Converting Thesaurus to Ontology (a Systematic Review)

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 6, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, January 2022, Pages 105-127   

Document Type: Review Article

DOI: 10.22067/infosci.2021.23662.0

Authors

Mansoureh Damerchiloo^{* 1}; Molouk Sadat Hosseini Beheshti²

¹PhD Student,/University of Tehran

²Assistant Professor/Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IRANDOC)

Abstract

Intruduction: The problems and disadvantages of thesauri and the increasing use of ontology in data retrieval have led to studies over the past two decades to suggest the use of thesauruses in the design and construction of ontologies. So, the aim of this study is to review and present a summary of available information about the converting of the thesaurus to ontology.
Methodology: The study was conducted using a systematic review. Kitchenham`s protocol was used (including Research Questions, Search Process, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria, Quality Assessment, Data Collection and Data Analysis). Five research questions (including what are similarities between thesaurus and ontology? what are differencies between thesaurus and ontology? what are the methods of converting a thesaurus to ontology? what are the benefits of using the thesaurus to create ontology?  and what are the challenges for converting the thesaurus to ontology?) were answerd based on the analysis.
Findings: The search strategy was determined and implemented and after the removal of duplicate documents, 71 documents were obtained. Then the documents were matched with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 13 documents were analyzed as final documents for answering research questions.
Conclusion: The results showed that both thesaurus and ontology were used in organizing and covering a particular subject area terminology and their main difference is in the amount of payments to semantic relations between concepts. The definition of classes based on the concepts contained in the thesaurus, the definition of the relationship between concepts and the use of a formal language were the common in all proposed methods. Taking time and avoiding repeating are the benefits of using the thesaurus and the need for an expert specialist in the process of doing work is one of the challenges of converting thesaurus into ontology.

Keywords

Thesaurus; Ontology; Systematic Review

References

حسینی ­بهشتی، ملوک السادات، فاطمه اژه­ای (1394). طراحی و پیاده‌سازی هستی‌شناسی علوم پایه بر اساس مفاهیم و روابط موجود در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های مرتبط. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 30(3)، 677-696. بازیابی شده در 15 آذر 1396 از

https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=2488&sid=1&slc_lang=fa

حسینی ­بهشتی، ملوک السادات (1391). ایجاد هستی‌شناسی واژگانی از اصطلاح‌نامه‌های فارسی. مجموعه مقالات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی،80، 148-164.

شریف، عاطفه (1388). مهندسی خودکار هستی‌شناسی: امکان‌سنجی استخراج روابط معنایی از متون فارسی و تعیین میزان پیدایی آن‌ها. کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 12(2)، 243-263. بازیابی شده در 22 خرداد 1396 در

http://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43626.html

شمس­فرد، مهرنوش، عبداله­زاده بارفروش، احمد (1381). استخراج دانش مفهومی از متن با استفاده از الگوهای زبانی و معنایی. تازه‌های علوم شناختی، 4(1)، 48-66. بازیابی شده در 22 خرداد 1396 از

http://icssjournal.ir/article-1-440-fa.pdf

صنعت­جو، اعظم، فتحیان، اکرم (1390). مقایسه کارآمدی اصطلاح‌نامه و هستی‌شناسی در بازنمون دانش (طراحی و ساخت نمونه هستی‌شناسی اصفا). پژوهش‌های نظری و کاربردی در علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی (پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی پیشین)، 1(1)، 219-240. بازیابی شده در 22 خرداد 1396 از

http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20140507153035-9910-12.pdf

صنعت­جو، اعظم، فتحیان، اکرم (1391). روش‌شناسی طراحی، ساخت و پیاده‌سازی هستی‌شناسی: رویکردها، زبان‌ها و ابزارها (مطالعه موردی طراحی هستی‌شناسی ASFAONT در حوزه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی). کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 15(1)، 113-142. بازیابی شده در 15 اردیبهشت 1396 از http://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_47857.html

میرزابیگی، مهدیه (1390). کاربرد هستی‌شناسی در فرایند بازیابی اطلاعات: مروری بر پژوهش‌های جاری و ارائه الگویی مفهومی. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات (ویژه‌نامه ذخیره، بازیابی و مدیریت اطلاعات)، 27(2)، 237-253. بازیابی شده در 15 اردیبهشت 1396 از https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-1872-fa.pdf

Colantonio, S., Gurevich, I., Martinelli, M., Salvetti, O., & Trusova, Y. (2007). Thesaurus-based ontology on image analysis. In B. Falcidieno, M. Spagnuolo, Y. Avrithis, I. Kompatsiaris & P. Buitelaar (Eds.), Semantic Multimedia, Proceedings (Vol. 4816, pp. 113-116). Berlin: Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-77051-0_12

Ejei, F., Hosseini Beheshti, M. S., Rajabi, T. & Ejehi, Z. (2017). Enriching semantic relations of basic sciences Ontology. Knowledge Organization, 44(5): 318-325. Doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2017-5-318

Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-Lόpez, M., & Corcho, O. (2004). OntologicalEngineering (2nd ed.). London: Springer-Verlag. Accessed in 2017 Jun 5, available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2Fb97353

Hu, Z. Q. (2013). Domain Ontology Construction from Chinese Thesaurus. In X. Sang & Y. H. Kim (Eds.), Materials Processing and Manufacturing Iii, Pts 1-4 (Vol. 753-755, pp. 3209-3213). Doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.753-755.3209

Huang, J.-X., Shin, J.-A., & Choi, K.-S. (2007). Enriching core ontology with domain thesaurus through concept and relation classification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the OntoLex 2007 Workshop associated with ISWC2007. Accessed in 2017 Jun 6, available at: http://semanticweb.kaist.ac.kr/home/images/a/a4/Enriching_Core_Ontology_with_Domain_Thesaurus_through_Concept_and_Relation_Classification.pdf

Khosravi, F., & Vazifedoost, A. (2007). Creating a persian ontology through thesaurus reengineering for organizing the digital library of the national library of iran. Faslnameh Ketab, 70: 19-36. Accessed in 2017 Jun 6, available at: http://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_454_d8b57b4e77a3778612a98187347c98d1.pdf

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2007). Protocol for a Tertiary study of Systematic Literature Reviews and Evidence-based Guidelines in IT and Software Engineering. Accessed in 2018 Mar 08, available at: http://community.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/studies/protocol/Protocol-for-Study-of-SLRs-v3.pdf

Kless, D. (2013). The differences and similarities in thesaurus and ontology structure: with a method for reengineering thesauri into qualitatively good ontologies. (Doctoral dissertation). Accessed in 2018 Mar 11, available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-differences-and-similarities-in-thesaurus-and-a-Kless/ff6e610311449db7a07087309cca37e1242e4bfc

KLESS, D., JANSEN, L., LINDENTHAL, J. & WIEBENSOHN, J. (2012). A method for re-engineering a thesaurus into an ontology. FOIS, 133-146. Accessed in 2018 Apr 13, available at: https://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/phth/jansen/Texte/Kless%20et%20al_A%20method%20for%20reengineering%20a%20thesaurus%20into%20an%20ontology%20_FOIS%202012_Preprint.pdf

Kless, D., Jansen, L., & Milton, S. (2016). A content-focused method for re-engineering thesauri into semantically adequate ontologies using OWL. Semantic Web, 7(5), 543-576. doi: 10.3233/sw-150194. Accessed in 2018 Mar 11, available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-content-focused-method-for-re-engineering-into-Kless-Jansen/dd8b1c87c8978ff78af6e32aa2ac2dc3cd3147ef

Linbo, D., Ping, Q., Lingfei, Q., & Ting, X. (2017). Research on Domain Ontology Construction Based on Thesaurus of Geographical Science. In H. Liu & M. Wan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Automation, Mechanical Control and Computational Engineering (Vol. 118, pp. 15-23). Doi: 10.2991/amcce-17.2017.4

Mothe, J., & Hernandez, N. (2007). TtoO: Mining a thesaurus and texts to build and update a domain ontology. Data Mining with Ontologies: Implementations, Findings, and Frameworks. London: Idea Group Reference, (pp. 123-144). Doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-618-1.ch007

 Nogueras-Iso, J., Lacasta, J., Teller, J., Falquet, G., & Guyot, J. (2010). Ontology learning from thesauri: An experience in the urban domain. Ontology Theory, Management and Design: Advanced Tools and Models: Advanced Tools and Models, London: Information Science Reference, P. 247. Doi: 10.4018/978-1-61520-859-3.ch011

Nowroozi, M., Mirzabeigi, M., & Sotudeh, H. (2017). The comparison of thesaurus and ontology: Case of ASIS&T web-based thesaurus and designed ontology. Library Hi Tech. doi: 10.1108/LHT-03-2017-0060

Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology: Knowldege systems laboratory, stanford university. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880. Accessed in 2017 Dec 06, available at: https://www.cs.upc.edu/~jvazquez/teaching/sma-upc/docs/ontology101.pdf

Soergel, D., Lauser, B., Liang, A., Fisseha, F., Keizer, J., & Katz, S. (2006). Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the AGROVOC example. Journal of digital information, 4: 1-23. Accessed in 2017 Dec 06, available at:

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Reengineering-Thesauri-for-New-Applications%3A-The-Soergel-Lauser/21d3ccc0a9893e60340d3cc7316680b4e349c024

Xing, X., Li, R., & Liu, K. (2009). Building ontology base on thesaurus. Paper presented at the Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, 2009. BMEI'09. 2nd International Conference on.doi: 10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305778