Investigating the Compaction Structure of Shandiz using Ecological City Theory

جغرافیاوتوسعه ناحیه ای

Article 2, Volume 20, Issue 2 - Serial Number 39, June 2022, Pages 50-27   

Document Type: Research

DOI: 10.22067/jgrd.2021.48974.0

Authors

foruzan taheri¹; Mohammad Rahim Rahnama^{* 2}; Omid Ali Kharazmi³; Baratali Khakpoor⁴

¹Ph.D. in urban planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Professor in Geography and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³Assistant Professor in Management (National Development), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

⁴Associate Professor in Geography and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the compressibility of Shandiz city using ecological city theory. This descriptive-analytical survey was conducted using source map. The data were entered into Arc GIS software. Using these tools, the variables of each index regarding the compact city dimension were determined, and then the area, percentage, and output of the map were determined. Shannon's entropy model was used to measure the urban spiral growth rate. Density indicators, combination and intensification of use and the variables of each index were used in the compact city dimension in the city and three districts of Shandiz city. It was found that the average gross density is 28.86, the average net density is 63.35, the average population weight is 58.03, the form of housing (average number of floors) is 1.27, and the average ratio of residential to non-residential land is 3.13. Based on the entropy coefficient, the horizontal composition in Shandiz city was 0.89 square meters in 2006 and 0.86 hectares in 2011. Regarding vertical composition, the total percentage of two-flour buildings is 86.40%, three-flour buildings are 6.79%, and four-flour buildings are 6.79%. Moreover, dispersion of facilities and variables of intensity of use, including increase in population, increase in development, and increase in density in Shandiz city were examined. The results show the horizontal growth and expansion of Shandiz city, which is caused by the lack of appropriate policies in the implementation of compact city indicators from the point of view of sustainable city and ecological city in Shandiz tourism city. To create a compact city, increasing the density by using vacant lands and buildings, contiguity or mixing of uses and expanding the use of public transportation in the tourism city of Shandiz should be considered.
 
 

Keywords

Sustainable Development; Compressed City; Ecological City Theory; Shandiz Tourism City

References

1.  برتون، ا، (1383). توان بالقوه شهر متراکم برای افزایش برابری اجتماعی در دستیابی شکل پایدار شهری: روش‌ها و استراتژی‌ها (و. مرادی مسیحی، مترجم) (چاپ اول). تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه ریزی شهری.
2. پوراحمد، ا.، حسام، م.، آشور، ح.، و محمدپور، ص. (1389). تحلیلی بر الگوی گسترش کالبدی فضایی شهر گرگان با استفاده از مدل های آنتوپی شانون و هلدرون. مجله پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 1(3)، 1-18.
3. رهنما، م. ر.، و عباس‌زاده، غ. ر. ( 1385)، مطالعه تطبیقی شکل شهر مشهد و سیدنی. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه‌ای، 3(6)، 101-128.
4. سیف اللهی، ف.، زیاری، ک. ا.، پوراحمد، ا.، و نیک‌پور، ع. (1391) تبیین پراکنش و فشردگی فرم شهری در آمل با رویکرد فرم شهری پایدار. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، (16)، 106-155.
5. عزیزی، م. م. (1383). تراکم در شهرسازی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
6. مثنوی، م. ر. (1381). توسعه پایدار و پارادیمهای جدیدتوسعه شهری؛ شهر فشرده و شهر گسترده. فصلنامه محیط شناسی، 29(31)، 89-104.
7. مثنوی، م. ر. (1383). هزاره جدید و پارادایم جدید شهری، در شکل پایدار شهری (و. مرادی مسیحی، مترجم). تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری.
8. مهندسین مشاور فرنهاد. (1390). طرح جامع شهر شاندیز. وزارت مسکن و شهر سازی خراسان رضوی.
9. Elkin, T., Mclaren, D., & Hillman, M. (1991). Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development. London: Friends of the Earth.
10. Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005).Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measuredurban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of PreventiveMedicine, 28(2), 117-125.
11. GHG Protocol. (2015). GHG Protocol for cities. Retrieved from http://www.ghgprotocol.org/city-accounting
12. Grubler, A. (2012). Urban energy systems. In G. W. Team (Ed.), Global energyassessment (GEA) toward a sustainable future (pp. 1307-1400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. E. M., & Graedel, T. E. (2004). Industrial ecology: A teenager’s progress. Technology in Society, 26, 433-445.
14. Holdren, E., & Norland, I. T. (2005). Three challenges for the compact city asa sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport ineight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2145-2166.
15. Hui, S. C (2001). Low Energy building design in high density urban cities. Renewable Energy, 24(3), 624-640.
16. Jenks, M., & Colin, J. (2010). Dimensions of the sustainable city. Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht.
17. Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (Eds). (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? London: E & FN Spon, an imprint of Chapman and Hall.
18. Leman, E, & Cox, J. E. (1991). Sustainable urban development: Strategic considerations for urbanizing nations. Ekistics, 58(348/349), 216-224.
19. McCarty, J., & Kaza, N. (2015). Urban form and air quality in the United Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, 168-179.
20. Naess, P. (2014). Urban form, sustainability and health: The case of greater European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1524-1543
21. Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, 11-26.
22. Wang, S., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Hu, J., & Ou, J. (2017). Examining the impacts ofsocioeconomic factors, urban form, and transportation networks on CO 2emissions in China’s megacities. Applied Energy, 185, 189-200.