Manufacturing and Evaluation of a Dry land Rice Transplanter

ماشین های کشاورزی

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 08 March 2025   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.2023.84424.1190

Authors

A. Sadin; M. H. Aghkhani; M. A. Ebrahimi-Nik; J. Baradaran Motie^*

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Planting rice seedlings in the main field followed by periodic or intermittent irrigation is often considered a form of dry farming. Research suggests that flood irrigation in rice cultivation is primarily favored by farmers for its ability to control weeds and ensure a reliable water supply, rather than necessarily enhancing rice quality or yield. Depending on the rice variety, intermittent irrigation can sometimes improve both the quality and yield per unit area. The transplanting process in this method can be carried out manually without machinery or through mechanized methods using a planter.
Materials and Methods
Conventional rice transplanters designed for use in flooded land are not suitable for transplanting in dry land farming due to technical constraints. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a specialized rice transplanter tailored for such soil condition. This transplanter encompasses essential components, including a furrow opener, coverer, seedling storage tank or tray, seedling mechanism (distributor), seedling transfer mechanism (seedling transport piston), end separator for seedlings in the soil, power transmission system, depth adjustment shoe, and main and sub chassis. To evaluate the planter's performance, various parameters were assessed, including the percentage of lost plants, the average vertical angle of plant orientation, the average spacing between plants in the crop row, and the average number of seedlings per plant. Moreover, a factorial randomized block design was employed, with three replications for each level of the independent variables. The independent variables were forward speed (X1) at three levels of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 m s^-1, planting depth (X2) at three levels of 4, 8, and 12 cm, and the size of the outlet opening of the seedling tray (X3) in three levels of 10, 15, and 20 mm.
Results and Discussion
The developed single-row planter features key specifications, including a working width of 250 mm, a power requirement of 0.57 kW, a theoretical field capacity of 0.06 ha h^-1, and a field efficiency of 66.67%. The research findings revealed that forward speed, planting depth, and outlet opening size, along with their interactions, significantly impact the percentage of lost plants at the 99% confidence level. Among the three levels of forward speed (X1), the best speed level is 0.25 m s^-1, as it results in the lowest percentage of lost seedlings. As the forward speed increases, the percentage of lost seedlings increases. The lowest percentage of lost plants (Y1) occurs at the planting depth of 8 cm and an outlet opening size of 20 mm. Furthermore, forward speed, planting depth, and their interaction have a noteworthy influence on the vertical angle of plants are established, at the 99% confidence level. With the increase of forward speed and planting depth, the average vertical angle of seedling establishment deviates from the vertical position. The forward speed of 0.25 meters per second and the planting depth of 8 cm show the best results for the establishment of seedlings. The sole factor affecting the spacing between plants in the row is the forward speed. The size of seedling tray’s outlet opening significantly affects the number of seedlings per plant at the 99% confidence level, while planting depth affects it at the 95% confidence level.
Conclusion
Given the recent water crisis, adopting the dry rice farming method and using transplanters offers a viable solution for managing and conserving water in agriculture. Implementing dry planting with a custom-made transplanter yields several benefits, including reduced water consumption, lower cultivation costs, improved soil aeration, increased efficiency, and simplified planting processes. Utilizing this transplanter is an effective strategy to decrease both the time and expenses related to transplanting, while also mechanizing rice planting in dry fields.

Keywords

Dry farming; Forward speed; Rice paddy; Transplanter

References

1. Alizadeh, M., Minaei, S., Tavakoli, T., & Khoshtaghaza, M. (2006). Effect of de-awning on physical properties of paddy. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(9), 1726-1731. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.1726.1731
2. ANTAM. (2017). Asian and Pacific Network for Testing of Agricultural Machinery. https://www.un-csam.org
3. Awika, J. M. (2011). Major cereal grains production and use around the world Advances in cereal science: implications to food processing and health promotion (pp. 1-13): ACS Publications. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2011-1089.ch001
4. Brown, K., Turner, F., Thomas, J., Deuel, L., & Keener, M. (1977). Water balance of flooded rice paddies. Agricultural Water Management, 1(3), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(77)90006-3
5. Chandrasekhararao, C., Jitendranath, S., & Murthy, T. (2013). Resource optimisation in rice through direct seeding by drum seeder. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology, 4(3), 239-246.
6. (2020). Food and Agricultural Organization Statistical Yearbook. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1329en
7. Farahmandfar, R., Farahmandfar, E., & Ramezani, A. (2009). Physical properties of rough rice. International Journal of Food Engineering, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.2202/1556-3758.1573
8. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Lee, D. J., Ito, O., & Siddique, K. H. (2009). Advances in drought resistance of rice. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28(4), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902952173
9. Ghanbarian, D., Valaei, M., Ghasemi Varnamkhasti, M., & Aghagoolzade, H. (2017). Discussion of Influence of parboiling in milling rice yield and head rice yield. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 48(2), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2017.62471
10. Gutaker, R. M., Groen, S. C., Bellis, E. S., Choi, J. Y., Pires, I. S., Bocinsky, R. K., Slayton, E. R., Wilkins, O., Castillo, C. C., Negrão, S. & Oliveira, M. M. (2020). Genomic history and ecology of the geographic spread of rice. Nature plants, 6(5), pp.492-502. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-020-0659-6
11. Hafeez, M., Bouman, B., Van de Giesen, N., & Vlek, P. (2007). Scale effects on water use and water productivity in a rice-based irrigation system (UPRIIS) in the Philippines. Agricultural Water Management, 92(1-2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.05.006
12. Hosseini, S. M., & Loghavi, M. (2009). Design, Development and Evaluation of a Paper-Pot Transplanter.  Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 40(1). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20084803.1388.40.1.1.3
13. Javidan, S. M., & Mohammad zamani, D. (2019). Design, Construction and Evaluation of Semi-Automatic Transplanter with Conical Distributing Cups. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 20(72), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2019.120477.1239
14. Mohammadzamani, D., Ghezavati, J., & Nazari, M. (2015). Designing manufacturing and evaluation of automated tomato planter. Journal of Agriculture Mecanization,16(65), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2016.105955
15. Pandey, S., & Velasco, L. (1999). Economics of alternative rice establishment methods in Asia: a strategic analysis. Social Sciences Division Discussion Paper, International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, 1(1), 12-18.
16. Pandey, S., & Velasco, L. (2002). Economics of direct seeding in Asia: patterns of adoption and research priorities. Direct seeding: Research strategies and opportunities, 3-14.
17. Pandey, S., & Velasco, L. (2005). Trends in crop establishment methods in Asia and research issues. Rice is life: Scientific perspectives for the 21st century, 178-181.
18. Popov, P. (1976). Mechanics of materials Popov. 2th edition. Chapter 2, paper 131-141.
19. Rabbani, G., & Ali, M. (2009). New ideas and concepts, rice bran: a nutrient dense mill-waste for human nutrition. The ORION Medical Journal, 32(3), 694-701.
20. Rao, A., Johnson, D., Sivaprasad, B., Ladha, J., & Mortimer, A. (2007). Weed management in direct‐seeded rice. Advances in agronomy, 93, 153-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1
21. Reddy, P. B. H., Sreenivasulu, S., & Manohar, C. (2009). Direct Seeding with Drum Seeder–Future Prospects. RASS–Acharya Ranga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tirupati, AP.
22. Singh, S., Sharma, S., & Prasad, R. (2001). The effect of seeding and tillage methods on productivity of rice–wheat cropping system. Soil and Tillage Research, 61(3-4), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00188-4
23. Singh, Y., Singh, G., Johnson, D., & Mortimer, M. (2005). Changing from transplanted rice to direct seeding in the rice-wheat cropping system in India. Rice Is Life: Scientific Perspectives for the 21st Century” (K. Toriyama, KL Heong, and B. Hardy, Eds.), 198-201.
24. Spotts, F., Shob, T. A., & Horen Berger, L.A., (2004). Design of machine elements, 8th ed, chapter 4, paper 311-314. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1637657
25. Usefian, M., Arabzade, B., Soodaee Mashaee, S., & Mohammadi Nesheli, Y. (2014). Evaluation of different levels of Irrigation on yield and qualitative properties of two rice varieties. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 27(104), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2014.101680
26. Vinay, M., Kumar, U., Parkash, V., & Kumari, S. (2016). Impact of direct seeded rice on economics of paddy crop in Haryana. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 8(62), 3525-3528.