Explanation of the Phrasal Compounds in Persian Using Distributed Morphology and Applying Harley’ (2008) and Siddiqi’ (2009) Approach

زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان

Article 2, Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 37, January 2025, Pages 50-25   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/jlkd.2024.88954.1257

Authors

Omolbanin Khazaei^{* 1}; Shoja Tafakkori rezayi²; Nahid Eslamihonar¹; Hedi Mardokhi¹

¹PhD Candidate in Linguistics, Razi University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran.

²Associate Professor in Theoretical Linguistics, Razi University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

This research studied phrasal compounds in Persian using Distributed Morphology and applying Harley (2008) and Siddiqi’s (2009) approach. The aim was to determine the existence of phrasal compounds in Persian and explain their structure within the distributed morphology. The results revealed that there are two kinds of phrasal compounds in Persian. The first one holds [S + NP]_N or [N/A + NP]_N/A phrasal compounds and the second one has [N/A + PP]_N/A structure. In Persian a phrasal compound can occupy the non-head position of another phrasal compound. This can illustrated by such examples as “بادمجان­دور­قاب­چین” and “دست­از­جان­شسته” which in turn confirm Pafel’s (2017) idea. The results also showed that phrasal compounds in Persian are made in zero derivation level of Harley (2008), so that a noun-maker or an adjective-maker functional head is incorporated into a syntactic group by affixation, and based on the specific context and according to Pafel’s (2017-2015) input-output rule, they are turned into a noun or an adjective. Finally, it was shown that phrasal compounds in Persian have NN or AN structures. The data os this study which were extracted by the writers and using Tabatabaei (2008) confirmed the DMs specific belief that morphological operation is done within the syntactic component.

Keywords

Phrasal Compound; Distributed Morphology; Zero Derivation Level; Input-Output Rule; Persian Language

References

ـ احمدی، م.، و انوشه، م. (1398). طبقه‌بندی واژه‌های مرکب زبان فارسی از منظر صرف توزیعی. پژوهش‌های زبانی، ۱۰(۲)، ۱-۲۰.  https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2020.292771.666557

ـ الوند، آ.، و محمد‌ابراهیمی، ز. (1401). بررسی ساختار نحوی افعال مرکب دو جزئی بر‌پایۀ نظریۀ صرف توزیعی. مجلۀ زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، 14(۲)،  201 ـ 181. https://doi.org/10.22067/jlkd.2022.72364.1054

ـ انوشه، م. (1394). فرافکن‌های نمود و زمان در صفت‌های فاعلی مرکب بر پایۀ نظریۀ صرف توزیعی. دو‌ماهنامۀ جستارهای زبانی، ۶(۵)، ۴۹-۷۲.

ـ  طباطبایی، ع. (1387). ترکیب در زبان فارسی: بررسی ساختاری واژه‌های مرکب. کتاب بهار.

ـ  طباطبایی، ع. (1389). فرایندهای واژه‌سازیِ زبان فارسی و استقلال صرف و نحو. مجلۀ پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی، ۲(۲)،  99 ـ 87.

- Achema, P., & Neeleman, A. (2004). Beyond morphology: Interface condition on word formation (Vol. 6). Oxford University Press.

- Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A Minimalist approach. Oxford University Press.

- Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Bisetto, A. (2015). Do romance languages have phrasal compounds? A look at Italian. STUF–Language Typology and Universals, 68, 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2015-0018

- Bresnan, J., & Mchomobo, S. (1995). The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 181-254.

- Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional grammar. Oxford University Press.

- Butha, T. (1981). Generalization about syntactic compounding in Afrikaans. University of Stellenbasch.

- Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Blackwell.

- Embick, D., & Halle, M. (2005). On the status of stems in morphology theory. In T. Geerts, I. V. Ginnenken, & A. Jcaobs (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003: Selected from going romance (pp. 37-62). https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.270.03emb

- Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2001). Movement operation after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(4), 555-‍595.

- Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2005). Distributed morphology and the syntax/ morphology interface. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 289–‍324). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010

- Göksel, A. (2015). Phrasal compounds in Turkish: Distingushing citations from quotations. STUF – Language Typology and Universal, 68, 359 – 394.

- Günther, C., Kotowski, S., & Plag, I. (2018). Phrasal compound can have heads: Evidence from English. English language and linguistics, 24(1), 75-95.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674318000229

- Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The viewfrom building (pp. 111-176). MIT press.

-Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford.

- Harley, H., & Noyer, R. (1999). State- of- article: Distributed morphology. GLOT, 4(4), 3-9.

- Harley, H. (2008). Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Štekaur (Eds.), The oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 129-144). Oxford University Press.

- Hohenhaus, P. (1998). Anti-naming through non – word – formation. Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 97-112.

- Hein, K. (2015). Modeling the properties of German phrasal compounds within a usage-based constructural approach. In C. Trips & J. Kornfilt (Eds.), Further investigations into the nature of phrasal compounding (pp. 119-148). Language Science Press.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.885123

- Jensen, J. T. (1990). Morphology: Word structure in generative grammar. Benjamins.

- Kageyama, T. (2001). Word plus: The intersection of words and phrases. In J. van de Weijer & T. Nishihara (Eds.), Issues in Japanese phonology and morphology (pp. 245–276). De Gruyter.

- Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. St Martin's Press.

- Klockow, R. (1980). Linguistik der gänsefüβchen. Untersuchungen zum gebrauch der Anführungszeichen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Haag und Herchen.

- Lieber, R., & Štekaur, P. (2009). Status and definition of compounding In R. Lieber & Štekaur (Eds), The oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 3- 18). Oxford University Press.

- Lawrenz, B. (2006). Moderne deutsche wortbildung. Phrasale wortbildung im deutschen: Linguistische untersuchung und sprachdidaktische behandlung (Philologia 91). Kovač. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrs.2009.015

- Lieber, R., & Scalise, S. (2006). The lexical integrity hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio, 5, 7-32.

- Lieber, R. (2010). Introducing morphology. Cambridge University Press.

- Marantz, A. (1988). Clitics, morphological merger and the mapping to phonological structure. Theoretical Morphology Academic Press.

- Matthews, P. H. (1999). Zellig Sabbettai Harris. Language, 75(1), 112-119.

- Pafel, J. (2011). Two dogmas on quotation. In E. Brendel, J. Meibauer, & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Understanding quotation (pp. 249-267). De Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085.249

- Pafel, J. (2015). Phrasal compounds are compatible with lexical integrity. Language Typology and Universals.

- Pafel, J. (2017). Phrasal compounding and the morphology – syntax relation. In Trips and Kornfilt (Eds.), Further investigations into the nature of phrasal compounding (pp. 233-259). Language Science Press.

- Sato, Y. (2010). Complex phrase structures within morphological words: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Lingua, 120(2), 379- 407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.008

- Spencer A. (2005). Word formation and syntax. In Š. Pavol & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 73-97). Springer.

- Spencer, A. (2010). Lexical relatness and the lexical entry – a formal unification. In Proceeding of the 17^th International Conference on Head- Driven Phrase Structur Grammar (pp. 322-340). Université Paris Diderot CSLI Publication.

- Siddiqi, D. (2009). Syntax within the word, economy, allomorphy and argument selection in distributed morphology. John Benjamins.

- Trask, R. (1993). A dictionary of grammatical terms in l iinguistics. Routledge.

- Trips, C., & Kornfilt, J. (2015). Typological aspects of phrasal compounds in English, German, Turkish and Turkic. STUF - Language Typology and Universal,, 68(3), 281-321.

https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2015-0015

- Vries, M. D. (2008). The representation of language within language: A syntactic–pragmatic typology of direct speech. Studia Linguistica, 62, 39–77.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00142.x

- Yespersen, O. (1924). Philosophy of grammar. Allen & Unwin.