Investigating the Feasibility of the Autumn Cultivation of Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Marvdasht

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 1, Volume 17, Issue 1 - Serial Number 63, March 2025, Pages 1-14   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/agry.2022.67871.1004

Authors

Ali Mojab Ghasroddashti; Alireza koocheki^* ; Mahdi nasiri mahalati

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Drought, as well as water scarcity, are the main limiting factors in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world, such as Iran (Deihimfard & Rahimi Moghadam, 2015). Autumn cultivation can be a solution provided that the upcoming long and cold temperatures do not limit the sugar beet development. One of the limitations of autumn sugar beet cultivation is dealing with low temperatures in winter, which results in vernalization and flowering of sugar beet in the first year. The bolting will reduce economic yield by reducing root weight as well as reducing sugar content (Taleghani et al., 2015). Considering the long period from sugar beet sowing to harvest, this study aimed to: (i) detect the interactions between planting dates and cultivars for three harvest dates; and (ii) recommend the best sugar beet cultivar with the best performance for increasing the sugar yield in Marvdasht region.
 
Materials and Methods
A split-split-plot field experiment with the randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replicates was conducted in two agronomic years (2016-17 and 2017-18) in Marvdasht. Three sowing dates 16 September, 7 October, and 27 October) were assigned to the main plots, and two varieties (Giada and Levante) consisted of the sub-plots. Three harvest dates (1 May, 26 May, and 20 June) were also assigned to the sub-sub-plots. Basic plot size was 15 m², with five rows, 6 m long, and row spacing of 0.5 m. The root yield (RY) was determined by measuring the weight of roots from three middle rows and recalculating it as ton/ha. Root samples were analyzed in the laboratory for sugar beet root quality testing at Sugar Beet Research Institute in Karaj. Sugar content (SC) was measured according to the polarimetric method. Sugar yield (SY) was calculated following the equitation: SY = RY × SC.
 
Results and Discussion
The statistical analysis showed that the two-factor interaction of sowing and harvest dates was significant on the root yield (alpha <0.01). The mean comparisons of the treatments showed that the lowest yield was obtained at the sowing date of 27th October and the harvest date of 1th May (32.95 ton/ha). On the other side, the highest yield (75.75 ton/ha) was acquired with the interaction of the 16th September sowing date and 20 June harvest date. Bolting did not occur with the second and third sowing dates while it happened with the first sowing date. Bolting percentage at the first sowing date was also affected by delays in harvesting dates. The interaction of sowing date × cultivar × harvesting date was significant on sugar content. The highest sugar content belonged to the sowing date of 7th October and harvesting date of 26th May in the Giada cultivar, and the lowest sugar content belonged to the Levante cultivar in the sowing date of 7th October and harvesting date of 1st May. In other words, sugar content is strongly affected by sowing and harvesting dates, so early planting and delaying harvesting until July will increase the sugar content significantly. Also, higher sugar content can be achieved by adjusting the planting and harvesting dates to minimize bolting (Taleghani et al., 2011).
 
Conclusion
Delayed sowing and early harvesting led to reductions in root yield, sugar content, and white sugar yield. The treatment with a sowing date of September 16 and a harvesting date of June 20 resulted in the highest root yield. Although this treatment also had a high bolting rate, the increased yield compensated for the reduction in sugar percentage, resulting in the highest overall sugar yield. However, considering both economic factors and final product outcomes, and given that sugar yield was not significantly different between the second and third harvesting dates, the sowing date of September 16, combined with a harvesting date of May 26, was identified as the most effective treatment for sugar production in Marvdasht.






 



 

Keywords

Autumn sugar beet; Bolting; Cultivars; Harvest date; Marvdasht; Sowing date

References

1. Adibifard, N., Habibi, D., Bazrafshan, M., Taleghani, D.F., & Ilkaee. M.N. (2017). Investigating of cultivating the autumn sugar beet in Fars province (Zarghan). International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences, 3, 1-9.
2. Al-Sayed, M., Usama, A., Abd El-Razek, F., Hayam, M., & Fateh, S. (2012). Effect of harvest dates on yield and quality of sugar beet varieties. Sugar Crops Res. Inst., Agricultural Researches Center, Giza, Egypt. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(9), 525-529. https://doi.org/10.52804/ijaas2023.4211
3. Asadi, M., (2007). Beet-Sugar Handbook: John Wiley & Sons. 884PP.
4. Ashraf Mansouri, G., Sharifii, M., & Hamdi, F. (2013). Study of autumn sowing of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in Fasa area. Journal of Sugar Beet, 29(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2013.1299 .
5. Basati, J., Koolivand, M., Nemati, A., & Zarei, A. (2002). Evaluation of autumn-sown sugar beet production possibility in Kerman-shah warm regions. Journal of Sugar Beet, 18(2), 119-130. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2003.8279.
6. Biscoe, P.V., Jaggard, K.W., Farley, R.F., & Messem, A.B. (1979). Radiation interception and sugar UK, Rothamsted Experimental Station Report. pp. 64PP.
7. Deihimfard, R., & Rahimi Moghadam, S. (2015). Assessing the yield of spring and autumn-sown sugar beet in Mashhad and Neyshabor, Khorasan using a simulation model. Journal of Plant Production Research, 22(3), 157-180
8. FAO STAT. 2017. (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC).
9. Fathullah Taleghani, D., Mohammadian, R., & Sadeghzadeh Hamayati. S. (2015). Guide to planting, holding and harvesting autumn beets. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. Sugar Beet Seed Breeding Research Institute. Pp. 194.
10. Fortune, R.A., Burke, J.I., Kennedy, T., & O’Sullivan, E. (1999). Effect of early sowing on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. Crops Research Centre, Oak Park 20, 25 p.
11. Garcia, J., Lopez, E., & Bellido, L. (1986). Growth and yield of autumn-sown sugar beet: Effects of sowing time, plant density and cultivar. Field Crops Research. 14, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(86)90042-0.
12. Hemayati, S., Shirzadi, M., Aghaeezadeh, M., Taleghani, D., Javaheri, M., & Aliasghari, A. 2012. Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). Journal of Sugar Beet, 28(1), 42-25. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.659.
13. Hoffmann, C.M. & Kluge-Severin, S. (2011). Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet. European Journal of Agronomy, 34(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.09.001.
14. Hoffmann, C.M. (2019). Importance of canopy closure and dry matter partitioning for yield formation of sugar beet varieties. Field Crops Research, 236, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.013.
15. Hossain, M.F., Khaliq, Q.A., & Karim, A. (2015). Effect of sowing date on growth and yield of tropical sugar beet. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 7(1), 53-60.
16. Illkaee, M.N., Babaei, Z., Baghdadi, A., & Golzardi, F. (2016) Effect of different planting dates and defoliation on the properties of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ). Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(1), 52-58. http://doi.org/10.18006/2015.4(1).52.58.
17. Javaheri, M.A., Najafinejad, H., & Azad Shahraki, F. (2006). Investigating the possibility of autumn beet cultivation in Arzooieh region (Kerman province). Journal of Pajhouhesh and Sazandegi, 71, 93-85.
18. Kenter, C., Hoffmann, C.M., & Märländer, B. (2006). Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris). European Journal of Agronomy, 24, 62–69. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.05.001.
19. Khajehpour, M. 2006. Industrial plants. Isfahan University of Technology Jihad Publications, Isfahan, Iran. 564 p.
20. Rinaldi, M., & Vonella, A.V. (2004). Water use efficiency in sugar beet, subjected to different sowing times and irrigation regimes in a Mediterranean Proceedings of the 4^th International Crop Science Congress, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004, Brisbane, Australia.
21. Sharifi, H., Sadeghian, S. Y., & Hosseinpour, M. (2000). Winter beet cultivation, current and future situation of the country. Report of Sugar Beet Research Institute.
22. Stibbe, C., & Marlander, B. (2002). Field emergence dynamics significance to intraspecific competition and growth efficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). European Journal of Agronomy, 17,161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00005-9
23. Storer, K.R., Schmehl., W.R., & Hecker, R.J. (1973). Growth analysis studies of sugar beet. Technical Bull., Colorado State University Experiment Station.118, 69 pp.
24. Taleghani, D.F., Moharamzadeh, M., Hemayati, S.S., Mohammadian, R., & Farahmand, R. (2011). Effect of sowing and harvest time on yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Moghan region in Iran. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 27(3), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.22092/sppj.2017.110442.