Yield and Water Use Efficiency for Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) as a Medicinal Plant in Mashhad Condition

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 1, Volume 18, Issue 4 - Serial Number 60, January 2021, Pages 373-384   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v18i4.74509

Authors

P Rezvani Moghaddam^* ; Gh Asadi; M Aghavani Shajari; F Ranjbar

Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) as a member of Malvaceae family is a subtropical medicinal plant. This plant is self-pollinated and sensitive to cold. Bolls of Roselle are used in food and pharmaceutical industries. One of the most important purpose to achieve high quality and quantity yield is evaluation of nutritional systems and irrigation management for plants. The use of chemicals in the production of medicinal plants in addition to environmental pollution, decreases the quality of drug. Furthermore, sustainable agriculture, by replacing organic fertilizers with chemical fertilizers, increasing the efficiency of inputs such as water, and fertility and soil health, preserving the environment and increasing product quality and protect resources. Drought stress is one of the most important problems in crop production in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Effective management of nutrition and irrigation and planting of drought resistant plants is one of the effective proceeding to increase water use efficiency in semi-arid regions. Roselle is relatively drought-tolerant plants, so that cultivation of this plant is common in Sistan and Baluchestan province of Iran. So, studying the ecological and agronomic needs of this plant in new areas is important. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the yield and yield components of this plant in response to application of nutritional resources and irrigation management.
Materials and Methods: In order to study the yield and water use efficiency for Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa), an experiment was conducted with 12 treatments as strip plot based on complete block design with three replications at Research Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, in year 2014-2015. Experimental factors included: nutritional management in four levels (chemical fertilizer, cow manure, cow manure+ chemical fertilizer and control) and irrigation management in three level (30, 70 and 100% of water requirement of Roselle). Roselle seeds were planted in seedling trays at greenhouse in February 2014. Then seedlings transferred to field in last April 2015. The distance between rows and plants were 75 and 25 cm, respectively. Chemical fertilizer (150, 100 and 200 kg.ha^-1 Triple super phosphate, Potassium sulfate and Urea, respectively), and cow manure (32 ton.ha^-1) were used at depth of 30 cm. Then, different water requirement of Roselle is determined and the water volume of irrigation will be recorded in each irrigation cycle by the contour, furthermore, water use efficiency was calculated. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by using of Minitab Ver.16. Also, means comparison were compared by Duncan multiple range test at 5% level.
Results and Discussion: Results indicated significant effects of treatments on most of the traits of Roselle. The maximum plant height (89.3 cm), number of lateral branch (6. 6 number), dry sepal yield (860.1 kg.ha^-1), biomass yield (7197 kg.ha^-1), harvest index (11.9%) and water use efficiency based on bolls and biomass yield (0.11 and 0.89 kg.m³) of Roselle obtained in cow manure + chemical fertilizer treatment. Also, providing of 100% of the plant's water requirement induced the highest height (91.5 cm), number of bolls on main and lateral branch (20.0 and 47.5 number), sepal yield (672.7 kg.ha^-1) and biomass yield (6944 kg.ha^-1) of Roselle. Combined application compared to single application of nutritional sources increased 16, 18, 35, 20 and 20%, respectively, height, number of lateral branches, bolls yield, biomass yield and harvest index of Roselle. Furthermore, results of interaction effects showed that application of cow manure + chemical fertilizer with providing of 100% of the plant's water requirement obtained the maximum number of lateral branch (8.5 number), bolls yield (934 kg.ha^-1) and biomass yield (7920 kg.ha^-1) of Roselle. The highest amount of water use efficiency based on sepal and biomass yield (0.2 and 1.5 kg.m³) obtained by application of cow manure + chemical fertilizer and providing of 30% of the plant's water requirement.
Conclusions: Totally, results showed that combined application and providing of 100% of the plant's water requirement improved the most traits of Roselle. Also, combined application of nutritional sources decreased water consumption and increased water use efficiency.

Keywords

Boll yield; Cow manure; Harvest index; Irrigation

References

1. Abid Askari, M. S. 1995. Autecological studies of exotic plant Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Roselle), a multipurpose plant, for is introduction and culture. Scientific and Industrial Research 38 (1): 17-21.
2. Adediran, J. A., Taiwo, L. B., Akande, M. O., Sobulo, R. A., and and Idowu, O. J. 2004. Application of organic and inorganic fertilizer for sustainable maize and cowpea yields in Nigeria. Plant Nutrition 27: 1163-1181.
3. Aghhavani Shajari, M. 2012. Effects of single and combined application of nutrients on quantitative and qualitative indices of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian).
4. Akanbi, W. B. 2002. Growth, Nutrient uptake and yield of maize and okra as influenced by compost and nitrogen fertilizer under different cropping systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 228 p.
5. Akanbi, W. B., Olaniyan, A. B., Togun, A. O., Ilupeju, A. E. O., and Olaniran A. 2009. The Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on growth, calyx yield and quality of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). American Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3: 652-657.
6. Akbarinia, A. 2003. Evaluation of yield and essential oil of Ajwain in conventional, organic and integrated agricultural systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University. (in Persian).
7. Akbari Nodehi, D. 2014. The effect of flow irrigation and reduced irrigation methods on the yield and water use efficiency of maize in Mazandaran. Sciences and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 70: 245-254. (in Persian).
8. Alizadeh, A., and Kamali, A. Gh. 2007.Water Requirement of Plants in Iran. Imam Reza University Press, First Edition, 223 p. (in Persian).
9. Aseri, G. K., Jain, N., Panwar, J., Rao, A. V., and Meghwal, P. R. 2008. Biofertilizers improve plant growth, fruit yield, nutrition, metabolism and rhizosphere enzyme activities of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in Indian Thar Desert. Scientia Horticulturae 117: 130-135.
10. Borras Linares, I., Fernandez Arroyo, S., Arraez Roman, D., Palmeros Suarez, P. A., Del Val Diazc, R., Andrade Gonzales, I., Fernandez Gutierrez, A., Gomez Leyva, J. F., and Segura Carretero, A. 2015. Characterization of phenolic compounds, anthocyanidin, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of 25 varieties of Mexican Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa). Industrial Crops and Products 69: 385-394. 
11. Darzi, M. T., Ghalavand, A., and Rejali, F. 2009. The effects of biofertilizers application on N, P, K assimilation and seed yield in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 25 (1): 1-19. (in Persian with English abstract).
12. Duke, J. A. 2006. Ecosystematic data on economic plants. Journal of Crude Research 17 (3): 91-110.
13. Ebhin Masto, R., Chhonkar, P. K., Singh, D., and Patra, A. K. 2006. Changes in soil biomass and biochemical characteristics in a long-term field trial on a sub-tropical incept soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38: 1577-1582.
14. Fallahi, H. R., Aghhavani Shajari, M., Taherpour Kalantari, R., and Soltanzadeh, M. G. 2016. Evaluation of superabsorbent efficiency in response to dehydration frequencies, salinity and temperature and its effect on yield and quality of cotton under deficit irrigation. Agroecology 7 (4): 513-527. (in Persian with English abstract).
15. Fallahi, H. R., Ghorbani, M., Aghhavani Shajari, M., Asadian, A. M., and Samadzadeh, A. R. 2017. Effects of mycorrhizal inoculation and humic acid on growth and yield of Roselle and mycorrhizal symbiosis indices under drought stress condition. Final report of research project, University of Birjand. (in Persian with English abstract).
16. Fardad, H., and Zeyghami Gol, R. 2005. Optimization of water consumption for irrigation of cotton in Gorgan region. Agriculture Science 36 (5): 1197-1206. (in Persian).
17. Fereres, E., and Soriano, M. A. 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Experimental Botany 58 (2): 147-159.
18. Fuladivanda, S., Aeinehband, A., and Naraki, F. 2010. Evaluation of different tillage systems and seed amount on yield and yield components of canola under rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal Field Crops Research 8 (2): 213-224. (in Persian).
19. Gad, N. 2011. Productivity of Roselle (Hibiscus Sabdariffa L.) plant as affected by cobalt and organic fertilizers. Applied Sciences Research 7 (12): 1785-1792.
20. Gendy, A. S. H., Said-Al Ahl, H. A. H., and Abeer, M. 2012. Growth, productivity and chemical constituents of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) plants as influenced by cattle manure and biofertilizers treatments. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6: 1-12.
21. Ghorbani Nasrabad, Gh., and Hezarjaribi, A. 2010. Cotton respond to the irrigation at different stages of growth. Journal of Plant Production 17 (4): 129-141. (in Persian with English abstract).
22. Ghost, B. C., and Bhat, R. 1998. Environmental hazards of nitrogen loading in wetland rice fields. Environmental Pollution 102: 123-126.
23. Gyllapsy, E., Bergervoel, C. K., and Jullien, D. 1993. Sink-source relation in fruit vegetables as affected by N fertilizer. Scientia Horticulture 58: 87-94.
24. Khalil, S. E., and Yousef, R. M. M. 2014. Study the effect of irrigation water regime and fertilizers on growth, yield and some fruit quality of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Advance Research 2 (5): 738-750.
25. Mahfouz, S. A., and Sharaf Eldin, M. A. 2007. Effect of mineral vs. biofertilizer on growth, yield, and essential oil content of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). International Agrophysics 21: 361-366.
26. Mallanagouda, B. 1995. Effects of N.P.K. and FYM on growth parameters of onion, garlic and coriander. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science 4: 916-918.
27. Murty, M. G., and Ladha, J. K. 1988. Influence of Azospirillum inoculation on the mineral uptake and growth of rice under hydroponic conditions. Plant and Soil 108: 281-285.
28. Nabila, Y. N., and Aly, M. S. 2002. Variations in productivity of (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) in response to some agricultural supplementation. Annals of Agricultural Science 47 (3): 875-892.
29. Nemati, M., and Dehmarde, M. 2015. Effect of using of cow and biomass manure on yield and Morphological indexes of Sour Tea (Hibiscus sabdariffa). Agroecology 7 (1): 62-73. (in Persian).
30. Parsa Motlagh, B. 2015. Study of eco-physiological, morphological, phytochemical, nutritional of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. in Jiroft region. Ph.D. Dissertation of agroecology, Department of Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian with English abstract).
31. Pimentel, D. 1993. Economics and energies of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture and Environment Ethics 6: 53-60.
32. Rahbariyan, P., Afsharmanesh, Gh. R., and Modafee Behzadi, N. 2011. Effect of drought stress and plant density on sour tea (Hibiscus sabdariffa) yield in Jiroft Region. New Agricultural Findings 5 (3): 249-257. (in Persian).
33. Rezvani Moghaddam, P. 2008. Forgotten Plants. In: Koocheki, A. R., and Khajeh Hosseini, M. Modern Farming. Chapter 17. 446 p. (in Persian).
34. Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Asadi, G. A., Ranjbar, F., Aghavani Shajari, M., and Shahriari, R. 2015. Effect of integrated organic and chemical fertilizer on growth indices of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) as a medicinal plant in Mashhad condition. Agroecology 96 (4): 971-960 (in Persian with English abstract).
35. Rezvani Moghadam, P., Asadi, Gh., Aghhavani Shajari, M., Ranjbar, F., and Shahriari, R. 2017. Evaluation of nutritional management on yield and yield components of Sour Tea (Hibiscus sabdariffa) in Mashhad. Iranian Journal Field Crops Research 15 (4): 776-785. (in Persian with English abstract).
36. Sadeghi, A. A., Akhsh Kelarestaghi, K., and Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf, K. 2014. The effects of vermicompost and chemical fertilizers on yield and yield components of marshmallow (Altheae officinalis L.). Agroecology 6: 42-50 .(in Persian with English abstract).
37. Safari, A., Asoudar, M. A., Ghasemi Nejad, M., and Ebdali Mashhadi, A. R. 2013. Effect of keeping of residues, different methods of conservation tillage and planting on physical properties of soil and wheat yield. Knowledge of Agriculture and Sustainable Production 23 (2): 59-49. (in Persian).
38. Seghatoleslami, M. J, Mosavi, Gh. R., and Barzegaran, T. 2013. Effect of irrigation levels and planting date on yield and water use efficiency of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Iranian Journal of Medical and Aromatic Plants 29 (1): 144-156. (in Persian with English abstract).
39. State Meteorological Organization. 2016. Statistics and information of Mashhad Meteorological Station.
40. Torabi, A. 2004. Effect of sowing date and row spacing on the yield of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft Branch. (in Persian with English abstract).
41. Tahami Zarandi, M. K., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Jahan, M. 2000. Comparison of the effects of organic and chemical fertilizers on yield and essential oil content of basil. Agroecology 2 (1): 63-74. (in Persian with English abstract).
42. Yang, Y., Watanabe, M., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, Q., and Hayashi, S. 2006. Optimizing irrigation management for wheat to reduce ground water depletion in the piedmont region of the Taihang mountains in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management 82: 25-44.