Evaluation of Physicochemical and Microstructure Properties of Expanded Quinoa

مجله پژوهشهای علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران

Article 4, Volume 19, Issue 4 - Serial Number 82, September and October 2023, Pages 451-462   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/ifstrj.2022.74911.1139

Authors

Elham Ghiami¹; Arash Koocheki¹; Elnaz Milani^{* 2}

¹Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Iranian Academic Center for Education Culture and Research (ACECR), Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
 Quinoa, which is known as the mother grain,has higher protein content than common cereals and possesses a large lysine content. Quinoa is composed mainly of carbohydrates (60-75%), of which 10-13% is dietary fiber. Quinoa also has a slightly higher protein content (12-16%) compared with cereal grains and fat content (5-9%) that is rich in unsaturated fatty acids. Quinoa seeds contain similar or slightly higheramounts of bioactive compounds such as polyphenols (2.7-3.8 g/kg). Moreover, quinoa is gluten-free, thus providing the ability to enhance the selection of gluten-free products forconsumers with celiac disease, but this type of characteristicis challenging to development of bakery products from quinoa with desirable physicochemical properties. Processing of cereal grains and pseudo-cereals into products that deliver a nutritive valueto consumers represents a considerable opportunity for large scale food processing. There havebeen some reported studies on roasting, extrusion, steam pre-conditioning and pearling of quinoafor further uses. Extrusion cooking is a promising technology for improvement of functional properties of quinoa flour. The Evaluation of physicochemical properties and microstructure of Expanded quinoa as affected by extrusion conditions was the main goal of this project.
 
Material and Methods
 In this study, a parallel twin-screw extruder (Jinan Saxin, China) with die diameter of 3 mm was applied. The effects of extrusion process parameters including feed moisture content (14 and 16%) and die temperature (130, 150 and 170 °C) on final moisture content, bulk density, water absorption index (WAI), color parametersL* (lightness), a*(redness), b*(yellowness), hardness, and microstructure of Expanded quinoa were studied. Extrusion was carried out using a co-rotating twin screw extruder with L/D ratio of 10:1 and die diameter of 4 mm. The feed rate of flour and the screw speed were set at 40 kg/h and 200 rpm, respectively. The physicochemical properties were measured using standard methods. The hardness measurement was performed by a texture analyzer. The cylinder steel probe (2 mm diameter) was set to move at a speed of 1 mm/s The samples were punctured by the probe to a distance of 10 mm . The color parameters of the samples were determined by the Hunterlab machine. The morphology of samples was assessed using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
 
 
 
Results and Discussion
 A comprehensive study on impacts of extrusion processing conditions on quinoa flour was conducted. The effect of process variables on the physicochemical attributes of the extrudates was observed. the expanded quinoa with higher feed moisture content had greater moisture and those extruded at higher die temperatures showed lower moisture content (p<0.05). Moisture can reduce the shear force as a plasticizer and increase the amount of moisture absorption of the product. While increasing the die temperature, the effect of shear force on starch dextrification increases and reduces moisture absorption (p<0.05). WAI was significantly influenced by extrusion variables. In fact, feed moisture content and die temperature both positively changed the WAI of quinoa flour so that all extruded samples had significantly higher WAI than the untreated sample (p<0.05). Moreover, the sample with the higher feed moisture content (24%) treated at the highest extrusion temperature (170 °C) showed the largest and lowest water absorption and Hardness respectively (p<0.05). Another important feature of expanded quinoa is the lightness index, the results revealed that extrusion cooking caused a reduction in L* and enhancements in a* and b*. While changes in color parameters were more pronounced at more severe die temperature, higher feed moisture content counteracted the effects of cooking temperature on the color of the products. As expected from changes in the abovementioned color parameters, the sample with lower feed moisture content (16%) treated at the highest extrusion temperature (170 °C) experienced the greatest color change (ΔE). The texture profile analysis (TPA) indicated that higher feed moisture content yielded extrudates with harder texture whereas, extrusion at higher temperature resulted in lower hardness. The scanning electron micrographs showed that the native quinoa flour encompassed both small- and large-sized starch granules while the extruded sample mainly consisted of disaggregated particles. Furthermore, extrusion cooking of samples with higher feed moisture content caused formation of more uniform starch aggregates with smoother surfaces.

Keywords

Extrusion; Functional properties; Gluten free; Quinoa

References

1. AACC. (2000). Approved methods of the American association of cereal chemists. 54-21.
2. AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC. AOAC International, Gaithersberg, MD.
3. Alandia, G., Rodriguez, J.P., Jacobsen, S.E., Bazile, D., & Condori, B. (2020). Global expansion of quinoa and challenges for the Andean region. Global Food Security, 26(September), 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100429
4. Aluwi, N.A., Gu, B.J., Dhumal, G.S., Medina-Meza, I.G., Murphy, K.M., & Ganjyal, G.M. (2016). Impacts of scarification and degermination on the expansion characteristics of select Quinoa varieties during extrusion processing. Journal of Food Science, 81(12), E2939–E2949. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13512
5. Ardameh, L., Beiraghi-Toosi, S., & Golimovahed, G. (2019). Effect of extrusion and formulation conditions on physicochemical characteristics of snack based on walnut and corn grits. https://doi.org/10.22104/jift.2019.3505.1841
6. Asare, E.K., Sefa-Dedeh, S., Afoakwa, E.O., Sakyi-Dawson, E., & Budu, A.S. (2012). Extrusion cooking of rice-groundnut-cowpea mixtures - effects of extruder characteristics on nutritive value and physico-functional properties of extrudates using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 36(5), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2011.00605.x
7. Cannas, M., Pulina, S., Conte, P., Del Caro, A., Urgeghe, P.P., Piga, A., & Fadda, C. (2020). Effect of substitution of rice flour with quinoa flour on the chemical-physical, nutritional, volatile and sensory parameters of gluten-free ladyfinger biscuits. Foods, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060808
8. De Pilli, T., Jouppila, K., Ikonen, J., Kansikas, J., Derossi, A., & Severini, C. (2008). Study on formation of starch-lipid complexes during extrusion-cooking of almond flour. Journal of Food Engineering, 87(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.12.028
9. Doǧan, H., & Karwe, M.V. (2003). Physicochemical properties of quinoa extrudates. Food Science and Technology International, 9(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013203009002006
10. Dura, A., Błaszczak, W., & Rosell, C.M. (2014). Functionality of porous starch obtained by amylase or amyloglucosidase treatments. Carbohydrate Polymers, 101(1), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.013
11. El-Sohaimy, S.A., Shehata, M.G., Mehany, T., & Zeitoun, M.A. (2019). Nutritional, physicochemical, and sensorial evaluation of flat bread supplemented with Quinoa flour. International Journal of Food Science, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4686727
12. El Hazzam, K., Hafsa, J., Sobeh, M., Mhada, M., Taourirte, M., Kacimi, K.E.L., & Yasri, A. (2020). An insight into saponins from Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd): A review. Molecules, 25(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051059
13. El Khoury, D., Balfour-Ducharme, S., & Joye, I.J. (2018). A review on the gluten-free diet: Technological and nutritional challenges. Nutrients, 10(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101410
14. Gulati, P., Weier, S.A., Santra, D., Subbiah, J., & Rose, D.J. (2016). Effects of feed moisture and extruder screw speed and temperature on physical characteristics and antioxidant activity of extruded proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) flour. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12974
15. Huang, S., Roman, L., Martinez, M.M., & Bohrer, B.M. (2020). Modification of physicochemical properties of breadfruit flour using different twin-screw extrusion conditions and its application in soy protein gels. Foods, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081071
16. Jadhav, M.V., & Annapure, U.S. (2013). Effect of extrusion process parameters and particle size of sorghum flour on expanded snacks prepared using different varieties of sorghum (Sorghum bicolour ). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. B, 3(2B), 71.
17. Jafari, M., Koocheki, A., & Milani, E. (2017). Effect of extrusion variable on physicochemical properties of extruded sorghum. 1–12. http://fsct.modares.ac.ir/article-1547-7-fa.html
18. Jafari, M., Koocheki, A., & Milani, E. (2017). Effect of extrusion cooking on chemical structure, morphology, crystallinity and thermal properties of sorghum flour extrudates. Journal of Cereal Science, 75, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.05.005
19. Ji, Y., Ao, Z., Han, J.A., Jane, J.L., & BeMiller, J.N. (2004). Waxy maize starch subpopulations with different gelatinization temperatures. Carbohydrate Polymers, 57(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.04.017
20. Kowalski, J., Medina, Meza Ilce Gabriela Bhim, B.T., Kevin, M.M., & Girish, M.G. (2016). Extrusion processing characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) var. Cherry Vanilla.
21. Lazou, A., & Krokida, M. (2011). Thermal characterisation of corn-lentil extruded snacks. Food Chemistry, 127(4), 1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.029
22. Liu, Y., Chen, J., Luo, S., Li, C., Ye, J., Liu, C., & Gilbert, R. G. (2017). Physicochemical and structural properties of pregelatinized starch prepared by improved extrusion cooking technology. Carbohydrate Polymers, 175, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.084
23. Ma, J., Kaori, F., Ma, L., Gao, M., Dong, C., Wang, J., & Luan, G. (2019). The effects of extruded black rice flour on rheological and structural properties of wheat-based dough and bread quality. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(5), 1729–1740. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14062
24. Mahasukhonthachat, K., Sopade, P.A., & Gidley, M.J. (2010). Kinetics of starch digestion and functional properties of twin-screw extruded sorghum. Journal of Cereal Science, 51(3), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2010.02.008
25. Mazumder, P., Roopa, B.S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Textural attributes of a model snack food at different moisture contents. Journal of Food Engineering, 79(2), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.011
26. Meng, X., Threinen, D., Hansen, M., & Driedger, D. (2010). Effects of extrusion conditions on system parameters and physical properties of a chickpea flour-based snack. Food Research International, 43(2), 650–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.016
27. O’Shea, N., Arendt, E., & Gallagher, E. (2014). Enhancing an extruded puffed snack by optimising die head temperature, screw speed and apple pomace inclusion. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7(6), 1767–1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1181-x
28. Otondi,A., Nduko, J.M., & Omwamba, M. (2020). Physico-chemical properties of extruded cassava-chia seed instant flour. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2(July), 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100058
29. Sharma, S., Singh, N., & Singh, B. (2015). Effect of extrusion on morphology, structural, functional properties and in vitro digestibility of corn, field pea and kidney bean starches. Starch/Staerke, 67(9–10), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201500021
30. Taverna, L.G., Leonel, M., & Mischan, M.M. (2012). Changes in physical properties of extruded sour cassava starch and quinoa flour blend snacks. Food Science and Technology, 32(4), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-20612012005000113
31. Xu, X., Luo, Z., Yang, Q., Xiao, Z., & Lu, X. (2019). Effect of quinoa flour on baking performance, antioxidant properties and digestibility of wheat bread. Food Chemistry, 294(December 2018), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.037