The Effect of Different Approaches of Distance Between Two Sets on Fractal Downscaling of Temperature in Mashhad

آب و خاک

Article 1, Volume 31, Issue 1 - Serial Number 51, March 2017, Pages 331-344   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v31i1.52049

Authors

shima tajabadi^{* 1}; Bijan Ghahraman²; Ali Naghi Ziaei¹

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: The range of meteorological parameters, such as temperature, are different at different scales. Fractal geometry is a branch of mathematics that has many applications in the field of discrete and continuous domains. Downscaling may be done by different methods, including univariate, multivariate regression functions, splined function and fractal function. Finding the best model for fractal downscaling, is needed to implement the distance between measured and modeled data sets. This distance may be estimated by different methods, including Euclidian. For temporal downscaling, the data are two-dimensional, i.e. time and that of principal variable (e.g. temperatures).In such a case, the dimensionality problem arises in Euclidean space. In these cases, data are usually changed to non-dimensional forms which are referred to standardization, normalization, scaling, or non-dimensionalizing. So, in addition to imbalance of data calculating distance between two sets, we are also considering the impact of standardized data on the number of interpolation points, run time, and accuracy of downscaling the temperature of Mashhad synoptic station.
Materials and Methods: In this paper, fractal model was used for modeling and downscaling temperature datasets for the period of 2007- 2009 at Mashhad Synoptic stations with two approaches of Hasdurf distance to determine the interpolation points (first approach: in first approach original data was used. Second approach: in second approach the data were standardized). We adopted some criteria, such as root mean squared error, correlation, and Akaike information criteria to assess the accuracy of fractal downscaling.
Mashhad is the second most populous city in Iran and capital of Razavi Khorasan Province. It is located in the northeast of the country, close to the borders of Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. It is built-up (or metro) area was home to 2,782,976 inhabitants including Mashhad Taman and Torqabeh cities. It was a major oasis along the ancientSilk Road connecting with Merv in the East. The city is located at 36.20º North latitude and 59.35º East longitude, Mashhad features a steppe climate with hot summers and cool winters. The city only receives about 250 mm of precipitation per year, summers are typically hot and dry, with high temperatures sometimes exceeds 35 °C (95 °F). Winters are typically cool to cold and somewhat humid, with overnight lows routinely dropping below freezing.
At first, fractal method was used to produce daily temperature from daily datasets with two attitude and different interval interpolation (5, 10, 15days). Then the same process was applied to produce 3-hours temperature.
Results and Discussion:
1. Downscaling for daily temperature: In this part, we considered that which standardizing approach and which interval interpolation, will carry the best accuracy for the fractal modeling. Although RMSE, R2, AIC, show that standardized approach is not better, but the difference is not substantial.
Results from fractal modeling from 5-day interval interpolation and 10-day interval interpolation with daily measured temperature in Mashhad compared based on 1:1 line of perfect agreement, and showed acceptable (=5%) behavior. In both approaches and two interval interpolation with both 5 and 10 days, predicted temperatures imitate the behavior of the measured temperatures. However, simulation with no standardization approach show better results for both distance interpolation compared to the second approach with standardization.
2. Downscaling daily temperature to 3-hour interval: We compared downscaled 3-hour temperature from two standardizing approaches and two timesinterpolation based on daily temperature with 3-hour measured temperature and compared the results with respect to 1:1 line of perfect agreement. It is clear that the results of the three-hour downscaling show the same results with daily downscaling, because temperature shows the fractal behavior. Although both approaches perform well but un-standardizing is better, yet the difference is not pronounced.
Conclusion: Overall, in both approaches, three-hour and daily downscaling is done precisely and with high quality. The number of interpolation points was reduced by 30% under the second standardizing approach, which followed by considerable computer runtime. However, the result shows that the first approach had better modeling.
The comparison results of the modeling with 5 intervals interpolation and with 10, the 10 intervals interpolation were more acceptable, such that correlation coefficient was between (first approach: 0.98 and 0.7, second approach: 0.98 and 0.65) while RMSE was between (first approach: 1.33 and 3.27 ° C and second approach: 1.44 and 6.02 ° C), and AICc was between (first approach: 0.55-3.27 and second approach: 2.87-3.51).The intercepts and slopes of regression lines between measured and predicted temperatures were not statistically (5% level of significant) different from 0 and 1, respectively.

Keywords

Downscaling; Housdorf distance; standardization

References

1- Barnsley M.F. 1993. Fractals Everywhere. 2nd ed. New York, Academic Press.

2- Chuanzhen L., Xiangdong, G. and Shuping Sh. 2000. A speedup method for fractal encoding of digital signals.Signal Processing, 5th International Conference on WCCC-ICSP, 2: 1115-1118.

3- GhahramanB. and Davary K. 2014. Adopting Hierarchial Cluster Analysis to Improve the Performance of K-mean Algorithm. Journal of Water and Soil, Vol. 28, 3, p: 471-480. (in Persian with English abstract).

4- Li Z.F. and Li X.F. 2008. An explicit fractal interpolation algorithm for reconstruction of seismic data. Chinese Physics Letters, 3: 1157-1159.

5- Mazel D.S. and Hayes M.H. 1992.Using itegrated function systems to model discrete sequences.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 40 (7) :1724-1734.

6- McQuarrie A. D. and Tsai C. L. 1998. Regression and time series model selection, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

7- Pathirana A. 2001. Fractal modeling of rainfall: Downscaling in time and space for hydrological applications. PhD thesis, University of Tokyo, Japan.

8- Puente C.E. 1995. Geometric modeling of rainfall fields. Water Resources Center Technical Completion Report W-804. Univercity of California, Davis.

9- Shahedi M., Sanaiinejad S.H. and Ghahraman B. 2012. Regional Frequency Analysis of Annual Maximum 1-day and 2-day Rainfalls Using Clustering and L-moments, Case study: Khorasan Razavi Province. . Journal of Water and Soil, Vol. 27(1): 80-89 .( in Persian with English abstract).

10- Shamkoueyan H., Ghahraman B., Davary K. and Sarmad M. 2009. Flood frequency analysis using Linear moment and flood index method in Khorasan provinces. Journal of Water and Soil, Vol. 23(1): 31-43. (in Persian with English abstract).

11- Strahle W.C. 1991. Turbulent combustion data analysis using fractals. AIAA,J, 3: 409-417.

12- Tajabadi Sh., Ghahraman B. and Ziaei A.N. 2016. Fractal analysis of temperature time series. Msc thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

13- ValidiN., Ziaei A.N., Ghahraman B. and Ansari H. 2014. Using Fractal Interpolation Functions for Temporal Downscaling of Temperature Data. Journal of Water and Soil, Vol. 27(6): 1123-1132.

14- Zhou G.Y. and Leu M.C. 1993. Fractal geometry model for wear prediction. Wear, 170: 1-14.