Corporate Governance and Aggressive Business Strategy of Companies

اقتصاد پولی مالی

Article 8, Volume 30, Issue 25, July 2023, Pages 233-260   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/mfe.2023.81265.1287

Authors

Mohammad Hosein Fatheh^{* 1}; Parisa Rahmani²

¹Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

²MSc., Department of Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
The business strategy of companies plays an essential role in achieving the company's goals, and strategies should be adopted based on the company's ability, resources, and goals. Choosing the wrong strategy can jeopardize the interests of the stakeholders and the company. As a result, the adoption of strategy by managers should be monitored. Meanwhile, corporate governance with two arms of non-commissioned managers and the audit committee as tools for monitoring the performance of managers and the overall performance of companies, is probably effective in adopting business strategy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide new evidence about the relationship between the quality of the board of directors and the audit committee as two fundamental pillars of corporate governance, in relation to the aggressive business strategy of commercial units.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
One of the variables influencing the policies and performance of companies is business strategy. Strategy includes a set of decision-making rules that direct the organization's overall behavior. These decision-making rules determine the organization's relationships with its external environment. In general, business strategy consists of integrated actions in search of competitive advantage. In the organizational literature, two major, different and complementary concepts are examined for the survival and progress of organizations, those two concepts are management and governance. In the concept of management, the main emphasis is on the methods of achieving organizational goals, while the concept of governance is a supervisory concept. The characteristics of the board of directors of companies refer to the mechanisms of corporate governance and the role of board members in monitoring the affairs of companies. Corporate governance is a system that not only enhances the relationship between different parties (shareholders, managers and investors of the company), but also ensures the availability of appropriate resources among competing users. In addition, it provides structures through which firm goals are formulated and ways to achieve goals as well as performance reviews. The purpose of creating an audit committee is to create a set of experts and specialists to monitor management activities on behalf of company owners.The audit committee is a sub-committee under the framework of corporate governance, in which the board of directors assigns some supervisory responsibilities to it. The board of directors and the audit committee are the main pillars of corporate governance and have the duty of fiduciary and protecting the interests of shareholders and supervise the implementation of the company's internal controls.
 
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The current research is applied and from the methodological point of view, the correlation is causal type (post-event). The statistical population of the research is all the companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange, and using screening, 131 companies were selected as the research sample and were investigated in the 10-year period between 1390 and 1399.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The results of the research hypotheses test showed that in the first hypothesis, the quality of the board of directors has a direct effect on the aggressive business strategy of the companies. The results of the second hypothesis also showed that the quality of the audit committee has no effect on the aggressive business strategy of the companies.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
Companies that want to progress and surpass their competitors in the market by choosing an aggressive strategy and using new operational plans and new technologies, actually accept a kind of risk and hazard that should be in the shadow of principled and accurate planning, so such companies They require strict internal controls that are the result of managers' careful supervision and strong and quality corporate governance, and the results obtained show that improving the quality of the board of directors can have a positive impact on choosing an aggressive business strategy.

Keywords

Corporate Governance; Audit Committee; Board of Directors; Aggressive Business Strategy

References

Abbott, L.J.; Parker, S. & Peters, G.F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 69-87, doi: 10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69.

Annarelli, A.; Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2020). Competitive Advantage Implication of Dfferent Product System Business Models: Consequences of "Not Replicable"Capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 114-121.

Asadi, L.; Jarjarzadeh; A.; & Kaab A. (2021). The moderating role of business strategy on the relationship between the dimensions of social responsibility and the economic performance of the company. Business Management Explorations, No. 26, Volume 39, pp. 167-205. (in Persian).

Barzegar; Ebrahimi; & Jamil, (2021). The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between social capital and cash dividend policies. Knowledge of financial accounting. Volume (8), number (1), pp. 120-93. (in Persian).

Bazrafshan, A., (2015). The impact of audit committee quality on achieving the goals of internal controls governing financial reporting. Scientific research quarterly, financial accounting empirical studies, year (13), number (52), pp. 171-196. (in Persian).

Bebchuck, L., & Cohen, A. (2004). The costs of entrenched boards. Working Paper. Harvard Law School.

Bentley-Goode, K.A.; Newton, N.J., & Thompson, A.M. (2017). “Business strategy, internal control over financial reporting, and audit reporting quality”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 49-69, doi: 10.2308/ajpt-51693.

Blue Ribbon Committee (1999). Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. New York: New York Stock Exchange and National Asso ciation of Securities Dealers.

Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020), "The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2018-0085.

Carcello, J.V.; Hermanson, D.R. & Ye, Z. (2011). “Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: insights, practice implications, and future research directions”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 1-31, doi: 10.2308/ajpt-10112.

Chen, Y.; Eshleman, J.D., & Soileau, J.S. (2017). “Business strategy and auditor reporting”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 63-86, doi: 10.2308/ajpt-51574.

Chen, Y., & Jermias, J. (2014). Business strategy, executive compensation and firm performance. Accounting & Finance, 54(1), 113-134.

Felizia A. R.; TjahjadiDian A., & Noorlailie S., (2022) Business strategy and industrial competition: the case of manufacturing companies. International Journal of Business EnvironmentVol. 13, No. 1 Published Online:January 5, 2022pp 35-59.

Freedom, the universe; Farzaneh, M., & Fallah Karimi, N., (2018). Investigating the relationship between the characteristics of the board of directors and the performance of the company with the moderating role of the audit committee. New approaches in management and accounting, number (19), volume (3), pp. 1-19. in Persian.

Ghofar, A., & Islam, S.M.N., (2015). Corporate Governance and Contingency Theory: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach and Accounting Risk Implications, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, available at:https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-10996-1.

Habib, A., & Hasan, M.M. (2017). Business strategy, overvalued equities, and stock price crash risk. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 389-405.

Hajiha, V., & Adeleh, A., (2018). Audit committee characteristics and comparability of financial statements with an emphasis on the size of the audit firm and corporate governance. Knowledge of financial accounting, volume (6), number (3), pp. 117-95. (in Persian).

Herusetya, A., & Suryadinata, M. (2022). "Business strategy typologies: do the board of commissioners and audit committee concern about prospector-type strategies?", Asian Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ AJAR-10-2021-0188.

Khoini, B.; Faqih, M., & Shafiei, M. (2017). The relationship between audit committee characteristics and company performance criteria. Accounting and Auditing Research, No. 40, pp. 105-126. (in Persian).

Kim, J-B.; Lee, J.J., & Park, J.C. (2016). Internal Control Weakness and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2481600.

Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 375-400, doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9.

Kong, X. F., & Jiang, L Zhu - Economic Modelling)(2022). Business strategy, corporate social responsibility, and within-firm pay gap. Economic Modelling. Volume 106, January 2022, 105703 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105703.

Kumar, V.; Verma, P., & Mittal, A., Tuesta Panduro, J.A., Singh, S., Paliwal, M. and Sharma, N.K. (2022). "Adoption of ICTs as an emergent business strategy during and following COVID-19 crisis: evidence from Indian MSMEs", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2021-0685

Lak, L., & Moulai Birgani, F. (2017). The effect of the quality of corporate governance on the performance of companies active in the Tehran Stock Exchange. New researches in management and accounting, new period, number 20, pp. 231-244. (in Persian).

Lin, J.W., & Hwang, M.I. (2010). “Audit quality, corporate governance, and earnings management: a meta-analysis”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 57-77, doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00403.x.

Lin, J.W., Li, J.F. & Yang, J.S. (2006). “The effect of audit committee performance on earning squality”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 9, pp. 921-933, doi: 10.1108/02686900610705019.

Mamorabadi, M.; Ghafourian Zafari, M. S., & Davoudi, M. (2018). Investigating the relationship between business strategy and the weakness of internal controls. Research in accounting and economic sciences. Year 3, No. 5, pp. 79-86. (in Persian).

Marfoo, M., & Shakri, R. (2017). Business strategies and its relationship with financial performance. Accounting empirical research. Volume (8), No. (1), pp. 157-183. (in Persian).

Menon, K., & Williams, D.J. (1994). “The use of audit committees for monitoring”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 121-139, doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(94)90016-7.

Miles, R. E.; Snow, C. C.; Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 3(3), 546-562.

Naseri, A.; Soleymani, S., & Yazdifar, H. (2017). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Working Capital Management Efficiency of Firms Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange. ـJournal of Financial Management Perspective, 7(20), 55-70. (in Persian).

Noor, A.; Farooq, M., & Tahir, Z. (2022). "Nexus between audit committee and corporate risk: evidence from Pakistan", Corporate Governance, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2021-0418.

RahmatiZad Khajeh P., J.; Derakhshani Darabi, K.; Nademi, Y., & Asayesh, H. (2020). the Corporate Governance and Disclosure of Information Relations and Their Effects on the Banks Performance. ـJournal of Financial Management Perspective, 10(31), 129-151. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.10.31.129. (in Persian).

Ramsay, I. (2001). Ramsay Report. Independence of Australian company auditors. Review of current Australian requirements and proposals for reform. http//www.treasury.gov.au.

Rostami, W.; Rezaei, L., & Commerce, Z. (2021). The effect of competition in the product market and life cycle on the business strategy of companies with an emphasis on new companies. Smart Business Management Studies, Allameh Tabatabai University, Volume (9), Number (36). (in Persian).

Sarbanes, P., & Oxley, M. (2002). Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002. Washington, DC:U.S.Congress.

Snow, C. C., & Hambrick, D. C. (1980)."Measuring organizational Strategies: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems". The Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 527-538. https://doi.org/10.2307/257458

Tanani, M., & Mohebkhah, M. (2013). Investigating the relationship between business strategy, profit quality and stock returns in companies listed on the stock exchange. Experimental accounting research. No. 13. pp. 105-127. in Persian

Valizadeh Larijani, A., & Khodayi, M. (2020). The moderating effect of internal auditor performance quality on the relationship between corporate governance quality and company performance. Financial Accounting and Audit Research, No. 52, pp. 1-22. (in Persian)

Yazdifar, H., & Mohammadi Seh Duran, S. (2021). The role and importance of audit, reward and introduction committees in companies' boards of directors. Accounting and Auditing Studies, No. 41, pp. 47-64. (in Persian)

Yuan, Y.; Lu, L. Y.; Tian, G., & Yu, Y. (2020). Business strategy and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 359-377.