Increasing Efficiency of Soil Fertility Map for Rice Cultivation Using Fuzzy Logic, AHP and GIS

آب و خاک

Article 11, Volume 30, Issue 4 - Serial Number 48, September 2016, Pages 1114-1129   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v30i4.38868

Authors

javad seyedmohammadi^{* 1}; leila esmaeelnejad²; Hassan ramezanpour³

¹University of Tabriz

²University of Tehran

³University of Guilan

Abstract

Introduction: With regard to increasing population of country, need to high agricultural production is essential. The most suitable method for this issue is high production per area unit. Preparation much food and other environmental resources with conservation of biotic resources for futures will be possible only with optimum exploitation of soil. Among effective factors for the most production balanced addition of fertilizers increases production of crops higher than the others. With attention to this topic, determination of soil fertility degree is essential tobetter use of fertilizers and right exploitation of soils. Using fuzzy logic and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) could be useful in accurate determination of soil fertility degree.
Materials and Methods: The study area (at the east of Rasht city) is located between 49° 31' to 49° 45' E longitude and 37° 7' to 37° 27' N latitude in north of Guilan Province, northern Iran, in the southern coast of the Caspian sea. 117 soil samples were derived from0-30 cm depth in the study area. Air-dried soil samples were crushed and passed through a 2mm sieve. Available phosphorus, potassium and organic carbon were determined by sodium bicarbonate, normal ammonium acetate and corrected walkly-black method, respectively. In the first stage, the interpolation of data was done by kriging method in GIS context. Then S-shape membership function was defined for each parameter and prepared fuzzy map. After determination of membership function weight parameters maps were determined using AHP technique and finally soil fertility map was prepared with overlaying of weighted fuzzy maps. Relative variance and correlation coefficient criteria used tocontrol groups separation accuracy in fuzzy fertility map.
Results and Discussion: With regard to minimum amounts of parameters looks some lands of study area had fertility difficulty. Therefore, soil fertility map of study area distinct these lands and present soil fertility groups for better management of soil and plant nutrition. Weight of soil parameters was0.54, 0.29 and 0.17 for organic carbon, available phosphor and potassium, respectively. Fuzzy map of study area includes five soil fertility groups as: 22.9% very high fertility, 27.7% high fertility, 35.53% medium fertility, 10.48% low fertility and 3.39% very low fertility. Consequently, a separated map for soil fertility prepared to evaluate soil fertility of study area for rice cultivation. Toinvestigatethe efficiency of fuzzy model and AHP in increasing the accuracy of soil fertility map, soil fertility map with Boolean method prepared as well. Boolean map showed 58.88% fertile and 41.12% unfertile.15 soil samples from different soil fertility groups of study area were derived fromcontrol of maps accuracy. 13 renewed samples of 15 and 9 soil samples have matched with fuzzy and Boolean map, respectively. Comparison of parameters mean in fuzzy map fertility groups showed that parameters mean amounts of very high and high fertility groups are higher than optimum level except potassium that is a few lower than optimum level in high fertility group, therefore, addition of fertilizers in these groups could not be useful to increase rice crop production. Phosphorus parameter amount is lower than the critical level in very low, low and medium fertility groups, then in these groups phosphorus fertilizer should be added to the soil toincreaserice production. The amount of potassium parameter is higher than the critical level and lower than optimum limit in very low, low, medium and high fertility groups, then in these groups addition of potassium fertilizer will results in theincrease of production. Organic carbon amount is lower than optimum level in very low and low fertility groups. With regard to the relation between organic carbon andnitrogen and phosphorus, therefore, the addition of organic carbon fertilizer could compensate deficit of nitrogen and phosphorus in these groups as well. Attention to the presented explanations and comparison of fuzzy and Boolean maps using parameters amounts in renewed sampling points for control of maps accuracy, it is distinct that fuzzy logic could influencetheoptimum using of fertilizers with increasing map efficiency and accuracy. In addition, relative variance and correlation coefficient amounts showed that fuzzy map has separatedquite wellparameters changes.
Conclusion: Effective parameters in soil fertility, includingorganic carbon, phosphorus and potassium were used topreparesoil fertility map for rice cultivation. With regard to the minimum amounts of parameters looks some lands of study area had fertility difficulty. Therefore, soil fertility map of study area distinct these lands and presents soil fertility groups tobetter management of soil and plant nutrition. Fuzzy and Boolean methods were used topreparesoil fertility map. Comparison of these two approaches showed that fuzzy method with AHP caused to increase theefficiency and accuracy of fertility map for rice. Separated and distinguish soil fertility groups in fuzzy map help suitable distribution and optimum use of fertilizers for rice production.

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process; Fertility map; Fuzzy; Geographic Information System

References

1- Aama Azghadi A., Khorassani R., Mokarram M., and Moezi A. 2010. Soil fertility evaluation based on soil K, P and organic matter factors for wheat by using Fuzzy Logic-AHP and GIS techniques. Journal of Water and Soil, 24(5): 973- 984, (In Persian with English abstract).

2- Burt R. 2014. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil survey investigations report No. 42, Version 5. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center.

3- Davatgar N., Neishabouri M.R., and Sepaskhah A.R. 2012. Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma, 173: 111- 118.

4- Doberman A., and Fairhurst T.H. 2000. Rice: Nutrient Disorders and Nutrient Management. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines.

5- Doberman A., and Oberthur T. 1998. Fuzzy mapping of soil fertility - a case study on irrigated Riceland in the Philippines. Geoderma, 77: 317- 339.

6- Ghodsipour S.H. 2013. Analytic Hierarchy Process. 10th ed., Amirkabir University of Technology Press, 230p, (In Persian).

7- Kavoosi M., and Malakoti M.J. 2006. Determination of available potassium critical level with ammonium acetate extractor in Guilan paddy soils. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3: 113–123, (In Persian with English abstract).

8- Kremenov O. 2004. Fuzzy Modeling of Soil Maps. Helsinki University of Technology Department of Surveying. 81p.

9- Kweon G. 2012. Delineation of site-specific productivity zones using soil properties and topographic attributes with a fuzzy logic system. Biosystem Enginearing, 112(4): 261- 277.

10- Lotfi Arpachaei1 Z., EsmaliOuri A., Hashemimajd K., and Najafi N. 2013. Soil fertility evaluation of Ardabil plain for wheat and potato based on some soil chemical properties by AHP and GIS techniques. Journal of Water and Soil 27(1): 45- 53, (In Persian with English abstract).

11- Mokarram M., and Bardideh M. 2013. Soil fertility evaluation for wheat cultivation by fuzzy theory approach and compared with Boolean method and soil test method in GIS area. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 96: 111- 123, (In Persian with English abstract).

12- Oberthur T., Dobermann A., and Aylward M. 2000. Using auxiliary information to adjust fuzzy membership functions for improved mapping of soil quality. IJGIS, 14: 431- 454.

13- Saaty T.H., and Vargas L.G. 2001. Models, Methods, Concepts, and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic, 160p.

14- Salehi M.H., and Khademi H. 2008. Fundamentals of Soil Survey. First edition, Isfahan University of Technology Press.

15- Salehi N., GhajarSepanlou M., and JafariGorzin B. 2013. An evaluation of soil fertility using soil organic carbon, potassium, phosphorus and salinity factors for rice cultivation by fuzzy logic and AHP techniques. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5(19): 2233- 2241.

16- Sarmadian F., and Keshavarzi A. 2014. The use of a hybrid fuzzy-AHP system on the evaluation and mapping of soil fertility. Soil and Water Resources Conservation, 3(2): 45- 56, (In Persian with English abstract).

17- Webster R., and Oliver M. 2007. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester UK.

18- Zhang B., Zhang Y., Chen D., Whit R.E., and Li Y. 2004. A quantitative evaluation system of soil productivity for intensive agriculture in China. Geoderma, 123: 319- 331.

19- Zhu A.X., Yang L., Li B., Qin C., Pei T., and Liu B. 2010. Construction of membership functions for predictive soil mapping under fuzzy logic. Geoderma, 155: 164- 174.