Investigating the Effect of Personal Knowledge Management and Information Seeking Behavior on Self-Efficacy of the Graduate Students of Tabriz University

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 4, Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 24, November 2022, Pages 76-100   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/infosci.2022.70454.1037

Authors

Abbas Doulani^* ; Parisa Ghodrati; Masume Karbala Aghaii Kamran

Department of Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: At present, the Internet has created tremendous changes in information seeking and research activities in scientific communities; but among these, there are successful people who use the created opportunities to their advantage with the help of management tools and new technologies. Personal knowledge management is one of these tools. Considering that knowledge is a necessary and vital resource for success, the study of knowledge management process, especially in organizations, should be considered. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of personal knowledge management and information seeking behavior on students' self-efficacy.
Methodology: The current research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of methodology; it is correlation with the approach of presenting the structural equation model. The statistical population of this research was all graduate students of Tabriz University. Regarding the statistical sample, considering that the method of selective analysis for the hypotheses of this research is in the form of structural equations, they were 190 students, which seems suitable due to the ease of access and also the number (according to the rank of the university). Based on this, the sampling method in the current research was simple random sampling. The measurement tool in the present study was a questionnaire. In the current research, three questionnaires were used: Wilson's  information-seeking behavior standard questionnaire, with 6 items; 2. Mohiuddin et al.'s standard personal knowledge management questionnaire, with 7 items; and the standard self-efficacy questionnaire of Sherer et al. with 6 items.
Findings: The results showed that there was no significant difference between the variables of gender and age and personal knowledge management among university graduate students. According to the path coefficient values, there is a significant relationship between personal knowledge management variables and information seeking behavior with self-efficacy. Also the models that are analyzed with a variance-based approach through variance-based software such as Smart PLS do not have a general index to look at the model at once. That is, there is no index to measure the entire model similar to the variance-based approach. However, in various researches in this field, it was suggested that an index called GOF, which was proposed by Tenenhaus, Esposito Vinzi, Chatenlin, Larue, can be used instead of the fit indices that exist in covariance-oriented approaches. This index considers both structural and measurement models simultaneously and tests their quality. This index is manually calculated as average R2 and average shared values.
Conclusion: Regarding the obtained results, it can be said that by improving the behavior of educational and research information and getting familiar with the motivations, goals and correct methods of searching, it saves time and money of researchers. Researchers can obtain relevant and reliable information and use it to complete their educational and research activities in order to avoid repetitions or using the trial and error method. People who have good skills, abilities and knowledge, evaluate their judgment and evaluation in reaching the desired goal and position higher. Based on the approach of social learning, cognitive learning and thinkers such as Bandura, the evaluation of people and their self-efficacy in achieving desirable situations and desired goals is influenced by their knowledge, cognition, and the way they organize their knowledge; When people have sufficient knowledge and understanding of desired situations and goals and can organize their knowledge, they see themselves as more capable in achieving their goals; That means they experience higher self-efficacy. In this regard, knowledge management also means collecting, acquiring, understanding, categorizing and sharing knowledge. Therefore, it can be expected that personal knowledge management will improve people's self-efficacy; because it increases a person's knowledge and awareness of desirable situations and goals.

Keywords

Personal Knowledge Management; Information Seeking Behavior; Self-efficacy; Tabriz University

References

ایرانزاده، سلیمان؛ اک، شورش؛ مهرگان، فرهاد (1388). بررسی رابطه بین برخی عوامل اجتماعی با خوداثربخشی، رضایت شغلی و بهره‌وری کارکنان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ارومیه و مهاباد، پژوهشنامه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بجنورد، 21، 27-42. از: http://ensani.ir/fa/article/download/267805

باقری بنجار، عبدالرضا؛ مصلحی جنابیان، نرگس؛ بیگی ملک‌آبادی، بانو؛ محمدی، میثم (1394). بررسی رابطه ارتباطات علمی با خوداثربخشی دانشگاهی دانشجویان، توسعه اجتماعی، 12(2) 79-100. https://doi.org/10.22055/qjsd.2016.11945

برزه کار، حسین؛ کاشانیان‌فر، سیما؛ سادات، یوسف (1390). بررسی میزان بهره‌گیری از مدیریت دانش شخصی در دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده فنی مهندسی دانشگاه الزهرا، فصلنامه مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 7(1) 12-18. https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2022.343425.1614

بطحایی، سمیه سادات؛ ترکیان‌تبار، منصور (1394). رابطه رفتار اطلاع‌یابی با مؤلفه‌های خلاقیت در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد دورود. نوآوری‌های مدیریت آموزشی، 10(3) 50-37. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20081138.1394.10.3.3.8

جمالی، زهرا؛ اسمعیلی‌گیوی، محمدرضا؛ نوروزی، علیرضا (1398). واکاوی ابعاد مدیریت دانش شخصی و تحلیل نقش واسطه‏‌ای آن در تأثیر ویژگی‏‌های روان‌شناختی بر شایستگی‏‌های سازمانی در خدمات اطلاعاتی و دانشی. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 9(1)، 85-106. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v0i0.70235

حسین زاده، علی‌اصغر؛ عزیزی، مرتضی؛ توکلی، حسین (1393). حمایت اجتماعی و رضایت از زندگی در نوجوانان: نقش واسطه‌ای خودکارآمدی و حرمت خود. روانشناسی تحولی (روانشناسان ایرانی)، 11(41)، 103-114. از: https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/78113934108.pdf

حسینی‌صدر، اقبال؛ اباصلتیان، علی (1392). بررسی تأثیر ابعاد هوش هیجانی بر تمایل افراد به تسهیم دانش در سازمان ناجا. فصلنامه منابع انسانی ناجا. 8، (33)13 – 45. دسترسی از: http://phr.jrl.police.ir/article_12301_32afee9264210715ea5c5ea9feae75a0.pdf?lang=en

رضازاده، آرش؛ داوری، علی (1393). مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزارPLS. تهران: سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.

زوارقی، رسول (1386). چشم‌اندازی بر مدیریت دانش شخصی، راهبردها، ابزارها، و مهارت‌ها. اولین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت دانش، تهران: موسسه اطلاع‌رسانی نفت، گاز و پتروشیمی. موسسه تحقیقات و آموزش مدیریت، دسترسی از: http://www.civilica.com/Paper-IKMC01-IKMC01_015

ساروخانی، باقر (1382). روش‌های تحقیق در علوم اجتماعی، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.

سرمد، زهره؛ بازرگان، عباس؛ حجازی، الهه (1384). روش‌های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. چاپ دوازدهم، تهران: آگه.

سواری، کریم؛ نیسی، عبدالکاظم (1391). ارتباط خودتنظیمی و خود اثربخشی با گرایش به تکالیف درسی، فصلنامه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، 26(8)، 69-82. از: https://jep.atu.ac.ir/article_2461_688f77d35d65abff857d3fc18fea3270.pdf

عباسی افسنجانی، حسین (1396). طراحی الگوی تجاری­سازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی با روش مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری حداقل مربعات جزئی(SEM-PLS). فصلنامه پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 82، 65-33. از: https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17350794.1396.21.82.2.6

قاضی طباطبایی، سید محمود؛ مرجایی، سید هادی (1380). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر خود اثربخشی دانشگاهی دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری دانشگاه تهران. پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، 19(2). https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/64813800102.pdf

مرادی، مهدی؛ مرندی، زکیه؛ محسنی، ایمان (1396). رابطه بین مدیریت دانش شخصی و عملکرد شغلی حسابداران، فصلنامه مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، 19، 97-116. از: https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2017.14159.1106

منصوریان، یزدان؛ سنگری، محمود (1394). بررسی رفتار اطلاع جویی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه خوارزمی در تدوین پایان‌نامه، تعامل انسان و اطلاعات، 3(2) 1-8. از: https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2017.14159.1106

نجفلو، پریسا؛ یعقوبی، جعفر؛ عباسی، عنایت (1394) بررسی مؤلفه‌های رفتار اطلاع‌یابی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان، تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 46(3)، 541-550. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2015.55536

نعمتی انارکی، لیلا؛ نوشین‌فرد، فاطمه (1392). بررسی عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر اشتراک دانش از دیدگاه اعضای هیئت‌علمی، فصلنامه مدیریت سلامت، 17(56)، 79-65. از:  http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-۱-۱۵۰۲-fa.html

نعیمی، جمیله؛ محمداسماعیل، صدیقه (1395). تعیین رفتار اطلاع‌یابی دانش‌پژوهان دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی خراسان رضوی با رویکرد شبکه عصبی. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی (مطالعات تربیتی و روان‌شناسی)، 6(2)، 80-96. از:  https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=299765

Agnihotri, R., & Troutt, M. D. (2009). The effective use of technology in personal knowledge management: A framework of skills, tools and user context. Online Information Review, 33(2), 329-342. . https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910951249

Aljanabi, A., and Kumar, D. (2012). Knowledge sharing and its impact on innovation performance: A case study of teaching quality assurance program. Research Journal of Commerce and Behavioural Science (RJCBS). 2(2): 14-23.

https://www.theinternationaljournal.org/ojs/index.php?journal=rjcbs&page=issue&op=view&path%5B%5D=01%20December%202012

Bandura, A. (2002). Social foundations of thought and action. The Health Psychology Reader, Prentice-Hall, United States, Englewood Cliffs, 94-106.  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technological studies, 2(2), 285-309. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=10934427946688273356.

Nissen, M. Knowledge management – systems implementation: lessons from the silicon valley. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7, 181–182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.3

Brachos, D., K. Kostopoulos, K. Eric Soderquist, and G. Prastacos (2007). Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(5): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710819780

Câmpeanu-sonea, E., Sonea, A. and c. Mitra-Crisan. (2014). knowledge management and organizational competence for the service quality to the customer. Managerial challenges of the contemporary society. Proceedings. 7(1): 58.

https://www.proquest.com/openview/3a370d2384b72a0b8be12961233b4d4a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1606337

Choo, Chun Wei; Detlor, Brian & Turnbull, Don (2000). Information Seeking on the Web: An Integrated Model of Browsing and Searching. Annal meeting of the American Society for information Science. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED438801.pdf

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Fornell, C., Johnson, M.C., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J. and Bryant, B.E. (2006), The American Consumer Satisfaction Index: nature, purpose and findings. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, October, pp. 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000403

Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. et al. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 414–433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G. & Ray, p. (2016). "Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines." Industrial management & data systems. 116. 2-20. DOI:10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8

Lee, S., Gon Kim, B. and Kim, H. (2012), An integrated view of knowledge management for performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211218807

Mohayidin, M., Azirawani, N., Man Norfaryanti, K., Mar Idawati, M, (2007), “The application of knowledge management in enhancing the performance of Malaysian Universities”, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(3), 311-312. http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/id/eprint/435

Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R.W. (2002). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-67. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663

Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005.

Tseng, S-M, & Huang, J-S. (2011). the correlation between Wikipedia and knowledge sharing on job performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6118-6124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.009

Verma, S. (2009). Personal Knowledge Management: A Tool to Expand Knowledge about Human Cognitive Capabilities. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(5): 435-438. http://ijetch.org/papers/81New.pdf

Wang, W. T., & Belardo, S. (2005, January). Strategic integration: A knowledge management approach to crisis management. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (252a-252a). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2005.559.

Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological measurement, 34(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400104

 Wetzels, M., Odekkerken-Schroder, G. & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quarterly, 33(1): 177. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284

Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.28945/576

Wright, K. (2005). Personal knowledge management: supporting individual knowledge worker performance. Knowledge management research & practice, 3(3), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500061