News

 Statistics

Number of Journals56
Number of Issues2,157
Number of Articles22,295
Article View98,920,216
PDF Download38,923,978
Mamnoie, E., Karaminejad, M., Minbash Moeini, M., Askary Kelestani, A. (2023). Evaluation of Ready-Mix herbicide Efficiency of Clodinafop Propargil+ Metribuzin in Comparison with Registered Herbicides in Weed Control of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Fars. , 37(1), 59-75. doi: 10.22067/jpp.2022.73993.1068
E. Mamnoie; M.R. Karaminejad; M. Minbash Moeini; A.R. Askary Kelestani. "Evaluation of Ready-Mix herbicide Efficiency of Clodinafop Propargil+ Metribuzin in Comparison with Registered Herbicides in Weed Control of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Fars". , 37, 1, 2023, 59-75. doi: 10.22067/jpp.2022.73993.1068
Mamnoie, E., Karaminejad, M., Minbash Moeini, M., Askary Kelestani, A. (2023). 'Evaluation of Ready-Mix herbicide Efficiency of Clodinafop Propargil+ Metribuzin in Comparison with Registered Herbicides in Weed Control of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Fars', , 37(1), pp. 59-75. doi: 10.22067/jpp.2022.73993.1068
Mamnoie, E., Karaminejad, M., Minbash Moeini, M., Askary Kelestani, A. Evaluation of Ready-Mix herbicide Efficiency of Clodinafop Propargil+ Metribuzin in Comparison with Registered Herbicides in Weed Control of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Fars. , 2023; 37(1): 59-75. doi: 10.22067/jpp.2022.73993.1068

Evaluation of Ready-Mix herbicide Efficiency of Clodinafop Propargil+ Metribuzin in Comparison with Registered Herbicides in Weed Control of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Fars

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران
Article 6, Volume 37, Issue 1 - Serial Number 59, March 2023, Pages 59-75    PDF (940.52 K)
Document Type: Research Article
DOI: 10.22067/jpp.2022.73993.1068
Authors
E. Mamnoie* 1; M.R. Karaminejad2; M. Minbash Moeini3; A.R. Askary Kelestani4
1Plant Protection Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Darab, Iran
2Department of Weed Research, Plant Pest and Disease Research Institute, AREEO, Tehran, Iran
3Associates Professor of Department of Weed Research, Plant Pest and Disease Research Institute, AREEO, Tehran, Iran
4Assistant Professor of Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Darab, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
 Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is one of the most important crops in Fars province and Iran. The area under cultivation of this crop is 337,000 hectares in Fars’s province. The weeds are one of the most famous factors limiting in the production of wheat in Iran and the world. Weeds can decrease grain yield of wheat by competing for resources such as water, light and nutrients and production of allelopathic compounds. If weeds are not controlled at this crop, cause great damage to the wheat. The amount of weed damage in wheat fields of Iran has been reported to be about 20 to 25%. The most important weeds of wheat in Fars are including Mavla neglecta Wallr., Centaurea solstitialis L., Veronica persica L., Carthamus oxyacanthus M.B., Capsella bursa-pastoris, L., Descurainia Sophia (L.) Webb&Berth, Hirschfeldia incana L., Lolium rigidum L., Avena fatua L., Bromus tectorum L. Application of herbicides is the most prevalent method of weed control in wheat fields. There are 26 herbicides registered for weed control in wheat in Iran, which are mainly used post-emergence. Herbicides are recommended for weed control in wheat included of Total, Othello, Atlantis, Geranestar, Bromicid MA, Apiros, Tapik and Axial. Therefore, it is necessary to register new herbicides with different site of action in this crop. This experiment was conducted to investigate the new herbicide efficacy of clodinafop propargil+ metribuzin in control of wheat fields, determination of the most appropriate dose, comparison of the effectiveness of new herbicide with the herbicides was recorded in wheat and the reaction of wheat to the herbicide
Materials and Methods
 In order to study the effect of herbicides to control weeds of wheat fields, an experiment was conducted during 2020- 2021 at Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Darab, Iran. Plots were located on a clay loam soil with pH 7.9. This experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design with 13 treatments and 4 replications. The treatments included post emergence application of Total (methsulfuron+ sulfosulfuron, 80% WG) at dose rate of 40 g ha-1, Othello (mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron+ diflufenican, 6% OD) at dose rate of 1.6 L ha-1, Tapik (clodinafop propargil, 8% EC) + Geranestar (tribenuron, 75% DF) at dose rates of 0.8 L ha-1+ 20 g ha-1, Tapik (clodinafop propargil) + Bromicid MA (bromoxynil+ MCPA, 40% EC) at dose rates of 1 L ha-1+ 1.5 L ha-1, ACM– 9 (clodinafop propargil + metribuzin, 29% WP) at dose rates of 500, 600, 700 g ha-1, Shagun 21-11 (clodinafop propargil+ metribuzin, 54% WG) at dose rates of 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 g ha-1 and weeding control. The herbicides were applied using a Matabi sprayer equipped with an 8002 flat fan nozzle tip delivering 350 L ha-1 at 2 bar spray pressure. Weed numbers and dry weights were determined in random 0.50-m2 quadrates per plot. The grain yield and biological yield were recorded for a 2 m2 and 0.50 m2 from each plot, respectively. Parameters were recorded including and control percentage of density, weed biomass, plant height, grains per spike, number spikes, 1000 grains weigh, grain yield and biological yield. Statistical analyses of data were done with SAS var 9 software and comparison of mean was tested using the LSD test at 5% level.
Results and Discussion
The weed infestations in the study consisted of Hirschfeldia incana L., Centaurea pallescens L., Veronica persica L., Malva neglecta L., Lolium rigidum L., and Convolvulus arvensis L. Among these weeds, Centaurea pallescens had the highest relative weight at 24%, while Convolvulus arvensis had the lowest relative weight at 8%. In terms of relative density, Veronica persica had the highest value at 44%, while Convolvulus arvensis had the lowest at 7%. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that the application of herbicides significantly reduced weed density and biomass. It also led to increased plant height, number of spikes per m2, grains per spike, 1000 grains weight, grain yield, and biological yield. Visual observations confirmed the effective control of these weeds using the ACM herbicide at a dose rate of 700 g ha-1. The best herbicide treatment for weed control was Tapik+ Bromicid MA, followed by ACM herbicide at a dose rate of 700 g ha-1. The ACM herbicide at a dose rate of 700 g ha-1 resulted in a significant reduction in biomass for Malva neglecta (87%), Lolium rigidum (76%), Hirschfeldia incana (81%), Centaurea pallescens (90%), Veronica persica (86%), and total weed (80%) compared to the weed control. Furthermore, when the ACM herbicide was applied at a dose rate of 700 g ha-1, the grain yield and biological yield were 5.65 and 14.51 tons ha-1, respectively. This treatment also led to a 26% increase in grain yield and a 25% increase in biological yield compared to the control.
Conclusion
 Results showed that applications of powder formulation of clodinafop+ metribuzin herbicide at dose rate of 700 g ha-1 had acceptable weed control efficacy and increased wheat yield. Therefore, the application of clodinafop+ metribuzin (WP) herbicide at dose rate of 700 g ha-1 is suggested for wheat fields.
Keywords
Chemical control; Control percentage; Density; Dry weight; Lolium rigidum
References
  1. Abbas, T., Abbas, T., Nadeem, M.A., Tanveer, A., Matloob, A., Zohaib, A., Safdar, M.E., Ali, H.H., Farooq, N., Javaid, M.M., Tabassum, T., & Nasir, I.R. (2018). Herbicide mixtures and row spacing effects on Fenoxaprop resistant Phalaris minor in wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 20: 2737- http://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0828.
  2. Asghar, M., Ullah Chauhdary, S., Afzal, M., Muhammad, M., Baig, Q., Qadir, M., Gafoor, A., & Zafaryab, H.S. (2017). Evaluation of the effectiveness of different herbicides against a new weed Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus) in wheat crop. Azarian Journal of Agriculture 4(3): 74-79.
  3. Azhar, M., Javaid-Iqbal, M., Chattha, M.B., & Shabbir Azhar, G. (2013). Evaluation of various herbicides for controlling grassy weeds in wheat. Mycopath 11(1): 39-44.
  4. Babaei, M., & Saeedipour, S. (2017). The effect of crop seed rate and post emergence herbicide application on weed control and grain yield of wheat. Journal of Plant Protection 31(1): 117-123. (In Persian). http://doi.org/20.1001.1.20084749.1396.31.1.12.9.
  5. Bailly, G.C., Dale, R.P., Aecher, S.A., Wright, D.J., & Kaundus, S.S. (2012). Role of residual herbicides for the management of multiple herbicide resistance to ACCase and ALS inhibitors in a black-grass population. Crop Protection 34: 96‒103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.11.017.
  6. Baziyar, S., Vazan, S., Oveisi, M., & Paknezhad, F. (2010). Optimization of herbicide doses of mesosulfuron-methyl (Atlantis) and clodinafop-propargyl (Topik) in control of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in competition with whea. Iiranian Journal of Field Crop Science 41(4): 755-761. (In Persian). http://doi.org/20.1001.1.20084811.1389.41.4.11.6.
  7. Cheema, M., & Akhtar, M. (2005). Efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides and their application methods in controlling weeds in wheat. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 11(1-2): 23-29.
  8. Choudhary, D., Singh, P.K., Chopra, N.K., & Rana, S.C. (2016). Effect of herbicides and herbicide mixtures on weeds in wheat. Indian Journal Agricultural Research 50(2): 107-112. http://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.v50i2.9587.
  9. Ebadati, A., Gholamalipour-Alamdari, E., Avasaji, Z., & Rahemi-Karizaki, A. (2019). Effect of application time of dual-purpose herbicides and mixing herbicides on weeds control and wheat yield. Journal of Plant Physiology 39: 192-209. (In Persian)
  10. Ebadi, A., Parmoon, G., Samadi, C.A., & Sajed, K. (2015). Evaluation of the effect of mixture of herbicides on weeds control in rainfed bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Ardabil. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 17(3): 179-192. (In Persian)
  11. Ebrahimpour, F., Chaab, A., Mousavi, H., & Musaviyan, N. (2011). Evaluation of management efficiency of total dual purpose herbicide and mixed granstar and axial herbicides at different growth stages of wheat. Electronic Journal Crop Production 4(2): 17-30. (In Persian). http://doi.org/20.1001.1.2008739.1390.4.2.2.6.
  12. Ghanbari-Birgani, D., Karaminejad, M.R., Farzadi, H., & Baghestani, V. (2015). Evaluation of the efficiency of metribuzin (WP 70%) in the control of weeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Field, Pesticides in Plant Protection Science 3(1): 13-26.
  13. Gherekhloo, J., Oveisi, M., Zand, E., & DE-Prado, R. (2016). A Review of herbicide resistance in Iran. Weed Science 64(4): 551-561. http://doi.org/10.22092/jppps.2016.106157.
  14. Izadi-Darbandi, E., Chitband, A.A., Abbasian, A., & Heydari, M. (2013). Evaluation of Wheat and Barley Cultivars Tolerance to Metribuzine Application. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 11(1): 152-161. http://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V14I2.40582.
  15. Khan, N., Hassan, G., Marwat, K.B., & Khan, M.A. (2003). Efficacy of different herbicides for controlling weeds in wheat crop at different times of application- II. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2(3): 310-313. http://doi.org/3923/ajps.2003.310.313.
  16. Kumar, M., Kishore, R., Kumar, S., & Bisht, S. (2018). Efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides application alone and in combination in wheat. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry SP1: 1668-1670.
  17. Kumar, S., Angiras, N.N., & Rana, S.S. (2011). Bio-efficacy of clodinafoppropargyl+ metsulfuron-methyl against complex weed flora in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 43(3&4): 195-198. https://www.isws.org.in/IJWSn/File/2011_43_Issue-3&4_195-198.pdf.
  18. Lata, K., Singh, V., & Kumar, R. (2017). Herbicide evaluation for control of weed flora in wheat. International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research 15(3): 253-254.
  19. Makvandi, M.A., Erzadeh, S., & Golabi, M. (2007). Evaluation of herbicide and micronutrient combining efficiency in weed control and wheat yield. Journal of Agricultural Science 30(3): 125-133. (In Persian)
  20. Mamnoie, E., & Karaminejad, M.R. (2020). Evaluation time and rate application of prosulfocarb herbicide in the weed control of wheat in south kerman. Journal of Crop Production 13(1): 51-66. (In Persian). http://doi.org/10.22069/EJCP.2020.17165.2269.
  21. Mamnoie, E., karaminejad, M.R., Minbash, M.M., & Askary, A.R. (2022). Evaluation of ready-mix herbicide efficiency of clodinafop propargil+ metribuzin in comparison with registered herbicides in weed control of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Fars. Journal of Plant Protection, Articles in Press, 1-19. http://doi.org/10.22067/JPP.2022.73993.1068.
  22. Mansourian, S., Alizadeh, H.M., & Zand, E. (2008). Effect of Dose and application time of metribuzin on grain yield of different wheat varieties. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 4(1): 65-74. (In Persian)
  23. Mortazavi, E., & Armin, M. (2019). The effect of adjuvant on reducing the dose of sulfosulfuron+ metsulfuronmethyl. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology 39: 253-243. (In Persian)
  24. Naghshbandi, M., Baghestani, M.A., Zand, E., & Mansourian, S. (2008). Effects of metribuzin and plant density on weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Iranian Journal of Weed Science 4(1): 85-95. (In Persian)
  25. Nanher, A.H., & Singh, R. (2015). Effects of weed control treatments on wheat crop and associated weeds. Advance Research of Crop Improvement 6(2): 158-165. http://doi.org/115740/HAS/ARJCI/6.2/158-165.
  26. Nazary-Alam, J., Mousavi, V., Sihrabi, N., Sadeghi, N., & Sadeghi-Shoa, M. (2013). Evaluation of herbicide for Cerastium and Vaccaria sp. weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum) fields of Lorestan, Alashtar. Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 9(3): 55-65. (In Persian with English abstract)
  27. Porazar, R., & Baghstani, M.A. (2004). The efficiency of new broadleaf herbicide in wheat fields in Khuzestan. 16nd Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
  28. Punia, S.S., Yadav, D.B., Kaur, M., & Sindhu, V.K. (2017). Post-emergence herbicides for the control of resistant littleseed canarygrass in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 49(1): 15- http://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00004.1.
  29. Sheikhi-Gorjani, A., Najafi, H., Abbasi, S., Saberfar, F., & Moradi, M. (2018). Guide to Chemical and Organic Pesticides of Iran. Rahdan Publications 228 pp.
  30. Singh, R., Singh, A.P., Chaturvedi, S., Pal, R., & Pal, J. (2015). Metribuzin + clodinafop-propargyl effects on complex weed flora in wheat and its residual effect on succeeding crop. Indian Journal of Weed Science 47(4): 362–365.
  31. Singh, S., Singh, S., Sharma, S.D., Punia, S.S., & Singh, H. (2005). Performance of tank mixture of metribuzin with clodinafop and fenoxaprop for the control of mixedweed flora in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 37: 9-12.
  32. Somani, L.I. (1992). Dictionary of weed science. Agronomy Publishing Academy (India) 256 pp.
  33. Veisi, M., Baghestani, M.A., & Minbashi, M.M. (2018). Study of tank mix application of dual propose and broad leaf herbicides for weed control in wheat fields. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 49(2): 171-183. (In Persian with English abstract)
  34. Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., & Konzak, C.F. (1974.) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415-421
  35. Zalghi, Z., & Saeedipor, S. (2017). Study the efficiency of Atlantis and its mixture with Duplosan Super and Bromicide MA herbicides for weeds controlling of wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology 9(21): 165-173. (In Persian with English abstract)
  36. Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Nezamabadi, N., Shimi, P., & Mousavi, S.K. (2019). A guide for herbicides in Iran. University Press Center, 216pp. (In Persian)
  37. Zand, E., Mousavi, S.K., & Heidari, A. (2008). Herbicides and methods of their application with approach of optimization and usage decrease. Publication of jehade daneshgahi Mashhad, Mashad Iran. 572 p. (In Persian)
  38. Zare, A., Miri, H.R., & Jafari-Haghighi, B. (2014). Effect of plant density and reduced dosages of iodosulfuron+ mesosulfuron (Atlantis) on integrated weed management in wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology 6(16): 38-93. (In Persian)
  39. Zare-Feizabdi, A., Sarian, H., Rajab-Zadeh, , & Khazaie, H. (2009). Evaluation of wheat cultivars to different densities of wild oat competition reactions (Avena ludovicianal). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7(2): 456-472. (In Persian)
  40. Zimdahl, R.L. (2004). Weed-Crop Competition: A Review. Blackwell publishing 99(2): 131-145.
 

 

Statistics
Article View: 3,094
PDF Download: 1,502


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb