Investigation the Effects of Conjunctive Irrigation with Saline Water on Morphological Properties and Yield of Quinoa

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 4, Volume 19, Issue 1 - Serial Number 61, April 2021, Pages 49-59   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jcesc.2021.37118.0

Authors

S Jamali; H Ansari^*

Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing population growth along with the lack of freshwater resources have necessitated the use of unconventional water resources in agriculture, as the largest fresh water consumer, especially in the arid and semiarid areas. Application of suitable irrigation management with saline water can reduce the yield loss caused by salinity. Saline farming is based on the cultivation of crops and plant varieties that can tolerate high levels of salinity. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) is a genetically diverse Andean grain crop that has earned special attention worldwide due to its nutritional and health benefits and its ability to adapt to contrasting environments, including nutrient-poor and saline soils and drought stressed marginal agro-ecosystems. Drought and salinity are the abiotic stresses most studied in quinoa. Cultivation of salinity resistant cultivars, such as Quinoa plant is one of the techniques to use saline water. The results of Jamali and Ansari (2019) showed that irrigation with saline water during all the growth stages of quinoa plants (Titicaca cv) significantly decreases grain yield and 1000 kernel weights by 20.8% and 20.0 %, respectively. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of conjunctive moderation of saline water in irrigation of Quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.).
Materials and Methods: Research station is located in northeast of Iran at 36° 16' N latitude and 59° 38' E longitude with 958.0 meters height from sea level. In this study, six irrigation treatments including well water (1.23 dS.m^-1; control treatment (W)), saline water (15 dS.m^-1, SW), alternative saline water and freshwater (ASW), mixture of 50:50 saline and freshwater (7.2 dS.m^-1, MSW), fixed partial root-zone salinity-stress (FPRS), and alternative partial root-zone salinity-stress (APRS) were evaluated on some growth parameters, yield, and physical productivity of water in Quinoa (CV. Titicaca) production. The research was done based on completely randomized design, including three replications as pot planting in the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, at greenhouse conditions, during 2018-2019. The seeds of Quinoa were planted at a depth of 1.5 centimeter in silty clay soil of each pot and were irrigated with well water. Physical and chemical properties of irrigation water and soil were determined before experiment. The collected data analyzed using statistical software of SAS (Ver. 9.0) and the means were compared using LSD test at 5 % probability.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that, different irrigation moderation had a significant impact on physical productivity of water, harvest index, panicle length, plant height, stem diameter, panicle weight, and grain yield at 1% (p < 0.01), but this treatment was significant at 5% (p < 0.05) on branches number, panicle width, panicle number, and 1000 kernel weights. The maximum reduction in physical productivity of water was observed in plants receiving SW treatment (15 dS.m^-1 NaCl). Notable increases of 23.1%, 19.2%, 3.8%, and 19.2% in the 1000 kernel weight, 25%, 23.4%, 2.7%, and 18.9% grain yield and 25%, 12.5%, 3.8%, and 25% physical water productivity in Quinoa (c.v. NSRCQ) production were observed when plants were grown under applying ASW, MSW, FPRS, and APRS moderation, compared with SW moderation.
Conclusions: Whilst comparing with control treatments (W), the lowest decreases of 19.4%, 23.5%, and 23.1% were noted respectively in grain yield, 1000 kernel weights, and physical water productivity exposed to ASW treatment. The NSRCQ cultivar showed the highest potential for yield and growing under saline conditions (ASW and APRS moderation). Morphological and yield responses of Quinoa (c.v. NSRCQ) to all treatments (moderation saline water), under greenhouse conditions, showed that quinoa has wide plasticity and tolerance to salinity stress. Due to the lack of water resources and increasing population growth, it is recommended to use unconventional water (for exp. saline water) and cultivation of crop varieties (for exp. Quinoa) that can tolerate high levels of salinity, especially in the arid and semiarid areas.

Keywords

1000 kernel weight; Alternate moderate; Grain yield; Partial root-zone salinity-stress; Physical productivity

References

1. Al-Naggar, A. M. M., El-Salam, R. A., Badran, A. E. E., and El-Moghazi, M. M. 2017. Drought tolerance of Five Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Genotypes and Its Association with Other Traits under Moderate and Severe Drought Stress. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research 3 (3): 1-13.‏
2. Attar, S. F., Mohammadkhani, A., and Houshmand, S. 2015. Effect of Salt Stress on Seed and Oil Yield, Chlorophyll and Proline Content in Three Local Populations of Castor Bean (Ricinus communis L.) in Controlled Environment. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 4 (14): 215-227. (in Persian with English abstract).
3. Gandahi, A. W., Kubar, A., Sarki, M. S., Talpur, N., and Gandahi, M. 2017. Response of Conjunctive Use of Fresh and Saline Water on Growth and Biomass of Cotton Genotypes. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 13: 326-334.‏
4. Hinojosa, L., González, J., Barrios-Masias, F., Fuentes, F., and Murphy, K. 2018. Quinoa abiotic stress responses: A review. Plants 7 (4): 1-32.‏
5. Hussain, M. I., Al-Dakheel, A. J., and Reigosa, M. J. 2018. Genotypic differences in agro-physiological, biochemical and isotopic responses to salinity stress in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants: Prospects for salinity tolerance and yield stability. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 129: 411-420.‏
6. Iqbal, S., Basra, S. M., Afzal, I., Wahid, A., Saddiq, M. S., Hafeez, M. B., and Jacobsen, S. E. 2019. Yield potential and salt tolerance of quinoa on salt‐degraded soils of Pakistan. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 205 (1): 13-21.‏
7. Jamali, S., and Ansari, H. 2019. Effects of water quality and irrigation management on growth and yield of Quinoa. Water Research in Agriculture 33 (3): 339-351. (in Persian with English abstract).
8. Jamali, S., and Sharifan, H. 2018. Investigation the effect of different salinity levels on yield and yield components of Quinoa (Cv. Titicaca). Water and Soil Conservation 25 (2): 251-266. (in Persian with English abstract).
9. Jamali, S. 2017. Investigation the effects of different salinity and deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of Quinoa. MSc thesis of irrigation and derainage, Gorgan university of Agriculture science and Natural resource. (in Persian with English abstract).
10. Kamali Maskooni, E., and Afzali, S. F. 2019. Effect of irrigation with different salinities on some soil characteristics and salt concentration factor (Case study: Bighard, Khonj). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 21 (4): 141-152. (in Persian with English abstract).
11. Khalili, S. Bastani, A., and Bagheri, M. 2019. Effect of different levels of irrigation water salinity and phosphorus on some properties of soil and Quinoa plant. Iranian Journal of Soil Research 33 (1): 155-167.
12. Khorasaninejad, S., Alizadeh Ahmadabadi, A., and Hemmati, K. 2018. The effect of humic acid on leaf morphophysiological and phytochemical properties of Echinacea purpurea L. under water deficit stress. Scientia Horticulturae 239: 314-323.‏
13. Mahmood, T., and Kaiser, W. M. 2003. Growth and solute composition of the salt-tolerant kallar grass [Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth] as affected by nitrogen source. Plant and Soil 252 (2): 359-366.‏
14. Mahmoud, A. H., Atteya, M. G., El-Damarawy, Y. A., and Saleh, M. E. 2019. Effects of water salinity and nitrogen fertilization on the production of quinoa grown in clay and sandy soils. The Middle East Journal 8 (2) 746-754.‏
15. Manaa, A., Goussi, R., Derbali, W., Cantamessa, S., Abdelly, C., and Barbato, R. 2019. Salinity tolerance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) as assessed by chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic performance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 162: 103-114.‏
16. Mandal, K., Saravana, R., and Maiti, S. 2008. Effect of different levels of N, P and K on downy mildew (Peronospora plantaginis L.) and seed yield of plantago ovate. Crop Protection 27 (6): 988- 995.
17. Mansour, H. A., Hongjouan, R., Jiandong, H., Feng, B. H., and Changmei, L. 2019. Performance of Water Desalination and Modern Irrigation Systems for Improving Water Productivity. In Irrigation-Addressing Past Claims and New Challenges.
18. Maleki, P., Saadat, S., Bahrami, H. A., Rezaei, H., and Esmaeelnejad, L. 2019. Accumulation of ions in shoot and seed of quinoa (Chenopodium‎ quinoa Willd.) under salinity stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 50 (6): 782-793.‏
19. Maleki, P., Bahrami, H. A., Saadat, S., Sharifi, F., Dehghany, F., and Salehi, M. 2018. Salinity threshold value of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa‎ Willd.) at‎ various growth stages and the appropriate‎ irrigation method by saline‎ water. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 49 (15): 1815-1825.‏
20. Marzi, M., Mirzaei, F., and Liaghat, A. 2019. Investigation of water absorption and yield of silage corn in different conditions of saline and non-saline water. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management 9 (1): 1-14. (in Persian with English abstract).
21. Miranda-Apodaca, J., Yoldi-Achalandabaso, A., Aguirresarobe, A., del Canto, A., and Pérez-López, U. 2018. Similarities and differences between the responses to osmotic and ionic stress in quinoa from a water use perspective. Agricultural Water Management 203: 344-352.‏
22. Murad, K. F. I., Hossain, A., Fakir, O. A., Biswas, S. K., Sarker, K. K., Rannu, R. P., and Timsina, J. 2018. Conjunctive use of saline and fresh water increases the productivity of maize in saline coastal region of Bangladesh. Agricultural Water Management 204: 262-270.‏
23. Parvez, S., Abbas, G., Shahid, M., Amjad, M., Hussain, M., Asad, S. A., Imran, M., and Naeem, M. A. 2020. Effect of salinity on physiological, biochemical and photostabilizing attributes of two genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) exposed to arsenic stress. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 187: 109814.‏
24. Pervize, Z., Afzal, M., Xi, S., Xiao, Y., and Anchng, L. 2002. Pysiological parameters of salt tolerance in wheat. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1: 478-481.
25. Pulvento, C., Riccardi, M., Lavini, A., Iafelice, G., Marconi, E., and d’Andria, R. 2012. Yield and Quality Characteristics of Quinoa Grown in Open Field under Different Saline and Non‐Saline Irrigation Regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198 (4): 254-263.
26. Qadir, M., and Oster. J. 2004. Crop and irrigation management strategies for saline-sodic soils and waters aimed at environmentally sustainable agriculture. Science of the Total Environment 323 (1): 1-19.
27. Razzaghi, F., Ahmadi, S. H., Jacobsen, S. E., Jensen C. R., and Andersen. M. N. 2012. Effects of salinity and soil–drying on radiation use efficiency, water productivity and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198 (3): 173-184.
28. Riaz, F., Abbas, G., Saqib, M., Amjad, M., Farooq, A., Ahmad, S., Naeem, M. A., Umer, M., Khalid, M. S., Ahmad, Kh., and Ahmad, N. 2020. Comparative effect of salinity on growth, ionic and physiological attributes of two quinoa genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 57 (1): 115-122.
29. Saeedipour, S. 2018. Effect of salinity tension on yield, concentration and distribution of some elements in different organs of two rice (Oriza sativa L.). Crop Physiology Journal 36: 27-40. (in Persian with English abstract).
30. Saleh, B. 2013. Water Status and ProteinPattern Changes towards Salt Stress in Cotton.Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry 9 (1): 113-123.
31. Sarkar, R. K., Mahata, K. R., and Singh, D. P. 2013. Differential responses of antioxidantsystem and photosynthetic characteristics in four rice cultivars differing in sensitivity to sodiumchloride stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35: 2915-2926.
32. Tabatabaei, S. H., Pesarakli, M., and Nourmahnad, N. 2019. Responses of grass (Seashore Paspalum) to Alternate Management of Saline water. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation 8 (3): 1-10. (in Persian with English abstract).
33. Yang, A., Akhtar, S. S., Iqbal, S., Qi, Z., Alandia, G., Saddiq, M. S., and Jacobsen, S. E. 2018. Saponin seed priming improves salt tolerance in quinoa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 204 (1): 31-39.‏
34. Yazdkhasti, M., Shayanmejad, M., Eshghizadeh, H. R., and Feizi, M. 2019. Effect of Conjunctive Irrigation on Soil Salinity and Herbal Elements of Sorghum and Simulation of Output Salt Using SWAP Model. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering (JISE) 42 (4): 121-135. (in Persian with English abstract).
35. Zhu, J. K. 2001. Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6 (2): 66-71.
36. Zare, R. 2018. The effect of using sea water on yield and yield components of Herb purslane (Portulacea oleracea L.) under different irrigation levels. MSc thesis of irrigation and derainage, Gorgan University of Agriculture Science and Natural Resource. (in Persian with English abstract).