Rejuvenation and Multiple-Trait Selection in the Five Chinese-Shape of Parental Silkworms

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 11, Volume 13, Issue 3 - Serial Number 47, September 2021, Pages 463-474   

Document Type: Research Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.2021.38311.0

Authors

Moineddin Mavvajpoor¹; zyaalden mirhosin²; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Moghaddam^{* 3}; Shahla Nematollahian⁴; Farjad Rafiee⁵; Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh⁶; Yuosof Kheirkhah⁷

¹Researcher of Iran Silkworm Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO).Guilan, Iran

²Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Gilan University, Gilan, Iran

³Department of Animal Science and Department of Sericulture, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran

⁴Researcher of Iran Silkworm Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO).Guilan, Iran

⁵Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.

⁶Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran

⁷Researcher of Iran Silkworm Research Center,Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Guilan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction Introducing new commercial lines is one of the goals of silkworm breeding centers in the world. Iran has the potential to introduce new lines for hybrid silkworm production due to its silkworm genetic resources and silkworm egg production technology. The performance of productive, reproductive and viability traits in the parental silkworms, including Japanese-shaped and Chinese-shaped lines, changes after several years for various reasons, including inbreeding. Therefore, after a few years, it is necessary to introduce new silkworm strains. Most silkworm breeding schemes in most of the countries are based on the introduction of the Chinese and Japanese-shaped lines to make commercial silkworm hybrid.
Material and Methods Five Japanese - shape lines of silkworms named 31, 103, 151, 153, and 1524 were selected from silkworm germplasm of Iran Silk Research Center in the spring of 2012. All genetic combinations obtained by using the diallel method of mating system (20 crosses) were reared in autumn 2012 and spring 2013. After two generations of mass rearing in each genetic combination, the reciprocal crosses in the diallel design were mixed to establish the basic generation of this breeding scheme. The selection program was based on independent culling levels (I.C.L.) method applied from 2014 to 2019 in the selected group. At the same time, all parental lines were reared as control by using a random mating system. Of the 10 genetic compounds, six combinations were retained and the rest were rejected. In this breeding program, due to the necessity of eliminating weak families, family selection, and individual selection were both used simultaneously. In the present study, the productive traits of cocoon weight, cocoon shell percentage, good cocoon percentage, number of cocoons per liter, and cocoon weight per liter were compared simultaneously in the genetic combinations and control lines. Two-factor analysis of variance (including 6 genotypes and 5 years) was performed in a completely randomized design with six replications; then the results were analyzed using SAS statistical software.
Result and Discussion In general, the effects of genotype, year and interaction effect of genotype and year were significant for all studied traits. Based on the average performance of each trait during selection program from 2016 to 2019 years (average performance of G2, G3, G4 and G5 generations), the cocoon weight in the combinations of IRA1, IRA11 and IRA7 was more than the parental lines. This advantage was also seen in the trait of cocoon weight per liter. For the cocoon shell percentage, none of the genetic combinations in all the studied years were completely superior to parents. The response to selection for cocoon weight based on deviation from the maternal control line in IRA5 and IRA1 was positive and significant. The two genetic compounds, IRA1 and IRA3, whose parent was 103, had the highest genetic progression for cocoon shell percentage. Due to the superiority of the good cocoons percentage in IRA1, this genetic combination performed well in terms of cocoon economic traits. IRA9, whose cocoon weight gain was lower than the others, not only did not show any improvement in cocoon shell weight compared to the parent during these years, but also showed the lowest amount compared to other genetic combinations.
Conclusion The six new genetic compounds in this breeding program had the minimum requirements for the economically important traits of the silkworm. In other words, cocoon-related characteristics such as cocoon weight, good cocoon percentage of each family, and cocoon size are superior to all parental lines, then they could introduce to the silkworm gene bank. IRA1 was superior to parents in most of the studied traits. This genetic combination showed the best performance compared to the parent for both cocoon weight and cocoon shell percentage. Therefore it can be considered more in subsequent evaluations. IRA3 also responded relatively well. Other new genetic combinations did not have a significant advantage over their parents in terms of cocoon shell percentage. However, lower performance in some traits is not a reason for the new strain to be undesirable. Because the selection of the best paternal and maternal lines (Chinese-shaped and Japanese-shaped lines) will be determined after that the hybridization program was carried out to produce all hybrids and then the best hybrids were selected based on  estimation of specific combining ability for all important traits.
 
 

Keywords

Genetic combinations; Independent culling levels method; Random mating; Selection; Silkworm

References

1. Bhat, S. A., M. Farooq, I. L. Khan, F. A. Kukiloo, and K. A. Sahaf. Selection of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. breeding resource material. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7:1612-1617.
2. Govindan, R., R. Narasimharaju., T. K. Narayanaswamy, and R. Munirajappa. 1990. Performance of some single and three-way cross hybrids of silkworm Bombyx mori for cocoon traits.Environment and Ecology, 8(3): 860-863.
3. Hosseini Moghaddam S. H. 2013. Priciples of Silkworm Rearing. 2^nd University of Guilan Press (In Persian).
4. Hosseini Moghaddam, S. H., N. Emamjomeh Kashan, S. Z. Mirhosseini, and M. R. Gholami. 2005. Genetic Improvement of some traitis in four strains of silkworm (Bombyx mori). International Journal of Industerial Entomology, 10(2):95-99.
5. Jingade, A., K. Vijayan, P. Somasundaram, G. Srinivasababu, and C. Kamble. 2011. A review of the implications of heterozygosity and inbreeding on germplasm biodiversity and its conservation in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Journal of Insect Science, 11(1):1-16.
6. Mirhosseini, S. Z., and A. R. Seidavi. 2011. Iran Silkworm Germplam Guidense. University of Guilan Press (In Persian).
7. Mirhosseini, S. Z., M. Ghanipoor, A. Shadparvar, and K. Etebari. 2005. Selection indices for cocoon traits in six commercial silkworm (Bombix mori) lines. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 88: 328 - 336.
8. Mirhosseini, S. Z., S. Nematollahian, M. Ghanipoor, and A. Seidavi. 2010. Comparison of phenotypic and genetic performance of local silkworm groups and two commercial lines. Biological Research, 43: 411-416.
9. Nagaraju, J. 2002. Application of genetic principles for improving silk production. Current Science, 83: 409-414.
10. Nematollahian, S., P. Barzin, Z. Mirhosseini, M. Naserani, and A. R. Seidavi. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters and improvement in the silkworm cocoon weight and shell cocoon weight traits using different goals of individual selection. Novin Genetic, 8(1):11-18. (In persian)
11. Rahmathulla, V. K., R. Tilak, and R. K. Rajan. 2006. Influence of moisture content of mulberry leaf on growth and silk production in Bombyx mori Caspian Journal of Environment Science, 4 (1): 25-30.
12. Rao, P. R. M., V. Premalatha, S. Ravindra, K. Vijayaraghavan, and R. Singh. 1997. Variability studies in some pure races and F1 hybrids of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. Environment and Ecology, 15: 3, 683-687.
13. Rudolf-Pilih, K., M. Petkovšek, J. Jakše, N. Štajner, J. Murovec, and B. Bohanec. 2019. Proposal of a new hybrid breeding method based on genotyping, inter-pollination, phenotyping and paternity testing of selected elite F₁ Frontiers in Plant Science, 10:1111.
14. Seidavi, A. R., S. Z. Mirhoseini, A. R. Bizhannia, and M. Ghanipoor. 2008. Effect of parents’ selection on the basis of cocoon weight on reproduction and resistance characters at lines of silkworm Bombyx mori Pajouhsh and Sazandegi, 78: 95-102. (In Persian)
15. Seidavi, A. R., and M. R. Goldsmith. 2014. Comparison of phenotypic value changes in pure lines of Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) during consecutive generations following initial selection on cocoon weight. Journal of Insect Science, 14(1):1–6.
16. Shivkumar, M. N., E. Ramya, E. Talebi, and G. Subramanya. 2018. Selection response for the expression of quantitative traits in the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 7(11): 3456-3474.
17. Singh, T., M. Mohan Bhat, and M. Ashraf Khan. 2011. Critical analysis of correlation and heritability phenomenon in the silkworm, Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: bombycidae). Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2:347-353.
18. Sudhakara Rao, S. P., R. K. Datta, K. M. Vijaya Kumari, and K. M. Ramesh Babu. 2002. Breeding resource materials of silkworm Bombyx mori, adaptive to tropical climates. International Journal of Industrial Entomolgy, 4(2):109-115.
19. Zamani, P., M. Ghanipoor, S. Z. Mirhosseini, R. Abdoli, and A. Seidavi. 2019. Comparison of different selection strategies for mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 39: 139–145.
20. Zhao Y., K. Chen, and S. He. 2007. Key principles for breeding spring-and-autumn using silkworm varieties: from our experience of breeding 873×874. Caspian Journal of Environment Science, 5 (1): 57-61.