Determining Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Tomato Shoot Silage Supplemented with Different levels of Beet Pulp by Using Nylon Bag and in vitro Gas Production Method

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 7, Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34, June 2018, Pages 153-162   

Document Type: Ruminant Nutrition

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.v10i2.38678

Authors

abasali naserian¹; REZA KHODAVERDI^{* 1}; Reza Valizadeh²; abdolmansoor tahmasbi³

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³ferdowsi

Abstract

Introduction The processed crop by-products can be used as a suitable feedstuff to meet livestock dietary requirements. Tomato shoots that left on the field surface after harvest, is a major valuable by-product. In Iran, the estimated annual tomato shoots production is about 100 million ton. We evaluated the nutritional value of ensiled tomato shoots processed by beet pulp as a fermentation enhancer.
Materials and Methods Tomato shoots were collected from tomato farms in Semnan, Iran. The shoots were ensiled with 0, 4 or 8% (W/W) air-dried beet pulp. After 60 days, the silos were opened and ensiled materials were evaluated for sensitive characteristics as well as pH. The ensiled samples were also analyzed for chemical composition after 48 h oven drying at 60° C. Rumen degradability and fermentation characteristics were measured by using a nylon bag method and an in vitro gas production technique, respectively. For in vitro gas production technique, 200 mg of dry matter was incubated for 96 h at 39° C. Cumulative gas volumes were recorded 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h after incubation. To estimate the gas production parameters, an exponential model was fitted for data. Rumen degradability parameters of dry matter (DM), crud protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were determined by incubation of 5 g sample for 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, 72 or 96 h in the rumen of a fistulated steer. Similar analysis and measurements were also performed for oven dried tomato shoot samples. All data were subjected to ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS and means were compared by using Duncan's multiple range test at 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion At the end of fruit harvest, the measured DM and CP content of tomato shoot samples were 26 and 14% respectively that are in agreement with previous reports. Ensiled tomato shoots had a significant higher content of CP than oven-dried shoots; more likely due to losses of soluble components during the ensiling process. However, the content of CP was decreased with increase in beet pulp level in the tomato shoot silage. Similarly, the tomato shoot silages with 4 or 8% beet pulp showed lower values of NDF and ADF in comparison with tomato shoot silage without beet pulp. Due to lower protein and fiber percentage of beet pulp, the decreases in CP, ADF and ADF contents of tomato shoot silages by adding beet pulp were expected. Although the potential of gas production was enhanced by increased levels of beet pulp in the silages, no significant difference was observed among tomato shoot silages. The silages were also similar for gas production parameters. However, cumulative volumes of gas produced at 96 h incubation for silages with 4 and 8% beet pulp were significantly higher than other treatment. The highest values of rapidly degradable DM, degradation rate constant and degradation potential were observed in tomato shoot silage supplemented with 8% beet pulp. However, there was no significant difference between tomato shoot silages with 4% beet pulp and without beet pulp supplementation.
Conclusions Tomato shoots are a suitable source of nutrient for ruminant. Our results indicated that ensiling increases nutritional value of tomato shoots. The in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics as well as rumen degradability of tomato shoot silages were improved by adding 8% beet pulp. However, future studies are needed to confirm these results and elucidate the potential use of tomato shoot silage in ruminant's diet.

Keywords

chemical composition; Degradability; Gas production; Tomato shoot silage

References

1- Al-Rwidah, M. N. 1989. The consequences of ensilinggrass with absorbent materials. DissAbstr. Int. B Sci. Eng. 49(10):4079B(Abstr).

2- Anonymous. 2014, Iranian Agricultural Statistics. Cropping Season 2011-2012. Volume 1. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).

3- AOAC International. 2012. Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.

4- Arosemena, A., E. J. DePeters, and J.G. Fadel. 1995. Extent of variability in nutrient composition within selected by-product feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 54:103-120.

5- Ben Salem, H. and T. Smith. 2008. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Rumin. Res. 77:174-194.

6- Borrell,B. 2009.How to grow a better tomato: The case against heirloom tomatoes.http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/case-against-heirloom-tomatoes/

7- Cummins, B., P. O’Kiely, M. G. Keane, and D. A. Kenny. 2007. Conservation characteristics of grass and dry sugar beet pulp co-ensiled after different degrees of mixing. J. Agric. Food Res. 46:181-193.

8- DePeters, E. J., J. G. Fadel, and A. Arosemena. 1997. Digestion kinetics of neutral detergent fiber and chemical composition within some selected by-product feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 67:127-140.

9- Durmic, Z., P. Hutton, D. K. Revell, J. Emms, S. Hughes, and P. E. Vercoe. 2010. In vitro fermentative traits of Australian woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 160:98-109.

10- El-Waziry, A. M., F. Alkoaik, A. I. Khalil, H. Metwally, and M. A. Al-Mahasneh. 2013. Evaluation of tomato and Cucumber Wastes as Alternative Feeds for ruminants using Gas production technique in vitro. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8(6):821-826.

11- FAO Statistics, 2011. HTML Accessed Apr. 2012. http://www.fao.org/.

12- Fazaeli, H., M. Zahedifar, and H. Nouroozian. 2006. Chemical composition and ensiling of domask rose extraction residue with different additives. Pajouhesh&Sazandegi. 72:58-65. (In Persian with English abstract).

13- France, J., J. Dijkstra, M. S. Dhanoa, S. Lopez, and A. Bannink. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br. J. Nutr. 83:143-150.

14- Givens, D. I., E. Owen, R. F. E. Axford, and H. M. Omed. 2000. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. CABI Press.

15- Grasser, L. A., J. O. Fadel, I. Garnett, and E. J. Depeters. 1995. Quantity and Economic Importance of Nine Selected By-products Used in California Dairy Rations. J. Dairy. Sci. 78:962-971.

16- Jahani-Azizabadi, H., M. DaneshMesgaran, A. R. Vakili, K. Rezayazdi, and M. Hashemi. 2011. Effect of various medicinal plant essential oils obtained from semi-arid climate on rumen fermentation characteristics of a high forage diet using in vitro batch culture. African J. Microb. Res. 5(27):4812-4819.

17- Kamali, A., 2009. Determine the nutritional value of tomato plants with different ratios of molasses and its application in feeding goat fattening. Pages 120-125. in The 4st In. Conf. New Ideas in Agric. proc. Islamic Azad Uni. Khorasgan, Isfehan.

18- Khodaverdi, R., A. A. Naserian, A. Ebrahimi, M.talebi, and M. Rahati. 2014. Determination of chemical composition and gas production of dried or ensiled tomato shoot. Pages 140-151. in The 1st In. Conf. New Ideas in Agric. proc. Islamic Azad Uni. Khorasgan, Isfehan.

19- Kordi, M., and A. A. Naserian. 2012. Influence of wheat bran as a silage additive on chemical composition, in situ degradability and in vitro gas production of citrus pulp silage. African. J. Biotec.11(63):12669-12674.

20- Kumara Mahipala, M. B. P., G. L. Krebs, P. McCafferty, and L. H. P. Gunaratne. 2009. Chemical composition, biological affects of tannin and in vitro nutritive value of selected browse species grown in the West Australian Mediterranean environment. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 153(3):203-215.

21- Masuda, Y., S. Kondo, M. Shimojo, and I. Goto. 1999. Effect of sugar-beet pulp supplementation on fiber degradation of grass hay in the rumen of goats. Journal of Animal Science, 12: 186-188.

22- McDonald, P., A. R. Henderson, and S. J. E. Heron. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed., Chalcombe publications, Marlow, Uk.

23- McDougall, E. I. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochemical Journal, 43:99-109.

24- Menke, K. H. and H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28:7-55.

25- Norman, H. C.,C. Freind, D. G. Masters, A. J. Rintoul, R. A. Dynes, and I. H. Williams. 2004. Variation within and between two saltbush species in plant composition and subsequent selection by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55:999-1007.

26- Norton, B. W. 2003. The nutritive value of tree legumes. In: Forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture (Ed. R.C. Gutteridge and H.M. Shelton) pp.1-10. Available in website: http://www.fao.org/ag/agP/agpc/doc/Publicat/Gutt-shel/x5556e0j.htm.

27- Razzaghi, A., R. Valizadeh. Chemical composition, degradability and gas production halophytes (Atriplexcanesences, Salsolarigida, Aeluropuslittoralis). 2013. Journal of Animal Science, the researcher-Iran. Develop. 7:1-11.

28- Rowghani, E., M. J. Zamiri, and A. R. Seradj. 2008. The chemical composition, rumen degradability, in vitro gas production, energy content and digestibility of olive cake ensiled with additives. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 9:213-221.

29- Tahseen, O, J. Abdallah, J. A. Omar. 2014. In situ degradability of dry matter, crud protein, acid and neutral detergent fiber of olive cake and greenhouse wastes of tomato and cucumber. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire, 165:93-98.

30- Theodorou, M. K., B. A. Williams, M. S. Dhanoa, A. B. McAllan, and J. France. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 48:185-197.

31- Towhidi, A., T. Saberifar, and E. Dirandeh. 2011. Nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43:617-622.

32- Van Soest. P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74:3583-3597.

33- Vanzant, E. S., R. C. Cochran, and E. C. Titgemeyer. 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Journal of Animal Science, 76:2717-2729.

34- Ventura, M. R., M. C. Pieltain, and J. I. R. Castanon. 2009. Evaluation of tomato crop by-products as feed for goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 154:271-275.

35- Zobdeh, M. R., S. A. Mousavi, and H. Fazaeli. 2007. Utilization of potato tops in the diet of finishing lambs. Pages 240-241 in International Trop. Anim. Nut. Conf. proc. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.