اثرات آتش سوزی بر خصوصیات خاک، فرسایش و رژیم هیدرولوژی حوضه آبخیز دریاچه زریبار

آب و خاک

مقاله 2، دوره 30، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 46، تابستان 1395، صفحه 618-631  

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jsw.v30i2.48630

نویسندگان

شیرکو ابراهیمی محمدی ¹؛ محمود آذری²؛ اسماعیل منوچهری³

¹دانشگاه کردستان

²دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

³اداره کل منابع طبیعی استان کردستان

چکیده

آتش سوزی یکی از مهم ترین عوامل تخریب جنگل ها و مراتع کشور به خصوص اکوسیستم های حساس جنگل های بلوط زاگرس می‌باشد لذا در این پژوهش به کمک شبیه ساز باران و استقرار پلات های 25/0 متر مربعی در بخش های آتش گرفته و طبیعی کف‌پوش جنگلی در دو کلاس عمده شیب (کم‌تر از 30 درصد و 30 تا 60 درصد) شرق حوضه آبخیز دریاچه زریبار در استان کردستان اثرات آتش سوزی بر وضعیت خاک سطحی (عمق 5 سانتی‌متر) شامل بافت، ذخیره رطوبتی، درصد ماده آلی و درصد کربن آلی کل، آبگریزی، pH و EC و هم چنین تولید روان آب و رسوب مطالعه گردید. میزان رطوبت نمونه ها به روش وزنی، pH و EC عصاره خاک توسط دستگاه پورتابل آزمایشگاهی، درصد کربن آلی کل و درصد مواد آلی به روش اکسیداسیون مرطوب اندازه‌گیری شدند. میزان روان آب و رسوب خروجی از پلات به مدت سی دقیقه، هر پنج دقیقه یکبار توسط بطری های پلاستیکی یک لیتری جمع آوری و حجم روان آب با استفاده از روش وزنی، غلظت رسوب معلق از روش خشک کردن در دمای 105 درجه سانتی گراد و نفوذپذیری و گیرش با ارزیابی بیلان آبی و با تفاضل آب نزولی بر پلات و روان آب ایجاد شده محاسبه شدند. نتایج بیانگر تأثیر آتش سوزی بر کاهش ذخیره رطوبتی، درصد ماده آلی و کربن آلی کل خاک و هم چنین افزایش ناچیز pH و هدایت الکتریکی و از طرفی عدم تاثیر آتش سوزی بر بافت خاک در هر دو کلاس‌ شیب بود. افزایش معنی دار آبگریزی خاک و روان آب در سطح اعتماد 95% در هر دو کلاس شیب و رسوب درشیب های کم تر از 30 درصد از دیگر اثرات آتش سوزی در منطقه مورد مطالعه بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

آبگریزی؛ پلات فرسایشی؛ رسوب؛ روان آب؛ مواد آلی

مراجع

1- Arocena J.M., and Opio C. 2003. Prescribed fire-induced changes in properties of sub-boreal forest soils. Geoderma 113: 1–16.

2- Assouline S., and Ben-Hur M. 2006. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the dynamics of interrill erosion during soil surface sealing. CATENA 66(3): 211-220.

3- Baldock J.A., and Smernik R.J. 2002. Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33: 1093–1109.

4- Bodi M.B., Martin D.A., Balfour V.N., Santin C., Doerr S.H., Pereira P., Cerdà A., and Mataix-Solera J. 2014. Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects, Earth-Science Reviews 130: 103– 127.

5- Cerdà A., and Doerr S.H. 2005. Influence of vegetation recovery on soil hydrology and erodibility following fire: An eleven year investigation, International Journal of Wildland Fire 14(4): 423–437.

6- Certini G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review, Oecologia 143: 1–10.

7- DeBano L.F. 2000. The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. Journal of Hydrology 231–232, 195–206.

8- Doerr S.H., Shakesby R.A., and Walsh R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellence: its causes, characteristics and hydro- geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews 51: 33–65

9- Doerr S.H., Shakesby R.A., Blake W.H., Chafer C.J., Humphreys G.S., and Wallbrink P.J. 2006. Effects of different wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological response. Journal of Hydrology 319: 295–311.

10- Gholami Gohareh R., Sadeghi S.H.R., Mirnia S.Kh., and Soleimankhani Z. 2012. Effects of Light Firing on Infiltration, Runoff and Sediment in Rangeland in Kodir Area, Iran. 5(17): 23-32. (In Persian with English abstract)

11- Gimeno-Garcia E., Andreu V., and Luis Rubio J. 2007. Influence of vegetation recovery on water erosion at short and medium-term after experimental fires in a Mediterranean shrubland. Catena 69: 150–160.

12- Glenn N.F., Finley C.D. 2010. Fire and Vegetation Type Effects on Soil Hydrophobicity and Infiltration in the Sagebrush-Steppe: I. Field Analysis, Journal of Arid Environments, 74: 653-659.

13- Gonzalez-Perez J.A., Gonzalez -Vila F.J., Almendros G., and Knicker H. 2004. The effect of fire on soil organic matter—a review. Environment International 30: 855–870.

14- Gyssels G., Poesen J., Bochet E., and Li Y. 2005. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Progress in Physical Geography 29: 198–217.

15- He J.J., Cai Q.G., and Liu S.B. 2012. Effects of slope gradient on slope runoff and sediment yield under different single rainfall conditions. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao (The journal of applied ecology) In Chinese. 23(5):1263-1268. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22919836

16- Hernandez T., Garcia C., and Reinhardt I. 1997. Short-term effect of wildfire on the chemical, biochemical and microbiological properties of Mediterranean pine forest soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25:109–116.

17- Hemmatboland I., Akbarinia M., and Banej Shafiei A. 2010. The effect of fire on some soil chemical properties of oak forests in Marivan region. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 18 (2): 205-218. (In Persian with English abstract)

18- Horne D.J, and McIntosh J.C. 2000. Hydrophobic compounds in sands in New Zealand-extraction, characterisation and proposed mechanisms for repellence expression. Journal of Hydrology 231: 35–46.

19- Hosseini S.S., and Hosseini V. 2014. Effect of fire occurrence through the time on changes of K, Mg, Ca and EC of forest soil. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 22 (1): 141-151.

20- Hudson N.W. 1993. Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. FAO Soil Bulletin 68.

21- Huffman E.L., Mac Donald L.H., and Stednick J.D. 2001. Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range. Hydrological Processes 15:2877–2892.

22- Keeley J. 2009. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18: 116–126.

23- Kurdistan Province natural resources head office. Detailed- executive Zarivar watershed studies, hydrology, erosion and sediment studies. Sixth and ninth volumes. Ideh Pardazan Consulting Company. (in Persian)

24- Letey J. 2001. Causes and consequences of fire-induced soil water repellency. Hydrological Processes 15(15): 2867–2875.

25- Loaiciga H.A., Pedreros D., and Roberts D. 2001. Wildfire-streamflow interactions in a chaparral watershed. Advances in Environmental Research 5: 295–305.

26- Martin D.A., and Moody J.A. 2001. Comparison of soil infiltration rates in burned and unburned mountainous watersheds. Hydrological Processes 15: 2893–29003.

27- Mermut A.R., Luk S.H., Romkens M.J.M., and Poesen J.W.A. 1997. Soil loss by splash and wash during rainfall from two loess soils. Geoderma 75: 203–214.

28- Moody J.A., and Martin D.A. 2001. Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26:1049–1070.

29- Morvan X., Naisse C., Malam Issa O., Desprats J. F., Combaud A., and Cerdan O. 2014. Effect of ground-cover type on surface runoff and subsequent soil erosion in Champagne vineyards in France. Soil Use and Management 30: 372–381.

30- Morvan X., Naisse C., Malam Issa O., Desprats J. F., Combaud A., and Cerdan O. 2015. Rainfall simulations to study the types of groundcover on surface runoff and soil erosion in Champagne vineyards in France. Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 17, EGU2015-4740.

31- Neary D.G., Gottfried G.J., and Ffolliott P.F. 2003. Post-wildfire watershed flood responses. Second International Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress, Orlando, Florida, 16–20 November, Paper 1B7.

32- Oswald B.P., Davenport D., and Neuenschwander L.F. 1999. Effects of slash pile burning on the physical and chemical soil properties of Vassar soils. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 8 (1): 75–86.

33- Rahimi I., and Esmaeeli A. 2010. Evaluate the potential of forests and rangelands fire using satellite images of MODIS and remote sensing techniques: Case study Marivan forests). 1–2 April. Iran National Cartographic Center. Tehran. Iran. (In Persian)

34- Robichaud P.R., and Brown R.E. 1999. What happened after the smoke cleared: onsite erosion rates after a wildfire in eastern Oregon. In: Olsen, D.S., Potyondy, J.P. (Eds.), Proceedings Wildland Hydrology Conference, Bozeman, Mt Hernon, Virginia, June. American Water Resource Association, pp. 419–426.

35- Sadeghi S.H.R., Gholami Gohareh R., and Mirnia S.Kh. Analysis of two pasture treatments runoff production threshold. 6th National Seminar on Watershed Management Science and Engineering and 4th National Seminar on Erosion and Sediment. 28–29 April. 2010. Natural Resources & Marine Sciences. Tarbiat Modares University., Noor, Mazandaran, Iran. (in Persian)

36- Scott D.F. 2000. Soil wettability in forested catchments in South Africa; as measured by different methods and as affected by vegetation cover and soil characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 231–232: 87–104.

37- Shakesby R.A., Bento C.P.M., Ferreira C.S.S., Ferreira A.J.D., Stoof C.R., Urbanek E., and Walsh R.P.D. 2015. Impacts of prescribed fire on soil loss and soil quality: An assessment based on an experimentally-burned catchment in central Portugal. Catena 128: 278–293.

38- Ulery A.L., and Graham RC. 1993. Forest fire effects on soil color and texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57: 135–140

39- Walling D.E., Collins A.L., Sichingabula H.A., and Leeks G.J.L. 2001. Integrated Assessmen of Catchment Suspended Sediment Budget: A Zambian Example. Land Degradation and Development 12: 387-415.