Evaluation of the Aerial and Underground Organs of Wild Mustard (Sinapis arvensis) Competition on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 10, Volume 35, Issue 3 - Serial Number 53, September 2021, Pages 389-398   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.2021.69400.1019

Author

A. Modhej^*

Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar

Abstract

Introduction: Among crops, wheat is one of the most widely cultivated crops in the world that supply about 60 to 70 percent of the world population's food energy. Among the factors reducing crop production, weeds are particularly important, and they could reduce crop yield through competition for water and food and also by disrupting the harvest. It is important to assessment of weed-crop competition mechanism to get vital resources as well as assessment useful crop features for increasing competition with weeds. One of these methods could be use of cultivars with high-ability competitors against weeds. So in this regard, awareness of weed-crop competition aspects in addition to yield losses due to weed competition, will leading to a reduction in herbicide application.
Materials and Methods: To evaluate the effect of wild mustard competition on morphological characteristics, yield and yield components of wheat, a factorial experiment was conducted based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in Islamic Azad University Shoushtar Branch in 2016. In the experiment, the treatments were type of competition between weed and wheat that was included: a) the shoots competition of weed with wheat cultivars b) the root competition of wild mustard with wheat c) the shoot and root competition of wild mustard with wheat cultivars and d) no weed competition as control and wheat cultivars was included: Chamran, Karim and Vrynak.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of variance showed that all the studied traits were significantly different from each other. Results showed that the maximum height (95 cm) was observed for Chamran cultivar in control treatment and the minimum height (74 cm) was for Vrynak in  the shoot and root competition of wild mustard with wheat cultivars. A comparative evaluation of interaction effects showed that the highest root length (13.3 cm), number of fertile tillers (2.1) and spike length (11.6 cm) were obtained in Chamran cultivar in control treatment. The least of these traits was observed in Vrynak cultivar in the both shoot and root competition of wild mustard with wheat cultivars. The results showed the largest decrease in the number of seeds per spike (40.95 percent compared to control) and spike number per m² (17.62 percent compared to control) was obtained in the treatment of shoot and root competition of wild mustard with Vrynak cultivar. The study showed that the highest 1000-grain weight (40 g) was obtained in Chamran and control treatment and the least was obtained in the treatment of shoot and root competition of wild mustard with Vrynak cultivar.  The highest grain yield (497.45  g m^-2) and  biologic yield (1784.39  g m^-2) were obtained in Chamran and control treatment, while, the lowest ones (150.25 g m^-2  and 1026.31 g m^-2) were obtained in the treatment of shoot and root competition of wild mustard with Vrynak cultivar, respectively. Reduction in wheat yield was occurred due to decreasing the number of spike, number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weight. Assessment the results of biological yield and grain yield in wheat cultivars showed that compared to economic performance of wheat, total dry matter production was less affected by wild mustard interference.
Conclusion: Overall, in this study, the highest amount of morphological traits, yield, and yield components were obtained in combined treatment of Chamran and control. Accordingly, Chamran due to higher economic performance both in weed-free and weed-interference conditions could be as a competitor cultivar in agricultural operations and its properties could be used in breeding.

Keywords

Competitive ability; Growth characteristics; Interference; Non-chemical management

References

1. Ahmadvand G. 2002. Canopy structure and light and nitrogen absorption and use efficiency as affected by wheat and wild oat inter and intra- specific competition. Ph.D thesis. Ferdowsi university of Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian)
2. Armin M., and Asghripour M. 2011. Effect of plant density on wild oat competition with competitive and noncompetitive wheat cultivars. Agriculture Science 10: 1554-1561.
3. Baghestani M.A., and Zand E. 2004. Study of competitive ability of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes against weeds with attention to Goldbachia laevigata DC and Avena ludoviciana Dur in Karaj. Plant Pest and Disease 72: 1-21. (In Persian with English abstract)
4. Baghestani M.A., Zand E., Rahimian Mashhadi H., and Soufizadeh S. 2005. Morphological and physiological characteristics which enhance competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against Goldbachia laevigata. Weed Science 1: 111-126.
5. Baghestani Meybodi M.A., Akbari A.G., Atri A.R., and Mokhtari M. 2003. Competitive effects of rye (Secale cereale ) on growth indices, yield and yield components of wheat. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 61: 2-11. (In Persian with English abstract)
6. Beckie H.J., Johnson E., Blackshaw R.E., and Gan Y. 2008. Weed suppression by canola and mustard cultivars. Weed Technology 22: 182–185.
7. Cousens R.D., Barnett A.G., and Barry G.C. 2003. Dynamics of competition between wheat and oats. I. effects of changing the timing of phonological events. Agronomy 95: 1295-1304.
8. Cowan P., Weaver S.E., and Swanton C.J. 1998. Interference between pigweed (Amaranthus ), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Science 46: 533-539.
9. Dianat M., Rahimian Mashhadi H., Baghestani M.A., Alizadeh H.M., and Zand E. 2007. Evaluation of Iranian cultivars of bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum ) for competitive ability against rye (Secale cereale). Agriculture Science 23: 267-280. (In Persian with English abstract)
10. Ebrahimpour Noorabady F., Aynehband A., Nour Mohammadi Gh., Moosavinia H., and Mesgarbashi M. 2006. Study of some wheat ecophysiologic indices as influenced by wild oat interaction. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 73: 117-125. (In Persian with English abstract)
11. Eslami S.V., Gill G.S., Bellotti B., and McDonald G. 2006. Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) interference in wheat. Weed Science 54: 749-756.
12. FinchA., Guillaume G., French S.A., Colaço R.D.D.R., Davies J.M., and Swarbreck S.M. 2017. Wheat root length and not branching is altered in the presence of neighbors, including blackgrass. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0178176.
13. Holman J.D., Bussan A., Maxwell B., Miller P., and Mickelson J. 2004. Spring wheat, canola, and sunflower response to Persian darnel (Lolium persicum) interference. Weed Technology 18: 509-520.
14. Huel D.G., and Hucl P. 1996. Genotypic variation for competitive ability in spring wheat. Plant Breeding 115: 325-329.
15. Kennet J., and Kirkland K.J. 1993. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) competition. Weed Technology 7: 890-893.
16. Knezevic S.Z., Evans S.P., Blankenship E.E., Van Acker R.C., and Lindquist J.L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: The Concept and Data Analysis. Weed Science 50: 773–786.
17. Kropff M.J., and Lotz L.A.P. 1992. Systems approaches to quantify crop-weed interactions and their application in weed management. Agricultural System 40: 265-282.
18. Lemerle D., Gill G.S., Murphy C.E., Walker S.R., Cousens R.D., Mokhtari S., Peltzer S.J., Coleman R., and Luckett D.J. 2001. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weed. Australian Journal Agricultural Research 52: 527-548.
19. Mennan H., and Zandstra B.H. 2005. Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and seeding rate on yield loss from Galium aparine (cleavers). Short communication. Crop Protection 24: 1061-1067.
20. Mohajeri F., and Ghadiri H. 2003. Competition in different densities of wild Mustard (Brassica kaber) with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer application. Iranian Journal of Agriculture 34(3): 527-537. (In Persian with English abstract)
21. Naderi R., and Ghadiri H. 2011. Competition of wild mustard (Sinapis arvense L.) densities with rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Agriculture Science 13: 45-51.
22. Navabpour S., and Kazemi G. 2013. Stady the relation between grain yield and related traits in wheat by path analysis. Crop Production 6(1): 191-203. (In Persian with English abstract)
23. Olsen J., Kristensen L., and Weiner J. 2005. Effects of density and spatial pattern, of winter wheat on suppression of different weed species. Weed Science 690-694.
24. Paynter B.H., and Hills A.L. 2009. Barley and rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) competition is influenced by crop cultivar and density. Weed Technology 23: 40-48.
25. Pester T.A., Burnside O.C., and Orf J.H. 1999. Increasing crop competitiveness to weed through crop breeding. Journal of Crop Production 2: 59-76.
26. Rahimian Mashhadi H., Baghestani M.A., Zand E., and Dianat M. 2004. Assess the competitiveness of the eight wheat cultivars with rye in Karaj and Varmyn. 8^th National Iranian Crop Science congress, Rasht. Guilan University. (In Persian)
27. Rezvani H., Asghari J., Ehteshami M.R., and Kamkar B. 2013. Study reaction yield wheat cultivars in competition with the weed in Gorgan. Journal of Crop Production 6(4): 178-214. (In Persian with English abstract)
28. Roberts J.R., Peeper T.F., and Solie J.B. 2001. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate and cultivar affect interference from rye (Secale cereale). Weed Technology 15: 19-25.
29. Saadatian B., Ahmadvand G., and Soleymani F. 2011. Study of canopy structure and growth characters role of two wheat cultivars in competition, on economic threshold and yield of rye and wild mustard. Iranian Journal Field Crops Research 9(3): 494-504. (In Persian with English abstract)
30. Saadatian B., Ahmadvand G., and Soleymani F. 2012. Effect of rye (Secale cereale) and wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) competition on yield and yield components of two winter wheat (Triticum aestivum ) cultivars. Journal Plant Protection 26(1): 8-19.
31. Safahani Langrodi A., Kamkar B., Zand E., and Bagherani Meybodi M.A. 2008. Evaluation of ability tolerance competition of canola cultivars to wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) using some empirical models in Golestan province. Journal Agriculture Science Natural Resource 15: (5):101-111.
32. Safahani Langrodi A., Kamkar B., Zand E., Bagherani Meybodi M.A., and Bagheri M. 2007. Reaction of grain yield and its components of canola (Brassica napus ) cultivars in competition with wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) in Gorgan. Crop Science 9: 356-370. (In Persian with English abstract).
33. Seefeldt S.S., Ogg A.G., and Yuesheng H. 1999. Near-isogenic lines for Triticum aestivum height and crop competitiveness. Weed Science 47: 316-320.
34. Siyahpoosh A., Zand E., Bakhshande A., and Gharineh M.H. 2012. Competitive of different densitiesof two wheat cultivars with wild mustard weed species (Sinapis arvensis) in different densities. Weed Science 20: 748-752.
35. Soleymani F., Ahmadvand G., and Saadatian B. 2012. The effect of nitrogen levels and wild mustard densities on yield and economic threshold of canola. Electronic Journal Crop Production 4(4): 85-102. (In Persian with English abstract)
36. Van Acker R.C., and Oree R. 2004. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and wild mustard (Brassica kaber) wheller interference in canola (Brassica napus). Weed Science 39: 210-221.
37. Wall D.A., Friesen G.H., and Bhati T.K. 2006. Wild mustard interference in traditional and semi-leafless field wheats. Canadian Plant Science 71: 473-480.
38. Williams W.D., and Muhammad K. 1997. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) effects on yield components of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science 44: 114-121.
39. Yenish J.P., and Young F.L. 2004. Winter wheat competition against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) as influenced by wheat plant height, seeding rate, and seed size. Weed Science 52: 996-1001.
40. Zand E., and Beckie H.J. 2002. Competitive ability of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus ) with wild oat (Avena fatua). Canadian Plant Science 82: 473-480.