Effect of strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on yield and land equivalent ratio in weedy and weed free conditions

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 3, Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, June 2010, Pages 225-235   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v2i2.7627

Authors

Alireza Koocheki; Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati; Hasan Feizi^* ; Shahram Amirmoradi; Farzad Mondani

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

In order to study the effect of strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on the dry matter yield and land equivalent ratio (LER) in weedy and weed free treatments, an experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Station of College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Treatments were strip width of 2, 3, 4 and 5 rows and sole cropping of each crop. In addition two levels of weedy and weed free as strips were also included. Results indicated that treatments affected dry matter accumulation of maize and bean. The highest dry matter accumulation found in two strip widths and sole crop showed the lowest. Thus by increasing strip width dry matter was decreased. Weeds decreased dry matter accumulation by reduction of both rate and content of dry matter. Increasing of strip width reduced dry matter yield of maize and bean, and two strip widths showed the highest dry matter yield. Dry matter yield in intercropping treatments were more than sole crops in all side rows. In side rows, weeds reduced biological yield of sole stand of maize, bean and intercropped by 18.7, 23.5 and 20.3 percent compared to weed free treatments respectively. In central rows these values were 29.6, 21.3 and 27.3 percent, respectively. Land equivalent ratio in strip intercropped was more than sole crops and was reduced with increasing strip width. Intercropped LER in weedy treatment enhanced 29 percent in side rows and 21 percent in central rows.

Keywords

Competition; Integrated Management; Nitrogen Fixation

References

1- Aerts, R. 1999. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: Mechanisms, trade-offs and plant–soil feedbacks. Journal Experimental Botany 50: 29–37.

2- Akuda, E.M. 2001. Intercropping and population density effects on yield component, seed quality and photosynthesis of sorghum and soybean. The Journal Food Technology (Africa) 6(3):170–172.

3- Anil, L., Park, J., Phipps, R.H., and Miller, F.A. 1998. Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Science 53: 301-317.

4- Banik , P., Midya, A. Sarkar, B. K., and Ghose, S. S. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in additive series experiment: advantages and smothering. European Journal Agronomy 24: 324-332.

5- Baumann.D.T., Bastiaans, L., and Kropff, M. 2003. Intercropping system optimization for yield, quality and weed suppression combining mechanic and descriptive models. Agronomy Journal 94: 734-742

6- Callaway, R.M. 1998. Facilitation in plant communities. p. 623–648. In: F.I. Pugnaire and F. Valladares (ed.) Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York.

7- Chen, C.,Westcott, M., Neill, K., Wichmann, D., and Knox, M. 2004. Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Agronomy Journal 96: 1730–1738.

8- Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P., and Jensen, E.S. 2001. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea–barley intercropping. Field Crops Research 70:101–109.

9- Hiebsch, C., Teiokagho, F. Chirembo, A. M., and Gerdner, F. P. 1995. Plant density and soybean maturity in soybean-maize intercropping. Agronomy Journal 87: 965-989

10- Hossienpanahi, F. 2008. Evaluation of yield and yield components in the corn and potato intercropping. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture. Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

11- Jahansooz, M.R., Yunusa, I.A.M., Coventry, D.R., Palmer, A.R., and Eamus, D. 2007. Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. European Journal Agronomy 26: 275–282.

12- Jensen, E.S. 1996. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea–barley intercrops. Plant and Soil 182(1): 25–38.

13- Kallu, B.A., and Erhabor, P.O. 1990. Barley, lentil and flax yield under different intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal 82: 1066–1068.

14- Li, L., Yang, S.C. Li, X.L. Zhang, F.S., and Christie. P. 1999. Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba bean. Plant and Soil 212(2): 105–114.

15- Makinde, E. A., Ayoola, O. T., and Makinde, E. A. 2009. Intercropping leafy greens and maize on weed infestation, crop development, and yield. International Journal Vegetable Science 15: 402–411.

16- Morris, R.A., and Garrity, D.P. 1993. Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: Non-nitrogen nutrient. Field Crops Research 34: 319–334.

17- Odhiambo, G.D., and Ariga, E.S. 2001. Effect of intercropping maize and beans on Striga incidence and grain yield. Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Reigenal Maize Conference. pp. 183-186

18- Ofori, F., and Stern, W.R. 1987. Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Advance in Agronomy 41: 41–90.

19- Olasantan, F.O.E, Lucas, E.O., and Ezumah, H.C. 1994. Effects of intercropping and fertilizer application on weed control and performance of cassava and maize. Field Crops Research 39:63-69

20- Poggio, S. L. 2005. Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Agriculture Ecosystems Environment 109: 48–58.

21- Rezvan-Bidokhti, S. 2004. Comparison to compounds of intercropping in corn and bean intercropping. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture. Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary).

22- Rostami, L., Mondani, F., Khuramdel, S., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2009. Effect of various corn and bean intercropping densities on weed populations. Weed Research Journal 1(2): 37-51. (In Persian with English Summary).

23- Sanjani, S. 2007. The investigation seed yield and weed control in additive intercropping of cowpea and grain sorghum in limited irrigation condition. MSc Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran. Iran. 143p. (In Persian with English Summary).

24- Schippers, P., and Kropff, M.J. 2001. Competition for light and nitrogen among grassland species: a simulation analysis. Functional Ecology 15:155-164.

25- Thobatsi, T. 2009. Growth and yield responses of maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in a intercropping system. MSc Thesis. University of Pretoria. 149 p.

26- Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Ogindo, H.O. 2005. A simulation model of cereal–legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions I. Model development. Field. Crops Research 93:10-22.

27- Walker, S., and Ogindo, H.O. 2003. The water budget of rainfed maize and bean intercrop. Physiology Chemistry Earth 28:919–926.

28- Wall, G.J., Pringle, E.A., and Sheaed, R.W. 1991. Intercropping red-clover with silage corn for soil erosion control. Canadian Journal Plant Science 71: 137-145.

29- Weil, R.R., and Mc Fadden, M.E. 1991. Fertility and weed stress effects on performance of maize/soybean intercrop. Agronomy Journal 83: 717-721.

30- West, T.D., and Griffith, D.R. 1992. Effect of strip intercropping corn and soybean on yield and profit. Journal Production Agriculture 5:107–110.

31- Xin, N.Q., and Tong, P.Y. 1986. Multiple cropping systems and its development orientation in China (a review). Science Agriculture Sinica 4:88–92.