Representation of Translators’ Habitus: A Case Study of Saleh Hosseini’s Style in Persian Translation of Moby Dick; Or the Whale and To the Lighthouse

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 4, Volume 54, Issue 1, April 2021, Pages 81-106   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v54i1.85424

Authors

Mehrnoosh Fakharzadeh^* ; Ahmad Dabaghzadeh Dezfouli

Department of English, Sheikhbahaee University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Translator studies, as a recent subfield of Translation Studies, focuses explicitly on translators rather than translated texts since translators create texts. While translators have been studied from different cultural and cognitive perspectives, their translatorial style from sociological perspectives has been remained underexplored. Against this backdrop, this study used Bourdieu’s theory of practice as a sociological theory to study major traces of Saleh Hosseini’s habitus in his translatorial style. To this end, a corpus from samples of Moby-Dick; Or the Whale and To the Lighthouse and their Persian translations was made. To study the samples, AntConc outputs were examined at morphological, lexical, and phrasal levels. Moreover, a semi-structured interview was conducted with Saleh Hosseini to complement and validate the findings. The results indicated that several aspects of Saleh Hosseini’s translatorial style, including his tendency towards using Arabic, literary, and archaic words, together with his inclination to use a wide variety of lexical items and sequence of genitive can be accounted for by the fields he comes from; in other words, his cultural capital and his primary and secondary habitus. His fields, life experiences, and interactions with various agents have shaped his style in translation, which can be known as Saleh Hosseini’s archaic style.

Keywords

Translatorial Style; Sociology of Translation; Habitus; Field; Translator Studies

References

حُرّی، ا. (1390). سبک در ترجمه: راهکار‌های فردی صالح حسینی از رهگذر همگانی‌های ترجمه در ترجمۀ خشم و هیاهو. پژوهش ادبیّات معاصر جهان، 16(62)،23-42.

حسینی، ص. (1394). موبی‌دیک یا نهنگ بحر. تهران: انتشارات نیلوفر.

حسینی، ص. (1387). به سوی فانوس دریایی. تهران: انتشارات نیلوفر.

خجسته، ک. (1387). به سوی فانوس دریایی. تهران: نشر نگاه.

داریوش، پ. (1344). موبی‌دیک یا وال سفید. تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.

دلزنده‌رودی، س.، و اولیایی‌نیا، ه. (1393). وجهیت در ترجمه: مورد پژوهی ترجمه‌های فارسی سبک روایی وولف در رمان The Waves. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 44(2)، 73-93.

رضوانی، ر.، و احمدیان، م. (1398). نقش تفاوت‌های جنسیتی در کیفیت ترجمه: بررسی سبک نگارش مترجمان زن و مرد. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 42(2)، 133-154.

سیدمن، ا. (1392). کشاکش آراء در جامعه‌شناسی. ترجمۀ هادی جلیلی. تهران: نشر نی.

شمیسا، س. (1376). سبک‌شناسی نثر. تهران: انتشارات میترا.

شقاقی، و. (1392). مبانی صرف واژه. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

فتوحی، م. (1391). سبک‌شناسی: نظریّه‌ها، رویکرد‌ها و روش‌ها. تهران: انتشارات سخن.

همایی، ج. (1373). فنون بلاغت و صناعات ادبی. نشر هما.

Baker, M. (2000). Towards a methodology for investigating the style of a literary translator. Target, 12(2), 241-266.

Baldick, C. (2004). The concise Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood.

Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology (L. J. D. Wacquant, Trans). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Chesterman, A. (2009). The name and nature of translator studies. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 42, 13-22.

Delzendehrooy, S. (2010). Adequacy or acceptability? Toward making the style of the author known. Translation Studies Quarterly, 8(30), 27-42.

Dirdal. H. (2019). Factors influencing the translation of –ingparticipial free adjuncts. In M. Mahlberg & V. Wiegand (Eds.). Corpus linguistics, context and culture (pp.197-222), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter

Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding morphology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education setting. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Hu, K. & Li, X. (2018). Corpus-based critical translation studies: Research areas and approaches. Meta, 63(3), 583–603.

Ji. M. (2012). Hypothesis testing in corpus-based literary translation studies. In M. P. Oakes & M. Ji (Eds.). Quantitative methods in corpus-based translation studies (pp. 53-73), Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Kenny, D. (2001). Lexis and creativity in translation: A corpus-based study. New York, NY: Routledge.

Li, D. (2017). Translator style: A corpus-assisted approach. In M. Ji, L. Hareide, D. Li & M. Oakes (Eds.). Corpus methodologies explained: An empirical approach to translation studies (pp. 103-136), London, New York: Routledge.

Kumiko, T. (2014). Oral history as a research method to study interpreters’ habitus. In G. M Vorderobermeier (Ed.). Remapping habitus in translation studies (pp. 135- 148), Amesterdam, New York: Rodopi.

Malamatidou, S. (2018). Corpus triangulation combining data and methods in corpus-based translation studies. London, New York: Routledge.

Melville, H. (1851). Moby- Dick; or the whale. US: Harper & Brothers Pub.

Meng, L. (2019). Gender in literary translation: A corpus-based study of the English translations of Chenzhong De Chibang. Singapore: Springer.

Patton, J. M., & Can, F. (2012). Quantitative methods in corpus-based translation studies. Amsterdam, New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage Publications.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London, England: Sage Publications.

Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Woolf, V. (1927). To the lighthouse. UK: Hogarth Press Pub.

Yannakopoulou, V. (2014). The influence of the habitus on translatorial style: Some methodological considerations based on the case of Yorgos Himonas’ rendering of Hamletinto Greek. In G. M. Vorderobermeier (Ed.). Remapping habitus in translation studies (pp. 163-182), Amesterdam, New York: Rodopi.

Zanettin, F. (2013). Corpus methods for descriptive translation studies. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 20-32.