, C., Luo, F., Xue, Y., Jiang, Y., Mu, Z., Liu, L., and Yang, M. 2016. Ecological effects of rice-duck integrated farming on soil fertility and weed and pest control. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16: 2395-2407.
   39. Thakur, A. K., Sreelata Rath, D. U., and Patil Ashwani, K. 2011. Effects of rice plant morphology and phsiology of water and associated management practices of the system of rice intensification and their implications for crop performance. Paddy and Water Enviroment 9: 13-24.
   40. Tojo, S., Yoshizawa, M., Motobayashi, T., and Watanabe, K. 2004. Effects of loosing Aigamo ducks on the growth of rice plants, weeds, and the number of arthropods in paddy fields. Weed Biology and Management 7: 38-43.
   41. Uphoff, N. 2005. Features of the system of rice intensification (SRI) apart from increases in yield. Cornell  international institute for food, Agriculture and development.
   42. Vergara, B. S., puranabhavung, S., and Lilis, R. 1965. Faktors determining the growth duration of rice varieties. Phyton 22: 177-185.
   43. Wei, H., Bai, W., Zhand, J., Chen, R., Xiang, H., and Quan, G. 2019. Integrated Rice-Duck Farming Decreases Soil Seed Bank and Weed Density in a Paddy Field. Agronomy Journal 9 (5): 259
   44. Yang, H., YU, D., Zhou, J., Zhai, S., Bian, X., and Weih, M. 2018. Rice-duck co-culture for reducing negative impacts of biogas slurry application in rice production systems. Journal of Environmental Management 213: 142-150.
   45. Yu, S. M., Ouyang, Y. N., Zhang, Q. Y., Peng, G. D., Xu, H., and Jin, Q. Y. 2005. Effects of rice-duck farming system on Oryza sativa growth and its yield. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 16 (7): 1252-1256.
   46. Zhang, J. 2013. Progresses and perspective on research and practice of rice-duck farming in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 1: 70-79
   47. Zhang, J. E., Xu, R., Chen, X., and Quan, G. 2009. Effects of duck activities on a weed community under a Transplanted rice-duck farming system in southern China. Weed Biology and Management 9: 250-257.
   48. Zhang, J., Quan, G., Huang, Z., and Luo, S. 2013. Evidence of duck activity induced anatomical structure change and lodging resistance of rice plant. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37: 975-984.