Evaluation of the Effect of Split application of Urea on Nitrogen Losses in Furrow Fertigation

آب و خاک

Article 4, Volume 30, Issue 5 - Serial Number 49, November 2016, Pages 1584-1594   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.41254

Authors

farid feizolahpour^{* 1}; mehdi kouchakzadeh¹; fariborz abbasi²; Mohammad nabi Gheibi³; Rajab Choukan⁴

¹TarbiatModares University

²Agricultural Engineering Research Institute

³Soil and Water Research Institute

⁴Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute

Abstract

Introduction: Broadcast fertilization method increases fertilizer losses while results in lower nutrient absorption by plant roots. Fertigation is an effective method to increase water and fertilizer efficiency and to reduce the losses of nitrogen. Moreover, it allows farmers to apply the nutrients in splits and few amounts in response to crop needs. In the present study, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of split application of fertilizer in furrow fertigation on nitrogen losses and corn yield.
Materials and Methods: Field experiments were carried out factorially in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Experimental treatments were consisted of three fertilizer splits (two, three, and four splits) and three levels of urea fertilizer (60, 80 and 100% of required urea fertilizer), which compared with the common method (broadcasting fertilizer) as used by farmers in the fields. Experiments were conducted on a one hectare field in 120 meter long and open end furrows. During the crop season, Irrigation water was applied in the same way for all fertigation treatments and the third type of the WSC flumes was used to measure the amount of input and output water in irrigation events. Moreover, for determining the indexes of uniformity of water distribution in carrying out fertigation experiments, the amount of infiltration into the soil was calculated using the Kostiakov-Louis equation. The parameters of this equation were determined using the water volume balance method. Injection of Urea fertilizer was done by using 40-liter barrels were placed at the beginning of Furrows. In this study, the injection of fertilizers was applied in the last 10 to 20 minutes of irrigation time.
Results and Discussions: Results showed that water distribution uniformities of low quarter and low half in all tests were very high. Such that the water low quarter distribution uniformities for all treatments were between 90.5 to 98.3 percent and the low half distribution uniformities of water for different treatments were between 94.4 to 99.0 percent. So, according to the high water distribution uniformity and injecting fertilizer in 20-10 minutes at the end of irrigation, it should be stated that the distribution uniformities of fertilizer, used in the experiments, were high too. Statistical analysis showed that nitrogen usage amount and interaction of splits-usage rates of fertilizer had a significant influence on run-off nitrogen losses. The most nitrogen losses were achieved in treatment using 100 percent of fertilization recommendation and there were not significant differences between 60 and 80 percent of fertilization recommendation. It is nothworthy that, in addition to the nitrogen loss by surface runoff, nitrogen deep percolation losses always are also considered. In fertigation treatments, because of high rate of nitrogen injection in short intervals at the end of irrigations, the amount of nitrogen in the surface layer (20-0 cm) was significantly higher than the lower depths and this could led to low percolation losses of nitrogen, but the broadcast fertilization method provided the highest percent of remaining nitrogen in the soil after fertilization, which almost is unusable for plant and in the case of over irrigation or rainfall, the risk of groundwater pollution could be raised. Besides, the results showed that application of nitrogen in 4 splits provided more grain yield compared to the 3 splits level. Also, grain yield of corn increased significantly with increasing nitrogen rate application. The fertigation treatments had better performance of water and fertilizer application efficiencies compared to broadcast fertilization method. The most grain yield was achieved in the fifth treatment by application of 100 percent of fertilization usage recommendation in three splits.
Conclusion: In this study, the effect of furrow fertigation on nitrogen losses and corn yield was studied under different splits and amounts of fertilizer consumption. Eventually, fertigation treatments were compared with traditional treatments (fertilizer broadcasting method). According to the obtained results, evaluate the interactions of the effect of split × N usage showed that, the fourth treatment (60% of fertilizer application in 4 splits) can be suggested, owing to its lower N losses by runoff. In addition there were no statistical significant differences of grain yield between the fourth and fifth treatments (100% of fertilizer application in 3 splits). Consequently, it can be concluded that by the usage of 60 percent of the recommended fertilizer application in four equal splits during the growing season, the potential of environmental pollution will be reduced while achieving optimal performance.

Keywords

Broadcast fertilization; corn; fertilizer use efficiency; Run off

References

1- Abbasi F., Adamsen F. J., Hunsaker D. J., Feyen J., Shouse P., and Van Genuchten M. T. 2003. Effects of flow depth on water flow and solute transport in furrow irrigation: Field data analysis, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 129(4): 237-246.

2- Abbasi F., Liaghat A.M., and Ganjeh A. 2009. Evaluation of fertigation uniformity in furrow irrigation, Journal of Soil and Water, 39 (1): 26-37. (in Persian with English abstract)

3- Alizadeh H.A., Abbasi F., and Liaghat A.M. 2010. Evaluation of distribution uniformity and nitrogen losses in furrow fertigation, Journal of Soil and Water, 23 (2): 75-86. (in Persian)

4- Alizadeh H.A., Liaghat A.M., and Abbasi F. 2009. The effect of furrow fertigation on fertilizer and water use efficiency, productivity and yield component of corn, Journal of Soil and Water, 23(4): 137-147. (in Persian with English abstract)

5- Allen R. G., Pereira L. S., Raes D., and Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelinesfor computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300, 6541.

6- Bhat R., and Sujatha S. 2009. Soil fertility and nutrient uptake by arecanut (Areca catechu L.) as affected by level and frequency of fertigation in a laterite soil, Agricultural Water Management, 96(3): 445-456.

7- Boldt A. L., Watts D. G., Eisenhauer D. E., and Schepers J. S. 1994. Simulation of water applied nitrogen distribution under surge irrigation, Transactions of the ASAE (USA).

8- Butters G. L., Benjamin J. G., Ahuja L. R., and Ruan H. 2000. Bromide and atrazine leaching in furrow-and sprinkler-irrigated corn, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(5): 1723-1732.

9- Ebrahimian H., Liaghat A., Parsinejad M., Abbasi F., and Navabian M. 2011. Water and nitrate losses and water use efficiency in alternate furrow fertigation, Iranian Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 25(1): 21-29. (in Persian)

10- Gheysari M., Mirlatifi S. M., Homaee M., Asadi M. E., and Hoogenboom G. 2009. Nitrate leaching in a silage maize field under different irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rates, Agricultural Water Management, 96(6): 946-954.

11- Granberry D.M., Harrison K.A., and Kelley W.T. 2000. Drip Irrigation. Cooperative Extension Service University ofGeorgia, USA.

12- Hou Z., Chen W., Li X., Xiu L., and Wu L. 2009. Effects of salinity and fertigation practice on cotton yield and 15N recovery, Agricultural water management, 96(10): 1483-1489

13- Jolaini M., and Abbasi F. 2009. Evaluation of fertigation uniformity and fertilizer losses in furrow irrigation, Journal of Soil and Water, 23(2): 75-86. (in Persian with English abstract)

14- Lehrsch G. A., Sojka R. E., and Westermann D. T. 2000. Nitrogen placement, row spacing, and furrow irrigation water positioning effects on corn yield, Agronomy Journal, 92(6): 1266-1275.

15- Liang H., Li F., and Nong M. 2013. Effects of alternate partial root-zone irrigation on yield and water use of sticky maize with fertigation, Agricultural Water Management, 116: 242-247.

16- Mohseni A., Mirseyed Hosseini H., and Abbasi F. 2012. Comparison of Fertigation with Surface Broadcast Fertilizer Method in Water, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, Yield, Compenent Yield of Corn and Losses of Nitrogen, Journal of Water and Soil, 26(5): 1181- 1189. (in Persian with English abstract)

17- Navabian M. 2008. Optimization of Furrow Fertigation Design and Management to Decrease Nitrate Pollution. ThesisPresented for the degree of Doctor of Science in Irrigation & Drainage Engineering. Agriculture and Natural Resource Camps of University of Tehran. (in Persian with English abstract)

18- Polychronaki E., Douma C., Giourga C., and Loumou A. 2012. Assessing nitrogen fertilization strategies in winter wheat and cotton crops in northern Greece, Pedosphere, 22(5): 689-697.

19- Rozati1 N.S., Gholami A., and Asghari H.R. 2011. Study of nitrogen split application levels and variety effects on yield and agronomical characteristics of corn, Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 4(2): 1-16. (in Persian with English abstract)

20- Sabillon G. N., and Merkley G. P. 2004. Fertigation guidelines for furrow irrigation, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(4): 576-587.

21- Yang G., Tang H., Nie Y., and Zhang X. 2011. Responses of cotton growth, yield, and biomass to nitrogen split application ratio, European Journal of Agronomy, 35(3): 164-170.

22- Zhou J. B., Xi J. G., Chen Z. J., and Li S. X. 2006. Leaching and transformation of nitrogen fertilizers in soil after application of N with irrigation: a soil column method, Pedosphere, 16(2): 245-252.