Porphyry Cu-Au prospectivity modelling using semi-supervised learning algorithm in Dehsalm district, eastern Iran

زمین شناسی اقتصادی

Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 28, 2021, Pages 193-213   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/econg.v13i1.81382

Authors

Majid Keykhay-Hosseinpoor¹; Amir Hossein Kouhsari^{* 1}; Amin Hossein Morshedy¹; Alok Porwal²

¹Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

²Center of Studies in Resource Engineering (CSRE), IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India

Abstract

Introduction
The identification of potentially mineralized areas has progressed with the use and interpretation of all available exploratory data in the form of mineral potential modeling (MPM) (Yousefi and Nykänen, 2017). Recently, machine learning methods have been a popular research topic in the field of MPM ((Chen and Wu, 2016). Machine learning algorithms that have been used in MPM generally fall into the categories of being supervised or unsupervised. Supervised models, use the location of the known mineral occurrences as training sites (or labeled data). Therefore, these models suffer stochastic bias and error (Zuo and Carranza, 2011). Unsupervised models classify mineral prospectivity of every location based solely on feature statistics of individual evidential data layers ((Abedi et al., 2012). The semi-supervised learning models are a hybrid of supervised and unsupervised learning models that use both labeled and unlabeled data to extract the hidden structure of the data, as well as the relation between the input exploration layers and the output labeled data (Fatehi and Asadi, 2017).
The Dehsalm study area forms a part of the Lut metallogenic block of eastern Iran, which is characterized by the subduction zone setting and extensive magmatism (Beydokhti et al., 2015). The objective of this research is to present a prospectivity model to delineate exploration target areas for porphyry Cu-Au mineralization in the study area. For generating a prospectivity model, we used TSVM algorithm, a semi-supervised learning integration technique, to identify the anomalous areas related to the porphyry Cu-Au mineralization. The input layers are selected based on a conceptual model for porphyry Cu-Au mineral system. The performance of the mineral prospectivity maps (MPMs) is evaluated using the various techniques, including the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, an area under curve (AUC) metric.
 
Materials and methods
To apply a process-based understanding of porphyry copper-gold deposit system on the mapping of prospectivity, a conceptual model must be first developed (Fatehi and Asadi, 2017). Such a model should depict critical scale-dependent processes involved in the mineral deposit formation, and a mineral system approach can be followed to aid understanding where, when and why mineral deposits form (Parsa et al., 2016).
The spatial data sets used to model porphyry Cu-Au prospectivity of the study area include geological, remote sensing, geophysical, and geochemical data. In this study, semi-supervised support vector machine (TSVM) prospectivity technique is utilized to model porphyry Cu-Au target areas. The TSVM is an extension of SVM that uses the unlabeled data to improve the performances of the classifier. The aim of TSVM algorithm is to find the decision hyper-plane subject to maximize the margin distance in labeled and unlabeled data.
 
Result
In the present study, TSVM and SVM models were applied to Cu-Au prospectivity modeling in the study area. The models were trained based on the location of known Cu-Au mineralization occurrences and non-deposit location using e1071 package in R open-source statistical software (70% of the labeled data were used in training and 30% in the testing phase of learning in both algorithms). The RBF kernel function were used and the optimal values of the kernel parameters were assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation procedure and the best learning performance was selected by correct classification rate. The output of the models highlighted the target areas for porphyry Cu-Au mineralization in the study area. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis shows that both models perform well, however, the TSVM model yields the best performance.
 
Discussion
To identify exploratory target areas on a regional scale, various supervised and unsupervised approaches have been developed in mineral potential modeling. Supervised methods such as SVM use labeled data to classify exploratory datasets. In this research, a new semi- supervised learning method, TSVM, was applied to model the mineral potential for porphyry Cu-Au mineralization in the Dehsalm exploration zone. The introduced target areas by TSVM method, within the known mineral indices, covered smaller areas than targets identified by SVM model, so planning the detailed exploration phase will be optimal. The result of this research demonstrates the superiority of the semi-supervised learning method in identifying the target areas for planning the exploratory operations.
 
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Geological Survey of Iran for providing the exploration data used in this research. The financial support of the South Khorasan Industry, Mine & Trade Organization is gratefully thanked.
 
References
Abedi, M., Norouzi, G.H. and Bahroudi, A., 2012. Support vector machine for multi-classification of mineral prospectivity areas. Computers & Geosciences, 46: 272–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.014
Beydokhti, R.M., Karimpour, M.H., Mazaheri, S.A., Santos, J.F. and Klötzli, U., 2015. U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd geochemistry, petrogenesis and tectonic setting of Mahoor granitoid rocks (Lut Block, Eastern Iran). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 111: 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.028
Chen, Y. and Wu, W., 2016. A prospecting cost-benefit strategy for mineral potential mapping based on ROC curve analysis. Ore Geology Reviews, 74: 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.11.011
Fatehi, M. and Asadi, H.H., 2017. Data integration modeling applied to drill hole planning through semi-supervised learning: A case study from the Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit in the central Iran. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 128: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.09.007
Parsa, M., Maghsoudi, A., Yousefi, M. and Sadeghi, M., 2016. Prospectivity modeling of porphyry-Cu deposits by identification and integration of efficient mono-elemental geochemical signatures. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 114: 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.12.007
Yousefi, M. and Nykänen, V., 2017. Introduction to the special issue: GIS-based mineral potential targeting. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 128: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.02.023
Zuo, R. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2011. Support vector machine: a tool for mapping mineral prospectivity. Computers & Geosciences, 37(12): 1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.09.014

Keywords

Mineral potential modeling; Porphyry Cu-Au mineralization; Semi-supervised learning; Support vector machine; Dehsalm

References

Abedi, M., Norouzi, G.H. and Bahroudi, A., 2012. Support vector machine for multi-classification of mineral prospectivity areas. Computers & Geosciences, 46: 272–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.014

Abedi, M., Norouzi, G.H. and Torabi, S.A., 2013. Clustering of mineral prospectivity area as an unsupervised classification approach to explore copper deposit. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(10): 3601–3613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0615-5

Afzal, P., Yusefi, M., Mirzaie, M., Ghadiri-Sufi, E., Ghasemzadeh, S. and Daneshvar Saein, L., 2019. Delineation of podiform-type chromite mineralization using geochemical mineralization prospectivity index and staged factor analysis in Balvard area (SE Iran). Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(3): 705–715. https://doi.org/10.22044/JME.2019.8107.1678

Akrami, M.A. and Naderi Mighan, N., 2005. Geological map of Dehsalm (1:100,000). Geological Survey of Iran.

Beydokhti, R.M., Karimpour, M.H., Mazaheri, S.A., Santos, J.F. and Klötzli, U., 2015. U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd geochemistry, petrogenesis and tectonic setting of Mahoor granitoid rocks (Lut Block, Eastern Iran). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 111: 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.028

Carranza, E.J.M., 2008. Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 365 pp.

Carranza, E.J.M. and Hale, M., 2002. Where porphyry copper deposits are spatially localized? A case study in Benguet province, Philippines. Natural Resources Research, 11(1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014287720379

Carranza, E.J.M. and Laborte, A.G., 2015. Random forest predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity with small number of prospects and data with missing values in Abra (Philippines). Computers & Geosciences, 74: 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.10.004

Chen, Y., 2015. Mineral potential mapping with a restricted Boltzmann machine. Ore Geology Reviews, 71: 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.08.012

Chen, Y. and Wu, W., 2016. A prospecting cost-benefit strategy for mineral potential mapping based on ROC curve analysis. Ore Geology Reviews, 74: 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.11.011

Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F.P. and Ballantyne, S.B., 1994. The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 51(2): 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)90013-2

Clark, D.A., 2014. Magnetic effects of hydrothermal alteration in porphyry copper and iron-oxide copper–gold systems: a review. Tectonophysics, 624–625: 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.12.011

Fatehi, M. and Asadi, H.H., 2017. Data integration modeling applied to drill hole planning through semi-supervised learning: A case study from the Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit in the central Iran. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 128: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.09.007

Geranian, H., Tabatabaei, S.H., Asadi, H.H. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2016. Application of discriminant analysis and support vector machine in mapping gold potential areas for further drilling in the Sari-Gunay gold deposit, NW Iran. Natural Resources Research, 25(2): 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-015-9271-2

Hengl, T., 2006. Finding the right pixel size. Computers & geosciences, 32(9): 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.008

John, D.A., Ayuso, R.A., Barton, M.D., Blakely, R.J., Bodnar, R.J., Dilles, J.H., Gray, F., Graybeal, F.T., Mars, J.C., McPhee, D.K. and Seal, R.R., 2010. Porphyry copper deposit model. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations, Reston, Report 2010–5070–B, 169 pp. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20105070B

Karimpour, M., Stern, C., Farmer, L. and Saadat, S., 2011. Review of age, Rb-Sr geochemistry and petrogenesis of Jurassic to Quaternary igneous rocks in Lut Block, Eastern Iran. Geopersia, 1(1): 19–54. https://doi.org/10.22059/JGEOPE.2011.22162

Keykha Hoseinpoor, M. and Aryafar, A., 2014. The use of robust factor analysis of compositional geochemical data for the recognition of the target area in Khusf 1: 100000 sheet, South Khorasan, Iran. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 48(2): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMGE.2014.53107

Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A. and Karimpour, M.H., 2013. Hydrothermal alteration mapping in northern Khur, Iran, using ASTER image processing: a new insight to the type of copper mineralization. Acta Geologica Sinica‐English Edition, 87(3): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.12092

Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A., Karimpour, M.H. and Stern, C.R., 2015. The Khopik porphyry copper prospect, Lut Block, Eastern Iran: geology, alteration and mineralization, fluid inclusion, and oxygen isotope studies. Ore Geology Reviews, 65(Part2): 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.04.015

McCuaig, T.C., Beresford, S. and Hronsky, J., 2010. Translating the mineral systems approach into an effective exploration targeting system. Ore Geology Reviews, 38(3): 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2010.05.008

Ostadhosseini, A., Barati, M., Afzal, P. and Lee, I., 2018. Prospecting polymetallic mineralization in Ardestan area, Central Iran, using fractal modeling and staged factor analysis. Geopersia, 8(2): 279–292. https://doi.org/10.22059/GEOPE.2018.254848.648376

Parsa, M., Maghsoudi, A., Yousefi, M. and Sadeghi, M., 2016. Prospectivity modeling of porphyry-Cu deposits by identification and integration of efficient mono-elemental geochemical signatures. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 114: 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.12.007

Porwal, A. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2015. Introduction to the Special Issue: GIS-based mineral potential modelling and geological data analyses for mineral exploration. Ore Geology Reviews, 71: 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.04.017

Porwal, A., Carranza, E.J.M. and Hale, M., 2003. Artificial neural networks for mineral-potential mapping: a case study from Aravalli Province, Western India. Natural resources research, 12(3): 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025171803637

Rodriguez-Galiano, V.F., Chica-Olmo, M. and Chica-Rivas, M., 2014. Predictive modelling of gold potential with the integration of multisource information based on random forest: a case study on the Rodalquilar area, Southern Spain. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(7): 1336–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.885527

Roshanravan, B., Aghajani, H., Yousefi, M. and Kreuzer, O., 2019. An improved prediction-area plot for prospectivity analysis of mineral deposits. Natural Resources Research, 28(3): 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9439-7

Rotiroti, M., Di Mauro, B., Fumagalli, L. and Bonomi, T., 2015. COMPSEC, a new tool to derive natural background levels by the component separation approach: application in two different hydrogeological contexts in northern Italy. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 158: 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.06.017

Shabankareh, M. and Hezarkhani, A., 2017. Application of support vector machines for copper potential mapping in Kerman region, Iran. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 128: 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.11.032

Shahsavar, S., Rad, A.J., Afzal, P., Nezafati, N. and Aghdam, M.A., 2019. Prospecting for polymetallic mineralization using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and fractal modeling in Aghkand Area, NW Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(7): 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4304-5

Sillitoe, R.H., 1972. A plate tectonic model for the origin of porphyry copper deposits. Economic geology, 67(2): 184-197. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.67.2.184

Sillitoe, R.H., 2000. Gold-rich porphyry deposits: descriptive and genetic models and their role in exploration and discovery. In: S.G. Hagemann and P.‌E. Brown (Editors), Gold in 2000. Society of Economic Geologists, Colorado, pp. 315–345. https://doi.org/10.5382/Rev.13.09

Sillitoe, R.H., 2010. Porphyry copper systems. Economic geology, 105(1): 3–41. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.105.1.3

Wang, J., Zuo, R. and Xiong, Y., 2020. Mapping mineral prospectivity via semi-supervised random forest. Natural Resources Research, 29(1): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09510-8

Whitney, D.L. and Evans, B.W., 2010. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American Mineralogist, 95(1): 185–187. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2010.3371

Yousefi, M. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2015a. Fuzzification of continuous-value spatial evidence for mineral prospectivity mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 74: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.10.014

Yousefi, M. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2015b. Prediction–area (P–A) plot and C–A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 79: 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.03.007

Yousefi, M. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2016. Data-driven index overlay and Boolean logic mineral prospectivity modeling in greenfields exploration. Natural Resources Research, 25(1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9261-9

Yousefi, M. and Nykänen, V., 2017. Introduction to the special issue: GIS-based mineral potential targeting. Journal of African Earth Sciences,  128: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.02.023

Zuo, R. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2011. Support vector machine: a tool for mapping mineral prospectivity. Computers & Geosciences, 37(12): 1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.09.014