The effects of co-inoculation of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas rhizobacteria on nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.)

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 3, Volume 1, Issue 1, March 2009   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v1i1.2651

Authors

Somayeh Nezarat¹; Ahamd Gholami^{* 2}

¹Shahrood Research Center, Iran

²Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) has been identified as an alternative to chemical fertilizer to increase soil fertility and crop production in sustainable agriculture. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of single and co-inoculation of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas strains on plant growth and nutrient uptake of maize as a factorial experiment. Treatments included control, Azospirillum lipoferum DSM 1691, A.brasilense DSM 1690, Pseudomonas putida strain R-168, P.fluorescens strain R-93, P.fluorescens DSM 50090 and P.putida DSM291. Bacterial treatment significantly increased shoot, ear and seed dry weight, 100 seed weight and number of seeds per ear. Plants nutrient uptake of N, P, K, Fe and Cu were also significantly influenced by application of PGPR(s). Also, the experimental results show that inoculation consortia apparently work better when different bacteria were combined with each other.

Keywords

Maize; PGPR; Azospirillum; Pseudomonas; Nutrient uptake

References

Ahmad, F., Ahmad, I., Khan, M.S., 2006. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant

growth promoting activities. Microbial. Res. 36:1-9.

2- Bagyaraj, D.J., Menge, J.A., 1978. Interaction between a VA mycorrhiza and Azotobacter and their effects on

rhizosohere microflora and plant growth. New Phytol. 80: 567-573.

3- Baldani, V.L.D., Alvarez, M.A.B., 1987.Establishment inoculated Azospirillum Spp. in the rhizosphere and in roots

of field grown wheat and sorghum. Plant Soil. 90: 35-45.

4- Bashan, Y., Holguin, G., 1997. Azospirillum-plant relationships: environmental and physiological advances. Can. J.

Microbiol. 43: 103-121.

5- Bashan, Y., Holguin, G., de-Bashan, L., 2004. Azospirillum-plant relationships: physiological, molecular,

agricultural, and environmental advances. Can. J. Microbiol. 50: 521–577.

6- Bashan, Y., Harrison, S.K., Whitmoyer, R.E., 1990. Enhanced growth of wheat and soybean plants inoculated with

Azospirillum brasilense is not necessarily due to general enhancement of mineral uptake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

56(3): 769-775.

7- Carlier, E., Rovera, M., Jaume, A. R., Rosas, S. B., 2008. Improvement of growth, under field conditions, of wheat

inoculated with Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. Aurantiaca. World. J. Microbiol. Biotech. 24(11): 2653-2658.

8- De Salomone, G., Dobereiner, J., 1996. Maize genotype effects on the response to Azospirillum inoculation. Biol.

Fertil. Soils. 21: 193-196.

9- Egamberdiyeva, D., 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in

two different soils. Appl. Soil. Eco. 36: 184-189.

10- Egamberdiyevaa, D., Hoflich. G., 2003. Influence of growth-promoting bacteria on the growth of wheat in different

soils and temperatures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 973–978.

نقش تلقیح مضاعف باکتری های آزوسپریلوم و سودوموناس … 31

11- Ferreira, M.C.B., Fernandes, M.S., Dobereiner, J., 1987. Role of Azospirillum brasilense nitrate reductase in nitrate

assimilation by wheat plants. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 4: 47-53.

12- Fulchieri, M., Frioni,L., 1994. Azospirillum inoculation on maize (Zea mays): effect on yield in a field experiment

in central Argentina. Soil biol. biochem.26: 921-923.

13- Glick, B.R., Penrose, D., Wendo, M., 2001. Bacterial promotion of plant growth. Biotech. adv. 19:135-138.

14- Glick, B. R., Liu ,C., Ghosh, S., Dumbroff, E. B., 1997. Early development of canola seedlings in the presence of

the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29: 1233–1239.

15- Okon, Y., Heytler, P.G., Hardy, R.W.F., 1983. N2 fixation by Azospirillum brasilense and its incorporation into

host Setaria italica. Appl.Environ. Microbiol. 46: 694-697.

16- Piao, Z., Cui, Z., Yin, B., Hu, J., Zhou, C., Xie, G., Su, B., Yin, S., 2005. Changes in acetylene reduction activities

and effects of inoculated rhizosphere nitrogen-fixing bacteria on rice. Biol. Fertil. Soils.41: 371–378.

17- Rudresha, D.L., Shivaprakasha, M.K., Prasad, R.D., 2005. Effect of combined application of Rhizobium, phosphate

solubilizing bacterium and Trichoderma spp. on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea (Cicer aritenium

L.).Appl. Soil. Eco. 28:139–146.

18- Saatovich, S.Z., 2006. Azospirilli of Uzbekistan soils and their influence on growth and development of wheat

plants. Plant & Soil. 283:137-145.

19- Sharaan, A. N., El-Samie, F.S.A., 1999. Response of wheat varieties to some environmental influences. 1. Effect of

seeding rates and N fertilization levels on growth and yield of two wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.). Ann.

Agric. Sci. 44: 589–601.

20- Siddiqui,I. A., Shaukat, S. S., 2002. Mixtures of plant disease suppressive bacteria enhance biological control of

multiple tomato pathogens. Biol. Fertil. Soil. 36: 260–268.

21- Wue, S.C., Cao, Z.H., Li, Z.G., Cheung, K.C., Wong, M. H., 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and

K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma. 125: 155–166.

22- Yasari, E., Patwardhan, A.M., 2007. Effects of Aztobacter and Azospirillium inoculations and chemical fertilizers

on growth and productivity of Canola. Asi. J. Plant. Sci. 6:77-82.

23- Zaied, K.A., Abd El-Hady, A.H., Sharief, A.E., Ashour, E.H., Nassef, M.A., 2007. Effect of Horizontal DNA

Transfer in Azospirillum and Azotobacter Strains on Biological and Biochemical Traits of Non-legume Plants. J.

Appl. Sci. Res. 3(1): 73-86.