Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics

Article 3, Volume 11, Issue 1, July 1394, Pages 17-22   

Document Type: Research articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijab.v11i1.36384

References

Anderson, S.S., Fedak M.F., 1985. Grey seal males: energetic and behavioral links between size and sexual success. Animal Behaviour 33, 829-838.

 

Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

 

Andersson, M., Norberg, R.A., 1981. Evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism and role partitioning among raptors, with a size scaling of flight performance. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 15, 105-130.

 

Audouin, V., [1827] ‘1809’. Explication sommaire des planches de reptiles (supplement), publiees par Jules-Cesar Savigny, membre de l’Institut; offrant un expose des caractères naturels des genres, avec la distinction des espèces. In: Description de l’Égypte. Histoire naturelle, Vol. 1. Paris: Imprimerie Imperiale, 161-184.

 

Blanckenhorn, W.U., 2005. Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethology 111, 977-1016.

 

Blomqvist, D., Johansson, O.C., Unger, U., Larsson, M., Flodin, L.A., 1997. Male aerial display and reversed sexual size dimorphism in the dunlin. Animal Behaviour 54, 1291-1299.

 

Choe, J.C, Crespi, B.J., 1997. Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Clutton-Brock, T.H., Harvey, P.H., 1977. Primate ecology and social organization. Journal of Zoology 183, 1-39.

 

Clutton-Brock, T.H., Guinness, F.E., Albon, S.D., 1982. Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Cooper, W.E., Vitt, L.J., 1989. Sexual dimorphism of head and body size in an iguanid lizard: paradoxical results. American Naturalist 133, 729-735.

 

Darwin, C., 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London. Volume 1:423 pp.,Volume 2, 476 pp.

 

Dunn, P.O., Whittingham, L.A., Pitcher, T.E., 2001. Mating systems, sperm competition and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55, 161-175.

 

Greenwood, P.J., Wheeler, P., 1985. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in birds and mammals: a ‘hot blooded’ hypothesis. In: Greenwood, P.J., Harvey, P.H., Slatkin, M. (Eds.), Evolution. Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 287-299 pp.

 

Mitani, J.C., Gros-Luis, J., Richards, A.F., 1996. Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. American Naturalist 147, 966-980.

 

Hews, D.K., 1990. Examining hypotheses generated by field measures of sexual selection on male lizards, Uta palmer. Evolution 44, 1956-1966.

 

Jehl, J.R., Murray, B.G., 1986. The evolution of normal and reverse sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds and other birds. In: Current Ornithology. Vol. 3 (Ed. by R. F. Johnston), pp. 1-86. New York: Plenum.

 

Lindenfors, P., Tullberg, B.S., 1998. Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64, 413-447.

 

Lindenfors, P., Szekely, T., Reynolds, J.D., 2003. Directional changes in sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls and alcids. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, 930-938.

 

Olsson, M., Shine, R., Wapstra, E., Ujvari, B., Madsen, T., 2002. Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56, 1538-1542.

 

Owens, I.P.F., Hartley, I.R., 1998. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265, 397-407.

 

Payne, R.B., 1984. Sexual Selection, Lek and Arena Behavior, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Birds. Washington, D.C.: American Ornithologists’ Union.

 

Raihani, G., Szekely, T., Serrano-Meneses, M.A., Pitra, P., Goriup, P., 2006. The influence of sexual selection and male agility on sexual size dimorphism in bustards (Otididae). Animal Behaviour 71, 833-838.

 

Sandercock, B.K., 2001. What is the relative importance of sexual selection and ecological processes in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in monogamous shorebirds? Wader Study Group Bulletin 96, 64-70.

 

Serrano-Meneses, M.A., Szekely, T., 2006. Sexual size dimorphism in seabirds: sexual selection, fecundity selection and differential niche-utilization. Oikos 113, 385-394.

Shine, R., 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the amphibia. Copeia 2, 297-306.

 

Shine, R., 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Quarterly Review of Biology 64, 419-461.

 

Szekely, T., Reynolds, J.D., Figuerola, J., 2000. Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution 54, 1404-1413.

 

Szekely, T., Freckleton, R.P., Reynolds, J.D., 2004. Sexual selection explains Rensch’s rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences, U.S.A 101, 12224-12227.

 

Temeles, E.J., Kress, W.J., 2003. Adaptation in a plant and humming-bird association. Science 300, 630-633.

 

Thornhill, R., Alcock, J., 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

 

Winquist, T., Lemon, R.E., 1994. Sexual selection and exaggerated male tail length in birds. American Naturalist 143, 95-116.

 

Woolbright, L.L., 1983. Sexual selection and size dimorphism in anuran amphibians. American Naturalist 121, 110-119.