Comparison of Energy Consumption Optimization in Sugar Factory Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 7, Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 36, June 2025, Pages 247-261   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.2024.89450.1278

Authors

M. Boroun¹; M. Ghahderijani^{* 1}; A. A. Naseri²; B. Beheshti¹

¹Department of Agricultural Systems Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

²Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Energy analysis offers significant benefits by establishing a foundation for resource conservation, quantifying the energy consumed at each stage of production, identifying processes that require minimal energy input, and supporting sustainable management practices. In sustainable agricultural systems, maximizing the productivity of input energies is a key objective. This study aims to assess energy consumption patterns within the sugar industry and to compare the optimization of energy consumption indicators using two meta-heuristic algorithms, ultimately seeking to enhance resource efficiency and promote sustainable production methods.
Materials and Methods
This study evaluated energy efficiency and environmental impacts in sugarcane-based sugar production at Dehkhoda Sugarcane Agro-Industry Company (in Khuzestan Province, Iran), during the 2019-2020 agricultural cycle. Data collection integrated field questionnaires, expert interviews, operational records from the facility, and national agricultural databases (Ministry of Agriculture Jihad statistics and energy balance sheet). Energy flow were analyzed using MATLAB statistical software and the Equinonet database, with comparative optimization through genetic algorithms and imperialist competitive algorithms to identify efficiency improvements.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that, for the majority of indicators evaluated, the imperialist competitive algorithm outperformed the genetic algorithm in optimizing energy consumption. In addition to reducing the environmental impacts of this profitable industry in the country, it has a high potential for energy savings. The total energy input reduction with the genetic algorithm was 17.05%, while the imperialist competitive algorithm achieved a higher reduction of 26.40%. Natural gas consumption decreased by 3.82% using the genetic algorithm, and by 27.60% with the imperialist competitive algorithm. Direct energy savings were 16.97% for the genetic algorithm and 27.48% for the imperialist competitive algorithm. Soil acidification reduction was 23.03% with the imperialist competitive algorithm and 19.19% with the genetic algorithm, compared to conditions before optimization.
Conclusion
In general, it can be concluded that, given the growing demand for sugar production and related industries, as well as the high efficiency of the sugar production sector, it is advisable to utilize expert knowledge and apply meta-heuristics methods to optimize energy consumption and available inputs with the aim of reducing harmful environmental impacts.

Keywords

Imperialist competitive; Genetic algorithm; Meta-heuristics; Sugarcane

References

1. Akram, A., Khanali, M., Mohammadnia Galshaklami, M., & Hosseinzadeh Bandabafha, H. (2018). Optimizing energy consumption and reducing environmental emissions in cake production using data overlay analysis and genetic algorithm. Environmental Science Quarterly, 17(2), 103-124. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.29252/envs.17.2.103
2. Elhami, B., Akram, A., & Khanali, M. (2016). Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Information Processing in Agricultures, 3(3), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2016.07.002
3. Ghadrijani, M. (2016). Determining the energy consumption of wheat and potato production at different levels of cultivation in west Isfahan. Master's thesis. University of Tehran. (in Persian with English abstract).
4. Gerami Matin, A., Vatani Nezafat, R., & Golroo, A. (2017). A comparative study on using meta-heuristic algorithms for road maintenance planning: Insights from field study in a developing country. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 4, 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2017.06.004
5. Guinee, J. B., & Lindeijer, E. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978897
6. Ismail Portroujani, M., Emadi, B., Khojastepour, M., & Vahidi, A. (2013). Optimizing energy consumption in the production of agricultural products, a review study. National Conference on Optimizing Energy Consumption in Science and Engineering, Babol. (in Persian with English abstract). https://civilica.com/doc/300243
7. ISO. (2006). 14040 International Standard. Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.03.001
8. Jacobs, R., Smith, P., & Street, A. (2006). Measuring efficiency in health care: Analytic techniques and health policy, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617492
9. Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., & Mobli, H. (2018). Analysis and optimization of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in sugarcane production using data overlay analysis. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering, 50(1), 19-30. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2018.251593.665035
10. Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., & Chau, K. W. (2019a). Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production. Science of The Total Environment, 664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.004
11. Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., & Chau, K. W. (2019b). Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy, 181, 1298-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.002
12. Kitani, O. (1999). Energy and biomass engineering, CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering. ASAE Publications, St Joseph, MI.
13. Karami, J., Moghadam, A. R., Faridhosseini, A. R., Sanainijad, H., & Ziaei, A. N. (2016). Optimization of energy consumption in pumping stations using Darwin Scheduler tool. Journal of Water and Wastewater Science and Engineering, 2(1), 12 p. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22112/jwwse.2017.87910.1006
14. Khanali, M., Mohammadnia Galshaklami, M., Akram, A., & Hosseinzadeh Bandbafha, H. (2018). Optimizing energy consumption and reducing environmental pollutants in the production of cookies using data envelopment analysis techniques and genetic algorithm. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 20(72), 162-143. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/22092/erams.2018.115061.1215
15. Khoshnoisan, B., Rafiei, Sh., Omid, M., Kihani, A., & Movahedi, M. (2012). Assessing of energy indices and environmental impacts of potato production (Case study: Fereydoonshahr region, Isfahan province). Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering, 44(1), 66-57. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2013.36164
16. Kizilaslan, H. (2009). Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Apply Energy, 86, 1354-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.009
17. Kochenderfer, M. J., & Wheeler, T. A. (2019). Algorithms for optimization. Mit Press.
18. Kosemani, B. S., & Bamgboye, A. I. (2020). Energy input-output analysis of rice production in Nigeria. Energy, 207, 118258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118258
19. Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Sharifi, M., Mousazadeh, H., Zarea-Hosseinabadi, H., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2016). Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.056
20. Mahmoudi, N., Almasi, M., & Burqai, S. A. M. (2013). Estimation of energy consumption indicators in pistachio production in Khatam city, Yazd province. The first national conference on sustainable development in arid and semi-arid regions. Abarkooh. (in Persian with English abstract).
21. Malek, R., Hashemian, S. M., & Mehrgan, M. (2018). Energy and exergy analysis of the simultaneous production system in the sugar production process in Shahrood sugar factory and the feasibility of improving the technical and economic conditions. Master's thesis. Shahrood University of Technology. (in Persian with English abstract).
22. Mohseni, P., Borghei, A. M., & Khanali, M. (2018). Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 937-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.243
23. Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S., & Mohammadi, A. (2011). Optimization of energy consumption and input costs for apple production in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energy, 36(2), 909-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.020
24. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R., Rafiee, Sh., & Taromi, K. (2014). Applying data envelopment analysis approach to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emission of rice production. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 7(4), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2014.06.001
25. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Saeid Mohtasebi, S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Assessment of optimized pattern in milling factories of rice production based on energy, environmental and economic objectives. Energy, 169, 1259–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.106
26. Nabavi Pelesarai, A., Pakrovan Cherudeh, M.R., & Ghasemi Mobatkar, H. (2022). Forecasting energy output and greenhouse gas emissions in peanut production: a case study of Astana Ashrafieh city, Gilan province. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 53(1), 145-162. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2021.306056.668924
27. Najafi, P., Fehresti Sani, M., Nazari, M. R., & Neshat, A. (2018). Investigating the economic and environmental effects of optimizing the sugar beet distribution network in Iran's sugar supply chain. Environmental Science Quarterly, 17(2), 31-42. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.29252/envs.17.2.31
28. Namdari, M., Rafiei, Sh., & Hosseinpour, S. (2015). Decreasing Environmental Burden by improving efficiency of sugar beet production using data envelopment analysis approach. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering, 47(2), 361-353. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2016.58785
29. Sabz Alipour, F., & Bagherpour, H. (2022). Optimizing energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in orange production using data envelopment analysis and genetic algorithm (case study: Dezful city). Environmental Science and Technology Quarterly, 23(8), 223-233. (in Persian with English abstract).
30. Sayadishahraki, A., Naseri, A. A., & Soltani Mohammadi, A. (2018). Simulation of hydraulic load using particle accumulation optimization algorithm and genetic algorithm (case study: Daabl Khaza'i sugarcane agro-industry fields). Journal of Water Resources Engineering, 12(43), 13-24. (in Persian with English abstract). 1001.1.20086377.1398.12.43.2.4
31. Shamshirband, S., Khoshnevisan, B., Yousefi, M., Bolandnazar, E., Anuar, N. B., Wahab, A. W. A., & Khan, S. U. R. (2015). A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for energy management of agricultural systems—a case study in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.038
32. Soleimani, A. N., & Ghafarzadeh, H. R. (2022). Measuring the effects of household economic status on energy consumption (case study: Yazd city). Sustainability, Development and Environment, 2(4), 75-51. (in Persian with English abstract).
33. TaheriGaravand, A., Asakereh, A., & Haghani, K. (2010). Energy elevation and economic analysis of canola production in Iran a case study: Mazandaran province. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1, 236- 243.
34. Taki, M., Ajab Shirchi, Y., Abdi, R., & M. Akbarpur. (2012). Analyzing the energy efficiency of the greenhouse cucumber product by data envelopment analysis method: a case study (Shahreza city), Isfahan province. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2(1), 27-37. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v2i1.14291
35. Talabi, S. A., & Goshaishi, H. R. (2015). Analysis of the problems of sugar industry in Iran and comparison of production and imports in Iran and the world. Second National Conference on Science and Technology. 15th December, Tehran.
36. Tayebi, N. R., Moghadas Nejad, F., & Mola, M. (2013). Comparison between GA and PSO in Analyzing Pavement Management Activities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140, 130613024931003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000590
37. Yang, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Li, X., Ma, P., Sun, J., Sun, Y., Ma, J., & Li, N. (2022). Comparison of energy use between fully mechanized and semi-mechanized rice production in Southwest China. Energy, 245, 123270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123270