Testing Value for Cultivation and Use of Negin Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivar Applying for Commercialization

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 9, Volume 16, Issue 1 - Serial Number 31, June 2025, Pages 145-161   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.2025.91502.1103

Authors

Babak Darvishi^* ; Saman Sheidaei; Mohammadreza Jazaiery Noushabadi; Mostafa Shakeri

Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Introducing improved bean cultivars with desirable characteristics such as high yield, large and marketable seeds, tolerant to environmental stress, erect growth type and suitable for mechanized harvesting are most important improvement goals in releasing new bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. These characteristics are considered in the manual for the implementation of the bean agronomic value test (VCU). The aim of current research is to evaluate the agricultural value, yield and other important agricultural characteristics of a pinto bean cultivar (Negin) applying for commercialization in the most important bean growing climates in Iran.
 
Materials and Methods
In this experiment, candidate pinto been cultivar (Negin) along with 4 control cultivars (Sembol, Sepehr, Saleh and Kusha) were studied in 3 locations (Khomein, Ardabil and Esfahan) based on complete randomized block design experiment in 4 replications during two crop seasons (2021-2022 and 2022-2023). Characteristics listed in the "Manual for the implementation of the bean agronomic value test" include the number of days until flowering, the number of days until physiological maturity, plant height, first pod height, pods number per plant, seeds number per pod, pod shedding, the weight of 100 seeds, the yield of seeds fresh weight and water absorption capacity were recorded.
 
Results and Discussion
Results showed that flowering occurred significantly earlier in Negin candidate cultivar (42.3 days) than control cultivars. Early flowering is considered as an important factor influencing yield of bean cultivars. This feature makes the flowering process start earlier before the onset of environmental stresses such as drought and high temperature. Also, in early flowering cultivars, the seed filling period will be longer. Seed ripening in Negin candidate cultivar occurred 5 days earlier than determinate control cultivars (mean ripening period 82.1 days) and 12 days earlier than indeterminate control cultivars (mean ripening period 89.5 days). Early ripening is not only an escape mechanism from end-season stresses such as drought, but it is also important because enables the early production and bringing to the appropriate market price, and for this reason many bean breeding programs in the world are focused on introducing of early cultivars. Among the studied cultivars, the number of seeds per pod in Kusha cultivar was significantly higher than the other studied cultivars, while this trait in Saleh, Sepehr and Negin cultivars was less than Kusha cultivar. In all 3 study locations, Sembol determinate cultivar had the highest hundred seed weight (52.9 g) and after that the other determinate cultivars (Negin and sepehr) had the highest hundred seed weight (48.9 g and 46.53 g respectively). Seed yield of determinate candidate cultivar (4235.8 kg.ha^-1) was significantly more than other determinate Sepehr and Sembol cultivars (4027.1 kg.ha^-1 and 34463.8 kg.ha^-1 respectively) and seed yield of Negin cultivar had not significant difference with seed yield of indeterminate Saleh cultivar. In terms of performance, the Negin cultivar outperformed other determinate cultivars and matched the performance level of one indeterminate cultivar. Among the studied cultivars, Sembol showed the highest water absorption capacity, followed by Kusha, Saleh, Sepehr, and Negin. Thus, the Negin candidate cultivar exhibited the lowest water absorption capacity.
 
Conclusion
The Negin candidate cultivar has strong potential as a new germplasm for national bean production due to its erect growth habit and ease of mechanical harvesting, early flowering and maturity, reduced water requirement (one to two times less), good marketability, and ability to produce larger seeds.
 
Acknowledgement
This article is extracted from the research project of the Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute under the approved number 04-08-08-040-011096 dated 2024/06/15, which is hereby thanked and appreciated.

Keywords

Earliness; Growth type; Hundred seed weight; Maturity

References

Amini, A., Ghanadha, M. R., & Abd-Mishani, C. (2002). Genetic diversity and correlation between different traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33, 605-615. (In Persian).

Animal and Plant Agency. (2023). VCU protocols and procedures for testing agricultural crops. Retrieved February, 12, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vcu-protocols-and-procedures-for-testing-agricultural-crops.

Anonymous. (2023). Annual Reports of Beans Research Projects. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Markazi Province, Arak, Iran. (In Persian).

Awan, F. K., Khurshid, M. Y., Afzal, O., Ahmed, M., & Chaudhry, A. N. (2014). Agro-morphological evaluation of some exotic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 46, 259-264.

Bennt, J. P., Adams, M. W., & Burga, C. (1977). Pod yield component variation and inter correlation in Phaseolus vulgaris as affected by planting density. Crop Science, 17, 35-75. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700010021x

Cerna, J., & Beaver, J. S. (1990). Inheritance of early maturity of indeterminate dry bean. Crop Science, 30, 1215-1218. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060011x

Darvishi, B., Rezvani, E., Sadeghi, H., Shakeri, M., Nasiri Vatan, H., Kavand, M., Yenkeje Farahani, S., & Sharafizad, M. (2023). Investigating the agronomic value of two new bean cultivars applying for commercialization. Journal of Crop Improvement, 25, 633-649. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2022.348230.2742

Fageria, N. K., & Santos, A. B. (2008). Yield physiology of dry bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31, 983-1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160802096815

Farshadfar, A. (1998). Application of quantitative genetics in plant breeding. Faculty of Agriculture. Kermanshah University, Iran. (In Persian).

FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. (2020). Crops production report from http://faostat.fao.org

Faraji, H., Gholizadeh, S., Owliaiee, H. R., & Azimi Gandomani, M. (2010). Effect of plant density on grain yield of three spotted bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Yasouj condition. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 1, 43-50. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/IJPR.V1I1.6338

Ghanbari, A. A. (2012). Physiological responses of common bean genotypes under contrasting moisture regimes. Faculty of Agriculture. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian).

Gomez, O. J., Blair, M. W., Frankow-lindberg, B. E., & Gullberg, U. (2004). Molecular and phenotypic diversity of common bean landraces from Nicaragua. Crop Science, 44, 1412-1418. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1412

Goncalves Ceolin, A. C., Goncalves-Vidigal, M. C., SoaresVidigalFilho, P., Vinicius Kvitschalm, M., Gonela, A., & Alberto Scapim, C. (2007). Genetic divergence of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) group Carioca using morpho-agronomic traits by multivariate analysis. Hereditas, 144, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01943.x

Gonzalez, A. M., Monteagudo, A. B., Casquero, P. A., De Ron, A. M., & Santalla, M. (2005). Genetic variation and environmental effects on agronomical and commercial quality traits in the main European market classes of dry bean. Field Crop Research, 95, 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.04.004

Harouna, D. V., Venkataramana, P. B., Matemu, A. O., & Ndakidemi, P. A. (2019). Assessment of water absorption capacity and cooking time of wild under-exploited vigna Species towards their domestication. Agronomy, 9, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090509

Hoseinnejad, A., Mehrpouyan, M., & Faramarzi, A. (2015). The use of two mechanized bean cultivation machines in comparison with manual cultivation and their effectiveness in some agricultural characteristics of red bean cultivars. International Conference on Applied Research in Agriculture, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).

Kamankesh, E., & Shafiee, E. (2018). Practical Guide for Beans Growing. Amoozesh va Tarvij Keshavarzi press, Tehran, Iran. 85 pp. (In Persian).

Liebman, M., Corson, S., Rowe, R. J., & Halteman, W. A. (1995). Dry bean response to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management systems. Agronomy Journal, 87, 538-546. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700030024x

Madani, H., Shirzadi, M. H., & Darini, F. (2008). Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of vigna and tepary local beans germplasms in Jiroft, Iran. New findings in Agriculture, 3, 93-104. (In Persian). https://www.magiran.com/p1486767

Raziei, T. (2017). Köppen-Geiger climate classification of Iran and investigation of its changes during 20^th century. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 43, 419-439. https://doi.org/10.22059/JESPHYS.2017.58916

Roman, H., Bralewski, T. W., Fiebig, M., & Bocian, S. (2004). Variability of selected characters of 18 local populations of bean (Phaseolus ssp.). Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Horticulture, 7(1).

Sabokdast, M., & Khyalparast, F. (2008). A study of relationship between grain yield and yield components in common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural of Resource, 11, 123-134. (In Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1386.11.42.11.0

Safapour, M., Khaghani, S., Amirabadi, M., Teymori, M., & Bezian, M. K. (2009). The effects of water stress on agronomic traits and phenology of white beans. New Findings of Agriculture, 4, 367-378. (In Persian).  

Salehi, F. (2014). The effect of plant density on yield and yield components of red beans new lines. Journal of Agriculture (Research and Development), 103, 22-28. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/AJ.2015.101200

Schoonhoven, A., & Vosyest, O. (1991). Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement for the 21^st Century. Kluwer Academic Publication. Dordrecht, Germany.

Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI). (2009). Guideline For the conduct of Value for Cultivation and Use of beans. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI). 13 p. (In Persian).

Serene, M. I., Jebaraj, S., & Ganesh, S. K. (2000). Path analysis in cowpea. Research on Crops, 1, 314-316.

Shafaei, S. M., Masoumi, A. A., & Roshan, H. (2016). Analysis of water absorption of bean and chickpea during soaking using Peleg model. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 15, 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.08.003

Smykal, P., Vernoud, V., Blair, M. W., Soukup, A., & Thompson, R. D. (2014). The role of the testa during development and in establishment of dormancy of the legume seed. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00351

Turhan, M., Sayer, S., & Gunasekaran, S. (2002). Application of Peleg model to study water absorption in bean and chickpea during soaking. Journal of Food Engineering, 53, 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00152-2

White, J. W., & Singh, S. P. (1991). Source and inheritance of earliness in tropically adapted indeterminate common bean. Euphytica, 55, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022554