Comparison and Evaluation of Common Orchard Sprayers with Variable-rate Sprayers

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 4, Volume 14, Issue 4 - Serial Number 34, December 2024, Pages 405-427   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.2023.84946.1198

Authors

R. Fathi¹; M. Ghasemi-Nejad Raeini^{* 2}; S. Abdanan Mehdizadeh²; M. Taki²; M. Mardani Najafabadi³

¹PhD Student in Agricultural Mechanization, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

²Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

³Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Innovative technologies, such as smart sprayers, are pivotal catalysts for modernizing the agricultural sector and play an indispensable role in providing food for human consumption. Without the utilization of these technologies and the implementation of proper input management, it is predicted that environmental impacts will worsen in the future. Attaining sustainable production, while implementing programs to ensure food security, presents a considerable challenge for researchers and policymakers worldwide. In this research, the performance of a fixed-rate orchard sprayer was evaluated. Employing various equipment, the sprayer was then upgraded to a variable-rate sprayer, and its performance was reevaluated and compared to the fixed-rate model.
Material and Methods
This research comprehensively evaluated a fixed-rate orchard sprayer and subsequently upgraded it to a variable-rate sprayer for further assessment. The primary components of the developed variable-rate sprayer, consists of an ON-OFF solenoid valve, a digital camera for imaging purposes, an ultrasonic sensor, a flow meter, and a control circuit. The necessary modifications were implemented on a fixed-rate turbine sprayer. The development of the variable-rate sprayer was devided into two distinct phases. The initial phase involved determining the canopy volume and acquiring the necessary information pertaining to the spraying target, specifically the tree. The subsequent phase focused on decision-making and control of the spraying rate, thereby facilitating variable-rate application. Upon laboratory examination of the samples, spectroscopic results were obtained, and the total concentration of the pesticide solution was calculated across different sections of a one-hectare orange orchard. An investigation into the sedimentation of pesticide solution was conducted across different treatments in two spraying modes namely, variable-rate and fixed-rate and at three distinct speeds: low (1.6 km hr^-1), medium (3.2 km hr^-1), and high (4.8 km hr^-1) resulting in six treatments.
Results and Discussion
The comparative analysis of average pesticide deposition on trees revealed a significant difference between the two spraying modes; variable-rate and fixed-rate. All indicators demonstrate that the type of sprayer and the spraying speed significantly influence changes in pesticide deposition across different treatments. However, the interaction effect of the type of sprayer and the speed of spraying did not significantly impact the amount of pesticide deposition on the trees and the total consumption of pesticide per hectare. The results indicated that neither the type of sprayer, nor the speed of spraying, nor their interaction had a significant effect on the spraying quality index. Furthermore, the numerical median diameter and volume median diameter were not significantly different across the treatments.
The maximum pesticide consumption savings in the variable-rate spraying mode was 46%, achieved at a speed of 1.6 km hr^-1. The maximum efficiency was 70% in the variable-rate spraying mode, occurring at a speed of 3.2 km hr^-1. The lowest amount of pesticide deposition on the canopy of trees was observed in the variable-rate spraying method at the speed of 4.8 km hr^-1 (1303 L ha^-1), and the highest amount of deposition occurred in the fixed-rate spraying at the speed of 1.6 km hr^-1 (2121 L ha^-1). The highest amount of pesticide release in the air was also calculated in the fixed-rate spraying mode with a speed of km hr^-1 (241 L ha^-1) and the lowest value was calculated in the variable-rate spraying mode with a speed of 3.2 km hr^-1.
Conclusion
Emerging technologies, such as smart sprayers, play a crucial role in increasing the productivity of the agricultural sector. If these technologies are not utilized, the challenges related to the sustainability of production will increase in the future. One of the critical operations in the production of agricultural products is the spraying phase. In this research, a fixed-rate sprayer was upgraded to a variable-rate sprayer, both sprayers were evaluated, and the results of this evaluation were then used to compare the two spraying systems. The results revealed that because the amount of the pesticide sprayed is controlled in real time by canopy volume detection in the variable-rate sprayer, in the best case (speed 1.6 km hr^-1), it reduced pesticide consumption by 46% and reached 70% efficiency. In all the studied treatments, both the type of sprayer and the speed of spraying significantly affected changes in pesticide deposition. However, the interaction between the type of sprayer and the speed of spraying did not have a significant effect on the amount of pesticide deposition on trees or total pesticide consumption per hectare. There was no significant difference in the coverage percentage of the pesticide deposition on the target in different treatments, and the best spraying quality occurred in variable rate spraying with a speed of 4.8 km hr^-1.
By using a variable-rate sprayer, while saving on the costs of chemical pesticide consumption and spraying, toxic emissions that cause environmental pollution will also be reduced. Future research should focus on developing a variable-rate system based on independent nozzles, allowing for real-time control of each individual nozzle's spraying.

Keywords

Energy; Environment; Sprayer; Variable rate technology

References

Asaei, H., Jafari, A., & Loghavi, M. (2019). Site-specific orchard sprayer equipped with machine vision for chemical usage management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.040

Balsari, P., Marucco, P., & Tamagnone, M. (2007). A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk. Crop Protection, 26(10), 1482-1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.12.012

Baran, M. F., Lüle, F., & Gökdoğan, O. (2017). Energy input-output analysis of organic grape production: A case study from Adiyaman province. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 59(4), 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0322-1

Behzadipour, F., Ghaseminejad Raini, M., Asodar, M. A., Marzban, A., & Abdanan Mehdizadeh, S. (2017). Evaluation of technical factors of agricultural turbine spraying on spraying quality and droplet diameter by image processing. Jurnal of Agricultural Machinery, 7(1), 61-72. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v7i1.48194

Berenstein, R., Shahar, O. B., Shapiro, A., & Edan, Y. (2010). Grape clusters and foliage detection algorithms for autonomous selective vineyard sprayer. Intelligent Service Robotics, 3, 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-010-0078-z

Carman, G. E., Iwata, Y., & Gunther, F. A. (1977). Pesticide deposition on citrus orchard soil resulting from spray drift and runoff. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 18, 706-710.

Carvalho, F. P. (2017). Pesticides, environment, and food safety. Food and Energy Security, 6(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.108

Chen, L., Wallhead, M., Reding, M., Horst, L., & Zhu, H. (2020). Control of insect pests and diseases in an Ohio fruit farm with a laser-guided intelligent sprayer. HortTechnology, 30(2), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04497-19

Chen, Y., Ozkan, H. E., Zhu, H., Derksen, R. C., & Krause, C. R. (2013). Spray deposition inside tree canopies from a newly developed variable-rate air-assisted sprayer. Transactions of the ASABE, 56(6), 1263-1272.

Ciacci, L., & Passarini, F. (2020). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of environmental and energy systems. Energies, 13(22), 5892. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225892

Cobbenhagen, A. T. J. R., Antunes, D. J., van de Molengraft, M. J. G., & Heemels, W. P. M. H. (2021). Opportunities for control engineering in arable precision agriculture. Annual Reviews in Control, 51, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.01.001

Cunningham, G. P., & Harden, J. (1998). Reducing spray volumes applied to mature citrus trees. Crop Protection, 17(4), 289-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(98)00007-6

Dou, H., Zhang, C., Li, L., Hao, G., Ding, B., Gong, W., & Huang, P. (2018, September). Application of variable spray technology in agriculture. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 186, No. 5, p. 012007). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/186/5/012007

El Bilali, H., Callenius, C., Strassner, C., & Probst, L. (2019). Food and nutrition security and sustainability transitions in food systems. Food and Energy Security, 8(2), e00154. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.154

Escolà, A., Rosell-Polo, J. R., Planas, S., Gil, E., Pomar, J., Camp, F., ... & Solanelles, F. (2013). Variable rate sprayer. Part 1–Orchard prototype: Design, implementation and validation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 95, 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.02.004

Garcerá, C., Moltó, E., & Chueca, P. (2017). Spray pesticide applications in Mediterranean citrus orchards: Canopy deposition and off-target losses. Science of the Total Environment, 599, 1344-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.029

Gil, E., & Escolà, A. (2009). Design of a decision support method to determine volume rate for vineyard spraying. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 25(2), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26323

Gil, E., Llorens, J., Llop, J., Fàbregas, X., & Gallart, M. (2013). Use of a terrestrial LIDAR sensor for drift detection in vineyard spraying. Sensors, 13(1), 516-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130100516

Gil, E., Llorens, J., Llop, J., Fàbregas, X., Escolà, A., & Rosell-Polo, J. R. (2013). Variable rate sprayer. Part 2–Vineyard prototype: Design, implementation, and validation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 95, 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.02.010

Ilica, A., & Boz, A. F. (2018). Design of a nozzle-height control system using a permanent magnet tubular linear synchronous motor. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(3), 374-385. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.456662

Kasner, E. J., Fenske, R. A., Hoheisel, G. A., Galvin, K., Blanco, M. N., Seto, E. Y., & Yost, M. G. (2018). Spray drift from a conventional axial fan airblast sprayer in a modern orchard work environment. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 62(9), 1134-1146. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy082

Khairy, M. F. A., Zaalouk, A. K., Rasmi, A. S., & Othman, Y. K. (2020). A prototype for spraying pesticide using vision technique. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 37(3), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2020.103153

Landers, A. J. (2008). Innovative technologies for the precise application of pesticides in orchards and vineyards. International Advances in Pesticide Application, Robinson College, Cambridge, UK, 9-11 January 2008, 411-416.

Lindgren, E., Harris, F., Dangour, A. D., Gasparatos, A., Hiramatsu, M., Javadi, F., ... & Haines, A. (2018). Sustainable food systems—a health perspective. Sustainability science, 13, 1505-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0586-x

Llorens, J., Gil, E., Llop, J., & Escolà, A. (2010). Variable rate dosing in precision viticulture: Use of electronic devices to improve application efficiency. Crop Protection, 29(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.022

Mahmud, M. S., Zahid, A., He, L., Choi, D., Krawczyk, G., Zhu, H., & Heinemann, P. (2021). Development of a LiDAR-guided section-based tree canopy density measurement system for precision spray applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 182, 106053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106053

Mamane, A., Raherison, C., Tessier, J. F., Baldi, I., & Bouvier, G. (2015). Environmental exposure to pesticides and respiratory health. European Respiratory Review, 24(137), 462-473. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.00006114

Méndez-Vázquez, L. J., Lira-Noriega, A., Lasa-Covarrubias, R., & Cerdeira-Estrada, S. (2019). Delineation of site-specific management zones for pest control purposes: Exploring precision agriculture and species distribution modeling approaches. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 167, 105101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105101

Mooney, D. F., Larson, J. A., Roberts, R. K., & English, B. C. (2009). Economics of the variable rate technology investment decision for agricultural sprayers (No. 1369-2016-108610). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.46860

Naseri, M., Abbaspour Fard, M. H., Chaji, H., & Heydarzadeh, A. (2007). Analysis of the effect of nozzle orifice diameter, pump pressure and tractor forward speed on spraying uniformity in agricultural turbine sprayer (turboliner). The 5th National Congress of Agricultural Machines and Mechanization of Iran. Ferdasi University of Mashhad. P. 9. (in Persian).

Oberti, R., Marchi, M., Tirelli, P., Calcante, A., Iriti, M., Tona, E., ... & Ulbrich, H. (2016). Selective spraying of grapevines for disease control using a modular agricultural robot. Biosystems Engineering, 146, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.12.004

Pergher, G. (2001). Recovery rate of tracer dyes used for spray deposit assessment. Transactions of the ASAE, 44(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.6240

Pimentel, D., & Lehman, H. (Eds.). (1993). The pesticide question: Environment, economics and ethics. Springer Science & Business Media.

Rathnayake, A. P., Chandel, A. K., Schrader, M. J., Hoheisel, G. A., & Khot, L. R. (2021). Spray patterns and perceptive canopy interaction assessment of commercial airblast sprayers used in Pacific Northwest perennial specialty crop production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 184, 106097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106097

Rodrigo, M. A., Oturan, N., & Oturan, M. A. (2014). Electrochemically assisted remediation of pesticides in soils and water: a review. Chemical Reviews, 114(17), 8720-8745. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500077e

Safari, M., Amirsheghaghi, F., Loveymi, N., & Chagi, H. (2009). Assessment of common sprayer used in wheat fields. Karaj Agricultural Engineering Research Institute Publications, 10(4), 1-12. (In Persian).

Shafii, A. 2008. Principles of agricultural machinery. Tehran University Publications. Third edition. 498 pages (in Farsi).

Shen, Y., Zhu, H., Liu, H., Chen, Y., & Ozkan, E. (2017). Development of a laser-guided, embedded-computer-controlled, air-assisted precision sprayer. Transactions of the ASABE, 60(6), 1827-1838. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12455

Soheilifard, F., Marzban, A., Raini, M. G., Taki, M., & van Zelm, R. (2020). Chemical footprint of pesticides used in citrus orchards based on canopy deposition and off-target losses. Science of the Total Environment, 732, 139118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139118

Solanelles, F., Escolà, A., Planas, S., Rosell, J. R., Camp, F., & Gràcia, F. (2006). An electronic control system for pesticide application proportional to the canopy width of tree crops. Biosystems Engineering, 95(4), 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.004

Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., ... & Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0

Subramanian, V., Burks, T. F., & Arroyo, A. A. (2006). Development of machine vision and laser radar based autonomous vehicle guidance systems for citrus grove navigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 53(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2006.06.001

Taheri-Rad, A., Khojastehpour, M., Rohani, A., Khoramdel, S., & Nikkhah, A. (2017). Energy flow modeling and predicting the yield of Iranian paddy cultivars using artificial neural networks. Energy, 135, 405-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.089

Tewari, V. K., Chandel, A. K., Nare, B., & Kumar, S. (2018). Sonar sensing predicated automatic spraying technology for orchards. Current Science, 115(6), 1115-1123.

Yadav, G. S., Das, A., Lal, R., Babu, S., Datta, M., Meena, R. S., ... & Singh, R. (2019). Impact of no-till and mulching on soil carbon sequestration under rice (Oryza sativa L.)-rapeseed (Brassica campestris L. var. rapeseed) cropping system in hilly agro-ecosystem of the Eastern Himalayas, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 275, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.02.001

Zaman, Q. U., Esau, T. J., Schumann, A. W., Percival, D. C., Chang, Y. K., Read, S. M., & Farooque, A. A. (2011). Development of prototype automated variable rate sprayer for real-time spot-application of agrochemicals in wild blueberry fields. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 76(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.014

Zürey, Z., Balci, S., & Sabanci, K. (2020). Automatic nozzle control system with ultrasonic sensor for orchard sprayers. European Journal of Technique (EJT), 10(2), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.715015