The Impact of Place Branding Complexity on Word of Mouth Advertising with Respect to the Moderating Role of Residents and Domestic Tourists of Kerman City

جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری

Article 12, Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 8, September 2018, Pages 243-259   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/gusd.v5i1.69703

Authors

Mohammad Mehdi Poursaeed; Mahboubeh Barzgarpour^*

Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Essentially, when destination/place marketers employ a similar, yet simple strategy, they may underestimate the issues related to the establishment and formation of place branding; meanwhile, places and locations are faced with a broad range of target groups whose understanding of the place are completely different, mostly shaped by stereotypical imaginations and clichés. Nevertheless, residents are of a deeper awareness on the place, which is contrary to the simple messages, they use to introduce the place. Simplified messages lead to weaker identification and improper behavior (negative word-of-mouth advertising) of residents against tourists. The present study seeks to identify the positive results of place identification and how this very concept along with word-of-mouth advertising could be improved through brand complexity.  

Methodology

In terms of purpose, the present inquiry is an applied study; and since it is attempted to describe the status of the society through field survey, it is descriptive-survey research. As for data collection and evaluation of various aspects of the model, the questionnaire instrument was used. The population of the study includes the entire residents of Kerman city in all four districts as well as the entire domestic tourists entering the city for a 1-month period since 21/3/2017 until 20/4/2017 (Nowruz celebration). Given the purpose of the study, which involves a comparative approach, the sample population in both groups should be considered as equal. Subsequently, the sample population was calculated as 384 people using Cochran’s formula, and the number of data analyzed was 460. Since a standardized questionnaire by Zenker, Braun & Petersen (2017) was used, there is no need to confirm its content validity. The outlook and behavior of residents and domestic tourists are examined in the following with a focus on these hypotheses:

The complexity of place branding influences word-of-mouth advertising through place satisfaction and the moderating role of residents.
The complexity of place branding influences word-of-mouth advertising through place satisfaction and the moderating role of domestic tourists.
The complexity of place branding influences word-of-mouth advertising through place identification and the moderating role of residents.
The complexity of place branding influences word-of-mouth advertising through place identification and the moderating role of domestic tourists.
The complexity of place branding influences word-of-mouth advertising through place commitment and the moderating role of residents.
The complexity of place branding influences word-of-mouth advertising through place commitment and the moderating role of domestic tourists.

Overall, the present study seeks to achieve the following purposes:

The impact of place branding on word-of-mouth advertisement with respect to the moderating roles of residents and domestic tourists
Results

In the first stage, the relation between the complexity of the city brand through satisfaction and identification were confirmed and its impact through commitment is rejected using the multiple mediator model. Consequently, the fourth and fifth hypotheses are rejected at the initial stage. In the next step, given the standardized regression coefficients of residents and domestic tourists as 0.170 and 0.380, respectively, it can be stated that the complexity of place branding through the satisfaction of word-of-mouth advertising mostly has a positive impact on domestic tourists with no significant effect on residents. Furthermore, considering the standardized regression coefficients of residents and domestic tourists as 0.352 and 0.490, respectively, it can be stated that the complexity of place branding through identification on word-of-mouth advertising is of positive impact on both the residents and domestic tourists.

Conclusion

The main purpose of the study was to examine the impact of place branding complexity on identification and recommending the location to others through a comparative outlook of residents and domestic tourists of Kerman city. The results obtained from the hypotheses of the study showed that the complexity of place branding influences the identification by residents and domestic tourists. Place brand complexity through satisfaction on word-of-mouth advertising mostly impacts domestic tourists in a positive manner with no significant effect on residents. As a result, it is recommended that the motives, expectations, and requirements of the present and potential (tourists) residents of the city are taken into account. To this end, meeting their needs such as a proper quality and price of living expenses, regional security, economic diversity, quality of life, parks, green spaces, and other factors should be ensured. Place branding complexity through identification on word-of-mouth advertising involves a positive impact on both the residents and domestic tourists. Nevertheless, in order to increase the identification by residents and domestic tourists, correct and comprehensive information on the identity of locations should necessarily be provided, particularly in places, which are of historical values. Place branding complexity through commitment on word-of-mouth advertising has no positive impact on both the residents and domestic tourists. Subsequently, in order to raise commitment, involvement in other urban projects through shareholding is recommended.

Keywords

place branding; destination branding; brand complexity; place identification; residents the and Internal Tourists city of Kerman

References

1. بهرام‌پور، عطیه؛ مدیری، آتوسا (1394). مطالعه رابطه میان رضایتمندی سا کنان از محیط زندگی و میزان حس تعلق آنها در مجتمع مسکونی بلند مرتبه شهرک کوثر تهران. نشریه هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی. دوره20. شماره 3. صص 85-94.

2. سجادزاده، حسن (1392). نقش دلبستگی به مکان در هویت‌بخشی به میدان‌های شهری( نمونه موردی: میدان‌های آرامگاه شهر همدان)، باغ نشر، دوره10، شماره25،صص78-69.

3. شیرخدایی، میثم ؛ نجات، سهیل؛ اسفیدانی، محمدرحیم و شاهی، محبوبه (1394). بررسی تاثیر برجستگی برند بر وفاداری برند مقصد گردشگری. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، سال دهم، شماره32،صص 129-111.

4. Anholt, S. (2009). Should place brands be simple? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(2), 91-96.

5. Ashworth, G., & Voogd, H. (1990). Selling the city: Marketing approaches in public sector urban planning. London, England: Belhaven.

6. Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.

7. Braun, E. (2012). Putting city branding into practice. Journal of Brand Management, 19(4), 257-267.

8. Cox, D. S., & Cox, A. D. (1988). What does familiarity breed? Complexity as a moderator of repetition effects in advertisement evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 111-116.

9. Fleury-Bahi, G., Felonneau, M. L., & Marchand, D. (2008). Processes of place identification and residential satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 669-682.

10. Freire, J. R. (2009). ‘Local people’ a critical dimension for place brands. Journal of Brand Management, 16(7), 420-438.

11. Gertner, D. (2011). Unfolding and configuring two decades of research and publications on place marketing and place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7(2), 91-106.

12. Gross, M. J., & Brown, G. (2006). Tourism experiences in a lifestyle destination setting: The roles of involvement and place attachment. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 696-700.

13. Hanna, S., & Rowley, J. (2015). Towards a model of the place brand web. Tourism Management, 48, 100-112.

14. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223-255.

15. Insch, A., & Florek, M. (2010). Place satisfaction of city residents: Findings and implications for city branding. In G. Ashworth & M. Kavaratzis (Eds.), Towards effective place brand management e Branding European cities and regions (pp. 191-204). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

16. Janiszewski, C., & Meyvis, T. (2001). Effects of brand logo complexity, repetition, and spacing on processing fluency and judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 18-32.

17. Kavaratzis, M., & Ashworth, G. J. (2007). Partners in coffee shops, canals and commerce: Marketing the city of Amsterdam. Cities, 24(1), 16-25.

18. Merrilees, B., Miller, D., & Herington, C. (2012). Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 1032-1047.

19. Palmer, A., Koenig-Lewis, N., & Medi Jones, L. E. (2013). The effects of residents’ social identity and involvement on their advocacy of incoming tourism. Tourism Management, 38, 142-151.

20. Park, S. Y., & Petrick, J. F. (2006). Destinations’ perspectives of branding. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 262-265.

21. Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48-60.

22. Qu, H., Kim, L. H., & Im, H. H. (2011). A model of destination branding: Integrating the concepts of the branding and destination image. Tourism Management, 32(3), 465-476.

23. Rehmet, J., & Dinnie, K. (2013). Citizen brand ambassadors: Motivations and perceived effects. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2(1), 31-38.

24. Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561-581.

25. Stokburger-Sauer, N. (2010). Brand community: Drivers and outcomes. Psychology & Marketing, 27(4), 347-368.

26. Stokburger-Sauer, N., Ratneshwar, S., & Sen, S. (2012). Drivers of consumer–brand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 406-418.

27. Swaminathan, V. (2003). The impact of recommendation agents on consumer evaluation and choice: The moderating role of category risk, product complexity, and consumer knowledge. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1), 93-101.

28. Wang, S., & Xu, H. (2015). Influence of place-based senses of distinctiveness, continuity, self-esteem and self-efficacy on residents’ attitudes toward tourism. Tourism Management, 47, 241-250.

29. Zenker, S. (2011). How to catch a city? The concept and measurement of place brands. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(1), 40-52.

30. Zenker, S., & Beckmann, S. C. (2012). Place branding: The issue of a narrowed tourism perspective. In R. H. Tsiotsou & R. E. Goldsmith (Eds.), Strategic marketing in tourism services (pp. 63-78). Bingley, England: Emerald.

31. Zenker, S., & Braun, E. (2010, June). Branding a city e a conceptual approach for place branding and place brand management. Paper presented at the 39th European Marketing Academy Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.

32. Zenker, S., & Petersen, S. (2014). An integrative theoretical model for improving resident-city identification. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(3), 715-729.

33. Zenker, S., Braun, E., & Petersen, S. (2017). Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors. Tourism Management, 58, 15-27.

34. Zenker, S., Petersen, S., & Aholt, A. (2013). The citizen satisfaction index (CSI): Evidence for a four basic factor model in a German sample. Cities, 31, 156-164.