A critique of Pierre Bourdieu's view on the relationship between agency and culture in the area of education based on Islamic theory of action

پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت

Article 1, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, March 2022, Pages 5-30   

Document Type: پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/fedu.2022.74241.1117

Authors

Hamideh Farahbakhsh¹; Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast^{* 2}; Narges Sadat Sajjadieh³; Morteza Monadi⁴

¹PhD in philosophy of education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

²Professor، University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

³Assistant Professor, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

⁴Associate Professor, University of Alzahra,Tehran, Iran,

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine and criticize Pierre Bourdieu's view about the relationship between agency and culture in the area of education based on Islamic theory of action. To this purpose, concept interpretation and external criticism methods are used. The results of this paper showed that based on the Islamic theory of action, individual agency in Pierre Bourdieu's view is weak. Absence of internal factors, underestimating the individual action, reducing different kinds of action to improvised actions, cultural relativism, and reducing the education function to cultural reproduction are among the criticisms. The implications of these criticisms in the area of education, lead to consider student agency in education process so it changes the education from the reproduction state to an interaction between teacher and students. This interaction take places in different dimensions asymmetrically.
 

Keywords

Pierre Bourdieu; culture; education; agency; Islamic theory of action

References

Bagheri, K. (1995). The identity of religious science. Tehran: Organization for Publication of the Ministry of Cultural and Islamic Guidance. (In Persian).

Bagheri, K. (2008). Introduction to the Philosophy of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Vol. 1). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. (In Persian)

Bagheri, K. (2010). An introduction to philosophy of education of Islamic Republic of Iran: Philosophy of curriculum (Vol. 2). Tehran. Elmi farahangi. (In Persian)

Bagheri, K. (2015). The P4C in the Balance (Vol. 1). Tehran. Pajuheshgahe Ulume Insani. (In Persian).

Bagheri, K. (2016). Islamic Education as Asymmetrical Democratic Interaction. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Alternative Education (pp. 339-353). Springer.

Bagheri, K. (2021). Human agency: A religious and philosophical approach (Vol. 1). Tehran: Vacavesh. (In Persian)

Bonnewitz, P. (1997). Premières leçons sur la sociologie de Bourdieu (J. J. H. Poorsafir, Trans.). FeniXX. (In Persian).

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=WvhSEMrNWHAC

Bourdieu, P. (1986). Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education. (R. Nice, Çev). The forms of capital, 47-58.

Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard university press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford university press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Languge and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Columbia University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=6kHKmIMNoBYC

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=Or0tmdjsiKsC

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Practical reason: On the theory of action (M. Mardiha, Trans.). Tehran: Naghsh-o-Negar. (In Persian).

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Univ of Chicago Pr.

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.

Chandler, B. (2013). The subjectivity of habitus. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 43(4), 469-491.

Chauviré, C., & Fontaine, O. (2003). Le vocabulaire de Bourdieu (M. kotobi, Trans.). Ellipses. (In Persian).

Chomsky, N. (2016). What Kind of Creatures are We? Columbia University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=qZGErgEACAAJ

Coombs, J., & Daniels, R. (2009). Philosophical Inquiry; Conceptual Analysis (K. Bagheri, Trans.). In Methodology of Curriculum Studies. . Tehran: SAMT Press. (In Persian).

Fakouhi, N. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu’s views on the question of knowledge and intellectualism. Journal Of Social Sciences., 1(1), -. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v0i0.5251

Golabi, F., Boudaghi, A., & Alipour, P. (2015). Analytical Review on Conflation of Agency and Structure in the thought of Pierre Bourdieu. Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research, 4(6), 117-143.

Grenfell, M. J. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu: key concepts (M. Labibi, Trans.). Tehran: Afkar. (In Persian)

Jamshidiha, G., & Parastesh, S. (2007). The dialectic of habitus and field in Pierre Bourdieu's theory of action. Journal of Social Science Letter, 30, 1-32.

Jenkins, R. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu (H. Chavehian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney. (In Persian).

Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32(5), 567-606. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0

O'Connor, T., & Sandis, C. (2011). A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. John Wiley & Sons.

Pudsey, J. (1996). The limits of reflexivity: a Weberian critique of the work of Pierre Bourdieu.

Reay, D. (2015). Habitus and the psychosocial: Bourdieu with feelings. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.990420

Schatzki, T. R. (1997). Practices and Actions A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319702700301

Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=wtv6upysjjgC

Verdaasdonk, H. (2003). Valuation as rational decision-making: a critique of Bourdieu's analysis of cultural value. Poetics, 31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2003.09.002

Warde, A. (2004). Practice and field: revising Bourdieusian concepts. Centre for Research on Innovation & Competition.

Webb, S., & Danaher,. Understanding Bourdieu. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?id=DDP7AwAAQBAJ