Investigating the Effect of Management Operations on the Time of Wild melon (Cucumismelo L. var. AgrestisNaud.) Emergence in Soybean (Glycine max)

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 12, Volume 32, Issue 3 - Serial Number 41, September 2019, Pages 429-444   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v32i3.73208

Authors

rahman khakzaD^* ; M.T. Al-e-Ebrahim

Mohaghegh Ardabili

Abstract

Introduction: Wild melon (Cucumismelo) is a monoecious, annual, trailing-vine plant of the Cucurbitaceae family. The reproduction of wild melon is only by seeds. Wild melon is native to Africa but is aggressively invading crop lands in the northern Iran. Because of rapid growth and limited control measures of wild melon, it is fast becoming a dominant weed in soybean fields. As wild melon and soybean share similar ecological niches, information pertaining to wild melon germination, and emergence would be beneficial.        
The ability to predict the time of seedling emergence is an important step towards increasing the timeliness and efficiency of chemical and cultural weed control measures. Controlling weed seedlings that emerge early may help to reduce competition during the critical phase of crop seedling establishment, but later emerging cohorts may escape control and contribute to the soil seed bank. Therefore, understanding the factors that regulate the time of weed emergence is crucial for both short- and long-term crop production goals.              
The time of weed germination and emergence in the field is influenced by environmental factors such as light, and soil moistureand temperature. Soil temperature is often considered as the primary environmental factor regulating emergence. The cumulative effect of temperature, expressed as thermal time, is correlated with the processes of after-ripening and seedling elongation.
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different management operations on the seedlings emergence of wild melon and to develop a soil thermal time (STT) model to predict the emergence of this species in soybeans.
Material and Methods: Experiment was arranged as split-split plot in a completely randomized block design with three replications. Conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT) systems were main plots, three seed rates of soybean (200,000; 300,000 and 400,000 seed ha-1) were sub-plots and sub-sub plots comprised five different doses of imazethapyear (0, 50, 75 100 and 125 g ai ha-1). The soybean cultivar used in the experiment was Telar (BP).
Before performing the experiment, field had also been in a continuous soybean production and contained natural infestations of annual weed, especially wild melon. The experimental design was then carried out during the growing seasons in 2016 and 2017. The experimental farm was divided into two uniform areas each year to adopt the CT and NT treatments. After seedbed preparation, planting in the first year was carried out on 17/6/2016 and in the second year on 25/6/2017 in both tillage systems. The spacing of the planting rows was 19 cm and the dimensions of each plot were 6×6 m. Each year after planting until flowering, irrigation was held once by week starting at 20 days after planting in each year, the indoxacarb (Avaunt) was used to control of heliotis. To evaluate the effect of different doses of imazethapyear (Pursuit) on the emergence pattern of  wild melon during each year, spraying was carried out as PRI based on the mentioned treatments by using Marina-type 20 liter sprayer equipped with a flood jet nozzle and 2.5 bar pressure (calibrated based on applying 200 to 300 lit ha-1 water).
To predict the wild melon emergence pattern in each plot, a fixed 50×50 cm quadrate was placed at the center of each plot, and from the beginning of the season after the first irrigation, the newly emerged seedling was counted. The counts were repeated every week, and then the seedlings counted at each stage were removed until new emerged seedling was not observed.
Statistical Analysis: Thermal time models were developed and evaluated, to describe observed wild melon seedling emergence pattern. Therefore, to estimate the cumulative seedlings emergence during the growing season, number of purslane seedlings was calculated based on the number of seedlings m-2.STT was obtained with the soil temperature by the following:
whereSTmean is the mean daily soil temperature, Tbase is the minimum temperature at which purslane seed germinates, and n is the number of days after sowing. Base temperature used in the calculations of STT for wild melon was 10 °C (Baker and Reddy 2001). Temperature Model software (STM2) (Spokas and Forcella 2009) was used to predict daily soil temperature at the 3cm depth. Daily precipitation, minimum and maximum air temperature were taken from the nearest meteorological station located near Sari, Mazandaran province. Soil texture properties and organic matter (%), along with the latitude, longitude, and elevation (1 m) of the research site were also used to predict daily soil temperature.
To describe the pattern of seedling emergence, cumulative emergence data were fitted using a three-parameters logistic model (Equation 2) (Brown and Mayer 1988; Eizenberg et al. 2005):
where a represents the upper asymptote (final CE), T50 represents the STT when the CE is 50% of the final CE (median), and b represents the slope of the curve at approximately T50. The parameter estimates were compared by using a two-tailed t-test (p < 0.05).
The goodness of model fit was evaluated with root mean square error (RMSE) and adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj) (Izquierdo et al. 2009). RMSE was calculated as follows:
wherePi and Oi are the predicted and observed emergence values, respectively, andn is the number of observations. Preliminary analysis of variance was conducted using PROC GLM in SAS to determine treatment effects and their interactions. Nonlinear regression analyses were applied using Sigma Plot ver. 12.5.
Results: The statistical measures of the model's performance showed that STT model is a good predictor for wild melon emergence, with adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj) values ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) values ranging from 2.59 to 12.69. The time of wild melon emergence was significantly affected by management practices such as tillage systems, soybean seeding rates, and imazethapyr doses. In the CT system, a seeding density of 400,000 seeds ha-1 and a 125 g ai ha-1imazethapyr dose showed a reduced wild melon emergence rate and had the highest T50, thus resulting in a long lag phase of wild melon emergence at the beginning of season. This provides more time for crops to establish and improves soybean competitive ability. The current study provides valuable information on prediction of the time of wild melon emergence to develop effective management strategies for this species. The proposed emergence models precisely predict the emergence pattern of wild melon seedlings as a function of STT, and STT models developed on the basis of field observations offer relatively strong predictions. With the continued development of such models, IWM will be more practical, enabling us to predict how farm management changes affect weed populations, the biological outcomes of the various management options, and the economic and environmental impact of crop-weed competition.

Keywords

Emergence pattern; Conventional tillage; no-till; Seeding rate; Competition

References

1- Arce G.D., Pedersen, P. and Hartzler R.G. 2009. Soybean seeding rate effects on weed management. Weed Technology, 23:17–22.

2- Baskin C.C. and Baskin J.M. 2001. Seed: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego: Academic Press. 666 p.

3- Benech-Arnold R.L., Ghersa C.M., Sanchez, R.A. and Garcia- Fernandez A.E. 1988. The role of fluctuating temperatures in the germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. regulation of germination under leaf canopies. Functional Ecology, 2:311–318.

4-Benech-Arnold R.L., Sanchez R.A., Forcella F., Kruk, B.C. and Ghersa C.M. 2000. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Research, 67:105–122.

5- Benvenuti S., Macchia, M. and Miele S. 2001. Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seed with increasing soil depth. Weed Science, 49:528–535.

6- Black I.D. and Dyson C.B. 1997. A model of the cost of delay in spraying weeds in cereals. Weed Research, 37:139–146.

7- Blackshaw R.E. 1993. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) density and relative time of emergence affects interference in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science, 41:551–556.

8- Blackshaw R.E., Larney F.J., Lindwall C.W., Watson, P.R. and Derksen D.A. 2001. Tillage intensity and crop rotation affect weed community dynamics in a winter wheat cropping system. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 81:805-813.

9- Blackshaw R.E., Harker K.N., O’Donovan J.T., Beckie, H.J. and Smith E.G. 2008. Ongoing development of integrated weed management systems on Canadian prairies. Weed Science, 56:146-150.

10- Bolfrey-Arku G.E.K., Chauhan, B.S. and Johnson D.E. 2011. Seed germination ecology of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis). Weed Science, 59:182–187.

11- Bradley J.P., Knittle, K.H. and Troyer A.F. 1988. Statistical methods in seed corn product selection. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1:34-38.

12- Brown R.F. and Mayer D.G. 1988. Representing cumulative germination. The use of the Weibull function and other empirically derived curves. Annals of Botany, 61:127–138.

13- Buhler D.D. and Proost R.T. 1992. Influence of application time on bioactivity of imazethapyr in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max). Weed Science, 40:122-126.

14- Chauhan B.S. and Johnson D.E. 2009. Influence of tillage systems on weed seedling emergence pattern in rainfed rice. Soil and Tillage Research, 106:15–21.

15- Conley S.P., Binning L.K., Boerboom, C.M. and Stoltenberg D.E. 2003. Parameters for predicting giant foxtail cohort effect on soybean yield loss. Agronomy Journal, 95:1226–1232.

16- Correll D.S. and Johnston M.C. 1979. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Richardson, TX: The University of Texas at Dallas. 1881 p.

17- Eizenberg H., Colquhoun, J.B. and Mallory-Smith C.A. 2005. A predictive degree-d model for small broomrape (Orobanche minor) parasitism in red clover in Oregon. Weed Science, 53:37–40

18- Forcella F., Eradat-Oskoui, K. and Wagner S.W. 1993. Application of weed seedbank ecology to low-input crop management. Ecological Applications, 3:74–83.

19- Forcella F., Benech-Arnold R.L., Sanchez, R.E. and Ghersa C.M. 2000. Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Research, 67:123–139.

20- Gan Y., Stulen I., Van Keulen, H. and Kuiper P.J.C. 2002. Physiological response of soybean genotypes to plant density. Field Crops Research, 74: 231-241.

21- Gebhardt M.R., Daniel T.C., Schweizer, E.E. and Allmaras R.R. 1985. Conservation tillage. Weed Science, 23:25-630.

22- Gibson K.D., Fischer A.J., Foin, T.C. and Hill J.E. 2002. Implications of delayed Echinochloa spp. germination and duration of competition for integrated weed management in water-seeded rice. Weed Research, 42:351–358.

23- Grichar W.J. 2007. Horse Purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum), Smellmelon (Cucumis melo), and Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in peanut with post-emergence herbicides. Weed Technology, 21:688-691.

24- Harder D.B., Sprague, C.L. and Renner K.A. 2007. Effect of soybean row width and population on weed, crop yield, and economic return. Weed Technology, 21:744–752.

25- Hasanzadeh S., Rezvani, M. and Abbasi R. 2015. The Effect of imazethapyr reduced dose on red bean (Phaseolus calcaratus L.) grain yield and yield components at competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.). Special Issue of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 1:14-24. (in Persian with English abstract)

26- Hongle X., Wangcang S., Di Z., Lanlan S., Hengliang W., Fei X., Shunguo Z., Zeguo, Z. and Renhai W. 2017. Influence of environmental factors on Cucumis melo L. var. agrestis Naud. Seed germination and seedling emergence. Plos One, 12:1-16.

27- Izquierdo J., Gonzalez-Andujar J.L., Bastida F., Lezaun, J.A. and Del Arco M.J.S. 2009. A thermal time model to predict corn poppy (Papaver rhoeas) emergence in cereal field. Weed Science, 57:660–664.

28- Kerje T. and Grum M. 2000. The origin of melon, Cucumis melo: a review of the literature. Acta Horticulturae, 510:37-44.

29- Legere A. and Schreiber M.M. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Science, 37:84–92.

30- Leon R.G., Izquierdo, J. and Gonzalez-Andujar J.L. 2015. Characterization and modeling of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) biphasic seedling emergence patterns in the tropics. Weed Science, 63:623-630.

31- McGlamery M.D., Pike D.R., Knake E.L., Curran, W.S. and Anderson C.D. 1990. Weed control for corn, soybeans, and sorghum. Pages 139-145 in Univ. Illinois Coll. Agric. Circ. no. 1277-90. Urbana, IL.

32- Mickelson J.A. and Renner K.A. 1997. Weed control using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in narrow and wide row soybean. Journal of Production Agriculture, 10:431–437.

33- Mohler C.L. and Callaway M.B. 1992. Effects of tillage and mulch on the emergence and survival of weed in sweet corn. Journal of Applied Ecology, 29:21-34.

34- Naylor J.M. and Jana S. 1976. Genetic adaptation for dormancy in Avena fatua. Canadian Journal of Botany, 54:306–312.

35- Nice G.R.W., Buehring, N.W. and Shaw D.R. 2001. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) response to shading, soybean (Glycine max) row spacing, and population in three management systems. Weed Technology, 15:155–162.

36- Norsworthy J.K. and Oliveira M.J. 2007. Tillage and soybean canopy effects on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) emergence. Weed Science, 55:474-480.

37- O’Donovan J.T., Remy E.A. de St., O’Sullivan P.A., Dew, D.A. and Sharma A.K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science, 33:498–503.

38- Oryokot J.O.E., Murphy S.D., Thomas, A.G. and Swanton C.J. 1997. Temperature and moisture dependent models of seed germination and shoot elongation in green and redroot pig weed (Amaranthus powellii, A. retroflexus). Weed Science, 45:488-496.

39- Parvizi S., Amirnia R., Bernosy I., Paseban Islam B., Hasanzadeh Ghorttapeh, A. and Raeii Y. 2011. Evaluation of different plant densities effects on rate and process of grain filling, yield and yield components in varieties of dry bean. Journal of Plant Production, 18: 69-87. (in Persian with English abstract)

40- Probert R.J. 2000. The role of temperature in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination. Pages 261–292 in M. Fenner, ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.

41- Rashedmohassel M.H., Rahimian, H. and Banaeian M. 1999. Applied W. Sci. Publicized University Jahad Mashhad. 576 P.

42- Reicosky D.C. and Allmaras R.R. 2003. Advances in tillage research in North American cropping systems. Journal of Crop Production, 8:75-125.

43- Rice K.J. and Dyer A.R. 2001. Seed ageing, delayed germination and reduced competitive ability in Bromus tectorum. Plant Ecology, 155:237– 243.

44- Rich A.M. and Renner K.A. 2007. Row spacing and seeding rate effects on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptychanthum) and soybean. Weed Technology, 21:124–130.

45- Sanyal D., Bhowmik P.C., Anderson, R.L. and Shrestha A. 2008. Revisiting the perspective and progress of integrated weed management. Weed Science, 56:161-167.

46- Sohrabi S., Ghanbari A., Mohassel M.H.R., Gherekhloo, J. and Vidal R.A. 2016. Effects of environmental factors on Cucumis melo L. subsp. agrestis var. agrestis (Naudin) Pangalo seed germination and seedling emergence. South African Journal of Botany, 105:1-8.

47- Spokas K. and Forcella F. 2006. Estimating hourly incoming solar radiation from limited meteorological data. Weed Science, 54:182–189.

48- Swanton C.J., Shrestha A., Clements D.R., Booth, B.D. and Chandler K. 2002. Evaluation of alternative weed management systems in a modified no-tillage corn-soybean-winter wheat rotation: Weed densities, crop yields, and economics. Weed Science, 50:505-511.

49- Symons S.J., Simpson, G.M. and Adkins S.W. 1987. Secondary dormancy in Avena fatua: effect of temperature and after-ripening. Physiologia Plantarum, 70:419–426.

50- Thompson K., Grime, J.P. and Mason G. 1977. Seed germination in response to diurnal fluctuations of temperature. Nature, 67:147–149.

51- Tingle C.H. and Chandler J.M. 2003. Influence of environmental factors on smellmelon (Cucumis melo var. dudaim Naud.) germination, emergence, and vegetative growth. Weed Science, 51:56–59.

52- Torabi Jafroudi A., Hasanzadeh, A.A. and Fayaz moghadam A. 2007. Effect of plant population on some morph physiological characteristics of two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 20: 63-71. (in Persian with English abstract)

53- Vasilas B.L., Esgar R.W., Walke W.M., Beck, R.H. and Mainz M.J. 1988. Soybean response to potassium fertility under four tillage systems. Agronomy Journal, 80:5-8.

54- Walsh K.D., Soltani N., Shropshire, C. and Sikkema P.H. 2015. Weed control in soybean with imazethapyr applied alone or in tank mix with saflufenacil/dimethenamid-P no access. Weed Science, 63:329-335.

55- Yelverton F.H. and Coble H.D. 1991. Narrow row spacing and canopy formation reduces weed resurgence in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technology, 5:169-174.

56- Zhang Z., Huo J.Q., Zhang Z.Q., Wang, Y.H. and Zhang J.L. 2016. A report of a Cucurbitaceae weed Cucumis bisexualis causing damage to corn. Plant Protection Science, 42:254-256.