Studying the Beneficial Indicators of Intercropping of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) with Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik), and Bitter Vetch (Lathyrus sativus L.)

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 3, Volume 16, Issue 3 - Serial Number 61, September 2024, Pages 463-475   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/agry.2023.84365.1166

Authors

Amin Yari; Farzad Mondani^* ; Alireza Bagheri; Hamid Reza Chaghazardi

Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Introduction[1]
 
Intercropping is an agroecological technique in which two or more species are grown in the same area for a certain period of time. These species should be complementary to each other regarding the use of productive resources. By selecting crop species with different growth habits and minimal competition, intercropping optimizes resource absorption, resulting in improved yields compared to monoculture. Many studies have shown that intercropping systems improve the resources used, stability of production, and increased profitability per area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the beneficial indicators of intercropping of safflower, an important oil plant, with three legume species, including chickpea, lentil, and bitter vetch, under Kermanshah climatic conditions.
 
Materials and Methods
 
A split plots experiment was done based on a completely randomized block design in three replications in dryland conditions at the research farm of the Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, during 2018-2019. In this study, chickpea, lentil, and bitter vetch were assigned to the main plots, and five intercropping arrangements included legume monoculture, 75:25 ratio of safflower and legume, 50:50 ratio of safflower and legume, 25:75 ratio of safflower and legume, and safflower monoculture were assigned to the subplots. In this research, safflower was the main crop, and chickpeas, lentils, and bitter vetch were considered as alternative crops. The beneficial indicators of intercropping, including Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), Relative Crowding Coefficient (RCC), System Productivity Index (SPI), and Actual Yield Loss (AYL) were calculated. The LER indicates the amount of land required for the crop in monoculture in order to achieve a similar yield as intercropping. The RCC indicates the competitive ability of crops grown in intercropping. In other words, it expresses the relative dominance of one species over others in intercropping. The SPI data are calculated by standardizing the alternative crop based on the main crop, whose higher values indicate the enhanced efficiency of the intercropping system. The AYL indicates the decrease or increase in the yield of intercropping compared to monoculture. The data were analyzed using ANOVA, and the means were compared with the LSD test.
 
Results and Discussion
 
The results showed that the LER in intercropping with chickpeas and lentils was higher than that in other treatments. Regardless of legume species, among the cultivation patterns, the 50:50 ratio of safflower and legume was superior in terms of LER (1.26) and competition index (RCC=4.6) compared to other intercropping patterns. The amount of actual yield reduction was positive for all intercropping patterns, but in the conditions where the chickpeas were cultivated as a companion crop in the intercropping, it was significantly more than the condition where the bitter vetch was cultivated as a companion crop (AYL=0.62). The highest productivity index in intercropping patterns was obtained when lentils were cultivated together with safflower (6089). The advantage of intercropping has been reported in many studies, especially those in which one of the components of intercropping is legume species, and the results of the current research are consistent with them. Intercropping provided better growth conditions for safflower compared to its monoculture. The different morphology of safflower compared to chickpea, lentil, and bitter vetch allows for minimal competition for resource uptake. The nitrogen fixation ability and facilitative effects of these legume species improved the indicators of intercropping profitability and ultimately increased safflower yield compared to its monoculture.
 
Conclusion
 
Regardless of the intercropping arrangements, the results of this study generally showed that the cultivation of chickpea together with safflower compared to lentil and bitter vetch resulted in more benefits in terms of the investigated intercropping indices. This was evident as the chickpea-safflower intercropping achieved the highest LERatio (1.14). This result was due to the presence of facilitative effects in chickpeas, especially their ability to biologically nitrogen fixation. With regard to the beneficial indicators of intercropping, the 50% safflower: 50% legumes pattern demonstrated superiority compared to other investigated patterns. Therefore, if the results of this study are confirmed in other years and regions under dryland conditions, the chickpea-safflower intercropping with a 50:50 pattern is recommended.
 



 
 



 
 

Keywords

Actual yield reduction; Competition index; Land equality ratio; Productivity index

References

1. Abdollahi, A. (2018). Evaluation of wheat and chickpea intercropping methods with nitrogen management under weed control and non-control conditions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)
2. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., & Sinebo, W. (2008). Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for sustainable development, 28, 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008012
3. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., & Sinebo, W. (2006). Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 25(3), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.05.002
4. Banik, B., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K., & Ghose, S.S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.010
5. Chapagain, T., & Riseman, A. (2014). Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research. 166, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.014
6. Esmaeilian, Y., & Amiri, M.B. (2021). Agronomic and economic evaluation of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) intercropping under micronutrient applications. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 15(1), 1-20. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.30495/jcep.2021.681003
7. Hajishabani, H., Mondani, F., & Bagheri, A. (2020). Simulation effects of sowing date on growth and yield of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arientinum) by CROPGRO-CHICKPEA model. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research. 18(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V18I2.82684
8. Hamzei, J., & Seyedi, M. (2013). Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) intercropping systems using advantageous indices of intercropping under weed interference conditions. Journal of Agronomy Sciences. 6(9), 1-12. (In Persian with English abstract). https://journals.shahed.ac.ir/article_1302.html
9. Hong, Y., Heerlink, N., Zhao, M., & Van der Werf. W. (2019). Intercropping contributes to a higher technical efficiency in smallholder farming: Evidence from a case study in Gaotai county, China. Agricultural Systems. 173, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.007
10. Imran, M., Ali, A., Waseem, M., Tahir, M., Ullah, A., Mohsin, S., Ghaffari, A., & Rehman, H. (2011). Bio-economic assessment of sunflower-mungbean intercropping system at different planting geometry. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science. 1(4), 126-136.
11. Jalilian, J., Najafabadi, A., & Zardashti, M.R. (2017). Intercropping patterns and different farming systems affect the yield and yield components of safflower and bitter vetch. Journal of Plant Interactions. 12(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1294712
12. Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Feizi, H., Amirmoradi, S., Mondani, F. (2010). Effect of strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on yield and land equivalent ratio in weedy and weed free conditions. Journal of Agroecology. 2(2), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V2I2.7627
13. Kheradmand, S., Mahmodib, S., & Ahmadi, E. (2015). Quantitative and qualitative performance evaluation of green pea and barley forage intercropping. Applied Field Crop Research. 27(105), 111-118. https:// 22092/AJ.2014.103358
14. Khoramivafa, M., Eftekharinasab, N., Nemati, A., Sayadian, K., & Najafi A. (2011). Economic evaluation of medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo var. Styriac)/chickpea-lentil intercropping system associated with several nitrogen levels. Journal of Agronomy Sciences. 4(5), 53-62. (In Persian with English abstract). https://journals.shahed.ac.ir/article_1275.html
15. Majnoon Hosseini, N., Soleimani, J., & Zinali, H. (2013). Investigating different proportions of strip intercropping on the yield and yield components of safflower and spring chickpea. Research on Crops and Breeds of Chickpea. 5,143-146. (In Persian with English abstract)
16. Mardani, F., Balouchi, H.R., Yadavi, A., & Salehi, A. (2015). Effect of row intercropping patterns on yield, yield components, and weed control of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgreacum) and anise (Pimpinella anisum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 13(3), 623-636. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v13i3.29670
17. Mazaheri, D. (1998). Intercropping. Tehran University Publications, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
18. Rahimi, G., Barmaki, M., & Seied Sharifi, R. (2015). Evaluation of yield and yield components in potato-safflower intercropping. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi). 108, 114-119. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2016.106730
19. Rezaei Chianeh, E., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., & Aharizad, S. (2011). Study of some agronomical characteristics of maize in intercropping with faba bean. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 21(1), 1-16. (In Persian with English abstract). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24764310.1390.21.1.1.9
20. Saeidi, M., Raei, Y., Amini, R., Taghizadeh, A., & Pasban Eslam, B. (2018). Evaluation of yield and protein content of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) in intercropping with faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under biological and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 28(4), 247-260. (In Persian with English abstract). https://sustainagriculture.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_8388.html
21. Saeidi, M., Yaghoub, R.A., Amini, R., Taghizadeh, A., Pasban-Eslam, B., & Saralan, A.R. (2019). Competition indices of safflower and faba bean intercrops as affected by fertilizers. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 11(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb11110340
22. Shaygan, M., Mazaheri, D., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., & Peyghambari S.A. (2008). Effect of planting date and intercropping of maize (Zea mays) and foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) on their grain yield and weeds control. Iranian Journal of Crop Science. 10(1), 31-46. (In Persian with English abstract). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1387.10.1.3.6
23. Shirzadi, M.H., Rezaei, S., Hemayati, S.S., & Abedi, M. (2011). Evaluation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) intercropping. Plant Ecophysiology. 3, 53-58.
24. Shobeiri, S.S., Khorsandi, H., & Kamel, M. (2019). Effects of seed rates and row spaces on grain yield and yield components of two lentil cultivars under cold dryland conditions. Iranian Dryland Agronomy Journal. 7(2), 125-141. http://doi.org/10.22092/IDAJ.2018.121553.214
25. Zafaranieh, M. (2014). The effect of different patterns of safflower and chickpea intercropping on yield and yield components of chickpea. 2^nd National Conference of Applicable Researches in Agriculture Sciences. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).