Comparison of some Physicochemical Characteristics and Polyphenolic Content in Six Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Cultivars

علوم باغبانی

Article 13, Volume 36, Issue 3 - Serial Number 55, November 2022, Pages 709-719   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhs.2022.74271.1116

Authors

A. Bonyanpour^{* 1}; B. Jamali²

¹Crop and Horticultural science Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran

²Crop and Horticulture science Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is a nutrient dense fruit with a high health value and one of the most important Iranian fruit crop. Historical evidence reveals that the primary origin of pomegranate is Iran and that it has been spread from this region to other areas. A vast range of pomegranate varieties can be found in Iran; 760 original, decorative and wild ones. Pomegranate juice contains a high amount of total soluble solid (TSS), anthocyanins, polyphenolic compounds, vitamin C, sugars and proteins.Pomegranate is considered as one of the most tolerant fruit crops capable of growing under arid and semi-arid climatic conditions. Cultivar and growing region climate are the main factors determining chemical composition of pomegranate fruits; Significant differences in various fruit quality parameters such as organic acids, phenolic compounds, sugars and water-soluble vitamins have been reported in previous studies.  The aim of present study was to compare and evaluate physical and biochemical characteristics of fruits and different polyphenolic compounds in juice of six commercial Iranian pomegranate cultivars.
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted in 2017 and 2018 years in a commercial orchard in Arsanjan region of Fras province. Six Iranian pomegranate cultivars included ‘Malas Yusef Khani’ (MYK), ‘Bajestani (BK), ‘Khazr Bardskan’ (KHZ), ‘Malas Dane Syah’ (MDS), ‘Rabbab’ (RB) and ‘Zard Anar Arsenjan’ (ZA) were studied. The trees were planted in randomized block design and spaced 5 and 3 m between and along the rows, respectively. The trees were grown under drip irrigation with routine cultural practices suitable for commercial fruit production. Orchard management was conducted uniformly according to optimized available recommendations (based on soil and water samples analysis) for the orchard site. Fruits were harvested randomly from orchard and some physicochemical characteristic of fruits were measured. Fruit length and fruit diameter measured by manual caliper, fruit and above ground weight was determined by digital scale. The fruit juice percentage was calculated by calculating the percentage of aril juice.  TSS (Total soluble solids) expressed in Brix◦ was measured using a refractometer. The titrable acidity (TA) was determined by titration to pH 8.1 with 0.1M NaOH solution and expressed as percentage.Total anthocyanins, total polyphenols, vitamin C and anthyoxidant activity were measured spectrophotometrically. Polyphenolic compositions of juices (Gallic acid, Catechin, Caffeic acid, Chloregenic acid, p-Coumaric acid Vanilin, Trans-ferulic acid, Hesperedin and Ellagic acid) were also measured using HPLC analysis. The chromatographic analysis was carried out on Agilent Technologies 1200 series HPLC system. Chromatograms were recorded at 280 and 320 nm. Each compound was quantified by comparing its peak. Data was analyzed by SPSS software and means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range tests at 5% probability level.
 
Results and Discussion
 Significant differences were found among studied pomegranate cultivars for various physical fruit characteristics, quality parameters and polyphenolic composition of fruit. ‘Malas Daneh Syah Yazd ’was the best in comparison to other cultivars.  ‘Malas Daneh Syah Yazd’ had the highest fruit weight (332 g), fruit length (8 cm), fruit diameter (8 cm), TSS(15.77 Brix◦), anthocyanin content (26.98 mg 100 ml^-1), polyphenol content (514.37 mg 100 ml^-1) , ascorbic acid content (9.23 mg 100 ml^-1) and antioxidant activity (52.2%). Also, the amount of polyphenols in this cultivar was relatively high. This cultivar had high amount of some polyphenol content such as cathechin (223.5 mg L^-1), Hesperidin (30.55 mg L^-1) and Ellagic acid (43.02 mg L^-1) with no significant differences with highest amount. ‘Rabbab’ had the highest aril weight (340 mg) and moderate levels of other fruit characterestics, this cultivar had the maximum polyphenols such as gallic acid (163.1 mgL^-1), catechin (264.2 mgL^-1), caffeic acid (265.1 mgL^-1), p-Coumaric (74.41 mgL^-1) acid, vanillin (18.21 mgL^-1) and ellagic acid (43.5 mgL^-1). Zard anar’ pomegranate cultivar which was native to this region in terms of most biochemical properties had a low a‘mount .Therefor, among the studied pomegranate cultivars‘ Malas Dane syah’ and was the best. This cultivar had the highest fruit characteristics and polyphenol content such as ellagic acid. 
Conclusion
The results of this study showed significant differences among studied pomegranate cultivars. ‘Dane syah Yazd’ had the highest physical and chemical characterestics of fruits. Previous studies showed that theses cultivars had good growth characteristics and high yield in comparison to other cultivars. Therefore, among the studied cultivars, ‘Dane syah Yazd’ is introduced as a suitable cultivar for this region. Also, ‘Rabbab’ Neyriz cultivar can be considered as a cultivar with high antioxidant properties of fruit juice due to having the highest amount of measured polyphenolic compounds, especially alginic acid.
 

Keywords

Anthocyanin; Antioxidant; Polyphenolic compounds; Vitamin C

References

1- Akbarpour, V., Hemmati, K., & Sharifani, M. (2009). Physical and chemical properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit in maturation stage. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 6(4): 411-416.

2- Akhavan, H., Barzegar, M., Weidlich, H., & Zimmermann, B.F. (2015). Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of juices from ten Iranian pomegranate cultivars depend on extraction. Journal of Chemistery 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/907101.

3- Artik, N., Ceremroglu, B., Murakami, H., & Mori, T. (1998). Determination of phenolic compounds in pomegranate juice by HPLC. Fruit Process 8: 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400684n.

4- Babu, K.D., Singh, N.V., Gaikwad, N., Maity, A., Suryavanshi, S.K., & Pal, R.K. (2017). Determination of maturity indices for harvesting of pomegranate (Punica granatum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87: 1225-30.

5- Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Food Science and Technology 28: 25–30.

6- Cam, M., Hisil, Y., & Durmaz, G. (2009). Classification of eight pomegranate juices based on antioxidant capacity measured by four methods. Food Chemistery 112: 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2008.06.009.

7- Cui, S.M., Sasada, Y., Sato, H., & Nii, N. (2004). Cell structure and sugar and acid contents in the arils of developing pomegranate fruit. Journal of Japan Society of Horticulture Science 73: 41-243. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.73.24.

8- Fadavi, A., Barzegar, M., Azizi, M.H., & Bayat, M. (2005). Physicochemical composition of 10 pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) grown in Iran. Food Science and Technology International 11(2): 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013205052765.

9- Halvorsen, B.L., Holte, K., Myhrstad, M., Barikmo, I., Havattum, E., Remberg, S.F., Haffner, K., Baugerd, H., Andersen, L.F., Moskaug, J., Jacobs, D.R., & Blomhoff, R.A. (2002). Systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. Journal of Nutrition 132: 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.461.

10- Hamid, I., Elothmani, D., Hanine, H., Oukabli, A., & Mehinagi, E. (2017). Comparative study of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant attributes of eighteen pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars grown in Morocco. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 10(2) 2675-2684.

11- Hepaksoy, S., Erogul, D., Şen, F., & Aksoy, U. (2009). Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some Turkish pomegranate varieties. Acta Horticulture 818: 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.10.011.

12- Jamali, B., & Eshghi, S. (2014). Application timing of nitric oxide ameliorates on deleterious effects of salinity on growth and fruit quality of strawberry cv. Selva. Journal of Berry Research 4: 137-145. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.818.35.

13- Kader, A.A. (2006). Postharvest biology and technology of pomegranates, in pomegranates: ancient roots to modern medicine, ed. by Seeram NP, Schulman RN and Heber D. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 211–220.

14- Kulkarni, A.P., & Aradhya, S.M. (2004).  Chemical changes and antioxidant activity in pomegranate arils during fruit development. Food Chemistery 93: 319-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.029.

15- Kulkarni, A.P., Aradhya, S.M., & Divakar, S. (2004). Isolation and identification of a radical scavenging antioxidant–punicalagin from pith and carpellary membrane of pomegranate fruit. Food Chemistery 87: 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.006.

16- Lee, J., Durst, R.W., & Wrolstad, R.E. (2005). Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: Collaborative study. Journal of the AOAC International 88: 1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/88.5.1269.

17- Li, R., Chen, X.G., Jia, K., Liu, Z.P., & Peng, H.Y. (2016). A systematic determination of polyphenols constituents and cytotoxic ability in fruit parts of pomegranates derived from five Chinese cultivars. Springer Plus 5(1): 914. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs40064-016-2639-x.

18- Meighani, H., Ghasemnezhad, M., & Bakhshi, D. (2014). Evaluation of biochemical composition and enzyme activities in browned arils of pomegranate fruits. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 1: 53-65. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhst.2014.50518.

19- Melgarejo, P., & Artes, F. (2000). Organic acids and sugar composition of pomegranate juice. Europian Food Research Technology 4: 30–31.

20- Mertens-Talcott, S.U., Jilma-Stohlawetz, P., Rios, J., Hingorani, L., & Derendorf, H. (2006). Absorption, metabolism and antioxidant effects of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Polyphenols after ingestion of a standardized extract in healthy human volunteers. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistery 54: 8956–8961. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061674h.

21- Misana, A.C., Mimica-Dukicb, N.M., Mandica, A.I., Sakaca, M.B., Milovanovica, I.L., & Sedeja, I.J. (2011). Development of a rapid resolution HPLC method for the separation and determination of 17 phenolic compounds in crude plant extracts. Central European Journal Chemistery 9: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-010-0126-8.

22- Mousavinejad, G., Emam-Diomeh, Z., Rezaei, K., & Khodaparast, M. (2009). Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds and their effects on antioxidant activity in pomegranate juices of eight Iranian cultivars. Food Chemistery 115: 1274–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.044.

23- Nikdel, K., Seifi, E., Babaei, H., Sharifani, M., & Hemmati, M. (2016). Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of five Iranian pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) in maturation stage. Acta Agriculture Slovenica 107(2): 277–286.

24- Orak, H.H., Yagar, H., & Isbilir, S.S. (2012). Comparison of antioxidant activities of juice, peel, and seed of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and inter-relationships with total phenolic, tannin, anthocyanin, and flavonoid contents. Food Science and Biotechnology 21(2): 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-012-0049-6.

25- Ozgen, M., Durgac, C., Serce, S., & Kay, C. (2008). Chemical and antioxidant properties of pomegranate cultivars grown in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Food Chemistry 111: 703–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.043.

26- Palvina, D., & Constantinus, T. (2005). Physical and chemical characterestics of pomegranate. Hortscience 40(5): 1200-1203.

27- Papanov, S., Petkova, E., & Ivanov, I. (2019). Polyphenols content and antioxidant activity of various pomegranate juices. Bulgarian Chemical Communications 51: 113-116.

28- Passaeium, R., Perrone, A., Sortino, G., Giangozzi, G., Salleta, F., Gentile, C., & Farina, V. (2019). Chemical–physical characteristics, polyphenolic content and total antioxidant activity of three Italian-grown pomegranate cultivars. NFS Journal 16: 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2019.06.001.

29- Patras, A., Brunton, N.P., Da Pieve, D., & Butler, A. (2008). Impact of high-pressure processing on total antioxidant activity, phenolic, ascorbic acid, anthocyanin content and colour of strawberry and blackberry pur´ees. International Food Science Emergency and Technology 10(3): 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2008.12.004.

30- Rena, K., Palida, A., & Zhang, A. (2009). Studies on the chemical constituents from Xinjiang Punica granatum. China Journal Chinese Materia Medica 32: 363-365.

31- Tehranifar, A., Zarei, M., Nemati, Z., Esfandiyari, B., & Vazifeshenas, M.R. (2010). Investigation of physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of twenty Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulture 126: 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.001.

32- Tezcan, F., Gultekin, O.M., & Diken, T. (2009). Antioxidant activity and total phenolic, organic acid and sugar content in commercial pomegranate juices. Food Chemidtery 115(3): 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.103.

33- Watson, L., & Dallwitz L.J. (1992). The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval. Version: 14th December 2000.

34- Zoubida, K.M., Elothmani, D., & Boutekrabt Benhadja, L. (2015). Morphological and physicochemical characteristics of three pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) grown in northern Algeria. Fruits 71: 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2015044.