Analysis and Critique of Different Approaches to the Problem of Consciousness in the Cartesian-European Tradition and Phenomenology

جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام

Article 12, Volume 53, Issue 2 - Serial Number 107, January 2022, Pages 201-222   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/epk.2022.69933.1024

Authors

Mohamad mehdi Moghadas^{* 1}; m ا²

¹department of philosophy

²ا

Abstract

The approach of Descartes and his subsequent philosophical tradition to consciousness did have epistemological consequences. The distinction between subject and object, and the question of how the mind and body relate, the entanglement of the mind in its ideas that led to the problem of “egocentric predicament,” the problem of the identity of the perceptual object, skepticism, and the issue of valuation regarding the gap between the mind and the object are some consequences of this approach. Consequently, alternative approaches have been proposed by philosophers to avoid such consequences. Among these approaches is phenomenology with the narratives of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology with its intentionality, Heidegger’s doctrine of “being-in-the-world” and Merleau-Ponty’s idea of conscious bodies tried to explain the mechanism and characteristics of consciousness. The present article seeks to examine the problems of the Cartesian-European epistemological system, to show how to deal with these problems, and finally to analyze and critique the characteristics of each approach to see whether these alternative approaches could have managed to solve these problems or not.

Keywords

consciousness; epistemology; subject and object; phenomenology; theory of ideas; soul and body; Cartesianism

References

Block, N, “On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness”, Behavioral and brain sciences, No. 18, 1995, pp. 228-287.

Descartes, Rene, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, vol. I, Cambridge University Press, I985.

Descartes, Rene, A Discourse on the Method of Correctly Conducting One’s Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences, translated by Ian Maclean, Oxford University Press, USA, 2006.

Descartes, Rene, Meditations on First Philosophy with Selections from the Objections and Replies, translated by Michael Moriarty, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Dreyfus, H, Being-in-the-world: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I, MIT Pres, 1991.

Dreyfus, H, “Responses, Coping, and Cognitive Science”, Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume 2, edited by Mark A. Wrathall and Jeff Malpas, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.

Feigl, H, The “Mental” and The “Physical:” The Essay and a Postscript, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol.2, Minneapolis, 1958.

Frith, C, Rees, and G, “A Brief History of the Scientific Approach to the Study of Consciousness”, In: The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness; Velmans, M & Schneider, S (Eds.), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.

Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time, tr. John Macquarie and Edward Robinson, New York: Harper & Row, 1962.

Hopp, Walter, “Perception”, in The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology, edited by Sebastian Luft and Soren Overgaard, New York and London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 146-157.

Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, Ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1960.

Husserl, Edmund, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book, translated by F. Kerstern. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983.

Husserl, Edmund, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book. Translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

Kant, Immanuel, critique of pure reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Levine, J., “Materialism and qualia: The Explanatory gap”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, No. 64, 1983, pp. 354-61.

Merleau–Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.

Merleau–Ponty, Maurice, Signs, translated by R. Mc Cleary. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1964.

Nagel, T., “What is it like to be a bat?”, Philosophical Reviews, No. 4, 1974, pp. 435-50.

Remes, P, “Ancient Theories”, In: Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind, Vol. 12, chapter 26, edited by: Simo Knuuttila and Juha Sihvola, London, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York, 2014, pp. 415-27.

Searle, J, Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language and Political Power, Columbia University Press, 2007.

Copleston, Frederic Charles, History of Philosophy: From Wolf to Kant, translated by Ismail Saadat and Manouchehr Bozorgmehr, Scientific and Cultural Publications, Tehran, 2015.