Understanding the Formation Process of Humility-Based Leadership in Business Using Meta Synthesis Approach

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 1, Volume 9, Autumn & Winter 2018, February 2018, Pages 24-46   

Document Type: Articles

DOI: 10.22067/pmt.v9i18.57784

Authors

behzad mohammadian^* ; hassan zarei matin; jabbar babashahi; hamidreza yazdani

university of tehran

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
Humility-based leadership is a style which is based on virtue. A virtue that is deeply rooted in the beliefs and basic assumptions of staffs. Theoretical development and empirical findings about this subject is very poor. The traces of recent organizational scandals have been blamed on arrogance, sense of selfishness and self-righteousness of the managers. Virtues such as humility have faced with an incresingly interest in organizational studies. The aim of this study is to provide a conceptual model of components, requirements and outcomes of humility-based leadership.

2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Humility-based leadership is a style which is based on virtue. It is a penetrating feature that allows a person to fit and even prevail in a particular society. Humility has been defined as possessing a multi-dimensional construct, which includes the passion for self-assessment (i.e., self-awareness and recognition of constraints), orientation and tendency to others (againest self-centred), interpersonal acceptance, the ability to regulate the emotions of others, and confirmation and appreciation of the value of creatures. Humble leadership is recognized as the acknowledgment of individuals’ limitations, highlighting the strengths of others and readiness to learn from models. Here it is assumed that this set of behaviors helps to reduce the social distance between leaders and followers through the promotion of bilateral exchange relations. Initially, with the acknowledgment of individual limitations, a leader will be able to stay close to the subordinates.

3- METHODOLOGY
The philosophy of research is interpretive, its approach is meta-synthesis and its strategy is grounded-theory, which is carried out qualitatively and through data collection using the instrument of documentation. Meta synthesis is qualitative analysis of concepts in previous studies using the common coding method in qualitative research and qualitative strategies such as grounded theory.

4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Analysis have shown that the main phenomenon (humility-based leadership) consists of four components: self-awareness, coaching, mentoring, and teachability. The first component of the definition of humility is the desire to engage enthusiastically in an influential process called self-awareness. In case of the second component, theorists have recently suggested that modesty is a driving force for credible service and leadership. The third essential component of humility is the ability to learn (experiential, responsive). As humility is rooted in development tendencies, this component also has implicit beliefs about the utility of learning and its potential for self-development.

5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
For further research, future researchers are advised to study the process of forming this leadership style in a variety of quantitative and qualitative ways. Reviewing the personality characteristics of these leaders can also significantly contribute to organizational growth. It is suggested that researchers investigate the impact of this phenomenon on other behavioral structures such as organizational citizenship behavior, organizational vocation, and organizational learning.

Keywords

Humility; Leadership; Humility-based leadership; Meta-synthesis

References

Argandona, A. (2015). Humility in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 63-71.

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150 –166.

Boje, D. M.; Roslie, G. A.; Durant, R. A., & Luhman, J. T. (2004). Enron spectacles: a critical dramaturgical analysis. Organization Studies, 25(5), 751–774.

Cameron K. S., & Spreitzer, G. (2012). The oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collins, J. (2005). Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 7, 136-146.

Dehkhoda, A. (1998). Encyclopedia, Tehran, university of Tehran. (in Persian).

Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23-43.

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective wellbeing in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389.

Exline, J. J., & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of humility: a preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3(2), 95–114.

Gonçalves, L.; Ribeiro, P., & Rego, A. (2016). How leader’s humility predict team Creativity: An Empirical Study. International Management Conference, 377-380.

Goncalo, J.A.; Flynn, F. J., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Are tow narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11). 1484-1495.

Greer, W. (2013). Humility isn’t just personal anymore: testing group-level humility in the organization, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in organizational leadership, submitted to regent university school of business & leadership.

Huber, G. P., & Lewis, K. (2010). Cross-Understanding: implications for group cognition and performance. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 6-26.

Jankowski, P. J.; Sandage, S. J., & Hill, P. C. (2013). Differentiation-Based models of forgivingness, mental health and social justice commitment: mediator effects for differentiation of self and humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(5), 412–424.

Kahai, S. S.; Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Effects of participative and directive leadership in electronic groups. Group & Organization Management, 29(1), 67-105.

Krause, N., & Hayward, D. R. (2014). Religious involvement and humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 254–265.

LaBouff, J. P.; Rowatt, W. C.; Johnson, M. K.; Tsang, J. A., & Willerton, G. M. (2012). Humble persons are more helpful than less humble persons: Evidence from Three Studies. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 16–29.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.

Luthans, F.; Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Psychological capital: developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Morris, J. A.; Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58(10), 1323–1350.

Mostafavi, H. (1981). Studies on holy qurans words. Tehran, Book Publishing and Translating Inc. (in Persian)

Nembhard, I. M., & Edmonson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The Effects of leader Inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966.

Niroomand, P.; Ranjbar, M.; Sadi, M., & Amirshahi, M. (2012). Identification and classification of mobile business models based on meta-synthesis approach. Information Technology Management, 4(10), 179-201. (In Persian)

Nielsen, R.; Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2012). A New look at humility: exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33–43.

Oc, B.; Bashshur, M. R.; Daniels, M. A.; Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2015). Leader humility in singapore. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 68–80.

Ou, Y. (2011). CEO humility and its relationship with middle manager behaviors and performance: examining the CEO-Middle manager interface, a dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of philosophy, Arizona State University.

Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2015). How does leader humility influence team performance? exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal. 42(2), 361-381.

Owen, J. (2013). Early career perspectives on psychotherapy research and practice: psychotherapist effect, multicultural orientation and couple interventions. Psychotherapy, 50(4), 496–502.

Owens, B. P.; Rowatt, W. C., & Wilkins, A. L. (2011). Exploring the relevance and implications of humility in organizations. In K. Cameron, & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), the Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press.

Owens, B. P. (2009). Humility in Organizational Leadership. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of Philosophy University of Washington.

Paine, D. R.; Jankowski, P. J., & Sandage, S. J. (2016). Humility as a predictor of intercultural competence: mediator effects for differentiation-of-Self. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 24(1) 15-22.

Park, N.; Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619.

Ragheb, E. (1996). Creation and happiness of the two worlds, Tabriz. (in Persian)

Roberts, R., & Wood, j. W. (2003). Humility and epistemic goods, Oxford scholarship Online, 257-279.

Saunders, M., & Thorhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, London.

Sohrabi, B.; Azami, A., & Yazdani, H. (2011). Pathology studies in the field of Islamic management with meta-synthesis approach. Public Administration Perspective, 2(6), 9-24. (In Persian)

Tangney, J. P. (2000). Humility: theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 70–82.

Templeton, J. M. (1997). Worldwide laws of life. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

Van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2015). Compassionate love as a cornerstone of servant leadership: an integration of previous theorizing and research. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 119–131.

Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2004). Strategic virtues: humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 393–408.

Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization volume 2: The impermanent organization, Wiley Online Library.