Modeling of Zinc Accumulation Rate and its Uncertainty in Agricultural Soils of Kermanshah

آب و خاک

Article 9, Volume 30, Issue 3 - Serial Number 47, July 2016, Pages 968-983   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v30i3.43689

Authors

shahab ahmadi doabi^{* 1}; Majid Afyuni¹; Mahin Karami²; Safura Merati Fashi¹

¹Isfahan University of Technology

²Razi University, Kermanshah

Abstract

Introduction: Zinc (Zn) is an essential trace element for plants as well as for animals and humans. On the other hand, Zn is a heavy metal and its high concentration can cause some environmental problems. There are significant relationships between soils, plants and humans Zn status in a certain agro-ecosystem.Therefore, mass flux assessment of Zn in agro-ecosystem is important regarding to plant and human nutrition in one hand and environmental quality on the other hand. Therefore, assessing the Zn accumulation trend in agricultural soils is essential to prevent Zn deficiency as well as soil pollution by Zn.
Materials and Methods: This investigation was conducted in order to model Zn accumulation rate in agricultural soils of Kermanshah province using inputs and outputs fluxes mass balance. Mass Flux Assessment (MFA) model were applied for the modeling accumulation rate of Zn uses a random method of element balance with the combination of Latin Hyporcube method and Mont-Carlo simulation, in several agricultural ecosystems of some townships (Kermanshah, Songhor, Gilanegharb, Ghasreshrin, Shaneh, Sarpolezahab, Kangavar, Paveh and Javanrood). In this study, mass flux assessments were done at both provincial and township scales. Various routes of Zn considered in this study were livestock manure, mineral fertilizers, pesticides, atmosphere deposition, municipal waste compost (input) and uptake by plant (output). Agricultural information, including crop type, crop area and yield, kind and number of livestock, application rates of mineral fertilizers, compost, pesticides and atmospheric deposition rates and also a metal concentration in the plants, livestock manure, mineral fertilizers, compost and dust was used to quantify Zn fluxes and Zn accumulation rate. Given that the other sources of Zn input such as sewage sludge and output such as leaching are not important fluxes in the study area, the calculations performed here presented a good estimation of the average net effects of the dominating Zn inputs and outputs of the Zn status in agricultural soils of the study region.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the maximum and minimum of the Zn accumulation rate were seen in agricultural soils of Paveh (1172 g ha-1yr-1 in average) and Kermanshah (-26 g ha-1yr-1 in average)respectively. The average net flux of Zn accumulation rate for Kermanshah province was also 1538 g ha-1yr-1. The negative Zn accumulation rate of Kermanshah soils implies depletion of this element that is due to higher uptake of Zn by plants, especially crops with high performance such as maize and sugar beet. The calculated accumulation rates were less than the critical accumulation rate (calculated for the next 200 years in the study area). The results showed the high range (difference between the simulated maximum and minimum) of the Zn accumulation rate in Paveh was 1307 g ha-1yr-1, and the lowest in Songhor was 175 g ha-1yr-1. The major part of the uncertainty in the Zn balance resulted from manure source. According to the calculated SRCAP (Standardized Regression Coefficients Aggregated in Percent) values, Zn input with manure and then Zn output with crop removal were the main sources of Zn net flux uncertainty at township and province 9 levels. The uncertainty associated with livestock manure fluxes explained 67-94% of the total uncertainty. This large contribution was mainly due to large uncertainty in the numbers of dominant livestock, in particular cattle and poultry, and in the Zn:P concentration ratios of their manures. The influence of crop removal on Zn net fluxes uncertainty ranged from 3-29% among the townships. Differences in contributions of individual crops to the total cultivated area and in the Zn concentration of dominant crops as well as uncertain crops yield data were the main reasons for this large variation among townships.
Conclusion:The most important routes of Zn entry into the agricultural soils were livestock manures (69-93%) and atmosphere deposition (9-28%) in township level, while in provincial scale, they were compost (61%), livestock manures (33%), and atmosphere deposition (5%) respectively. The uncertainty analysis results indicated that livestock manure was the most effective rout on Zn accumulations rate uncertainty (79% in province scale and 67-94% in township scale). The results also indicated that current agricultural management generally leads to accumulation of Zn in soils of the study area (with exception for Kermanshah township soils). This can cause some difficulties such as soil contamination or soil fertility loss by nutritional elements imbalance in future.

Keywords

Agriculture soil; Kermanshah; Modeling; Zinc

References

1- Afyuni M. 1993. The Development of Soil Standards of Iran.Department of Environment. I.R. Iran. (in Persian)

2- Afyuni M., Khoshgoftarmanesh A.H., Dorostkar V., and Moshiri R. 2007. Zinc and Cadmium content in fertilizers commonlyused in Iran. In International Conference of Zinc Crops, Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 24-28.

3- Ahmadi Doabi S., Afyuni M., Karami M.,and Khademi H. 2013. Dust deposition rates and the entry of heavy metals zinc and copper along the Kermanshah province. The 1st International Conference of IALE-Iran, Isfahan University of Technology, October 30-31. (in Persian with English abstract).

4- Ahmadi Doabi S., Afyuni M., Karami M., and Khademi H. 2014. Atmospheric deposition rates in Kermanshah province during 2013 spring and summer seasons. The 3rd National Conference on Wind Erosion and Dust Storms, Yazd University, Iran, January 15-16. (in Persian).

5- Amini M. 2004. Modeling heavy metal accumulation and assessing its uncertainty in agro-ecosystems of isfahan region. Soil Science Doctorate Thesis, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).

6- Bengtsson H., Oborn I., Jonsson S., Nilsson I. andAndersson A. 2003. Field balances of some mineral nutrients and trace elements in organic and conventional dairy farming, a case study at Ojebyn, Sweden. European Journal of Agronomy, 20: 101-116.

7- Burt R. 2004. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual, Soil SurveyInvestigations, Report No. 42, Version 4.0, USDA, Natural ResourcesConservation Service, Lincoln, NE, USA, 700 Pages.

8- Dach J., and Starmans D. 2005. Heavy metals balance in polish and dutch agronomy: Actual state and previsions for the future. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 107: 309 – 316.

9- Iman R.L., and Helton J.C. 1988. An investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Risk Analysis, 8: 71-90.

10- Jones Jr.J.B. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis.CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 27-160.

11- Karami M. 2010. Modeling Zn fluxes from soil into selected crops and their dependence on soil, plant and land management factors under arid regions.Soil Science Doctorate Thesis, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).

12- Karami M., Amini M., Afyuni M., Khoshgoftarmanesh A.H., Keller A., Abdi A. and Schulin R. 2014. Agricultural zinc fluxes into soils and crops of central Iran at regional scale. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60: 437-456.

13- Keller A., Abbaspour K.C., and Schulin R. 2002. Assessment of uncertainty and risk in modeling regional heavy-metal accumulation in agricultural soils.Journal of Environmental Quality, 31: 175-187.

14- Keller A., and Schulin R. 2003. Modelling heavy metal and phosphorus balances for farming systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 66: 271-284.

15- Keller A., and Schulin R. 2003.Modelling regional-scale mass balances of phosphorus, cadmium and zinc fluxes on arable and dairy farms. European Journal of Agronomy, 20: 181-198.

16- Keller A., Von Steiger B., Van der Zee S.E.A.T.M., and Schulin R. 2001. A stochastic empirical model for regional heavy-metal balances in agroecosystems. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30: 1976-1989.

17- McBratney A.B., Santos M.M. and Minasny B. 2003. On digital soil mapping.Geoderma, 117: 3-52.

18- Moolenaar Simon W., Van Der Zee S.E. and Lexmond T.M. 1997. Indicators of the sustainability of heavy-metal management in agro-ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 201: 155-169.

19- Olsen S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate.US Government PrintingOffice.

20- Prasad A.S., Halsted J.A. and Nadimi M. 1961.Syndrome of iron deficiency anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, hypogonadism, dwarfism and geophagia. The American Journal of Medicine, 31: 532-546.

21- Shamshiri S. 2012. Dust mapping using MODIS satellite data (Case study: Kermanshah province). Master of Science non-desertification thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract)

22- Shomar B.H. 2006. Trace elements in major solid-pesticides used in the Gaza Strip. Chemosphere, 65: 898-905.

23- Sparks D.L., Page A.L., Helmke P.A., Loeppert R.H., Soltanpour P.N., Tabatabai M.A., and Sumner M.E. 1996. Methods of soil analysis.Part 3-Chemical methods.Soil Science Society of America Inc.

24- Tiktak A., Leijnse A. and Vissenberg H. 1999. Uncertainty in a regional-scale assessment of cadmium accumulation in the Netherlands.Journal of Environmental Quality, 28: 461-470.

25- USEPA. 1998. Method 3051A. Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludge’s, soils and oils. U. S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington DC.

26- Von Steiger B., and Obrist J. 1993. Available databases for regional mass balances in agricultural land. In Soil Monitoring, p. 35-46. Brikhauser Basel.

27- Welch R.M. 1993. Zinc concentrations and forms in plants for humans and animals. In Zinc in Soil and Plants, p. 183-195.Springer Netherlands.

28- Yasrebi J., Karimian N., Maftoun M., Abtahi A., and Sameni A. M. 1994. Distribution of zinc forms in highly calcareous soils as influenced by soil physical and chemical properties and application of zinc sulfate. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 25: 2133-2145.

29- Yeganeh M. 2012. Modeling accumulation rates of heavy metals in surface soils of hamedan province and assessing its associated risk for human health. Soil Science Doctorate Thesis, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).