The Features of Author’s Individuality in Alavi Discourse Case Study of Sermon 238 regarding the Invitation to Unity and Forbidding Division

زبان و ادبیات عربی

Volume 14, Issue 2 - Serial Number 29, September 2021, Pages 70-87   

Document Type: research article

DOI: 10.22067/jallv14.i2.2207-1154

Authors

Maryam Hashemi^{* 1}; Ma’soumeh Nemati Ghazvini²

¹Assistant Professor of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies Institute, Tehran, Iran

²Associate Professor of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies Institute, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Deep knowledge, understanding of the text, and finding underground semantic layers require applying scientific, systematic tools. One of these tools presented in Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics theory (1768-1834) is a psychological interpretation used in the present article in the form of an epistemic paradigm named psychological paradigm. The achievement of focusing on this paradigm is to present scientific solutions to Nahj-al-Balaghe’s interpreter to infer meaning from Nahj-al-Balaghe’s text. The psychological paradigm is established by adopting particular approach concepts’ including author individuality, author humanity, and discourse space dominant in the author’s epoch. The present article aims to explain features of Imam Ali (AS)’s individuality concerning the strategic concept of Islamic unity, looking to answer this question according to Schleiermacher’s psychological paradigm of how the approachable concept of the author’s individuality is demonstrated in Nahj-al-Balaghe’s 238th sermon? The unity issue is still one of the challenges of the Islamic world that makes the return to pure Islamic discourse and re-reading its simple principles an unavoidable necessity. Sermon 238, regarding the invitation of unity and forbidding division, is one of the richest sources in this field. The obtained results indicate that subjective order and logical structure are dominant over Imam Ali (AS)’s discourse in confronting the unity issue, precise rooting of dividing elements and then presenting solutions for solving the problem, the special place of rationality and rationalizing in Alavi discourse and positive self-concept while interacting with the audience are among the most notable features of his holiness’s individuality in the mentioned sermon.
 

Keywords

Hermeneutics; Psychological Paradigm; Author’s Individuality; Islamic Unity; Nahj-al-Balaghe

Supplementary Files

رفرنس + چکیده 5.pdf

References

Holy Quran.

Aghagolzadeh, F. (2010). Critical discourse analysis, second edition, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. [In Persian].

Alavi Moghadam, M. (2017). Literary studies of cognitive text hermeneutics, first edition, Tehran: Sokhn. [In Persian].

Anvari, H. (2008). The Great Encyclopedia of Sokhan. Sixth Ed. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian].

Bayat, A. (2002). The Encyclopedia of Words, Qom: The Cultural Foundation of Religious Thought. [In Persian].

Bohrani, K. (1999). The Explanation of Nahj al-Balagheh. Beirut: Dar al-Saghalein. [In Arabic].

Brandel, N. (2009). The Psychology of Self-Respect.Trans. Jamal Hashemi. Fourth Ed. Tehran: Enteshar Corporation. [In English].

Bruno, F. (2005). The Descriptive Encyclopedia of Psychology, Third Ed. Tehran: Nahid. [In English].

Eghbali, A. (2015). “The Analysis of some Thoughts in Nahj al-Balagheh”,The Journal of Arabic Language and Literature, 12(7): 31-50. [In Persian].

DOI: 10.22067/jall.v7.i12.49809

Elahi Rad, S. (2015). Familiarity with hermeneutics, first edition, Tehran: Semit. [In Persian].

Ghandehari, M.& et al. (2016). “Creating Unity as the Revival of Islamic Rationality”,The Journal of Islamic Religions’ Thought, 1 (1):108-142. [In Persian].

Hasani, S. (2012). “An Introduction to the Foundations of Text Understanding from Mohaghegh Isfahani and Hermeneutics’ Perspective”,The Journal of Islamic Law, 34: 71-108. [In Persian].

Ibn Abi Al-Hadid Al-Moatazeli, A. (2005).The Explanation of Nahj al-Balagheh, Research: Mohammad Abolfazl Ibrahim . Iraq: Darolketab Al-Arabi. [In Arabic].

Ibn Manzor. (n.d). Arabic Language, Cairo: Dar al-Ma’aref. [In Arabic].

Javadi Amoli, A. (2001). The Unity of Societies in Nahj al-Balagheh. Qom: The Asra Publication Center. [In Persian].

Khansari, J. (1981). The Explanation of Ghorar el-Hakam va Dorar el-Kalam lel-Imam Amir al-Momenin (AS), Second Ed. Tehran: Tehran University. [In Persian].

Makarem Shirazi, N. (2011). The Explanation of Imam Amir al-Momenin’s Message, Qom: Imam Ali Ibn Abi Taleb. [In Persian].

McGraw, P. (2008). Self-Knowledge and Self-Respect.Trans. Aghdas Rezaee, Second Ed. Tehran: Nasl-e-Noandish. [In English].

Montazeri, H. (1989). Description of the Qasea sermon, first edition. Tehran: Information. [In Persian].

Motahari, M. (1993). About Islamic Republic, Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian].

Norbakh Golpayegani, M. (2001).The Terms of Social Science. Tehran: Behineh. [In Persian].

Safari Foroshani, N. (1996). “Anthropology of Kufeh”,The Journal of Meshko, 53: 13-41. [In Persian].

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 14, No.2 Serial Number. 29                        page: 3

Salarzani, A.& I. Asgari. (2013). “Meditating in Jurisprudence Inference”.The Journal of Jurisprudence Researches, 9(1): 31-53. [In Persian].

Shams al-Din, M. (1984). The History Movement for Imam Ali (AS), First Ed. Tehran: Nahj al-Balagheh Foundation. [In Arabic].

Tababtabee, S. (1996). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Quran, Qom: The Society of Teachers of Elmiyeh Circle. [In Arabic].

Vaezi, A. (2000). An introduction to hermeneutics, first edition. Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian].

Valvi, A. (2001). Religion and Politics in the Beginning Islamic Ages, First Ed. Tehran: Al-Zahra University. [In Persian].

Dehkhoda, A. (1997). Dehkhoda dictionary, second edition. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian].

Palmer, R. (2008). Science of hermeneutics, translated by Mohammad Saeed Hanai Kashani, Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian].

Vaezzadeh Khansari, M. (2000). “Imam Ali (AS) and Unity”, Book Review Quarterly, 19: 4-31. [In Persian].