The Numbers Game: A Comparative Study of Microsoft Translator and Professional Simultaneous Interpreters

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 2, Volume 56, Issue 4, February 2024, Pages 33-70   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.2024.85304.1229

Authors

Pardis Qasemi¹; Sima Ferdowsi^{* 1}; Najmeh Bahrami Nazarabadi²

¹Department of Foreign Languages, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

²Department of Foreign Languages,, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, kerman, Iran

Abstract

Interest in computer-assisted interpreting tools has increased as a result of the desire to prevent cognitive saturation during interpreting. The present study examined the quality of interpreting numbers by Microsoft Translator and professional simultaneous interpreters. For this purpose, a collection of political speeches delivered at the United Nations was gathered. The results showed that there was no significant difference between Microsoft Translator and professional interpreters in terms of interpreting numbers. There was a significant difference in the error categories across the types of numbers, indicating that interpreting errors varied depending on the type of number. The findings of this research suggest that Microsoft Translator could be a useful tool for assisting human interpreters during simultaneous interpreting. In other words, Microsoft Translator could provide a quick and accurate interpreting of numbers, alleviating the cognitive burden on human interpreters and enabling them to focus their attention on other aspects of the conversation.
 

Keywords

Simultaneous Interpreting; Problems Triggers; Numbers; Microsoft Translator; Professional Interpreters

References

قاسمی، پ.، فردوسی، س.، و بهرامی، ن. (1402). بررسی عملکرد مترجم مایکروسافت در ترجمۀ گفتار به متن: شناسایی انواع خطا و منشا ایجاد خطا. پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی در زبان‌های خارجی، 13(3)، 439-456.  https://doi.org/10.22059/JFLR.2023.357547.1028

محمدی،  ع. م. (1401). تحلیلی بر راهبردهای مترجم شفاهی همزمان ایرانی بر اساس نظریة معادل‌های ترجمه: مطالعة گفتمان‌نماهای استنباطی و توالی. پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی در زبان‌های خارجی، 12(1)، 132-156. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2021.329419.880

 

Alessandrini M.S. (1990). Translating numbers in consecutive interpretation: An experimental study, The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 3, 77-80.

Andres, D., & Falk, S. (2009). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in interpreting–remote and telephone interpreting. Spürst Du, wie der Bauch rauf-runter, 2, 9-27.

Braun, S. & Clarici A. (1996). Inaccuracy for numerals in simultaneous interpretation: Neurolinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 7, 85–102.

Chernov, G. V. (2004). Interference and anticipation in simultaneous interpreting: A probability-prediction model. John Benjamin.

Cheung, A. K. (2015). Accent. In F. Pochhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies (pp. 1-2). Routledge.

Cooper C.L., David R., & Tung R.L. (1982). Interpreting stress: Sources of job stress among conference interpreters, Multilingua, 1 (2), 97- 107. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1982.1.2.97.

Dailidenaite, A., & Noreikaite, V. (2010). The relation between the speech delivery rate and quality in simultaneous interpretation. Vertimo Studijos, 3, 9–22.

De Groot, A., & Christoffels, I. (2006). Language control in bilinguals: Monolingual tasks and simultaneous interpreting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002537.

Desmet, B., Vandierendonck, M., & Defrancq, B. (2018). Simultaneous interpretation of numbers and the impact of technological support. In C. Fantinuoli (Ed.), Interpreting and technology (pp. 13-27). Language Science Press.

Dodd, S. (2012). How to become an interpreter and translator: A beginner’s guide. The English Press.

Fantinuoli, C.  (2018). Interpreting and technology: The upcoming technological turn. In C. Fantinuoli (Ed.), Interpreting and technology (pp. 1–12). Language Science Press.

Fantinuoli, C. (2017). Computer-assisted preparation in conference interpreting. Translation & Interpreting, 9(2), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.109202.2017.a02

Gerver, D. (1971). Simultaneous and consecutive interpretation and human information processing. Durham University.

Gile, D. (1995). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. John Benjamins.

Gile, D. (2009). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. (Revised edition). John Benjamins.

Kajzer-Wietrzny, M., Ivaska, I. & Ferraresi A. (2021). ‘Lost’ in interpreting and ‘found’ in translation: Using an intermodal, multidirectional parallel corpus to investigate the rendition of numbers, Perspectives, 29(4), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1860097

Kelly, N. (2008). Telephone interpreting: A comprehensive guide to the profession. Trafford Publishing.

Korpal, P., & Stachowiak-Szymczak, K. (2018). The whole picture: Processing of numbers and their context in simultaneous interpreting. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2018-0013.

Korpal, P., & Stachowiak-Szymczak, K. (2020). Combined problem triggers in simultaneous interpreting: Exploring the effect of delivery rate on processing and rendering numbers. Perspectives, 28(1), 126-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1628285.

Lin, I. H. I., Chang, F. L. A., & Kuo, F. L. (2013). The impact of non-native accented English on rendition accuracy in simultaneous interpreting. Translation & Interpreting, 5(2), 30-44. https://doi.org/05202.2013.a03

Mackintosh, J. (1983). Relay interpretation: An exploratory study (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of London.

Mankauskienė, D. (2016). Problem trigger classification and its applications for empirical research. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 231, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.083.

Mazza, C. (2001). Numbers in simultaneous interpretation. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 11, 87–104.

McAllister, R. (2000). Perceptual foreign accent and its relevance for simultaneous interpreting. In B. E. Dimitrova & K.  Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 45-64). John Benjamins.

Mead, P. (2015). Numbers. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies (pp.286–288). Routledge.

Meyer, B. (2008). Interpreting proper names: Different interventions in simultaneous and consecutive interpreting. Trans-kom, 1(1), 105-122.

Moser-Mercer, B. (1985). Screening potential interpreters. Meta, 30(1), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.7202/003631ar

Moser-Mercer, B. (2011). Remote interpreting. In Y. Gambier & L. V. Doorslaer (Eds.), The handbook of translation studies (pp. 131-134). John Benjamins.

Mouzourakis, P. (2006). Remote interpreting: A technical perspective on recent experiments. Interpreting, 8(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.04mou.

Nolan, J. (2005). Interpretation: Techniques and exercises. Multilingual Matters.

Obler, L. (2012). Conference interpreting as extreme language use. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403199.

Pinochi, D. (2009). Simultaneous interpretation of numbers: Comparing German and English to Italian. An experimental study. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 14, 33–57.

Plevoets, K., & Defrancq, B. (2018). The cognitive load of interpreters in the European parliament. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 20(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00001.ple.

Pöchhacker, F. (2004). I in TS: On partnership in translation studies. In C. Schäffner (Ed.) Translation research and interpreting research: Traditions, gaps and synergies (pp. 104-115). Multilingual Matters. 

Prandi, B. (2018). An exploratory study on CAI tools in simultaneous interpreting: Theoretical framework and stimulus validation. In C. Fantinuoli (Ed.), Interpreting and technology (pp. 29-59). Language Science Press.

Puková, Z. (2008). Daniel Gile’s efforts model and its application to the simultaneous interpreting of texts saturated by numerals and enumerations. Folia Translatologica, 10, 46-72.

Russo, M., Bendazzoli, C., & Defrancq, B. (2018). Making way in corpus-based interpreting studies. Springer.

Seeber, K. G. (2007). Thinking outside the cube: Modeling language processing tasks in a multiple resource paradigm [Conference presentation]. Eighth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.

Seeber, K. G. (2011). Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories – new models. Interpreting, 13(2), 176–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.2.02see

Seeber, K. G. (2015). Simultaneous interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), Routledge handbook of interpreting (79-95). Routledge.

Seligman, M., Waibel, A., & Joscelyne, A. (2017). TAUS Speech-to-Speech Translation Technology Report.  TAUS BV. https://isl.anthropomatik.kit.edu/downloads/S2STranslationTechnologyReport.final.pdf

Timarova, S. (2012). Working memory in simultaneous interpreting (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leuven

Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). Academic Press.

Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806.

Williams, J., & Chesterman, A. (2002). A beginner's guide to doing research in translation studies. Jerome Publishing.