Using the Information Literacy Framework (2016) for Evaluating Information Literacy of Higher Education Students (Case Study: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz)

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 8, Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19, December 2020, Pages 185-204   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v0i0.81781

Authors

Abdolhossein Farajpahlou; Masoumeh Badnorooz

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Abstract

Introduction: With the advent of the twenty-first century, the educational centers are in transition from the educational process to the teaching-learning process. In this process change, every citizen must be freely exposed to learning, education and research under any circumstances. Therefore, attention to training information literacy skills is one of the key elements in the advancement of lifelong learning and modern education system. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the viewpoint of graduate students about the factors affecting the status of information literacy in Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.  
Methodology: This study is an applied research carried out through a survey method. The study population consisted of all postgraduate students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz who have completed at least two semesters of academic study before the second semester of 2019-2020. Because of the large size of the research population, sampling was done. The sample size has been determined as 380 subjects through Krejcie-Morgan formula. The data collection tool was a researcher-made information literacy questionnaire that its validity was confirmed by the faculty members of the Knowledge and Information Department of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz and its reliability amounted to.82.
Findings: The features of the context and previous learning affected the information literacy status of respondents at high and medium levels, the faculty members at the moderate level and IT facilities and libraries at the moderate and low levels. Based on the mean score rate, these four factors are contextual features, faculty members, the facilities of the university's information and communication technology and, finally, academic libraries, respectively.
Conclusion: As far as teaching information literacy skills and attention to technological methods are the first priorities of academic libraries as determined by Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) in 2018 and concerning information literacy framework (2016), regarding the role of students as learners and librarians as intermediates in learning the required skills, academic libraries should provide their services so that students independently improve their literacy skills and meet their information needs. Based on the instructions of 2016 framework, it is suggested that universities and higher education institutions move towards greater use of cyberspace, such as Web 2 and use facilities such as library websites and a virtual reference desk and an ongoing dialogue.

Keywords

Information literacy; Academic libraries; Information and Communication Technology; Framework 2016; Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

References

احمدی، مهناز؛ شریف، عاطفه؛ و نوکاریزی، محسن (1395). چارچوب سواد اطلاعاتی 2016 در وب‌سایت کتابخانه‌های دانشگاه‌های برتر ایران و جهان و رویکرد دانشجویان به مصداق‌های آن. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی دانشگاهی، 51‌(4)، 111-93.DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.22059/jlib.2017.61312

احمدی، مهناز؛ شریف، عاطفه؛ و نوکاریزی، محسن (1395). از استاندارهای سواد اطلاعاتی تا چارچوب سواد اطلاعاتی برای آموزش عالی 2016. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 6(2)، 119-97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v6i2.56228

پریرخ، مهری؛ ارسطو‌پور، شعله؛ و نادری، رامین (1390). اثربخشی کارگاه‌های آموزشی سواد اطلاعاتی برای دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی: پژوهشی با رویکرد زمینه‌گرا. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 1(2)، 201-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v1i2.8663

حبیبی، حمدالله و خدایاری شوطی، سعید (1394). ارتباط سواد اطلاعاتی و دسترسی به امکانات با نگرش به یادگیری الکترونیکی در دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارومیه. آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 15(1)، 8-1. بازیابی شده در 1 شهریور 1398 از http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-3558-fa.html

زاهدی نوقابی، مهدی؛ فتاحی، رحمت‌الله؛ صالحی فدردی، جواد؛ و توکاریزی، محسن (1396). بررسی سبک یادگیری، سواد اطلاعاتی و سواد رایانه‌ای دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی و واکاوی رابطه میان آن‌ها. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 7(2)، 231-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v7i2.63317

نصیری‌پور، نسرین؛ نوکاریزی، محسن و تجعفری، معصومه (1395). مهارت‌های سواد اطلاعاتی و عوامل مرتبط با آن در میان کتابداران دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی مشهد و فردوسی مشهد. دوماهنامه مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 13(2)، 101-96. بازیابی شده در ۳۱ فروردین 1399 از http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/2552/3519

یاری، شیوا (1388). بررسی عوامل اثرگذار بر وضعیت سواد اطلاعاتی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه‌های بیرجند و فردوسی مشهد. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند.

American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago: ACRL. Available at: http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/candy-paper.html

Association of College and Research Libraries (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, Final Version. Unpublished Manuscript. Reterived in January 11, 2016. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.

Candy, P. C. (2002). "Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning," White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, and The Czech Republic.

Henkel, M. (2015). Educators of the information society: Information literacy instruction in public and academic libraries of Canada. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010036

Kipnis, D.G., & Frisby, A. J. (2006). Information Literacy and library attitudes of occupational therapy students. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 25(4). Retrieved September 15, 2008, Available at: http:/mrsq.haworthpress.com. DOI: 10.1300/J115v25n04_02

Repanovici, A., & Koukourakis, M. (2017). Assessment of information literacy courses for PhD students. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 1(3), 221-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2017040106

Trembacha, S., & Dengb, L. (2018). Understanding millennial learning in academic libraries: Learning styles, emerging technologies, and the efficacy of information literacy instruction. College and undergraduate libraries. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1484835.

Whitmire, E. (2001). Factors influencing undergraduates self-reported satisfaction with their information literacy skills. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 1(4), 409-420. Available at:http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/portal-libraries-and-the-academy/v001/1.4whitmire html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00223-3

Yang, S., & Chou, M. (2014). Promoting and teaching information literacy on the internet: surveying the web sites of 264 academic libraries in North America. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(3), 88-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.03.008