Effect of Plant Density and Planting Pattern on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Tulip cv. ʹSpryngʹ

علوم باغبانی

Article 1, Volume 38, Issue 3 - Serial Number 63, September 2024, Pages 479-492   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhs.2021.72661.1092

Authors

D. Hashemabadi^{* 1}; B. Kaviani¹; K. Shakeri Kiasaraei¹; R. Onsinejad¹; M. R. Safari Motlagh²

¹Department of Horticultural Science, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

²Department of Plant Protection, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

Introduction   
Tulip flower (Tulipa L.) from the family Liliaceae is a bulbous and monocotyledon plant that has the highest level under cultivation among this family group. Tulips can be propagated by seeds and bulbs. Its seeds produce bulbs up to two years after planting and it takes six years for the bulbs to reach the flowering stage. In fields, the quality characteristics of flowers can be changed to some extent by changing some planting characteristics such as planting pattern and plant density. Some researchers have reported changes in the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of various crops and orchards, including ornamental plants, with changes in planting pattern and plant density. One effect of changes in planting patterns and plant density is alterations in photosynthesis and plant growth regulators. The purpose of this study was to identify the best planting pattern and determine the optimal planting density, as well as to examine the impact of these factors on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of tulip (Tulipa L.) cv. 'Spryng'.
 
Materials and Methods
To evaluate the effect of planting pattern and density on growth and flower characteristics of tulip cv. ʹSpryingʹ, present study study was conducted as a factorial experiment based on completely randomized block design (RCBD) with 3 replications in 27 plots. The first factor was three planting patterns (square, triangle and rectangle) and three planting densities (25, 45 and 65 plant/m²) as the second factor. Morphological and physiological traits such as height, length and diameter of stem, leaf and flower, flowering time, cut flower number, flower longevity, number, diameter and weight of bulb and bulblet, and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid were measured. Statistical analysis of data was performed with SAS 9 software and mean comparison of the data with LSD test at 5% probability level. Graphs were drawn in Excel.
 
Results and Discussion
Results showed that the maximum number of cut flowers (59.90) was counted in plants cultivated in triangle cultivation design with planting density of 65 plants/m². The lowest time to start of flowering (69.30 days) and the highest content of leaf chlorophyll (13.57 μg/ml) was obtained in plants cultivated in trianle cultivation design with planting density of 45 plants/m². The most flower longevity (12.73 day) and the highest content of carotenoid (1.68 μg/ml) was obtained in plants cultivated in square cultivation design with planting density of 45 plants/m². The height of the flowering stem is one of the important traits for the marketing of cut flowers. The results of the present study showed that the height of the tulip plant was affected by plant density and planting pattern. This result was consistent with the results reported by some researchers. At low plant densities, long plant spacing reduces plant competition for water and nutrient uptake, resulting in larger plant growth and leaf size. Also, long plant distances cause the roots to develop and grow, and the leaves to grow and thicken. Increasing the vegetative competition of adjacent plants at high densities causes photosynthetic organs to be placed in the shade (change in the quantity and composition of the received radiation spectrum in the shade leaves), which has a great effect on the balance of plant growth regulators, resulted in longitudinal and superficial growth of plant organs. It intensifies the longitudinal growth of the petiole and accelerates all the developmental processes of the plant. Plant morphology and angle of leaf deviation can also be effective in increasing leaf size. Uniform distribution of plants and greater absorption of light and nutrients increased leaf length and width. The results revealed that plants compete for light and nutrients, and in these competitive conditions, roots and stems are taller than optimal, and the distance between nodes increases. The effect of planting pattern on flowering process can be related to changes in plant photosynthesis and the availability of photosynthetic materials for the developing reproductive parts. Changes in planting distance or pattern can alter inflorescence characteristics by affecting root growth and modifying the production of plant growth regulators in the roots. These regulators are then transferred to the aerial parts, influencing inflorescence characteristics. Adjusting the planting distance or pattern can also impact various traits of bulbs and bulblets in bulbous plants. Competition for receiving maximum light and photosynthesis is a key factor in changing bulb and bulblet traits. This competition is influenced by planting arrangement and plant density. Some studies have shown that planting pattern and plant density affect the amount of plant pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoids, the main reason being the difference in light intake.

Keywords

Family Liliaceae; Flower quality; Planting pattern and density; Tulip flower

References

• Ali, A., Afzal, M., Rasool, I.J., Hussain, S., & Ahmad M. (2011). Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids performance at different plant spacing under agro-ecological conditions of Sargodha, Pakistan. In: International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology, IACSIT Press, Singapore 9, 317–322. https://www.academia.edu/92387895
• Amjad, A., & Ahmad, I. (2012). Optimizing plant density, planting depth and postharvest preservatives for Lilium longifolium. Journal of Ornamental and Horticultural Plants, 2, 13–20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285675355
• Baghdadi, A., Ridzwan, A.H., Nasiri, A., Ahmad, I., & Aslani, F. (2014). Influence of plant spacing and sowing time on yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus ). Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 12, 688–691. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263279191
• Bahar, S.N.G., & Korkut, A.B. (1998). Research on the effects of planting densities on the yield of corm and cormel in some gladiol (Gladioulus) varieties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 22, 51–58. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/vol22/iss1/8
• Balalić, I., Zorić, M., Branković, G., Terzić, S., & Crnobarac J. (2012). Interpretation of hybrid × sowing date interaction for oil content and oil yield in sunflower. Field Crops Research, 137, 70–77. https://doi.org/1016/j.fcr.2012.08.005
• Beg, A., Pourdad, S.S., & Alpour, S. (2007). Row and plant spacing effect on agronomic performance of sunflower in warm and semi-cold areas of Iran. Helia, 30, 99–104. https://doi.org/2298/HEL0747099B
• Bhosale, A.B., Deshmukh, M.R., & Takte, R.L. (2012). Effect of different planting densities on performance of gerbera under polyhouse conditions. The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 7, 449–453. Corpus ID: 127171956
• Bijimol, G., & Singh, A.K. (2001). Effects of spacing and nitrogen on flowering and post-harvest life of gladiolus. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 3, 48–50. https://www.sid.ir/paper/601689/en
• Corbesier, L., Prinsen, E., Jacqmard, A., Lejeune, P., Onckelen, H.V., Perilleux, C., & Bernier, G. (2003). Cytokinin levels in leaves, leaf exudate and shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis thaliana during floral transition. Experimental Botany, 54, 2511–2517. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg276
• Craine, J.M., & Dybzinski, R. (2013). Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients, water and light. Functional Ecology, 27, 833–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12081
• Daneshvar, M.H., & Heidari, M. (2009). Effects of plant density and planting pattern on growth and flower characteristics of gladiolus. Journal of Horticultural Science, 23(2), 32–40. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v1388i2.2566
• Daneshvar, M.H., & Heidari, M. (2011). Effect of planting distance and cultivation depth on some quantitative traits of narcissus (Narcissus tazetta) cut flower in climatic conditions of Khouzestan (Mollasani). Journal of Horticultural Science, 25(3), 304–309. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v1390i0.11337
• De Hertogh, A., & Le Nard, M. (1993). The physiology of flower bulbs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ISBN: 0444874984, 9780444874986
• Ehsanzadeh, P., & Zarean Baghdadabadi, A. (2003). Effect of plant density on yield, yield components and some growth characteristics of two safflower cultivars in Isfahan climate. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, 7(1), 129–139. (In Persian with English abstract). https://dorl.net/dor/1001.1.22518517.1382.7.1.10.9
• Ford, E.D. (2014). The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275
• Ghannadi, F. (1992). Growing Tulips. Magda Press, Isfahan, p. 113. (In Persian)
• Ghasemi Ghehsareh, M., & Kafi, M. (2009). Practical and scientific floriculture. Razavi Press, Isfahan, p. 313. (In Persian)
• Ghobadi, M.E., & Ghobadi, M. (2010). The effects of sowing dates and densities on yield and yield components of coriander (Coriandrum sativum ). International Scholarly and Scientific Research and Innovation, 10, 725–728.
• Gomes, H.F., Vieira, M.C., & Heredia, Z.N.A. (2007). Density and plant arrangement on Calendula officinalis yield. Revista Brasileira de Plants Medicinais, 9, 117–123.
• Hamidi, A., Khodabandeh, N., & Mohammady-nasab, A.D. (2010). Plant density and nitrogen effects on some traits of maize (Zea mays). Plant Ecophysiology, 2, 47–52.
• Heinen, M., Mollier, A., & Willigen, P.D. (2003). Growth of a root system described as diffusion. II. Numerical model and application. Plant and Soil, 252, 251–265. https://doi.org/1023/A:1024749022761
• Hocking, P.J. (1993). Seasonal dynamics of the accumulation, distribution and redistribution of dry matter and mineral nutrients in a weedy species of gladiolus (Gladiolus caryophyllaceus). Annals of Botany, 71, 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1993.1066
• Ibrahim, H.M. (2012). Response of some sunflower hybrids to different levels of plant density. APCBEE Procedia, 4, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.11.030
• Jhon, A.Q., Mir, M.M., & Bhat, Z.A. (2008). Effect of planting time and density on growth and bulb production in tulip cv. Apeldoorn. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 65(4), 466–470.
• Kaya, Y., Jocić, S., & Miladinović, D. (2012). Sunflower. In: Gupta, S.K. (eds): Technological Innovations in Major World Oil Crops: Breeding. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York 85–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0356-2
• Khalaj, M.A., & Edrisi, B. (2013). Effect of nitrogen and plant spacing on nutrient uptake, quality and quantity characteristics of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa 'Double'). Journal of Horticultural Science, 27(1), 59–66. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.20791
• Klasman, R., Molinari, J., Benedetto, A.D., & Benedetto, A. (1995). Greenhouse cultivation of gladiolus at four planting densities. Horticultura Argentina, 14, 65–68.
• Kumar, K., Singh, G.P., Singh, N., Bhatla, A.K., & Nehra, B.K. (2007). Performance of seed crop of coriander under dif­ferent levels of row spacing, nitrogen and cycocel. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 36, 127–128.
• Mane, P.K., Bankar, G.J., & Makne, S.S. (2007). Influence of spacing, bulb size and depth of planting on flower yield and quality of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa) cv. Single. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research, 41(1), 71–74.
• Martin, R.J., & Deo, B. (2000). Effect of plant population on Calendula officinalis flower production. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 28(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/1080/01140671.2000.9514120
• Mladenović, M., Cvejić, S., Jocić, S., Ćuk, N., Čukanović, J., Jocković, M., & Marjanović Jeromela, A. (2020). Effect of plant density on stem and flower quality of single-stem ornamental sunflower genotypes. Horticultural Science (Prague), 47(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.17221/10/2019-HORTSCI
• Mojiri, A., & Arzani, A. (2003). Effects of nitrogen rate and plant density on yield and yield components of sunflower. Jour­nal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 7, 115–125. https://dorl.net/dor/1001.1.24763594.1382.7.2.9.5
• Moosavi, S.G.R., Seghatoleslami, M.J., & Zareie, M.H. (2012). The effect of planting date and plant density on morphologi­cal traits and essential oil yield of coriander (Coriandrum sativum). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4, 496–501.
• Moraes-Cerdeira, R.M., Burandt, C.L., Bastos, J.K., Nanayakkara, D., Mikell, J., Thurn, J., & McChesney, J.D. (1997). Evaluation of four Narcissus cultivars as potential sources for galanthamine production. Planta Medica, 63(5), 472–474. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-957740
• Mostofipour, A.A., & Hashemabadi, D. (2010). The effect of planting arrangement and different levels of potassium sulfate fertilizer on yield and quality of marigold flowers. M.Sc. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran. (In Persian)
• Niknejad, M., & Yahya, A. (1994). Introduction to Crop Yield Physiology. Shiraz University Press. P. 570. (In Persian)
• Parkash, J., Singh, N.P., & Sankaran, M. (2006). Package of practices for tuberose cultivation in tripura. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Tripura Centre Publication No. 31.
• Rajcan, I., & Swanton, C.J. (2001). Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light qualiy and the whole plant. Field Crops Research, 71, 139–150. https://doi.org/4236/tel.[phone]
• Roghayeh, S.A., Ahmad, T., & Shahzad, J-e-S. (2012). Effect of plant density on phenology and oil yield of safflower herb under irrigated and rainfed planting systems. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6, 2493–2503. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR12.004
• Samani, M.R.K., Khajehpour, M.R., & Ghavaland, A. (1999). Effect of row spacing and plant density on growth and dry matter accumulation in comon on sfhan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 29, 667–679. https://doi.org/3390/agronomy13041117
• San-oh, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yoshita, D., Ookawa, T., & Hirasawa, T. (2006). The effect of planting pattern on the rate of photosynthesis and related processes during ripening in rice plants. Field Crops Research, 96, 113–124. https://doi.org/1016/j.fcr.2005.06.002
• Sharma, J.R., & Gupta, R.B. (2003). Effect of corm size and spacing on growth, flowering and corm production in gladiolus. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 6, 352–356.
• Sher, A., Khan, A., Ashraf, U., Liu, H.H., & Li, J.C. (2018). Char­acterization of the effect of increased plant density on canopy morphology and stalk lodging risk. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1047. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01047
• Singh, A.K. (2006). Flower Crops, Cultivation and Management. New India Publishing Agency. New Delhi. 463 p.
• Singh, A.K., Singh, N.P., & Singh, V.B. (2001). Effect of time, spacing and depth of planting on gladiolus. Indian Journal of Hill Farm, 14, 128–131.
• Singh, K.P. (2002). Effect of planting methods and earthing on gladiolus. Annals of Agricultural Research, 23, 7230–7235.
• Süzer, S. (2011). Effects of nitrogen and plant density on dwarf sunflower hybrids. Helia, 33, 207–214. https://doi.org/2298/HEL1053207S
• Vaziri, R., Biabani, A., Azizy, M., Gholizadeh, A.Gh., & Mahdavi, A.R. (2010). Investigate effects plant density and different fertilizer rates on the agronomic characteristics and yield of tobacco (var. K326). Crop Plants Production, 30(4), 205–215 (In Persian with English abstract)