Effects of Fire on Soil Properties, Erosion and Hydrologic Regime of Zrebar Lake Watershed

آب و خاک

Article 2, Volume 30, Issue 2 - Serial Number 46, May 2016, Pages 618-631   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v30i2.48630

Authors

Shirko Ebrahimi Mohammadi^{* 1}; Mahmood Azari²; Esmaeel Manoochehri³

¹University of Kurdistan

²University of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³Kurdistan Province Head Office of Natural Resources and Watershed Management

Abstract

Introduction: Forest herbs due to decrease of runoff coefficient and the kinetic energy of raindrops, is known as a key factor in controlling runoff and soil conservation. Many physical (hydrophobicity, electrical conductivity, pH, particle size distribution, color and temperature regimes), chemical (quality and quantity of organic matter, nutrient availability) and biological (Microbial biomass, soil invertebrates living community) soil properties can be affected by forest fires. Fire not only reduces forest herbs, vulnerability against splashing rain but also has strong effects on the hydrological cycle and soil loss. despite of repeated fires, there are very few studies about fire impact on natural resources of the west of the country, especially the city of Marivan, in Kurdistan province so this study aimed to investigate the short-term fire impacts on soil properties, Hydrologic regime, soil erosion and sedimentation of Zrebar Lake watershed in west of Iran.
Materials and Methods: Considering the importance of the slope on the hydrological response of the watershed, slope classes of the Zrebar Lake watershed were mapped. Therefore, effects of fire on hydrological characteristics, erosion and sedimentation were studied by the establishment of twelve 0.25 square meter plots in three replications at two dominant slope classes (0 to 30 and 30 to 60%) in burned and natural areas . The first plots in the burned and natural sections, was established randomly and two other plots with the similar conditions at a distance of 1.5 meters from each other were established. Garden Spray Simulator with constant pressure was used to fall rain from half a meter height for thirty minutes with an intensity of about 2 mm min-1 and 1 mm droplet diameter according to the general weather conditions of the studied area. For every five minutes, runoff and sediment were collected. Runoff volume by weighting and suspended sediment concentration by drying at 105°c were measured. Infiltration and interception by water balance assessment and subtracting the simulated rainfall volume and runoff were calculated. Soil samples were also collected in triplicate by auger drilling method to assess the effects of fire on different characteristics of topsoil (depth of 5 cm) asthe samples 1 and 2 in the slope class of 30 to 60%, and samples 3 and 4 in slope class of 0 to 30%, at the burned and natural sections respectively. In the laboratory, after determination of soil texture, the moisture content, pH and EC by portable laboratory instruments, the percentage of total organic carbon and organic matter bye wet oxidation were measured. Soil water repellency by Water Drop Penetration Times (WDPT) method in the field was calculated. Statistical analysis for comparing the average hydrophobicity of the soil, runoff and sediment of both natural and burned treatments by independent t-test and for equality of variances by the Levene test was performed using SPSS 21 software.
Results and Discussion: The results showed no effect of fire on soil texture because the fire severity was low to moderate as the color of ash was black. The fire caused to 46 percent reduction of soil moisture and also 24 percent reduction of soil organic matter and 29 percent reduction of total organic carbon at 0% to 30% and 30% to 60% slope classes respectively. Slight increase in pH and electrical conductivity were another effects of fire. At the slope of less than 30%, the average water drop penetration time were 1.24 and 0.70 S in burned and natural treatments and at the slope of 30 to 60 % slope class were 4.52 and 1.04 S respectively. Independent t-test results showed that, the water repellency differences of natural (t=3.466, p=0.003) and burned (t=7.364, p=0.000) treatments were significant. Levene test and independent t-test results showed significant difference in the average of runoff at confidence level of 95% in both slope classes. At the slope of less than 30%, differences of sediment average of burned and natural plots with a significant level of 0.012 were significant. But in slope class of 30% to 60%, despite of large different sediment concentration output from the burned and natural plots at the beginning of the experiment, there was no significant difference between them. The results showed that fire leads to low soil moisture content, total organic carbon and soil organic matter. Slight increase of pH and EC and also lack of effect on soil texture, in both slope classes were also observed. Ash on the forest floor caused to soil water repellency and therefor decreased soil infiltration and increased runoff and soil erosion.

Keywords

Erosion Plot; Organic matter; Runoff, Sediment; Water Repellency

References

1- Arocena J.M., and Opio C. 2003. Prescribed fire-induced changes in properties of sub-boreal forest soils. Geoderma 113: 1–16.

2- Assouline S., and Ben-Hur M. 2006. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the dynamics of interrill erosion during soil surface sealing. CATENA 66(3): 211-220.

3- Baldock J.A., and Smernik R.J. 2002. Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33: 1093–1109.

4- Bodi M.B., Martin D.A., Balfour V.N., Santin C., Doerr S.H., Pereira P., Cerdà A., and Mataix-Solera J. 2014. Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects, Earth-Science Reviews 130: 103– 127.

5- Cerdà A., and Doerr S.H. 2005. Influence of vegetation recovery on soil hydrology and erodibility following fire: An eleven year investigation, International Journal of Wildland Fire 14(4): 423–437.

6- Certini G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review, Oecologia 143: 1–10.

7- DeBano L.F. 2000. The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. Journal of Hydrology 231–232, 195–206.

8- Doerr S.H., Shakesby R.A., and Walsh R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellence: its causes, characteristics and hydro- geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews 51: 33–65

9- Doerr S.H., Shakesby R.A., Blake W.H., Chafer C.J., Humphreys G.S., and Wallbrink P.J. 2006. Effects of different wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological response. Journal of Hydrology 319: 295–311.

10- Gholami Gohareh R., Sadeghi S.H.R., Mirnia S.Kh., and Soleimankhani Z. 2012. Effects of Light Firing on Infiltration, Runoff and Sediment in Rangeland in Kodir Area, Iran. 5(17): 23-32. (In Persian with English abstract)

11- Gimeno-Garcia E., Andreu V., and Luis Rubio J. 2007. Influence of vegetation recovery on water erosion at short and medium-term after experimental fires in a Mediterranean shrubland. Catena 69: 150–160.

12- Glenn N.F., Finley C.D. 2010. Fire and Vegetation Type Effects on Soil Hydrophobicity and Infiltration in the Sagebrush-Steppe: I. Field Analysis, Journal of Arid Environments, 74: 653-659.

13- Gonzalez-Perez J.A., Gonzalez -Vila F.J., Almendros G., and Knicker H. 2004. The effect of fire on soil organic matter—a review. Environment International 30: 855–870.

14- Gyssels G., Poesen J., Bochet E., and Li Y. 2005. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Progress in Physical Geography 29: 198–217.

15- He J.J., Cai Q.G., and Liu S.B. 2012. Effects of slope gradient on slope runoff and sediment yield under different single rainfall conditions. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao (The journal of applied ecology) In Chinese. 23(5):1263-1268. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22919836

16- Hernandez T., Garcia C., and Reinhardt I. 1997. Short-term effect of wildfire on the chemical, biochemical and microbiological properties of Mediterranean pine forest soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25:109–116.

17- Hemmatboland I., Akbarinia M., and Banej Shafiei A. 2010. The effect of fire on some soil chemical properties of oak forests in Marivan region. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 18 (2): 205-218. (In Persian with English abstract)

18- Horne D.J, and McIntosh J.C. 2000. Hydrophobic compounds in sands in New Zealand-extraction, characterisation and proposed mechanisms for repellence expression. Journal of Hydrology 231: 35–46.

19- Hosseini S.S., and Hosseini V. 2014. Effect of fire occurrence through the time on changes of K, Mg, Ca and EC of forest soil. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 22 (1): 141-151.

20- Hudson N.W. 1993. Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. FAO Soil Bulletin 68.

21- Huffman E.L., Mac Donald L.H., and Stednick J.D. 2001. Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range. Hydrological Processes 15:2877–2892.

22- Keeley J. 2009. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18: 116–126.

23- Kurdistan Province natural resources head office. Detailed- executive Zarivar watershed studies, hydrology, erosion and sediment studies. Sixth and ninth volumes. Ideh Pardazan Consulting Company. (in Persian)

24- Letey J. 2001. Causes and consequences of fire-induced soil water repellency. Hydrological Processes 15(15): 2867–2875.

25- Loaiciga H.A., Pedreros D., and Roberts D. 2001. Wildfire-streamflow interactions in a chaparral watershed. Advances in Environmental Research 5: 295–305.

26- Martin D.A., and Moody J.A. 2001. Comparison of soil infiltration rates in burned and unburned mountainous watersheds. Hydrological Processes 15: 2893–29003.

27- Mermut A.R., Luk S.H., Romkens M.J.M., and Poesen J.W.A. 1997. Soil loss by splash and wash during rainfall from two loess soils. Geoderma 75: 203–214.

28- Moody J.A., and Martin D.A. 2001. Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26:1049–1070.

29- Morvan X., Naisse C., Malam Issa O., Desprats J. F., Combaud A., and Cerdan O. 2014. Effect of ground-cover type on surface runoff and subsequent soil erosion in Champagne vineyards in France. Soil Use and Management 30: 372–381.

30- Morvan X., Naisse C., Malam Issa O., Desprats J. F., Combaud A., and Cerdan O. 2015. Rainfall simulations to study the types of groundcover on surface runoff and soil erosion in Champagne vineyards in France. Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 17, EGU2015-4740.

31- Neary D.G., Gottfried G.J., and Ffolliott P.F. 2003. Post-wildfire watershed flood responses. Second International Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress, Orlando, Florida, 16–20 November, Paper 1B7.

32- Oswald B.P., Davenport D., and Neuenschwander L.F. 1999. Effects of slash pile burning on the physical and chemical soil properties of Vassar soils. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 8 (1): 75–86.

33- Rahimi I., and Esmaeeli A. 2010. Evaluate the potential of forests and rangelands fire using satellite images of MODIS and remote sensing techniques: Case study Marivan forests). 1–2 April. Iran National Cartographic Center. Tehran. Iran. (In Persian)

34- Robichaud P.R., and Brown R.E. 1999. What happened after the smoke cleared: onsite erosion rates after a wildfire in eastern Oregon. In: Olsen, D.S., Potyondy, J.P. (Eds.), Proceedings Wildland Hydrology Conference, Bozeman, Mt Hernon, Virginia, June. American Water Resource Association, pp. 419–426.

35- Sadeghi S.H.R., Gholami Gohareh R., and Mirnia S.Kh. Analysis of two pasture treatments runoff production threshold. 6th National Seminar on Watershed Management Science and Engineering and 4th National Seminar on Erosion and Sediment. 28–29 April. 2010. Natural Resources & Marine Sciences. Tarbiat Modares University., Noor, Mazandaran, Iran. (in Persian)

36- Scott D.F. 2000. Soil wettability in forested catchments in South Africa; as measured by different methods and as affected by vegetation cover and soil characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 231–232: 87–104.

37- Shakesby R.A., Bento C.P.M., Ferreira C.S.S., Ferreira A.J.D., Stoof C.R., Urbanek E., and Walsh R.P.D. 2015. Impacts of prescribed fire on soil loss and soil quality: An assessment based on an experimentally-burned catchment in central Portugal. Catena 128: 278–293.

38- Ulery A.L., and Graham RC. 1993. Forest fire effects on soil color and texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57: 135–140

39- Walling D.E., Collins A.L., Sichingabula H.A., and Leeks G.J.L. 2001. Integrated Assessmen of Catchment Suspended Sediment Budget: A Zambian Example. Land Degradation and Development 12: 387-415.