اثر روش‌های فرآوری دانه جو و منابع نیتروژن غیر‌پروتئینی جیره غذایی بر خصوصیات تجزیه‌پذیری شکمبه‌ای، تولید گاز و تولید پروتئین میکروبی در بره‌های پرواری نژاد افشاری

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

مقاله 3، دوره 15، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55، مهر 1402، صفحه 333-350   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijasr.2022.77937.1091

نویسندگان

بهمن قربانی^{* 1}؛ یداله چاشنی دل¹؛ اسداله تیموری یانسری¹؛ عبدالحکیم توغدری²

¹گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده علوم دامی و شیلات، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ایران

²گروه تغذیه دام و طیور، دانشکده علوم دامی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، ایران.

چکیده

این آزمایش در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با هفت تیمار شامل گروه شاهد حاوی دانه جو کامل (بدون فرآوری) و بدون اوره و کود مرغی، تیمارهای 2 و 3 و 4 به­ترتیب با روش­های فرآوری مختلف آسیاب کردن، پرک کردن و پلت کردن با سطح معین اوره (1 درصد) و تیمارهای 5 و 6 و 7 به­ترتیب با روش­های فرآوری مختلف آسیاب کردن، پرک کردن و پلت کردن با سطح معین کود مرغی (12 درصد) روی بره­های نر نژاد افشاری انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان دادند، روش­های فرآوری دانه جو به همراه منابع نیتروژن غیرپروتئینی تأثیر معنی­داری بر قابلیت هضم ظاهری ماده خشک و ماده آلی داشت. پارامترهای مختلف تجزیه‌پذیری ماده خشک، پروتئین خام و الیاف نامحلول در شوینده خنثی تیمارهای آزمایشی تفاوت معنی‌داری بین تیمارها را نشان داد. تجزیه‌پذیری مؤثر ماده خشک، پروتئین خام و الیاف نامحلول در شوینده خنثی با سرعت عبور 2، 5 و 8 درصد در ساعت بین تیمارهای آزمایشی تفاوت معنی‌داری داشت. نتایج نشان داد که بین تیمارهای آزمایشی از نظر پارامترهای تولید گاز و میزان گاز تولیدی در 96 ساعت، قابلیت هضم مواد آلی، میزان انرژی قابل متابولیسم و ​​غلظت اسیدهای چرب فرار با زنجیره کوتاه تفاوت معنی‌داری وجود داشت. میزان دفع هر یک از مشتقات پورین (آلانتوئین، اسید اوریک، گزانتین + هیپوگزانتین) و دفع کل مشتقات پورین از طریق ادرار و میزان پروتئین میکروبی سنتز شده در شکمبه تحت تأثیر جیره‌های آزمایشی قرار گرفت و تفاوت مشاهده شده معنی‌دار بود. تفاوت معنی‌داری در pH شکمبه و نیتروژن آمونیاکی در تیمارهای آزمایشی وجود داشت. به‌طور کلی، استفاده از اوره (1 درصد) و کود مرغی (12 درصد) با روش­های مختلف فرآوری دانه جو بدون اثرات منفی بر تجزیه‌پذیری شکمبه­ای، فراسنجه­های شکمبه­ای مایع و تولید گاز از نظر تولید پروتئین میکروبی می­تواند مفید باشد.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

تولید گاز؛ تجزیه‌پذیری شکمبه‌ای؛ تولید پروتئین میکروبی؛ نیتروژن غیرپروتئینی

مراجع

1. Alijoo, Y. A., Valizadeh, R., Nasserian, A. A., Danesh Mesgaran, M., & Tahmasbi, A. (2011). Effect of barley grain processing and source of supplemental dietary fat on performance and fermentation characteristics of ruminants. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 3(3), 266-273. (In Persian). DOI: 22067/ijasr.v3i3.11301
2. Afshar, S., Kazemi-Bonchenari, M., & Ferdowsi, H. R. (2015). Effect of feeding whole or cracked barley grain accompanied bv soybean meal or urea on nutrients digestibility and parameters of rumen in Mehraban sheep. Research on Animal Production, 6(11), 102-107. (In Persian). http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-501-fa.html
3. AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis 15^th AOAC, Arlington, VA.
4. Boucher, S., Ordway, R., Whitehouse, N., Lundy, F., Kononoff, P. J., & Schwab, C. (2007). Effect of incremental urea supplementation of a conventional corn silage-based diet on ruminal ammonia concentration and synthesis of microbial protein. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(12), 5619-5633. DOI:3168/jds.2007-0012
5. Beauchemin, K. A., Yang, W. Z., & Rode, I. M. (2011). Effects of barley grain processing on the site and extent of digestion of beef feedlot finishing diets. Journal of Dairy Science, 79, 1925-1936. DOI:2527/2001.7971925x
6. Beizaei, R., Sari, M., Boojarpour, M., Chaji, M., & Eslami, M. 2013. Effect of starch replacement with soluble fiber on feed digestibility and carcass characteristics of lambs fed high concentrate diet and gas production of low quality forage sources. Journal of Ruminant Research, 1(4), 47-64. (In Persian) DOI:1001.1.23454253.1392.1.4.4.
7. Callison, S. L., Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L., & Hull, B. L. (2001). Site of nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed corn of different particle sizes or steam-rolled. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1458-1467. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70179-8
8. Campling, R. C. (1991). Processing cereal grain for cattle- A review. Livestock Production Science, 28, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(91)90144-F
9. Chizzotti, F., Pereira, H., Tedeschi, O. G., Valadares Filho, S. C., Chizzotti, M. L., Leao, M. I., & Pereira, D. H. (2008). Effects of dietary nonprotein nitrogen on performance, digestibility, ruminal characteristics, and microbial efficiency in crossbred steers. Journal of Dairy Science, 86:1173-1181. DOI:2527/jas.2006-654
10. Church, D. C. (1988). The Ruminant animal: Digestive physiology and nutrition. Waveland Press, 564 p.
11. Davies, K. L., McKinnon, J. J., & Mutsvangwa, T. (2013). Effects of dietary ruminally degradable starch and ruminally degradable protein levels on urea recycling, microbial protein production, nitrogen balance, and duodenal nutrient flow in beef heifers fed low crude protein diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 93: 123-136. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2012-062
12. Dadvar, P., Diani, O., & Mohammad Abadi, M. R. (2011). Determining the nutritional value of citrus pulp (lemon and orange) treated with yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Animal Science Research, 21 (2): 106-116. (In Persian).
13. Elemam, M. B., Fadelelseed, A. M., & Salih, A. M. (2009). Growth performance, digestibility, N-balance and rumen fermentation of lambs fed different levels of deep-stack broiler litter. Research Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science, 4: 9-16.
14. Fayed, M. Afaf. (2011). Comparative study and feed evaluation of sprouted barley grains on rice straw versus tamarix mannifera on performance of growing Barki Lambs in sinai. Journal of American Science. 7: 954-961.
15. Fazaeli, H., Zahedifar, M., Mahdavi, A., Amini, F., & Maghsoudinegad, G. (2013b). Achieving appropriate technology of poultry litter processing as animal feed supplement. Research Report, Animal Science Research Institute, Iran. (In Persian).
16. Gabriel, I., Lessire, M., Juin, H., Burstin, J., Duc, G., Quillien, J., Thibault, M., Leconte, M., Hallouis, J., Ganier, P., Meziere, N., & Seve, B. (2008). Variation in seed protein digestion of different pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes by cecectomized broiler chickens: 1. Endogenous amino acid losses, true digestibility and in vitro hydrolysis of proteins. Livestock Science, 113, 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.002
17. Erjaei, K., Taghizadeh, A., Ganjkhanlou, M., Hosseinkhani, A., & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). Eeffcts of lactic acid-treated barley and dietary fat source on performance, milk fatty acid profils, and microbial protein synthesis in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Ruminant Research, 7 (1), 59-76. DOI:22069/ejrr.2019.15710.1655
18. Hale, W. H. 1980. Digestion Physiology and Nnutrition of Ruminants. O & B. Book, Inc., Corvallis, OR, 3, 19-35.
19. Jordaan, J. D. (2004). The influence of bedding material and collecting period on the feeding value of broiler and layer litter. M. Sc. Dissertation, Free State University. South Africa.
20. Khalid, M. F., Sarwar, M., Rehman, A. U., Shahzad, M. A., & Mukhtar, N. (2012). Effect of Dietary Protein Sources on Lamb’s Performance: A Review. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2, 111-120.
21. Khalesizadeh, Vakili, A. R., Danesh Mesgaran, M., & Valizadeh, R. (2011). The effects of garlic oil (Allium sativa), turmeric powder (Curcuma iongalinn) and monensin on total apparent digestibility of nutrients in Baloochi lambs. International Journal of Biological, Bimolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 5(11), 791-793.
22. Koenig, K. M., Beauchemin, K. A., & Rode, L. M. (2003). Effect of grain processing and silage on microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in beef cattle fed barley-based diets. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1057-1067. DOI: 2527/2003.8141057x
23. Kiran, D., & Mutsvangwa, T. (2007). Effects of barley grain processing and dietary ruminally degradable protein on urea nitrogen recycling and nitrogen metabolism in growing lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 3391–3399. DOI: 2527/jas.2007-0081
24. Kyriazakis, I., & Oldham, J. D. (1997). Food intake and diet selection in sheep: The effect of manipulating the rate of digestion of carbohydrates and protein of the feeds offered as a choice. British Journal of Nutrition, 77, 243-254. DOI: 1079/bjn19970027
25. Kowalczyk, j. (1977). Maximizing NPN use in feeding systems based on agro-industrial by-products. Chapter 12. F. A. O, ROME. ISBN. 92-5-000431-1.
26. Kim, S. C., Kim, J. H., Kim, C. H., Lee, J. C., & Ko, Y. D. (2000). Effects of whole crop corn ensiled with cage layer manure on nutritional quality and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 13, 1548-1553. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1548
27. Larbi, A., Smith, J. W., Kurdi, I. O., Adekunle, I. O., Raji, A. M., & Ladipo, D. O. (1998). Chemical composition, rumen degradation, and gas production characteristics of some multipurpose fodder trees and shrubs during wet and dry seasons in the humid tropics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 72(1-2), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00170-3
28. López‐Soto, M. A., Barreras, A., & Calderón‐Cortés, J. (2014). Effects of forage level in broiler litter-based diets on feed intake, digestibility and particulate passage rate in Holstein steers at different live weights. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 62, 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)00967-4
29. Menke, K. H., & Steingass, H. (1998). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Reseach and Development, 28(1), 7-55.
30. Matison, G. W. (1996). Effects of processing on the utilization of grain by cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 58, 113-125.
31. Mirmohammadi, D., Rouzbehan, Y., & Fazaeli, H. (2015). The effect of the inclusion of recycled poultry bedding and the physical form of diet on the performance, ruminal fermentation, and plasma metabolites of fattening lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 93, 3843-3853. DOI: 2527/jas.2014-8789
32. McAllister, T. A., & Chen, K. J. (1992). Effect of Formaldehyde treated barley or escape protein on nutrient digestibility growth and carcass traits of feedlot lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 72, 309-316. DOI:4141/cjas92-039
33. Nazem, K., Rozbehan, Y., & Shodjaosadati, S. (2008). The Nutritive Value of Citrus Pulp (Lemon and Orange) Treated with Neurospora sitophila. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 12 (43), 495-505. (In Persian). 1001.1.22518517.1387.12.43.42.0
34. Negesse, T., Patra, A. K., Dawson, L. J., Tolera, A., Merkel, R. C., Sahlu, T., & Goetsch, A. L. (2007). Performance of Spanish and Boer Spanish doelings consuming diets with different levels of broiler litter. Small Ruminant Research, 69, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.01.008
35. Najafi, S., Tabatabaei, M., Zaboli, K., Ahmadi, A., & Saki, A. A. (2017). Interaction between barley grain processing and source of dietary nitrogen on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism and microbial protein synthesis in Mehraban sheep. Animal Production Research, 6, 39-51. (In Persian). DOI:22124/ar.2017.2189
36. Norton, B. W. (1994). Nutritive value of tree legumes. Forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture, CAB International, Oxon, 389 pp.
37. Ørskov, E. R., & Mcdonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 92, 499-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
38. Orskov, E. R. (1992). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants (1^st). United State: Academic Press, INC, San Diego.
39. Pathak, A. K. (2008). Various factors affecting microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Veterinary World, 1(6), 186-
40. Papi, N., Fazaeli, H., & Azizi-Shotorkhoft, A. (2013). Effect of supplementing roughage diet with processed broiler litter on voluntary feed intake, microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen balance in sheep. Pajuhesh and Sazandegi Journal, 98, 56-63. (In Persian).
41. Parand, E., & Taghizadeh, A. (2010). Examination of digestibility of processed barley grain with different methods, using gas production technique with two sources of inocola. Journal of Animal Science Research, 40, 23-35. (In Persian).
42. Pozdíšek, J., & Vaculová, K. (2008). Study of wheat (Triticum aestivum) quality for feeding ruminants using in vitro and in vivo methods. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 253-264.  DOI: 10.17221/359-CJAS
43. Razm-Azar, V., Torbatinejad, N. M., Seifdavati, J., & Hassani, S. (2012). Evaluation of chemical characteristics, rumen fermentation and digestibility of Vicia sativa, Lathyrus sativus and Vicia ervilia grain by in vitro Journal of Animal Science Researches, 22(2), 107-119. (In Persian).
44. Rapetti, L., & Bava, L. (2004). Effect of grinding of maize and level of starch on digestibility and lactation performance of Saanen goats. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34, 85-88. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC94392
45. Rahimi, M. R., Alijo, Y. Y., Pirmohammadi, R., & mirzaei, A. (2018). Effects of feeding with broiler litter in pellet-form diet on qizil fattening lambs performance, nutrient digestibility, blood metabolites and husbandry economics. Veterinary Research Forum, 9, (3) 245-251. https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2018.32081
46. Sadeghi, A. A., & Shawrang, P. (2008). Effects of microwave irradiation on ruminal dry matter, protein and starch degradation characteristics of barley grain. Animal Feed Science Technology, 141,184-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.034
47. Swan, C. G., Bowman, J. G. P., Martin, J. M., & Giroux, M. J. (2006). Increased puroindoline levels slow ruminal digestion of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) starch by cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 641.650. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.843641x
48. Sinclair A., Garnsworthy, P. C., Newbold, J. R., & Buttery, P. J. (1993). Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, 120, 251-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960007430X
49. Tothi, Lund, P., Weisbjerg, M. R., & Hvelplund, T. (2003). Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evaluation and in situ techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 104, 71-94. DOI:10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00292-4
50. Valentin, S. F., Williams, P. E. V., Forbes, J. M., & Sauvant, D. (1999). Comparison of the in vitro gas production technique and the nylon bag degradability technique to measure short-and long-term processes of degradation of maize silage in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 78, 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00262-4
51. Vaithiyanathan, S., Bhatta, R., Mishra, A. S., Prasad, R., Verma, D. L., & Singh, N. P. (2006). Effect of feeding graded levels of prosopis cineraria leaves on rumen ciliate protozoa, nitrogen balance and microbial protein synthesis in lambs and kids. DOI:1016/J.SMALLRUMRES.2005.09.027
52. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal soybean meal on nitrogen utilization by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science, 63, 879-886.
53. Vanzant, E. S., Cochran, R. C., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (1998). Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 2717-2729. DOI:10.2527/1998.76102717x
54. Wilson, J. P., Gates, R. N., & Hanna, W. W. (1991). Effect of rust on yield and digestibility of pearl millet forage. Phytopathology, 81, 233–236.
55. Wolin, M. J. (1960). A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. Journal of Dairy Science, 43(10), 1452-1459. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(60)90348-9
56. Yoon, C. S., Lee, N. H., & Gung, K. K. (1986). The effect of corn or barley plus urea and soybean meal on microbial protein production in the rumen of sheep. Korean Journal of Animal Science, 28, 588-596.