Investigating Teachers’ Experiences Regarding their Use of L1 in English Language Classes

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 6, Volume 54, Issue 1, April 2021, Pages 127-156   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v54i1.85679

Authors

Mostafa Morady Moghaddam^* ; Farhad Moezzipour

Department of English Language, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

Using or not using the first language has been considered a challenging issue among language teachers. The use of the first language in teaching has been affected by the traditional methods of language teaching, which for some researchers has no theoretical or practical justification. However, with the advent of the CLT approach, teachers were allowed to use the L1 judiciously. In this study, an attempt is made to examine how language teachers use the first language in different situations in EFL classes. Observation and interview analysis were used to gather data. The results of this study showed that teachers use first language in the following areas: 1) teaching grammar; 2) teaching expressions and proverbs; 3) teaching vocabulary; 4) aiding comprehension; 5) establishing discipline; 6) clarifying cultural issues; 7) comparing L2 structures with those of learners’ L1 and 8) defining the function of words and sentences. Moreover, the Chi-square (X²) test was used to find significant differences among male and female teachers. Overall, this study provided insights into how to better incorporate first language into L2 language classes, basing our arguments on the teachers’ experiences.

Keywords

English Language Teaching; Communicative Language Teaching; First Language; Language Learner; Foreign Language

References

Ansarin, A. A., & Morady Moghaddam, M. (2016). Complimenting functions by native English speakers and Iranian EFL learners: A divergence or convergence? Applied Research on English Language, 5(1), 51-76.

Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1999). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 233-247.

Atkinson, D. (1987). The mother tongue in the classroom: A neglected resource? ELT Journal, 41(4), 241-247.

Berg, J. (2018). Intuitions and the semantics of indirect discourse. In A. Capone, M. Garcia Carpintero, & A. Falzone (Eds.), Indirect reports and pragmatics in the world languages (pp. 99-108). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Bianchi, C. (2011). Contextualism. In M. Sbisà, J. O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.),
Philosophical perspectives for pragmatics (Vol. 10, pp. 53–70). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Brooks-Lewis, K. A. (2009). Adult learners' perceptions of the incorporation of their L1 in foreign language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 216-235.

Carless, D. (2008). Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 331-338.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language research: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 

Chesterman, A. (2000). A causal model for translation studies. In M. Olohan (Ed.), Intercultural faultlines (pp. 15-27). Manchester, England, St. Jerome.

Cook, G. (2008). An unmarked improvement: Using translation in ELT. In B. Beaven (Ed.) IATEFL  Aberdeen conference selections (pp.76-86), Canterbury: University of Kent.

Cook, G. (2010). Translation in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms.  Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics (CJAL), 10(2), 221–240.

Edstrom, A. (2006). L1 use in the L2 classroom: One teacher’s self-evaluation. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(2), 275-292.

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Gignac, A. (2016). Enunciation, personification, and intertextuality. In B. J. Oropeza & S. Moyise (Eds.), In exploring intertextuality: Diverse strategies for new testament interpretation of texts (pp. 176–186). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Golkar, A., Ahmadi, M., & Rezaii, M. (1390/2012). Russian loanwords in Mazandarani dialect. Foreign Language Research Journal, 1(2), 67-79.

House, J. (2001). Translation quality assessment: Linguistic description versus social evaluation. Meta, 46(2), 243-257. 

Janulevièienë, V., & Kavaliauskienë, G. (2004). Legal English: Translation issues. Jurisprudencija, 57(49), 141–146.

Kern, R. G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 441-461.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, USA: Pergamon Press.

Mart, C. T. (2018). From communicative competence to language development. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(2), 163-167.

Macdonald, C. (1993). Using the target language. Cheltenham, England: Mary Glasgow. 

Morady Moghaddam, M. (2017). Politeness at the extremes: Iranian women's insincere responses to compliments. Language and Dialogue, 7(3), 414-432.

Morady Moghaddam, M. (2019). The praxis of indirect reports: Cognitive, sociopragmatic, and philosophical issues. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Naji Meidani, E., Pishghadam, R., & Ghazanfari, M. (2015). The role of home culture in English language classes: Comparison of three different viewpoints. Language and Translation Studies, 47(4), 91-105.

Nazari, S., & Nazari, M. (1390/2012). Intercultural competence in foreign language teaching. Foreign Language Research Journal, 1(2), 95-109.

O’Driscoll, J. (2017). Face and (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 89–118). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rezaeyan, M., Ghahari, S., & Dahmardeh, M. (2018). Sociocultural pathology of English language teaching: A case study of home culture attachment, cultural intelligence, politeness, and cultural adaptability. Language and Translation Studies, 50(4), 169-192.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2^nded.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ritzer, G. (2007). Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: The basics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. London, England: Routledge.

Schäffner, C. (2004). Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1253-1269.

Schweers, W. (1999). Using L1 in the L2 Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37(2), 6–9.

Setton, R. (2006). Context in simultaneous interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(3), 374-389.

Shin, J. Y., Dixon, L. Q., & Choi, Y. (2019). An updated review on use of L1 in foreign language classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(5), 406-419.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2009). Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting? TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 760-770.

Sweet, H. (1964). The practical study of language: A guide for teachers and learners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Zulfikar, Z. (2019). Rethinking the use of L1 in L2 classroom. Englisia Journal, 6(1), 42-51.