Investigation of the Role of Sand- Geotextile-Zeolite Composite Filters on some Wastewater Properties

آب و خاک

Article 5, Volume 35, Issue 5 - Serial Number 79, November and December 2021, Pages 673-687   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.2021.72031.1082

Authors

H. Shirvani Ichi¹; M. Ghobadinia²; negar nourmahnad^{* 3}; Seyed Hassan Tabatabaei

¹Former M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Water Engineering Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

²Assistant Professor, Dept. of Water Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

³Assistant Professor, Dept. of Agriculture, Payame Noor University

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, the use of effluent in irrigation and especially drip irrigation systems has increased. The findings uncovered that drip irrigation is assumed as the only method which is capable of overcoming specific problems caused by wastewater usage. In this study, the efficiency of sand and geotextile filters with zeolite on wastewater properties and their application in the filtration of the drip irrigation system was investigated.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted to investigate the changes in important chemical properties in the municipal wastewater of a university after passing through sand filters, geotextiles, and zeolites in the drip irrigation filtration system. A factorial experiment was performed in a completely randomized design with three replications. Treatments included sand filter (control-CTRL treatment), geotextile filter (G), sand filter with zeolite (SZ), and geotextile filter with zeolite (GZ). The sand used in this study was the usual silica sand which was in three sizes of 3-5, 5-8, and 8-12 mm. In order to remove any contamination and soil particles and increase the accuracy of the measurement of suspended solids in the effluent, the sands were washed several times with water before usage. The geotextiles used in this study had three types with weights of 300, 500, and 1000 grams per cubic meter. The zeolite used in this study was clinoptilolite modified with hydrochloric acid. The wastewater used in this study was obtained from the effluent of Shahrekord University. System flow rate, Pressure, nitrate, suspended solids, sodium, calcium, magnesium, electrical conductivity, effluent pH were measured before and after entering the filters at different hours. Statistical analysis was done by SAS software and the Duncan test was used to compare the means of the data.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the sand-zeolite treatment had a good performance in terms of pressure and the geotextile-zeolite treatment was able to provide pressure for a short time. The amount of nitrate in the wastewater of the sand filter was not significantly different from the amount of inlet, but in other filters was significantly reduced. The amount of nitrate input of all treatments was 26 mg/l.The average output nitrate in the sand filter was about 25 and in the other filters was less than 20 mg/l. The average amount of suspended solids in the effluent was about 110 mg/l, while the average amount of suspended solids in the wastewater was reduced to less than 72 mg/l. The sand and sand-zeolite treatments increased the total amount of calcium and magnesium in the wastewater more than geotextile and geotextile-zeolite treatments, respectively. The average Ca + Mg of effluent in the total operating hours of the system was higher than the average input in all filters. The percentage of EC changes in total hours increased about 4% in sand and geotextile treatments and 14% in geotextile- zeolite and sand -zeolite filters. The highest percentage of pH changes was related to sand-zeolite filter, which reduced the pH of incoming wastewater by about 4.5%. After that, geotextile- zeolite filter reduced the pH of the incoming wastewater by 4%. The average pH of the effluent of all filters is lower than the average of their inlet.
Conclusion: Sand and geotextile filters alone cause pressure drop and dropper clogging. However, the sand-zeolite treatment has performed well in this regard. The geotextile-zeolite treatment has the potential to be used in terms of supplying the necessary pressure for a short period by applying special treatment measures before this filter. These conclusions are only in terms of pressure drop due to the ability of filters in practical use and do not refer to their ability to filter the parameters and provide the desired flow. All treatments, especially zeolite treatments, significantly reduced nitrate, and these filters can be used to reduce effluent nitrate in cases where the amount of nitrate is more than allowed. However, since the sand filter had no effect on nitrate reduction, the effluent must be treated for nitrate before using sand filters. The geotextile filter had a higher percentage of suspended solids removal at all hours. The addition of zeolites to both geotextile and sand base filters reduced their ability to treat suspended solids. Therefore, geotextile filters can be a good alternative to ordinary sand filters in terms of this parameter. All treatments increased Ca + Mg relative to the input. The sand- zeolite treatment reduced the pH of the incoming wastewater more than other treatments (about 4.5%). Also, desalination of salts from zeolite treatments increased the EC of effluent in the sand-zeolite and Geotextile- zeolite treatments. According to this study, the use of sand-zeolite in terms of reducing nitrate and suspended solid, increasing calcium and magnesium, and reducing pH and no pressure drop is recommended.

Keywords

Clogging; Inlet wastewater; Nitrate; Total Suspended Solid

References

1. Akkashe L. 2007. Application of natural zeolite in order to absorb heavy elements in the leachate of Isfahan Organic Fertilizer Factory. Master thesis, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch. Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
2. Alizade A. 1997. Principles and operations of drip irrigation (first edition). Imam Reza University Press. (In Persian)
3. Bucks D.A., and Nakayama F.S. 1980. Injection of fertilizer and other chemicals for drip irrigation. Technical conference Proceedings-Irrigation Association. Houston, Texas. USA. Silver Spring, Maryland. 166-180
4. Christen E.W., Quayle W.C., Marcoux M.A., Arienzo M., and Jayawardane N.S. 2010. Winery wastewater treatment using the land filter technique. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 1665-1673.
5. Ehsangar M., Charm M., and Farokhiyan Firozabadi A. 2013. Investigation of the possibility of adsorption of nitrate in Ahvaz municipal wastewater by columns of zeolite, activated carbon and sand. Proceedings of the Iranian National Conference on Environmental Research, 31 October. Shahid Mofateh College of Hamadan. (In Persian)
6. Gilbert R.G., Nakayama F.S., and Bucks D.A. 1979. Trickle irrigation, Prevention of clogging. Transactions of the ASAE 22: 514-519.
7. Hajhashemkhani M. 2013. Investigation of the effect of modified microzeolite in combination with soil on some hydrodynamic and chemical parameters of soil in effluent application conditions. Master thesis, Shahrekord University, Iran. (In Persian)
8. Ibrahim H.S., Jamil T.S., and Hegazy E.Z. 2010. Application of zeolite prepared from Egyptian kaolin for the removal of heavy metals: II. Isotherm models. Journal of Hazardous Materials 182: 842–847.
9. Kutay M.E., and Aydilek A.H. 2005. Filteration Performance of tow-layer geotextile systems. Geotechnical Testing Journal 28(1): 79-91.
10. Maharana M., and Sen S. 2021. Magnetic zeolite: A green reusable adsorbent in wastewater treatment. Materials Today: Proceedings.
11. Maleki A. 2012. Potential of Acid Modified Zeolite for Cadmium Adsorption in Aqueous Environment. Journal of Mazandaran University Medical Science 21(86): 74-85. (In Persian with English abstract)
12. Malekian R., Abedi-Kuopai J., and Eslamian S.S. 2011. Influences of clinoptilolite and surfactant-modified Clinoptilolite zeolite on nitrate leaching and plant growth. Journal of Hazardous Materials 185: 970-976.
13. Mohajeri S., and Horlemann L. (Eds.). 2017. Reviving the Dying Giant: Integrated Water Resource Management in the Zayandeh Rud Catchment, Iran. Springer.
14. Mohammadi P., Siyahi M.K, Naseri M., Liaghat A.M., Adl M., Ehteshami M., Ashrafi A., Ghodosi F., Zarankabi M.R. A review of standards and experiences of using wastewater for irrigation. 2010. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage.
15. Najafi P., and Tabatabaei S.H. 2009. Aplication of sand and geotextile envelope in subsurface drip irrigation. ICPTT: 1-6. Advances and Experiences with Pipelines and Trenchless Technology for Water, Sewer, Gas, and Oil Applications 2026-2031.
16. Pescod MB. 1992. Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture. FAO, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 47. p 113.
17. Rabbani M.S., Kazemian H., Ghannadi Maragheh M., and Mallah M.H. 2002. Characterization of a natural analcime from Ardebil (Germi) region of Iran and evaluation of its ion-exchange properties in comparison with synthetic analcime, Second FEZA Conference, 1-5 September, Taormina, Giardini Naxos, Italy.
18. Soleimani M., Ansarie A., Haj Abassie M., and Abedi J. 2008. Investigation of Nitrate and Ammonium Removal from Groundwater by Mineral Filters. Journal of Water and Wastewater 19(3): 18-26. (In Persian with English abstract)
19. Tabatabaei S.H., and Najafi P. 2009. Effects of irrigation with treated municipal wastewater on soil properties in arid and semi – arid regions. Irrigation and Drainage 58: 551-560
20. Tabatabaei S.H., Nourmahnad N., Kermani S.G., Tabatabaei S.A., Najafi P., and Heidarpour M. 2020. Urban wastewater reuse in agriculture for irrigation in arid and semi-arid regions-A review. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 9(2): 193-220.
21. Taheri-Sodejani H., Ghobadinia M., Tabatabaei S.H., and Kazemian H. 2015. Using natural zeolite for contamination reduction of agricultural soil irrigated with treated urban wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment 54(10): 2723-2730.
22. Wang S., and Peng Y. 2010. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater Chemical Engineering Journal 156: 11–24.