Transformation to a fixed domain in LP modelling for a class of optimal shape design problems

Iranian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Optimization

مقاله 1، دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15، خرداد 2019، صفحه 1-16   

نوع مقاله: Research Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijnao.v9i1.53910

نویسندگان

H.H. Mehne^{* 1}؛ M. H. Farahi²

¹Aerospace Research Institute, Tehran,

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

چکیده

A class of optimal shape design problems is studied in this paper. The boundary shape of a domain is determined such that the solution of the underlying partial differential equation matches, as well as possible, a given desired state. In the original optimal shape design problem, the variable domain is parameterized by a class of functions in such a way that the optimal design problem is changed to an optimal control problem on a fixed domain. Then, the resulting distributed control problem is embedded in a measure theoretical form, in fact, an infinite-dimensional linear programming problem. The optimal measure representing the optimal shape is approximated by a solution of a finite-dimensional linear programming problem. The method is evaluated via a numerical example.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Approximation؛ optimal shape design؛ Linear programming؛ measure theory

مراجع

References

1. Burden R. L. and Faires, J. D. Numerical Analysis, (7th Edition), Brooks/Cole (ITP) 2000.

2. De Santis,D., Zahr, M. J. and Farhat, C. Gradient based aerodynamicshape optimization using the FIVER embedded boundary method, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech, (2016), 1–11.

3. Farahi, M. H., Borzabadi, A. H., Mehne H. H. and Kamyad, A. V. Measure theoretical approach for optimal shape design of a nozzle, J. Appl. Math. Comput. 17 (2005), 315–328.

4. Farahi, M. H., Mehne, H. H. and Borzabadi, A. H. Wing drag minimization by using measure theory, Optim. Method. Softw. 21(2) (2006), 169–177.

5. Hacio˘ glu, A. andÖzkol,˙I. Inverse airfoil design by using an accelerated genetic algorithm via distribution strategies, Inverse. Probl. Sci. En. 13(6)(2005), 563–579.

6. Ghaedamini Harouni, A. and Mehne, H. H. Multi-Disciplinary Multi-Objective Shape Optimization of Orion Type Re-entry Capsule, Modares. Mech. Eng. 19(3) (2019), 665–675.

7. Jahromi, A. F. A shape-measure method for solving free-boundary elliptic systems with boundary control function, Iran. J. Numer. Anal. Optim. 3(2) (2013), 47–65.

8. Kurahashi, T. Investigations on boundary temperature control analysis considering a moving body based on the adjoint variable and the fictitious domain finite element methods, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 103(8) (2015), 582–597.

9. Laumen, M. Newton’s method for a class of optimal shape design problems, SIAM J. Optim. 10(2) (2000), 503–533.

10. Li, D. and Hartmann, R. Adjoint-based airfoil optimization with discretization error control, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl. 77(1) (2015), 1–17.

11. Mehne, H. H. On solving constrained shape optimization problems for finding the optimum shape of a bar cross-section, Appl. Numer. Math.58(8) (2008), 1129–1141

12. Mehne, H. H., Farahi M. H. and Esfahani, J. A. Slot nozzle design with specified pressure in a given subregion by using embedding method, Appl. Math. Comput. 168(2) (2005), 1258–1272.

13. Mehne, H. H., Farahi M. H. and Esfahani, J. A. On an optimal shape design problem to control a thermoelastic deformation under a prescribed thermal treatment, Appl. Math. Model. 31(4) (2007), 663–675.

14. Mikhailov, V. P. Partial Differential Equations, MIR publishers, Moscow 1978.

15. Nguyen, Q. and Yang, C. Design of a longitudinal cooling fin with minimum volume by a modified NewtonRaphson method, Appl. Therm. Eng. 98 (2016), 169–178.

16. Rubio, J. E. Control and Optimization: the linear treatment of nonlinear problems, Manchester University Press, Manchester 1986.

17. Rudin, W. Real and Complex Analysis (3rd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York 1987.

18. Rudin, W. Functional Analysis (2ed Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York 1991.

19. Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Tang, Y. and Meng, X. Optimizing the shape of toppiston ring face using inverse method, Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 68(1) (2016), 9–15.