Production potential of several main crops in Kurdistan province during last two decades and their future forecast

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 1, Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, June 2010, Pages 206-214   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v2i2.7625

Authors

Farzad Hosseinpanahi^* ; Farzad Mondani; Farzin Pouramir; Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Cultivated area, yield and production trend of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as the main crops of Kurdistan province were studied during 1983-2006 using time series analysis and the situation of future were predicted for 2006-2021 period. The results showed that the cultivated area of irrigated wheat (18%), rainfed wheat (10.3%), rainfed barley (30.1%), rainfed chickpea (48.2%), potato (42.4%) and alfalfa (9.2%) will be increased; while the cultivated area of rainfed barley (31.1%) and irrigated chickpea (100%) will be reduced. The yield of irrigated wheat (36.3%), rainfed wheat (43.5%), irrigated barley (30.2%), rainfed barley (23%), irrigated chickpea (10.6%), potato (9.3%) and alfalfa (14.5%) will be increased and yield of rainfed chickpea (36.8%) will be reduced until year 1400. Therefore, the amount of production of all crops except irrigated chickpea will be increased during oncoming 15 years. On the basis of results, the rate of irrigated wheat, dryland wheat, irrigated barley, dryland barley, dryland chickpea, potato, and alfalfa production will be 270, 1000, 20, 20, 30, 530, and 270 thousand tones, respectively, and the amount of irrigated chickpea production will be zero at 2021. The reason for reduction of irrigated chickpea production will reduce of cultivated area. Based on results of this study the increasing of yield and cultivated area have a more important role in the increasing of cereal and alfalfa production and irrigated chickpea and potato production, respectively. Thus it can be concluded that although amount of crops production in province will improve during oncoming 15 years, however, due to limitation in arable lands in that province, more efforts should be focused on improving management methods in order to increase crops yield. It is emphasized that the results of this study are the basis of past trend and the effects of some factors such as climate change and administration politics in agriculture was ignored.

Keywords

Alfalfa; barley; Chickpea; Potato; wheat

References

1- Abravan, P., and Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S. 2003. Investigation of climate factors effects on spring rapeseed yield at rainfed conditions in Kalaleh region. The 1st congress of Rapeseed Research and Development in Gorgan, Iran. Pp: 79. (In Persian)

2- Bell, M.A., and Fischer, R.A. 1994. Using yield prediction models to assess yield gains-a case study for wheat. Field Crops Research 36: 161-166.

3- Bell, M.A., Fischer, R.A., Byerlee, D., and Sayre, K. 1995. Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains: a case stydy for wheat. Field Crops Research 44: 55-65.

4- Blackmore, B.S., and Godwin, R. 2003. The analysis of spatial and temporal trends in yield map data over six years. Biosystems Engineering 84: 455-466.

5- Food and Agriculture Organization. 2004. Internet database: http://www.fao.org.

6- Feyzabadi, A., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahalati, M. 2005. Trend analysis of yield, production and cultivated area of cereal in Iran during the last 50 years and prediction of future situation. Iranian Field Crops Research. 4: 49-69. (In Persian with English Summary)

7- Hall, C.A.S., Perez, C.L., and Leclerc, G. 2000. Quantifying Sustainable Development: The Future of Tropical Economies. Academic Press, San Diego.

8- Hafner, S. 2003. Trends in maize, rice, and wheat yields for 188 nations over the past 40 years: a prevalence of linear growth. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 97: 275–283.

9- Hanke, J.E., and Reitsch, A.G. 1995. Business Forecasting. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

10- Khush, G.S. 1999. Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome 42: 646-655.

11- Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., Kamali, G.A., and Shahandeh, H. 2006. Potential impacts of climate change on agro-meteorological indicators in Iran. Arid Land Research and Management 20 (3): 245-259. (In Persian with English Summary)

12- Mazaheri, D. 2001. Food Security Project. Science Cultural, Islamic Republic of Iran. (In Persian)

13- Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2008. Modelling. Pp 420-445. In: Koocheki, A., and Khajehhoseini, M. 2008. Modern Agronomy. Jehad-University of Mashhad Press. 704pp. (In Persian)

14- Patchet, S.I. 1982. Statistical Methods for Managers and Administrators. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY.

15- Peng, S., Laza, R.C., Visperas, R.M., Sanico, A.L., and Cassman, K.G. 1999. Grain yield of rice cultivars and lines developed systems: Yield potential, Soil quality and Precision agriculture. Proceeding National Academic Science 96: 5952-5959.

16- Rao, M.S., and Mendham, N.J. 1991. Comparison of chinoli (Brassica campestris) and B. napus oilseed rape using different growth regulators plant population treatments. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 117: 177 – 187.

17- Reynolds, M.P., Rajaram, S., and Sayre, L.D. 1999. Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Science 39: 1611-16-21.

18- Rosegrant, M., Paisner, M., Meijer, S., and Witcover, J. 2001. Global Food Projections to 2020: Emerging Trends and Alternative Futures. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

19- Slafer, G.A., Satorre, E.H., and Andrade, F.H. 1994. Increases in grain yield in bread wheat from breeding and associated physiological changes. In: Slafer, G.A., Ed., Genetic improvement of Field Crops. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp: 1-68.