An Analysis of Urban Livability with Emphasis on Security and Stability Indicators (Case Study: Mashhad Metropolis

پژوهش ‎های جغرافیای سیاسی

Article 4, Volume 1, Issue 3, November 2016, Pages 129-154   

Document Type: مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/pg.v3i3.58581

Authors

Mohammad Ghanbari^* ; Mohammad Ajzae Shokuhi; Mohammad Rahim Rahnama; Omid Ali Kharazmi

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Extended abstract
1. Introduction
Today different approaches are proposed and used for solving the current issues and problems in cities, some of which are livability, smart city, ideal city, resilient city, child-friendly city, age-friendly city, city of learning, creative city and secure city. Multiple factors affect the livability of a place, of which the presence of people, mixed use, housing, safety and security, sense of belonging, efficiency and the environment can be noted. The crime rate (real) and fear of crime (perceived) has a causal relationship with many of health and wellbeing outcomes. Livability refers to the degree of satisfying society's needs based on the needs and capacities of the people of that society. A livable city is not just satisfaction of physical needs, but its main purpose is giving the feeling of satisfaction with the city to citizens. Mashhad city as the second most populous and the largest religious city of Iran hosts large number of domestic and foreign pilgrims annually. Certainly, the existence of good conditions for urban livability is extremely important, especially in terms of environment. The main goal of this research is the analysis of urban livability with emphasis on security and stability indicator in Mashhad metropolis.
2. Methodology
The research method of this research is practical in terms of goal, and is descriptive – analytical in terms of methodology. Due to the nature of this research, indicators related to the security and stability and existence of objective and subjective information, Arc GIS and SPSS software were used for analyzing of data. Indicators examined in this research included 8 indicators (the crime rate of murder, drugs, theft, forgery, group conflict, social evils, financial crimes, crime ratio per person and‌ subjective indicator). Finally, prioritization of different areas of Mashhad city in terms of livability was determined by using multi criteria decision making methods (VIKOR and Entropy models). The population of Mashhad metropolis, with an area of 288,664,457 square meters, was 2,766,258 in 2011 which live in 13 zones.
3. Results and Discussion
There were 27 police stations in Mashhad metropolis in 2012. From the total 27 current police stations in the city of Mashhad, a number of 25 police stations are active and two are inactive. Among these 25 active police stations, operating radius of 2 police stations of passenger terminal and airport is limited to the same areas. The majority of police stations are distributed in the center and east of Mashhad city, while their distribution in the western part of the city is significantly lower than other areas. This issue is remarkable with regard to the formation of the primary core of Mashhad city and its growth to west direction in recent decades, because western zones of Mashhad city have lower population than the eastern zone of the city. Based on the information recorded in these police stations, the crime rate of murder, drugs, theft, forgery, group conflict, social evils, financial crimes and crime ratio per person were investigated. Then, using the GIS Software, maps related to the status of each of these sub-indicators based on the limits of Mashhad metropolis's zones were drawn. For mental indicator, which includes 7 questions, a questionnaire was used for a sample size of 402 persons in all zones of Mashhad. In terms of crime ratio to person, zones 2 and 9 with the lowest ratio have the best position compared to other zones. Furthermore, zones Samen, 12 and 5 with the highest ratio to person have the worst position compared to other zones. The total average of questions related to mental indicator of security and stability in Mashhad city was equal to 3.51. After studying the average of security and stability mental indicator questions, it can be said that zone 11 with the average of 4.06 and zone 4 with the average of 2.72 are the best and worst zones in this indicator, respectively.
4. Conclusion
The zone 11 of Mashhad metropolis is the best zone in terms of security and stability indicator, followed by zones 10 and 9, respectively. By contrast, zones 3, 4 and 6 had the worst conditions in terms of environmental indicator, respectively. Zones 11, 10 and 9 were at ideal level. None of the zones of Mashhad metropolis were at good level. Considering that zones 1 and 12 have 0.486 and 0.437 score respectively, they are placed in the average level. Also zones 8, 7 and 2 are placed in the bad level. Since the final scores of zones 5, 13, 6, 4, and 3 are between 1 and 0.8, these zones are ranked at critical level in terms of security and stability indicator in Mashhad metropolis. In other words, about 40% of Mashhad's zones are at security and stability critical level with respect to the urban livability.

Keywords

Urban livability; Security and stability indicator; Objective and subjective indicators; Mashhad

References

1. Amir, A.L and Puspitaningtyas, Ai and Santosa, H.R. (2015). Dwellers Participation to Achieve Livable Housing in Grudo Rental Flats, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 179, Pp. 165-175.

2. Badland, H & Whitzman, C & Lowe, M & Davern, M & Aye, L & Butterworth, I & Hes, D & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Urban livability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health, Social Science & Medicine, V. 111, Pp. 64-73.

3. Badri, S.A and Taeibi, S. (2012). Factors affecting the costs of religious tourism: A case study of Mashhad, Iran. Journal of tourism planning and development, 1(1). 153-177.] In Persian [

4. Ball, Dimitris. (2013). what makes a happy city? Journal of cities, Volume. 32, Pp. 39-50.

5. Bandar Abad, A.R. (2010). Codification of principles of spatial development pattern and Iranian form of livable city, Case study: zone 1, 15 and 22 of Tehran. Ph.D. thesis of urbanism, Islamic Azad University.]In Persian [

6. Blassingame, Lurton. (1998). sustainable cities: oxymoron, utopia or inevitability? Social science Journal, Vol.35. Pp. 1-13.

7. Chandola, T. (2001). The fear of crime and differences in health. Health & Place, V. 7, Pp. 105-116.

8. Deputy of planning and development of Mashhad Municipality. (2013). Statistical Yearbook of Mashhad in 1392. Mashhad Municipality.]In Persian[.

9. Haji Nejhad, A & Rafieian, M & Zamani, H. (2011). Assessment and Ranking of the Effective Factores on level of Citizen Satisfaction with Environmental Quality of Life (Case Study: Old and New Urban Pattern of Shiraz City) (In Persian), Human Geography Research Quarterly, N.77.

10. Heckman, J & Stixrud, J & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, V. 24, Pp. 411-482.

11. Khastoo, M & Saeedi Rezvani, N. (2010). The Effective Factors on Urban Spaces Vitality (Creating a Lively Urban Space with Emphasizing the Concept “Pedestrian Mall”) (In Persian), Identity Journal, N.6.

12. Khorasani, M.A. (2012). The explain of Livability in Peri Urban Villages by approach of life quality (Case Study: Varamin Township), PH.D Thesis geography and rural planning, Supervisor: Dr. M.R Rezvani, Tehran University. ]In Persian[.

13. Larice, M.Z. (2005). Great neighborhood: the livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in urban North America, PhD thesis in University of California, Berkeley.

14. Lorenc, T & Clayton, S & Neary, D & Whitehead, M & Petticrew, M & Thomson, H & Cummins, S & Sowden, A & Renton, A. (2012). Crime, fear of crime, environment, and mental health and wellbeing: Mapping review of theories and causal pathways, Health & Place, V.18 (4), Pp.757-765.

15. Lotfi, S & Bordi Anamorad Nejhad, R & Sasani Poor, M. (2014). The survey of security sense in public spaces (Case study: Shiraz Metropolis) (In Persian), Journal of Research and urban planning, N.19.

16. Lowe, M & Whitzman, C & Badland, H.M & Davern, M & Hes, D & Aye, L & Butterworth, I & Giles-Corti, B. (2013). Liveable, Healthy, Sustainable: What are the Key Indicators for Melbourne Neighbourhoods? McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne University.

17. Madani. Pooya. (2013). Dealing with segregation, improving livability in a segregated neighborhood, Ms Thesis, Department of urbanism and building sciences, Faculty of Architecture, TU Delft.

18. Merriam-Webster. (2011). Retrieved March 17, 2011, from Dictionary: http://www.merriam-webster.com/ dictionary/livability.

19. Momeni, M. Sarafi, M and Ghasemi khuzani, M. (2008). The Structure and Function of Religious-Cultural Tourism and the Necessity of Integrated Management in Mashhad Metropolis,]In Persian Journal of Geography and Development, N.6.

20. Montgomery, Charles. (2013). happy city: transforming our lives through urban design, ISBN: 9780141047546, London, Publish Routledge.

21. Nelson, Alyse. (2010). Livable Copenhagen: The design of a bicycle city, center for public space research, Copenhagen, University of Washington, Seattle.

22. Norris, T & Pittman, M. (2000). The health community’s movement and coalition for healthier cities and communities. Public Health Reports, N.115. Pp. 118-124.

23. Police headquarters of Khorasan Razavi province. (2013). Research plan, Applied Research Office of Police headquarters of Khorasan Razavi province, (In Persian).

24. Razavi Nejhad, M. (2013). The role of passive defense in locating and security of police stations in cities (case study: Mashhad) (In Persian), Research plan, Applied Research Office of Police headquarters of Khorasan Razavi province.

25. Ross, C & Mirowsky, J. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder and health, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, V. 42, Pp. 258-276.

26. Stafford, M & Cummins, S & Ellaway, A & Sacker, A & Wiggins, R & Macintyre, S. (2007). Pathways to obesity: identifying local, modifiable determinants of physical activity and diet, Social Science & Medicine, V. 65, Pp. 1882-1897.

27. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2015). A Summary of the Liveability Ranking and Overview, London, England.

28. Urban land institute of Singapore. (2006). 10 principles for liveable High-density cities, lessons from Singapore.

29. Vanzerrr, M & Seskin, S. (2011). Recommendations Memo #2 Livability and Quality of Life Indicators, Memorandum.

30. Vergunst, P. (2003). Livability and ecological land use the challenge of localization, Ph.D. thesis in department of rural development studies, Swedish University of Agriculture.

31. Williams, C and Zhou, N and He, G and Levine, M. (2012). Measuring in All the Right Places: Themes in International Municipal Eco-City Index Systems, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Pp.1-15.

32. www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/08

33. www.mashhad.ir

34. www.mercer.com/qualityofliving#city-rating-tables

35. www.spacing.ca/vancouver/2014/03/31/happiness-urban-design-intersect-interview-happy-city-author-charles-montgomery.