Evaluation of Different Methods of Sugarcane Hilling Up in Two Soil Textures and Three Forward Speeds

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 12, Issue 3 - Serial Number 25, September 2022, Pages 265-280   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.2021.58678.0

Authors

N. Monjezi^* ; M. Soleymani

Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Sugarcane cultivation in Khuzestan province is in the form of planting in-furrow. Due to the fact that in a machine harvesting, the reaper is not able to fully harvest the straw in the furrow, in the planting in-furrow method, it is necessary to transfer the rows of straw to the stack. So one of the measures at the time was hilling up operations or stacking reeds planted in the furrow. Therefore, due to the salinity of irrigation water and high groundwater levels, which have increased the salinity of sugarcane fields in Khuzestan province, planting this product in summer to protect the seedlings against salinity is mandatory in the furrow. On one hand, due to the difficulty of harvesting operations in the furrow during the harvest season, and on the other hand, because of the reduction of waste during harvesting, the plant needs to be located on the ridge. Therefore, in sugarcane fields, when the seedlings are established and grown, the furrow and ridges are replaced, and to perform this operation special machines are required. According to the study, so far there has been no scientific and reasoned report on the study and evaluation of different types of hilling up devices and different speeds in sugarcane cultivation, and the use of machines in sugarcane cultivation and industry is based solely on objective observations. Therefore, in this study, three different types of devices have been evaluated in two soil textures and three different forward speeds as a step towards choosing the best type of machine and optimal speed of hilling up operations in sugarcane cultivation.
Materials and Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different methods of sugarcane hilling up in two soil textures and three different forward speeds. Research treatments include: soil texture (clay loam and silty clay loam), hilling up methods (6-shanks subsoil + 10-shanks subsoil, 8-shanks subsoil + hilling up device No. 1 and 8-shanks subsoil + hilling up device No. 2), and forward speeds (5, 6, and 7 kilometers per hour). Design of a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Amirkabir field 208 (ALC 200 field 8) with clay loam texture and cultivar CP69-1062 and farm ARC14-22 with silty clay loam texture and cultivar CP69-1062, 15% moisture, and first-year cultivation was performed. The test plot includes 108 furrows. The area of each plot was two furrows. The length of each furrow was 250 meters (equal to the length of the sugarcane rows). To avoid affecting the interactions of the treatments, a distance was given between the treatments. The farms being tested were newly cultivated farms. The surface of the farm was furrowed and ridged. Care was taken in selecting the farm so that the humidity was similar in its different sections. After setting the right time for the hilling up and before starting the operation, soil sampling is required to determine the soil cone index and soil moisture. The physical properties of this study include Mean Weight Diameter (MWD), bulk density, soil surface uniformity, soil water permeability, and furrow depth (stack height). Analysis of variance and Duncan test were used to compare the treatments using SAS 9.4 software.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that there was a significant difference between soil Mean Weight Diameter, bulk density, soil surface uniformity, and soil water permeability in soil texture treatments, type of hilling up machine, and forward speed. Furrow depth index (stack height) was significantly different in treatments of type of machine and forward speed but not in soil texture treatments. The comparison of means showed that the whole loam texture treatment had 6-shanks + 10-shanks at a speed of 7 km h^-1 with the smallest mean weight diameter (16.06 mm). The use of 6-shanks subsoil + 10-shanks subsoil in hilling up in whole texture and speed of 5 km h^-1 significantly reduced soil bulk density. The lowest coefficient of variation of soil surface uniformity was obtained with 8-shanks subsoil + hilling up device No. 1 in clay loam texture and 7 km h^-1 forward speed. The highest rate of water permeability in the soil was obtained after the hilling up operation with 6-shanks subsoil + 10-shanks subsoil in a total texture of 2.32 cm h^-1. Furrow depth index (stack height) was also within the acceptable range (10-15 cm) in all treatments. But in addition to height, the appearance of the ridges is also important. In the treatment of 6-shanks + 10-shanks in plant stacking and embankment operations, sometimes in fields, there are parts where this operation is not done well and the machine is not capable enough and is in the middle of the created ridges. Harvesting operations do not cause proper reed flooring. Therefore, to solve this problem, it is necessary to perform the hilling up operation at the appropriate speed and humidity so that the soil is well placed on the rows of reeds and the proper appearance of the ridge is maintained.
Conclusion
In this study, three different types of devices have been evaluated in two soil textures and three different forward speeds as a step towards choosing the best type of machine and optimal speed of hilling up operations in sugarcane cultivation. The physical properties of the soil, including the soil Mean Weight Diameter, bulk density, soil surface uniformity, soil water permeability, and the size of the furrow depth (ridge height) were measured, and the best treatments were identified. Considering the importance of hilling up operations in sugarcane cultivation and to complete the results of this experiment, the following items that could not be studied in this study are suggested. The effect of using different methods on hilling up should be investigated on the yield of sugarcane. The effect of using different devices on hilling up in terms of tensile strength, work efficiency, and time required to do the work, fuel consumption, cost of timely work, and maintenance costs in operations on sugarcane hilling up should be investigated.

Keywords

Bulk density; Hilling up; Soil mean weight diameter; Soil surface uniformity; Soil water permeability; Sugarcane

References

1. Abbaspour Gilandeh, Y., and A. R Shayegani Soltan pour. 2014. Soil cone index prediction using artificial neural networks model and its comparison with regression models. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production 4 (2): 187-204. (In Persian).
2. Abdullahi Lorestani, S., Sh. Lorzadeh, and Q. Fathi. 2012. Investigation of the possibility of using helping operations in the management of weeds in sugarcane fields. 12^th Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding of Iran, September 6-14, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch. (In Persian).
3. Adam, K. M., and D. C. Erbach. 1992. Secondary tillage tool effect on soil aggregation. Transactions of the ASAE, 35 (6): 1771-1776.
4. Afzalinia, S., and A. Ziaee. 2020. Cotton yield and water poductivity affected by conservation tillage and irrigation methods in cotton-wheat rotation. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 10 (1): 103-114. http://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v10i1.76229.
5. Aghilinategh, N., M. Rezaei, and R. Tabatabaei kolor. 2019. Effect of depth and puddling intensity on engineering properties of clay loam soil. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering 50 (2): 367-374. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2018.225241.665068.
6. Ahmad, N., A. Zada, A. Ali, and M. Junaid. 2015. Effect of earthing up procedure on enhancement in yield of different groundnut varieties planted under agro-climatic conditions of Malakand division. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 4 (1): 181-184. https://doi.org/10.15640/jaes.v4n1a22.
7. Ahmadpour, S. R., H. Alizadeh, and N. Majnoon Hosseini. 2010. Integrating of Hilling up and Cultivation with Banded Spraying in Weed Management in Sugarcane Fields. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 41 (4): 719-729. (In Persian).
8. Bouma, H. 1996. Compaction and subsoiling effects on sugarcane yield and physical properties. Transcations of the ASAE 39 (5): 1641-1649.
9. Carter, M. R. 2000. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, 823 p.
10. Dagne, Z. 2015. Effect of seed tuber size and plant spacing on yield and quality of potato in Holetta. MSc Thesis Summitted to Haramaya University.
11. Dev, C. M., R. N. Meena, A. Kumar, and G. Mahajan. 2011. Earthing up and nitrogen levels in sugarcane ratoon under subtropical Indian condition. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 26 (1): 1-5.
12. Eskandari, I., and V. Feizias. 2017. Influence of conservation tillage on some soil physical properties and crop yield in vetch-wheat rotation in Dryland Cold region. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 7 (2): 451-467. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v7i2.50933.
13. Fleissner, K. 2001. Management practices and preferences of Bambara groundnut producers in Oshana Region, North Central Namibia. In: Sesay, A., Edje, O. T. and Cornelissen, R. (Eds.). Proceedings of a mid-project workshop, University of Swaziland. Pp.47-53.
14. Gutema, C. 2016. Effect of earthing up frequencies and tuber seed form on yield and profitability of potato (Solanum Tuberosum) production in Bale Highlands. Agricultural Research & Technology 2 (4): 96-101. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2016.02.555592.
15. Hossain, I. 2014. Effect of whole and cut seed tubers on the growth and yield of eight germplasm of potato. MSc Thesis Submitted to Bangladesh Agricultural University.
16. Hossain, M. A., M. A. Mrnnan, M. I. Nazrul, and M. A. Larma. 2000. Barthing up as a cultural practice for the management of sweet potato weeyil (Cylaf Formtcartus). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 1 (1): 71-73.
17. Khaffaf, A., and A. Khadr. 2008. Effect of some primary tillage implement on soil pulverization and specific energy. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering 25 (3): 731-745.
18. Lorzadeh, Sh., H., Nadiyan, A., Bakhshandeh, Gh. Noormohamadi, and F. Darvish. 2002. Effects of different levels of soil compaction on yield, yield components and sucrose in sugarcane cv. CP 48-103, in Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 4 (1): 36-47. (In Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1381.4.1.4.5
19. Madhu, G., S. I. Halikatti, R. B. Khandagave, and M. P. Potdar. 2017. Effect of methods of fertilizer applications, fertilizer levels and split application of potassium on available nutrient status and nutrient use efficiency in sugarcane. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5 (6): 1043-1051.
20. Mhungu, S. and Z. A. Chiteka. 2010. The effect of timing of earthing up on the performance of four Bambara groundnut landrace cultivars in the MutasaDistrict of Manicaland Province in Zimbabwe. Second RUFORUM Biennial Meeting 20-24 September 2010, Entebbe, Uganda.
21. Ming, G., L. You-Jin, W. Zi-Fang, Xiao-Hong, and W. Chao-Fu. 2008. Effect of tillage system on distribution of aggregates and organic carbon in a hudragric anthrosol Pedosphere. Pedosphere 18 (5): 574-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60051-X.
22. Namdari, M., Sh. Rafiei, and A. Jafari. 2010. Investigation of the effect of tractor depth and speed on plowing characteristics. 6^th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering. (In Persian).
23. Nasirian, A. 2008. Evaluation of the application of conventional submersibles and vibration on porosity, penetration resistance and soil permeability and conducting operations of reconnaissance operations in agriculture and industry of Dabal Khazaei Khuzestan. Master Thesis in Agricultural Mechanization Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar Branch. (In Persian).
24. Omrani, A. 2012. Investigation of the situation of agricultural machinery management in sugarcane cultivation (Case study of Amirkabir agro-industry). Master Thesis in Agricultural Mechanization Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (In Persian).
25. Ouedraogo, M., B. Zagre, S. Thorndal, and F. Liu. 2012. Effect of mounding times on yield of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) landraces in Sahel-Burkina Faso. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 4505-4511. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.974.
26. Patil, P. B., V. A. Kamble, and S. V. Chavan. 2018. Effect of soil forces on ridger plough under different working conditions during earthing up operation of sugarcane. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 5 (5): 4081- 4083.
27. Raina, S., and J. P. Singh. 2018. Design and development of weeding-cum-earthing-up equipment. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 11 (2): 324-327. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/11.2/324-327
28. Rangiah, P. K., R. Duraj, and S. Renugo palan. 1988. Biofertilizer for suger cane proc-51st. Ann. Conv sugar tech-Assoc. india, 101-107 pp.
29. Rezaei, Gh., and H. Zarei. 2013. Comparison of the application of herbicidal PVC herbicides and common methods of progressive control with cheese herbicide in new sugarcane farms. 5^th Iranian Weed Science Conference. September. Agricultural Campus of Tehran University. (In Persian)
30. Sakadzo, N., F. Tafirenyika, and K. Makaza. 2019. Effects of time of earthing up on yield and yield parameters of Irish potato (Solanum Tuberosum) in Zaka district. Zimbabwe. Agricultural Science 1 (1): 39-46. https://doi.org/10.30560/as.v1n1p39.
31. Sedaghat Hosseini, M., and H. Saebi Fard. 2006. Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment: principles and applications. Written by Frank M. Inz. Fourth Edition, Agricultural Education Publishing, Tehran, Pages 326-334. (In Persian).
32. Shrinivasa, D. J., V. D. Paradkar, and S. L. Rathod. 2018. Development and evaluation of mechanical earthing up equipment for groundnut crop. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 10 (1): 118-123. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/10.1/118-123.
33. Singh, P., S. N. Singh, A. K. Tiwari, S. K. Pathak, A. K. Singh, S. Srivastava, and N. Mohan. 2019. Integration of sugarcane production technologies for enhanced cane and sugar productivity targeting to increase farmers’ income: strategies and prospects. Biotech 9 (48): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1568-0.
34. Srivustuva, H. 1990. Compaction effect on root growth in sugarcane tropical agriculture, 67: 382-383.
35. Suwanarak, K. 1990. Weed management in sugarcane in Thailand. BIOTROP Special Publication, 38: 199-214.
36. Svubure, O., P. C. Struik, A. J. Haverkort, and J. M. Steyn. 2015. Yield gap analysis and resource footprints of Irish potato production systems in Zimbabwe. Field Crops Research 178: 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.002.
37. Zandvakili, B., A. Bahadori, J. Saudi, A. Saeedi, Sh. Heydarian, and A. Karami. 2015. Sugarcane from experience to standard. First edition, Kordgar Publishing, Ahvaz, Pp. 56-93. (In Persian).