Simulation of Wetted Area of Moisture Bulb in Pulsed Drip Irrigation

آب و خاک

Article 8, Volume 34, Issue 2 - Serial Number 70, May 2020, Pages 349-364   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v34i2.82228

Authors

B. Karimi^* ; N. Karimi

University of Kurdestan

Abstract

Introduction: Among irrigation methods, a drip irrigation system (surface and subsurface) is more acceptable in arid and semi-arid regions due to high water use efficiency and potential crop yield. Pulse drip irrigation (with suitable management practices) is one of the drip irrigation methods (includes a set of cycles, each cycle consisting of the irrigation phase and a resting phase) that have high potential to improve the uniformity of soil moisture distribution. Suitable design and management of pulse or/and continuous drip irrigation systems substantially require a proper understanding of the moisture distribution pattern around the emitter. One of the critical parameters concerning the moisture distribution pattern, taking into account the wetted area of emitter. Important parameters of the wetted area include the down wetted area (Ad) for the surface and subsurface drip irrigation system as well as the up wetted area of an emitter (Aup) for the subsurface drip irrigation. Modeling the wetted area pattern and considering this parameter in design as one of the criteria for increasing water efficiency in surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems is critical and important.
Materials and Methods: In this research, experiments were carried out in a transparent rectangular cube with dimensions of (3 * 1 * 0.5 m) using three different soil textures (fine, heavy, and medium). The drippers were installed at three different soil depths (surface, 15cm, and 30cm). The emitter discharge was considered 2.4, 4, and 6 lit/hr. Also, these experiments were carried out for two continuous and pulse irrigation systems. In pulse irrigation, the pulse cycles were considered 30-30, 20-40, and 40-20 min. The first number refers to the irrigation time, and the second number refers to the resting time of the system in each cycle. In this research, using a nonlinear regression model, empirical models were developed to predict the wetted area of the moisture front. The input parameters of the suggested model include emitter discharge, saturated hydraulic conductivity, application time, soil bulk density, emitter installation depth, initial soil moisture content, pulse ratio (the ratio of irrigation time to complete period of each cycle) and the proportions of sand, silt and clay in the soil.
Results and Discussion: The results of this study show that the highest and the lowest down wetted area (for surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems) are related to sandy and clay soils, respectively. Also, the highest up wetted area in the subsurface irrigation system is related to loamy and clay soils. The results of the comparison between measured and simulated values of down and up wetted area indicated that these models have acceptable precision and accuracy in estimating the wetted area of the wetting front in surface and subsurface drip irrigation (with pulsed and continuous application). The comparison between the measured and simulated down wetted area of the emitter (for surface drip irrigation with pulsed application) showed that the R2, MAE and RMSE values varied between 0.98-0.99, 0.0027-0.0065 m2 and 0.0034-0.0082 m2, respectively. Concerning statistical values, it is evident that these models have excellent performance in estimation of down and up wetted area for subsurface drip irrigation. For subsurface drip irrigation with the pulsed application, the values of R2, MAE and RMSE for the down wetted area of emitter, ranged 0.91-0.99, 0.002-0.0077 and 0.0032-0.0098, respectively. These models also estimate up wetted areas with less error, and the values of R2, MAE, and RMSE for all treatments varied between 0.89-0.99, 0.0015-0.0067 m2, and 0.0019-0.0077 m2, respectively.
Conclusion: This paper was aimed at presenting relationships for estimating the up and down wetted area of emitter for surface and subsurface drip irrigation (with pulsed and continuous application). Regarding the importance and applicability of empirical models, in this research, nonlinear regression models (NLR, which are more widely used among researchers) were applied. For NLR method, different ten input variables (i.e., emitter discharge, saturated hydraulic conductivity, application time, soil bulk density, emitter installation depth, initial soil moisture content, pulse ratio (the ratio of irrigation time to complete period of each cycle) and the percentage of sand, silt and clay) were considered. The results of this study indicate that the NLR model can estimate the up and down wetted area, and the statistical indices values are within acceptable ranges. Considering these relations in designing surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems can improve the performance of these systems.

Keywords

Drip irrigation; irrigation management; Moisture bulb; simulation; Wetted area

References

1- Al-Ogaidi A.A.M., Wayayok A., Rowshona M.K., and Abdullah A.F. 2016. Wetting patterns estimation under drip irrigation systems using an enhanced empirical model. Agricultural Water Management 176: 203-213.

2- Amin M.S.M., and Ekhmaj A.I.M. 2006. DIPAC- drip irrigation water distribution pattern calculator. In: 7th Int Micro Irrigation Congress PWTC, Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia, pp. 503–513.

3- Arbat G., Puig-Bargues J., Duran-Ros M., Barragan J., and Ramirez de Cartagena F. 2013. Drip-Irriwater: Computer software to simulate soil wetting patterns under surface drip irrigation. Computer and Electronic in Agriculture 98: 183–192.

4- Cook F.J., Thorburn P.J., Fitch P., and Bristow K.L. 2003. WetUp: a software tool to display approximate wetting patterns from drippers. Irrigation Science 22: 129–134.

5- Elmaloglou S., and Diamantopoulos E. 2010. Soil water dynamics under surface trickle irrigation as affected by soil hydraulic properties, discharge rate, dripper spacing and irrigation duration. Irriggation and Drainage. 263: 254–263.

6- Elmaloglou S., Soulis K.X., and Dercas N. 2013. Simulation of Soil Water Dynamics under Surface Drip Irrigation from Equidistant Line Sources. Water Resource Management. 27: 4131–4148.

7- Hammami M., and Zayani K. 2016. An analytical approach to predict the moistened bulb volume beneath a surface point source. Agricultural Water Management 166: 123–129.

8- Kandelous M.M., Liaghat A., and Abbasi F. 2008. Estimation of soil moisture pattern in subsurface drip irrigation using dimensional analysis method. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 39(2): 371–378. (In Persian)

9- Kandelous M.M., and Simunek J. 2010. Numerical simulations of water movement in a subsurface drip irrigation system under field and laboratory conditions using HYDRUS-2D. Agricultural Water Management 97: 1070–1076.

10- Kandelous M.M., Simunek J., Van Genuchten M.Th., and Malek K. 2011. Soil Water Content Distributions between Two Emitters of a Subsurface Drip Irrigation System. Soil Physics 75 (2): 488–497.

11- Karimi B., Sohrabi T., Mirzaei F., and Rodriquez-Sinobas L. 2012. Evaluation of wetting area and water distribution on different soils in subsurface drip irrigation emitters. EGU General Assembly. Vienna, Austria. 22-27 April.

12- Karimi B., Mirzaei F., and Sohrabi T. 2015a. Developing Equations to Estimate Wetted Area Pattern for Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems by Dimensional Analysis. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Science 25(3): 241:252. (in Persian with English abstract)

13- Karimi B., Sohrabi T., Mirzaei F., and Ababaei B. 2015b. Developing Equations to Estimate the Advance Velocity of the Wetting Front in Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems by Dimensional Analysis. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Science 25(1): 101:112. (in Persian with English abstract)

14- Karimi B., and Mohammadi P. 2018. Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network for estimating the Advance Velocity of the Wetting Front in Drip Irrigation. Iranian Journal of Water Research in Agriculture. 32(1): 79-92. (in Persian with English abstract)

15- Karimi B., and Alinazari F. 2019.Simulation of Full Shape of Wetting Bulb in Subsurface Drip Irrigation System with Nonlinear Regression Model. Iranian Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 33(2): 327-338. (in Persian with English abstract)

16- Karimi B., and Karimi N. 2019. Simulation of the advance Velocity of the Wetting Front in pulse Drip Irrigation Systems by nonlinear regression mode. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 13(5): 1374-1387. (in Persian with English abstract)

17- Karmeli D., and Peri G. 1974. Basic principles of pulse irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage Division 100(3): 309-319.

18- Khanmohammadi N., and Besharat S. 2018. Wetting Pattern Dimensions Determination in Drip Irrigation by Coupling the HYDRUS-2D Software and Backingham π Theorem in Texturally Different Soils. Iranian Journal of Applied soil Reseach 6(2): 109-118. (in Persian with English abstract)

19- Khattak M.Sh., Ali W., Ajmal M., Khalil T.M., Ahmad J., Malik A., and Akbar Gh. 2017. Assessment of wetted irrigation patterns for inline and online emitters in different soil textures. Himalayan Earth Science. 50 (2): 149-163.

20- Levin I., Van Rooyen P.C., and Van Rooyen F.C. 1979. The effect of discharge rate and intermittent water application by point source irrigation on the soil moisture distribution pattern. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43: 8–16.

21- Li J., Zhang J., and Ren L. 2003. Water and nitrogen distribution as affected by fertigation of ammonium nitrate from a point source. Irrigation Science. 22(1): 19–30.

22- Li Jiusheng., Zhang J., and Rao M. 2004. Wetting patterns and nitrogen distributions as affected by fertigation strategies from a surface point source. Agricultural Water Management 67: 89–104.

23- Li J., Ji Hong-yan., Li Bei., and Li Yu-chun. 2007. Wetting Patterns and Nitrate Distributions in Layered-Textural Soils Under Drip Irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences in China 6(8): 970-980.

24- Liu Zhigang., and Xu Qinchao. 2018. Wetting patterns estimation in cultivation substrates under drip irrigation. Desalination and Water Treatment 112: 319-324.

25- Malek K., and Peters R.T. 2011. Wetting pattern models for drip irrigation: new empirical model. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 137: 530–536.

26- Mohammadbeigi A., Mirzaei F., and Ahraf N. 2017. Simulation of soil moisture distribution under drip irrigation pulsed and continuous in dimensional analysis method. Iranian Journal of Water and Soil Conservation 23(6): 163-180. (in Persian with English abstract)

27- Mostaghimi S., and Mitchell J.K. 1983. Pulsed trickling effect on soil moisture distribution. Journal of Water Resource Bulletin 19(4): 605–612.

28- Qiaosheng Sh., Zouxin L., Zhenying W., and Hayjung L. 2007. Simulation of the soil wetting shape under porous pipe sub-Irrigation using dimensional analysis. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 125: 389- 398.

29- Samadianfard S., Sadraddini A.A., Nazemi A.H., Provenzano G., and Kisi O. 2012. Estimating soil wetting patterns for drip irrigation using genetic programming. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 10: 1155–1166.

30- Schaap M.G., Leij F.J., and Van Genuchten M.T. 2001. Rosetta: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Hydrology. 251: 163–176.

31- Schwartzman M., and Zur B. 1986. Emitter Spacing and Geometry of Wetted Soil Volume. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 112(3): 242-253.

32- Šejna M., Simunek J., and Van Genuchten M.T. 2014. The HYDRUS Software Package for Simulating Two- and Three-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Porous Media, Version 2.04 (PC Progress, Prague, Czech Republic).

33- Singh D.K., Rajput T.B.S., Sikarwar H., and Ahmad V.T. 2006. Simulation of soil wetting pattern with subsurface drip irrigation from line source. Agricultural Water Management 83:130-134.

34- Subbaiah R. 2013. A review of models for predicting soil water dynamics during trickle irrigation. Irrigation Science 31: 225–258.