Effect of Rock Fragment Cover on Hydraulics Properties of Surface Flows and Rill Initiation with Simulating Runoff under Natural Conditions

آب و خاک

Article 10, Volume 31, Issue 1 - Serial Number 51, March 2017, Pages 75-85   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v31i1.51812

Authors

sara kalbali; Shoja Ghorbani-Dashtaki^* ; Mahdi Naderi; Salman Mirzaee

Shahrekord University

Abstract

Introduction: Rock fragments on soil surfaces can also have several contrasting effects on the hydraulics of overland flow and soil erosion processes. Many investigators have found that a cover of rock fragments on a soil surface can decrease its erosion potential compared to bare soil surface (1, 12 and 18). This has mainly been attributed to the protection of the soil surface by rock fragments against the beating action of rain. This leads to a decrease in the intensity of surface sealing, an increase in the infiltration rate, a decrease in the runoff volume and rate, and, hence, a decrease in sediment generation and production for soils covered by rock fragments. Parameters that have been reported to be important for explaining the degree of runoff or soil loss from soils containing rock fragments include the position and size (15), geometry (18), and percentage cover (11 and 12) of rock fragments and the structure of fine earth (16). Surface rock fragment cover is a more important factor for hydroulic properties of surface flows such as flow depth, flow velocity, Manning’s roughness coefficient (n parameter) and flow shear stress and geometrics properties of formed rill such as time, location, number, length, width and depth of rill. Surface rock fragment cover is directly affected soil erosion processes in dry area specially in areas that plant can not grow because of sever dryness and salinity. Also, Surface rock fragment prevent the contact of rain drops to aggregates, decreasing physical degradation by decreasing flow velocity. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different surface rock fragment cover on hydraulic properties of surface flows and geometrics properties of formed rill.
Materials and Methods: For this purpose, 36 field plots of 20 meter length and 0.5 meter width with 3% slope were established in research field of agricultural faculty, Shahrekord University. Before each erosion event, topsoil was tilled and smoothed with hand tools to remove soil irregularities and soil sealing, update aggregates which come from deeper soil. Then, for beginning the experiment, surface rock fragment cover is scattered randomly on plot surface. Experiment equipment such as collecting the runoff systems installed at the end of plots. In each experiment after setting the surface flow, surface runoff inter to soil surface and testing continued for 60 minutes after starting runoff. Flow velocity was measured using a dye-tracing technique (potassium permanganate) and depth, width and length of rill were measured using a ruler. Treatments were including four level rock fragment cover (0, 10, 20 and 30%) and three rate runoff (2.5, 5 and 7.5 L min-1) with three replications that experiments were done in a factorial with randomized complete block design. Surface runoff samples were oven-dried and weighed to determine sediment loads. Sediment concentration was determined as the ratio of dry sediment mass to runoff volume, while the erosion rate was calculated as the sediment yield per unit area per period of time.
Results and Discussion: The results of this study showed that surface rock fragment cover plays an important role in water distribution. Based on the results, the positive effects of rock fragment cover on Manning’s n and the negative effect on flow velocity. Increasing surface rock fragment cover increased hydroulic properties such as flow depth, Manning’s n and flow shear stress significantly (p

Keywords

Geometric properties of rill; Soil erosion and conservation; Surface cover

References

1. Abrahams A.D., Li G., Krishnan C., and Atkinson J.F. 2001. A sediment transport equation for interrill overland flow on rough surfaces. Earth Surf. Process Landf, 26.1443–1459.

2. Agassi M., and Levy G.J. 1991. Stone-cover and rain intensity: effects on infiltration, erosion and water splash. Aust. J. Soil Res, 29: 565–575.

3. Blake G.R., and Hartge K.H. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Monograph Number 9 (Second Edition). American Society of Agronomy, pp. 363–375.

4. Cerda A. 2001. Effects of rock fragment cover on soil infiltration, interrill runoff and erosion. Eur. J. Soil Sci, 52: 59–68.

5. Fryear D.W. 1985. Soil cover and wind erosion. Trans. ASAE. 28(3): 781-784.

6. Govers G. 1985. Selectivity and transport capacity of thin flow in relation to rill erosion. Catena, 12.35-49.

7. Gee G.H., and Bauder J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis. In: A. Klute, (ed). Methods of soil Analysis. Physical Properties. SSSA, 9: 383–411.

8. Gilley J.E., Elliot W.J., Laflen J.M., and Simanton J.R. 1993. Critical shear stress and critical flow rates for initiation of rilling. Journal of Hydrology, 142: 251–271.

9. Lavee H., and Poesen J. 1991. Overland flow generation and continuity on stone-covered soil surfaces. Hydrol. Process, 5: 345–360.

10. Li X.Y., and Liu L.Y. 2003. Effect of gravel mulch on Aeolian dust accumulation in the semiarid region of northwest China. Soil Tillage Res, 70: 73-81.

11. Mandal U.K., Rao K.V., Mishra P.K., Vittal K.P.R., Sharma K.L., Narsimlu B., and Venkanna K. 2005. Soil infiltration, runoff and sediment yield from a shallow soil with varied stone cover and intensity of rain. Eurpan Journal of Soil Science, 56: 435–443.

12. Martinez-Zavala L., Jordan A., Bellinfante N., and Gil J. 2010. Relationships between rock fragment cover and soil hydrological response in a Mediterranean environment. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 56: 95–104.

13. Mirzaee S., Gorji M., and Jafari ardakani A. 2012. Effect of rock fragments on distance of rill erosion initiation and overland hydraulics. International Journal of soil science, 7(3): 100-107.

14. Nearing M.A., Bradford J.M., and Parker S,C. 1991. Soil detachment by shallow flow at low slopes. Soil Science. Am. J, 55: 339-344.

15. Poesen J., and Lavee H. 1994. Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes. Catena, 23: 1-28.

16. Poesen J., Ingelmo-Sanchez F., and Mucher H. 1990. The hydrological response of soil surfaces to rainfall as affected by cover and position of rock fragments in the top layer. Earth Surf. Process Landf, 15: 653-671.

17. Prosser I.P., Dietrich W.E., and Stevenson J. 1995. Flow resistance and sediment transport by concentrated flow in a grassland vally. Geomorphology, 13: 73-86.

18. Rieke-Zapp D., Poesen J., and Nearing M.A. 2007. Effects of rock fragments incorporated in the soil matrix on concentrated flow hydraulics and erosion. Earth Surf. Process Landf, 32: 1063–1076.

19. Sadeghi HR,. Bashari Seghaleh M., and Rangavar AS. 2008. Comparing the sediment variation with hillside direction and plot length in storm wise soil erosion. Journal of water and soil, 22(2): 230-239. (In Persian with English abstract)

20. Savat J., and De Ploy, J. 1982. Sheetwash and rill development by surface flow. Chapter 6 I: Bryan, R, B and Yair, A. (eds): Badland Geomorphology and Piping.

21. Tailong G., Quanjiu W.D., and Li J.Z. 2010. Effect of surface stone cover on sediment and solute transport on the slope of fallow land in the semi-arid loess region of northwestern China. Soils Sediments, 10: 1200-1208.

22. Tonon I. 1999. Thresholds for incipient rilling and particle enteainment, Unpub. Utrecht University.

23. Walkley A., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79: 459–465.

24. Torri D., Sfalaga M., and Sette M.D. 1987. Splash detachment: Runoff depth and soil cohesion. Catena, 14(1-3):149-155.

25. Wang X., Li Z., Cai C., Shi Z., Xu Q., Fu Z., and Guo Z. 2012. Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological response and soil loss from Regosols in a semi-humid environment in South-West China. Geomorphology, 151-152: 234–242.

26. Yao C., Lei T., Elliot W.J., McCool D.K., Zhao J., and Chen S. 2007. Critical Conditions for Rill Initiation. Soil & Water Division of ASAE. SW, 70-56.

27. Yu B. 2003. A Unified Framework For Water Erosion And Deposition Equations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67( 1): 251-257.

28. Zang G.H., Liu B.Y., Nearing M.A., Hang C.H., and Zand K.L. 2002. Soil detachment by shallow flow. Trans. ASAE, 45: 331-357.