Developing a Model for Organizational Identity Using Grounded Theory in Iran Tractor Manufacturing Industrial Group

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 10, Volume 13, Spring & summer 2021 - Serial Number 25, September 2021, Pages 233-258   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/tmj.2021.30001.0

Authors

Vahid Fattahi Sarand¹; Ali Shaemi Barzoki^{* 2}; Hadi Teimouri²

¹PhD, Business Management, University of Isfahan Assistant Professor of Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University

²Associate Professor, Department of Management, University of Isfahan

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
Organizational identity refers to the common beliefs of an organization's members. despite plenty of research on organizational identity, there is little knowledge about its affecting factors and how it is formed. in line with shaping organizational identity, some researchers emphasize internal and external factors such as organizational communications, top management activities, and human resource management. organizational identity is one of the most important factors that affect organizational performance and productivity. research shows that there exists a theoretical gap in developing systematic models for organizational identity, particularly in iranian organizations. accordingly, this study attempts to provide a comprehensive model of organizational identity in iran tractor manufacturing company.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Organizational identity involves a strong emotional attachment to the organization, which is referred to as the perception of common characteristics. according to social identity theory, the psychological relationship between employees and an organization is known as organizational identity. the power of organizational identity reflects the degree to which the employees perceive an organization as particularity and unique. the organizational identity has the ability to predict many important organizational attitudes and behaviors. it has been considered as a concept that forms the common understanding of an organization’s members of its central characteristics and it shapes a kind of shared thinking among employees.
3- METHODOLOGY
This research is a developmental and applied study in terms of purpose, and in regard to the method, it is a descriptive survey. and in terms of the research design, it is a mixed study. in the qualitative phase, grounded theory is used to create a conceptual model of organizational identity. in this regard, a three-step process of open, axial, and selective coding was performed by nvivo10 software. in the quantitative phase, confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm qualitative findings.
 4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The process model developed in this research, as a native model of organizational identity, attempts to consider the issue of organizational identity from a multidimensional viewpoint. this model is capable of directing the employees' intentions and behaviors in line with the organizational goals. the results of this study made causal conclusions on the components of internal identity, employees’ empowerment, and job enrichment. leadership style is also proposed as a context for shaping organizational identity. in addition, managerial factors and financial requirements were determined to be the intervening factors. additionally, perceived organizational support and socialization were considered as effective strategies of organizational identity. finally, the consequences of organizational identity were found to have positive effects on customer performance and satisfaction.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
In order to enhance the causal conditions through internal identity, managers are advised to strengthen the trust among employees with their honest behaviors to make employees more compatible with the organization, which leads to strengthening the employees' internal identity. furthermore, to create a suitable context, it is suggested that managers improve moral and transformational leadership characteristics to increase the sense of solidarity among employees and managers. in order to create a positive role for interveners, it is suggested that managers adopt a management style based on ethical traits and cooperation with employees and show positive managerial competencies. additionally, managers are also advised to support employees in three ways as emotional, managerial, and health support. besides, it is emphasized that according to the consequences of managers' organizational identity, different roles and tasks may be assigned to employees. in the individual dimension, managers should strengthen job satisfaction, psychological security, job performance, job motivation, and organizational citizenship behavior. moreover, in the organizational dimension, it is recommended to take some defective actions to improve organizational decision-making, promote organizational commitment, productivity, and enhance the organizational image.

Keywords

Identity; Organizational Identity; Grounded Theory; Iran Tractor Industrial Group

References

References  

     Amirkafi M., & Karevani, A. (2018) A study of the effects of organizational justice and organizational identity on organizational commitment. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 9(1), 29-51. (in Persian)

Ashforth, B. E.; Schinoff, B. S., & Rogers, K. M. (2016). I identify with her, i identify with him: unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 28-60.

Bartel, C.; Baldi, C., & Dukerich, J. M. (2016). Fostering stakeholder identification through expressed organizational identities. in pratt, M. G., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B. E., & Ravasi, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational identity (pp. 474–493). oxford university press.

Bellou, V.; Chitiris, L., & Bellou, A. (2005). The impact of organizational identification and self-esteem on organizational citizenship behavior: The case of Greek public hospitals, Operational Research, 5(2), 305-318.

Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.

Bilgrami, A. (2011). Identity, Retrieved from http://www. politicalconcepts. org/issue1/identity.

Bizumic, B.; Reynolds, K. J., & Meyers, B. (2012). Predicting social identification over time: the role of group and personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 453-458.

Brown, A. D. (2017). Identity work and organizational identification, International Journal of Management Review, 19(3), 296-317.

Brown, A. D., & Humphreys, M. (2002). Nostalgia and the narrativization of identity: a turkish case study, British Journal of Management, 13(2), 141-159.

Brown, A. D., & Humphreys, M. (2006). Organizational identity and place: a discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 231-257.

Brown, A. D.; Humphreys, M., & Gurney, P. M. (2005). Narrative, identity and change: a case study of laskarina holidays, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(4), 312-326.

Carmeli, A.; Atwater, L., & Levi, A. (2011). How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 257-274.

Carmeli, A.; Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972-992.

Cole, M. S., & Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter?  Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 585 – 605.

Corley, K. G.; Harquail, C. V.; Pratt, M. G.; Glynn, M. A.; Fiol, C. M., & Hatch, M. J. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 85-99.

Cornelissen, J. P. (2002). On the ‘organizational identity’ metaphor. British Journal of Management, 13(3), 259-268.

Cornelissen, J. P.; Haslam, S. A., & Balmer J. M. (2007). Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: towards an integrated understanding of processes, patterns and products, British Journal of Management, 18(1), 1-16.

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review, Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.

DeConinck, J. B. (2011). The effects of ethical climate on organizational identification, supervisory trust, and turnover among salespeople, Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 617-624.

Dhalla, R. (2007). The construction of organizational identity: key contributing external and intra-organizational factors, Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 245-260.

Domurath, A.; Patzelt, H., & Liebl, A. (2019). Does negative feedback impact new ventures' organizational identity? the role of founding teams' human capital and feedback source. Journal of Business Venturing, 105987.

Dukerich, J. M.; Golden B. R., & Shortell. S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: the impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507-533.

Edwards, J., & Cable, D. (2009). The value of value congruence, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654-677.

Edwards, M. R. (2009). HR, perceived organizational support and organizational identification: an analysis after organizational formation. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 91-115.

Ellemers, N.; De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance, Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459-478.

Erdheim, J.; Wang, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2006). Linking the big five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 959–970.

Gioia, D. A.; Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2002). On celebrating the organizational identity metaphor: a rejoinder to cornelissen, British Journal of Management, 13(3), 269-275.

Glavas, A., & Lindsey, N. G. (2012). Is the perception of ‘goodness’ good enough? exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification, Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 15-27.

Gupta, S. (2016). New perspectives on communication of change in corporate identity, IIMB Management Review, 28(2), 60–71.

Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2^nd ed.). London: Sage.

Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of marketing, 31(5-6), 356-365.

Hatch, M. J., & Shultz, M. (2000). Scaling the tower of babel: relational differences between identity, image and culture in organizations. in M. Schultz, M. H. Larsen (Eds), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand, Oxford University Press.

He, H. (2012). Corporate identity anchors: a managerial cognition perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 46(5), 609-625.

He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3-35.

Homburg, C.; Wieseke, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2009). Social identity and the service–profit chain. Journal of Marketing, 73, 38-54.

Kreutzer, K., & Rueede, D. (2019). Organizational identity consistency in a discontinuous corporate volunteering program. European Management Journal, 37(4), 455-467.

Lawler, S. (2008), Identity: Sociological perspectives, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lotfi Jallalabadi, M.; Mooghali, A. R.; Feizi, T., & Amirkhani, A. H. (2015). An investigation of the effect of authentic leadership on organizational identification (a case study of the personnel of defensive-industrial units), Military Management, 15(58), 24-42. (in Persian)

Moradi, E.; Safania, A., & Zarandi, H. P. (2018) The causal relationship of types of organizational silence with organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of organizational identity, Journal of Psychological Achievements, 26(1), 131-150. (in Persian)

Morrison, E. U., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world, Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-25.

Nazari, S. (2019). The Relationship between organizational socialization and organizational identity among physical education teachers in cities of Tehran province. Family and Research, 16(2), 101-122. (in Persian)

Nwamaka A., & Anaza, B. R. (2012), How organizational and employee-customer identification, and customer orientation affect job engagement, Journal of Service Management, 23(5), 616 – 639

Olkkonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 100(1), 202-215.

Puusa, A., & Tulvanen, U. (2006). Organizational identity and trust, Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11(2):24-111.

Tangirala, S.; Green, S. G., & Ramanujam, R. (2007). In the shadow of the boss's boss: effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 309-320.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. thousand oaks, CA: sage publications, inc.

Walumbwa, F. O.; Mayer, D. M.; Wang, P.; Wang, H.; Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204-213.

Weiseke, J.; Ahearne, M.; Lam, S. K., & Van Dick, R. (2008). The role of leaders in internal marketing: a multilevel examination through the lens of social identity theory, Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 123-146.